Printable View
So a bit ago someone posted in the Richmond Virginia about the coding and finding the messages. Well the girls do in fact get your messages. And they send their numbers. It worked. I beat the system. Spread the word. Screw them bastards and their 90 $ fee LOL.
For giggles try searching for "sexual" in profile text. I've blocked over 300 profiles.
"I am looking for someone to help open my mind to new ideas for my art and new experiences. I am not in favor of anything sexual but I am here to make new friends and form a cordial relationship. ".
"Monthly allowance, someone seeking a platonic relationship. ".
"Not really looking for anything sexual right now; just looking for someone that'll listen when I speak. ".
"I'm looking for more of a non sexual sugar baby-sugar daddy relationship. ".
If this were a real life meet up of two adults on a first date and the girl says "Just so you know we're never having sex this is a non-sexual relationship" how many of us would just stand up and leave?
How many lonely rich guys are there out there who want to pay to spend time listening to this drivel? "Help you open your mind to art and new experiences?" Seriously? Read a book or go to a museum.
Though I will say I do appreciate the honesty it helps me get through their profiles quickly and not waste any time on them.
Can you point us to the hack?
[QUOTE=LordOfThEeyes;4069267]So a bit ago someone posted in the Richmond Virginia about the coding and finding the messages. Well the girls do in fact get your messages. And they send their numbers. It worked. I beat the system. Spread the word. Screw them bastards and their 90 $ fee LOL.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BenignNine;4069700]Can you point us to the hack?[/QUOTE]Here's the note from the guy in NC. It works but is a little complicated. I had best results in Chrome.
I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.
It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.
Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.
If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.
Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.).
Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".
Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4069685]For giggles try searching for "sexual" in profile text. I've blocked over 300 profiles.
"I am looking for someone to help open my mind to new ideas for my art and new experiences. I am not in favor of anything sexual but I am here to make new friends and form a cordial relationship. ".
"Monthly allowance, someone seeking a platonic relationship. ".
"Not really looking for anything sexual right now; just looking for someone that'll listen when I speak. ".
"I'm looking for more of a non sexual sugar baby-sugar daddy relationship. ".
If this were a real life meet up of two adults on a first date and the girl says "Just so you know we're never having sex this is a non-sexual relationship" how many of us would just stand up and leave?
How many lonely rich guys are there out there who want to pay to spend time listening to this drivel? "Help you open your mind to art and new experiences?" Seriously? Read a book or go to a museum.
Though I will say I do appreciate the honesty it helps me get through their profiles quickly and not waste any time on them.[/QUOTE]They may or may not mean the platonic, non sexual, etc for relationships. They could be posting that up in case someone they know sees them on the site, they would be covered.
Just my. 02 cents, I have not contacted any of the girls that post those things but may throw a message out to them and see what happens.
[QUOTE=Stylish;4064991]Interesting. I'm pasting a link below that (hopefully) provides a quicker way to get to the post with the back door instructions.
It's worth pointing out that you can't respond to the messages, you can only read them. And it's not very user friendly. But if you left a bunch of feelers just before your paid membership expired, then you can at least go check the responses without having to upgrade again. SA will probably find out about this soon enough and close the back door though.[/QUOTE]I posted the thread breadcrumbs last weekend.
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4069724]Here's the note from the guy in NC. It works but is a little complicated. I had best results in Chrome.
I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.
It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.
Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.
If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.
Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.).
Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".
Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.[/QUOTE]Once you've done all of the above paste the text into this viewer. Makes it easy to browse via a tree.
[URL]http://jsonviewer.stack.hu/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/9e87e934-7db1-4d4f-9541-c5cc95ca1bd1[/URL]
[QUOTE=NewEngland;4070519][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/9e87e934-7db1-4d4f-9541-c5cc95ca1bd1[/URL][/QUOTE]So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.
[QUOTE=SteveInMa428;4071021]So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.[/QUOTE]Anybody have information to break the tie?
[QUOTE=SteveInMa428;4071021]So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.[/QUOTE]I agree you got to be firm and tell her the ground rules.
I met with Brandy twice. The first time was decent the second time rather ho-hum. Okay looking but not hot in my book. Never had any issues but she did continue to message me about seeing her again. Long sob story about blah blah blah. I wasn't interested.
ARG.
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4048982]I know Jessica4190. I can confirm easy cum in pussy even without any prenegotiation, and she's a former stripper and a very nice GFE / PSE pleaser. I can also confirm she can easily be had bareback cum in pussy for 150 hh and 200 for an hour session with multiple cups. Her huge knockers are bolt-ons, but they are nevertheless spectacular, as you can see in the pic I took of her below, about a year ago.
[URL]https://drive.google.com/file/d/14xSgPn6KElCGxZ7GcOk7BWGxQEjDj41C/view?usp=sharing[/URL]
But there has been some recent drama with her which has made me leery of returning for another visit. I believe that she is trying to hide her whoring from someone, so if you are concerned about that, you may want to take that into account before seeing her.
I would very much like to get more detailed info on this Queenblondie7. Looks, etc. And what her actual rate is. I consider 300 or even 250 to be too much for these SA girls. But I'd consider her for 200, if you think she would agree to bareback full service beforehand? If someone has her permission to share her phone number, that would be great, as I am not a paying member of these so-called sugar sites.[/QUOTE]I just recently tried to set up a date with Jessica. She is now asking for $500.
What is she looking at per meet and can she host?
[QUOTE=KingOfFours;4048982]I know Jessica4190. I can confirm easy cum in pussy even without any prenegotiation, and she's a former stripper and a very nice GFE / PSE pleaser. I can also confirm she can easily be had bareback cum in pussy for 150 hh and 200 for an hour session with multiple cups. Her huge knockers are bolt-ons, but they are nevertheless spectacular, as you can see in the pic I took of her below, about a year ago.
[URL]https://drive.google.com/file/d/14xSgPn6KElCGxZ7GcOk7BWGxQEjDj41C/view?usp=sharing[/URL]
But there has been some recent drama with her which has made me leery of returning for another visit. I believe that she is trying to hide her whoring from someone, so if you are concerned about that, you may want to take that into account before seeing her.
I would very much like to get more detailed info on this Queenblondie7. Looks, etc. And what her actual rate is. I consider 300 or even 250 to be too much for these SA girls. But I'd consider her for 200, if you think she would agree to bareback full service beforehand? If someone has her permission to share her phone number, that would be great, as I am not a paying member of these so-called sugar sites.[/QUOTE]Went back and forth with QB7 via SA messages. She wouldn't take the conversation to email or text. She is a stripper at EB in Tolland, CT and somewhere else in Stoughton, Mass. Had to keep the conversation very PG-13, cause it was on the SA site. Told her I wanted to meet outside the club for a potential intimate date, I'm not into strip clubs. She wanted to meet at one of the clubs while working. Stalemate.