Printable View
[QUOTE=Kimbll83;3888563]At least I know not to bother to try premium then.[/QUOTE]Think you can block by age, income, location etc so maybe they don't want to be contacted by someone that fits your profile. I don't currently have premium but I very rarely can't see a profile. Only happens when someone gets a bad review or too glowing of a review and they want to close their profile.
That's hard to believe every link from this forum is a girl who has blocked me though.
[QUOTE=Jayp80;3888732]Think you can block by age, income, location etc so maybe they don't want to be contacted by someone that fits your profile. I don't currently have premium but I very rarely can't see a profile. Only happens when someone gets a bad review or too glowing of a review and they want to close their profile.[/QUOTE]
The second one is weird and sent me some pictures which looks decent. I actually went to her place and she was paranoid and she looks older than the picture she sent me. I went into her place then all of a sudden she tells me it's not what she expected and apologized. I left feeling I dodge a bullet.
[QUOTE=ChiNorthside;3887004]Both down to meet, curious if anyone as experienced either. Thanks!
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/f703d002-381d-4ad4-9ebd-4754b80fa6b3[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/8ada888f-06dd-4c25-9486-05bc93788c1a[/URL][/QUOTE]
Thanks for the info on the 2nd one fellas. She def has the stink of crazy on her. Tho sadly that does mean she must be crazy in bed and now I kinda want to fuck her more. Thanks again.
I was with her twice and she was fine at 300. She will jump in right after the first meet and would like someone who just like to fuck.
She keeps changing her profile every now and then. This is the 2nd change. Good one if you like a slightly big girl. Everything covered including BJ.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/30606b49-efeb-4e00-8199-3b54984160d8[/URL]
I think she is looking again. Looks fine and gets down to business right away. 250. I was with her thrice. I dropped as she was not providing the full experience. No BJ. Also had some concern with the smell her pu*.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/67dd7a6d-4dc0-4c4a-ae94-9cc3328168a4[/URL]
[QUOTE=ArielDude28;3889723]I was with her twice and she was fine at 300. She will jump in right after the first meet and would like someone who just like to fuck.
She keeps changing her profile every now and then. This is the 2nd change. Good one if you like a slightly big girl. Everything covered including BJ.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/30606b49-efeb-4e00-8199-3b54984160d8[/URL]
I think she is looking again. Looks fine and gets down to business right away. 250. I was with her thrice. I dropped as she was not providing the full experience. No BJ. Also had some concern with the smell her pu*.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/67dd7a6d-4dc0-4c4a-ae94-9cc3328168a4[/URL][/QUOTE]The bottom SA profile said ave. Body type, is that ave fat or ave ave, I always concerns about face pic only, usually girls that have great body will show it off, girls with fat body will only have face pic.
[QUOTE=Kimbll83;3888759]That's hard to believe every link from this forum is a girl who has blocked me though.[/QUOTE]Although it may be a slight hassle, you may want to create a new profile if you aren't premium. I've done this twice and had pretty solid success. Revisiting conversations fresh that may have fizzled out.
[QUOTE=ChicagoGoer;3818771]She dabbles in one of the agencies downtown.[/QUOTE]Any links to that agency?
[QUOTE=FafaFooey;3886570]Some interesting changes on the site in the last 24 hours. A key word is now gone from the name of the site, the 'Lifestyle Expectation' field is gone from profiles, and several tags have been removed like 'Short Term' and 'Monthly Allowance'. Must have had some pretty detailed reviews with their lawyers and got the web developers busy quickly LOL. This doesn't change much, especially for those on both sides who have looked at the site for awhile, but it does up the risk of newer POTs viewing it as a 'vanilla' or 'platonic' dating site. Of course the pricing and recurring subscription requirement are still in place.[/QUOTE]The lifestyle expectation field was just not working from either direction. Many guys would not even deal with the women in the higher lifestyle expectations, perceiving major GPS. The newer ladies to the website would think it was the norm for guys give them $10 k or $20 k per month for platonic dates. When that did not work out, they would give up on the site. It gave them false expectations of what an arrangement is.
There are also new tags added. Here are some of them.
