Questions for the Experst
As some of you know by now, I had an issue with a provider. I will leave names out of it (initials are KC). She has a fairly good reputation and is a favorite MILF for many mongers. However, I had an issue with her and, based upon the #of PMs I received, so have several others.
My question is this:. Would you meet with her in public? The reason I ask is that she reached out to me and suggested just that. I responded with a "No", but am now council on this. She claims that she does not know who I am based upon my name on this board. She suggested we grab a drink and see if we can't resolve this.
I do not see an upside to that. The way I see it, if she was going to pay me back she would have by now. Even if she made restitution I would never engage in recreational activities with her again. If she does not know who I am, does that mean there are so many others that she has screwed over that she can't recall all of them?
I honestly do not see any upside to meeting in public or private.
Any thoughts?
Interesting, My Take and Opinion
[QUOTE=Sapper5;3031525]She claims that she does not know who I am based upon my name on this board. She suggested we grab a drink and see if we can't resolve this.
If she does not know who I am, does that mean there are so many others that she has screwed over that she can't recall all of them?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TryinAgain2;3032346]But you're ignoring his real concern, I. E. , possibly being set up, or her knowing his identity for retaliation in some way. What about his experience should make him trust her now?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3032455]Not sure where you're getting all of that. He's seen her in the past. How is meeting in a public place going to reveal his real identity? All it does is connect the face to the online handle.
The point is, there was some kind of disagreement. Apparently, 1 or more times she asked him, apparently a regular, to advance her money for the next session, but never provided the prepaid session.
[B]1. You don't advance money to a provider, never, for no reason.[/B]
He fucked up. He made the first mistake. His mistake enabled her to fuck up. Regardless of why, she has said, "let's sit down and work this out. " If he's not willing to let her try to pay him back, he can't continue to complain about her not paying him back. Is that so hard to understand?[/QUOTE]She really doesn't know him as he indicated in his original post. Only a handle on the board and a phone number for contact. Once she meets him and puts a handle, face, phone number and circumstances discussed during the meeting together she may go back to her memory and notes and be able to fill in the blanks and know his true identity. Yes many long term providers have notes about mongers if you don't think they do then check what you are smoking. Let's say he is one of the unlucky hobbyists that charged services on a CC and then she upped the charges and added more later. Does the CC have a real name and the meeting helps her to remember? Let's say she has a friend follow him after he leaves the public establishment, it's happened. To many possible surprises. So there is some type of risk in meeting her.
In regards to giving money in in advance to a provider, never, for no reason. I have seen three mongers post this on the board and the advice is sound. However a high percentage of mongers have given financial advances in one way or another if they truly believe the provider will return the favor with services or actual repayment. This is especially true if the monger has a good relationship with the provider, or should I say, [B]THINKS[/B] there is a good relationship with the provider. I have won and lost in regards to [B]THINKING[/B] my relationship with the provider was sound. I guess you can say I have Fucked Up because I have lost more $ than I have won. That's because my heart was thinking and not my big head and hindsight is like a bad horror movie.
If she is going to make restitution with him, then she needs to make restitution to all those that she scammed money from including the provider who paid for the photo shoot and hotel and never was reimbursed for KC's portion. If a provider is harmed in any way by another provider then I think it's the same as a monger hurting a provider or vice versa. It's just plain and simply wrong. His warnings are valid and he has the right to say them even if he doesn't meet her. She made the final choice to scam him after he fucked up and advanced her money. Life is full of choices and she made a bad choice last and she has to live with it.
KC's history is poor as a lendee, so like I said in my original post, treat her just like any other BP provider, pay for the service and don't give her any financial advances or CC's. She's probably not all bad, just not trustworthy.