Didn't know people still wore watches.
[QUOTE=HoyaSvnFgr;2926129]Had a date with a new SB. She's early 30's, single parent, divorced. She's a freelance writer and is getting alimony and child support. She's not in need of sugar, but it sounds like she wants a little bit of fun. She mentioned that she looks at a guys watch and shoes to determine his qualifications. I don't know how you got get an accurate assessment of a guy's wealth based on watch and shoes, but she swears by it. Her claim is that this is what most women look at to determine status. I personally don't think a girl can determine Payless loafers and a fake Rolex for the real thing. Does what she's saying hold any merit? I happened to be wearing my Rolex stainless steel Submariner and sneakers. I paid for our dinner with cash, but didn't press for the FC. Is this all that's required? Most younger SBs can't tell a Tag Heur from a Timex.[/QUOTE]I wonder what she'd think of all the guys who do not care to wear a watch, but rather carry a cellphone. I have heard the shoes thing before from strippers.
The issue I see with my SB's is that we are at different places in life. These SB's are all about brands and showing off those brands. They will pay 1,200 dollars for a Louis Vuitton bag just for the name. After you've grown old, you could care less what people think of you. I buy things that are practical. I could easily afford a Lamborghini, but much rather drive a five year old Expedition. In the eyes of some of these GPS bitches, I must be broke.