Designer Clothes & Accessories: I'm looking for someone who can accomodate my designer style.
Life of Leisure: I'm looking for someone who will support me in living a life of leisure.
Tuition & School Support: I'm looking for someone who can pay for my tuition or help me with minor school related expenses.
Fine Dining: I'm looking for someone who will take me out to amazing restaurants.
Shows & Entertainment: I'm looking for someone who wants to see shows and live entertainment with me.
Get that sex.
SDX
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;3891179]The lifestyle expectation field was just not working from either direction. Many guys would not even deal with the women in the higher lifestyle expectations, perceiving major GPS. The newer ladies to the website would think it was the norm for guys give them $10 k or $20 k per month for platonic dates. When that did not work out, they would give up on the site. It gave them false expectations of what an arrangement is.
There are also new tags added. Here are some of them.
Designer Clothes & Accessories: I'm looking for someone who can accomodate my designer style.
Life of Leisure: I'm looking for someone who will support me in living a life of leisure.
Tuition & School Support: I'm looking for someone who can pay for my tuition or help me with minor school related expenses.
Fine Dining: I'm looking for someone who will take me out to amazing restaurants.
Shows & Entertainment: I'm looking for someone who wants to see shows and live entertainment with me.
[/QUOTE]LOL. I'm sure the young ones especially will have fun with those new tags. Of course now the tag library is pretty firmly biased towards what the girls can 'get' out of an arrangement vs what they'll offer. I won't miss the lifestyle expectations either, although it could sometimes help weed out the most irrational girls. The high ends of the old scale were ludicrously inflated, but it, along with the 'big fish' stories that go around on some message boards fed the fantasies of the young ladies. Can't blame them for being a little jaded when they're sold on images of evenings on a yacht with George Clooney and the offers they get are lunch hours in a Motel 6 with George Costanza!
This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/09b636b2-71a6-4b94-b0d9-cbfbd79e068d[/URL]
SDX.
And she did say she does yoga and acrobatic. Besides she has pics so it's not like she is totally trying to pull a fast one on guys. I have seen a lot worse!
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;3891418]This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/09b636b2-71a6-4b94-b0d9-cbfbd79e068d[/URL]
SDX.[/QUOTE]
New poster long time lurker. Thought I'd give my take on SA. So far it's been good.
Signed up for premium last week. Probably put in around 20 hours to date (setup, searching, messaging).
Have sent 100 or so cold messages, basically any profile that caught my eye or has an oz of thought in it.
Right now, getting about 30-40% response rate, 10-15% transition to conversation / digits.
From those, I've 'selected' to hang with two of them this week, both beautiful and dtf, 19 and 23 yo. Going to book a hotel room this weekend and see how it goes. Hopefully, I keep both my kidneys.
Keep you guys posted.
[QUOTE=Navmd;3891554]New poster long time lurker. Thought I'd give my take on SA. So far it's been good.
Signed up for premium last week. Probably put in around 20 hours to date (setup, searching, messaging).
Have sent 100 or so cold messages, basically any profile that caught my eye or has an oz of thought in it.
Right now, getting about 30-40% response rate, 10-15% transition to conversation / digits.
From those, I've 'selected' to hang with two of them this week, both beautiful and dtf, 19 and 23 yo. Going to book a hotel room this weekend and see how it goes. Hopefully, I keep both my kidneys.
Keep you guys posted.[/QUOTE]Goodluck, man. But definitely do yourself a favor and have some sort of a backup if you already paid for the hotel. Most SA girls will flake. That's just life when fishing in the SA pool.
I've had my fair share of flakes, and I'd hate for it to happen to you.
[QUOTE=SugarDaddyX;3891418]This girl came up in my search since she lists herself as athletic. Looking at the photos I would grade her out as either "a few extra pounds" or "full / overweight", and these might be her most flattering photos from a year or two ago. There must be some disconnect between men and women on body type.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/09b636b2-71a6-4b94-b0d9-cbfbd79e068d[/URL]
SDX.[/QUOTE]I would said full / overweight, however there are guys out there that like full / overweight women, so different strokes for different folks, I guess, just not for me.