Can we start putting links please
[QUOTE=GqGuy1999;7169965]Two-parter. A quick report and question:
Had my second dream about Jess at Zen. I called ahead and met her right when they opened. She was wearing tight black pants and a tight top which accentuated her curves very well. Requested an hour and got a pretty good massage for the first 40 minutes. She asked me what I wanted on the flip and I asked for everything. She got a bit excited at that point. Cool that she was very into it. Gave $. 60 for full service. We undressed, started with a covered BJ, then missionary. Those lips and tits. Geesh. I'm a fan. Asked if I could finish on her tits and she agreed. I moved her to the chair nearby and went to town. Exploded in between those gorgeous knockers. All in all a great visit. I met the other worker while there. Didn't catch the name but she seemed like fun.
Question on Devine Rachel. She lists mutual touch massage (60 minutes and 90 minutes) as well as FS among her services. For those that have seen her, does the mutual touch massage include a HE? Is there a separate donation required for it beyond the price she has listed? I've been thinking about scheduling but want to know what to expect.
Thanks in advance, gang.[/QUOTE]Not sure why so many people are reporting without providing links. Divine rachel gets a pass since so many have reported already. But Jess at zen is no where to be found. Have zero clue who your talking about.
1 photos
UTR is now over near Beechmont
My UTR is over in the Beechmont area for a few weeks. Let me know if you want her info! As always, use good judgement.
Something Different alright
[QUOTE=MarblesKyle;7172521]Has anyone ever actually seen this chick? I've seen her ads for years, have tried multiple times and could never get a response until just last week. I decided "f*ck it, I'm going to text her five days in a row and see if I get a response. " In previous attempts I've just stopped trying after no initial response. This approach worked and the third or fourth time she responded. She told me a location and then when I asked her rates she ghosted again.
She's my type, I'd love to connect with her, but I'm assuming she's a junkie or some other sort of flake. She doesn't list a name so it's hard to search for her on USASG but I know she's been mentioned on here before. Every ad just says "east side". If she's real and looks close to her photos I'll keep trying. S. O. S. Someone chime in.
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view/197658231/5139082049[/URL][/QUOTE]Total flake (emphasis added). Not even if it's free. In my opinion, Move On.
She's real, and worth it!
[QUOTE=BabyDsRealDad;7175090]I've seen her twice, she definitely has a habit of ghosting but she is legit. Not on drugs as far as I could tell but I've been wrong before. A bit heavier than the pictures let on, but she's enthusiastic for sure. Asked me if I wanted to go bb the second time so beware if you're the cautious type, gents.[/QUOTE]I have seen her several times, sweet, definitely into it, and sexy as hell! Be patient, she will get back to you. And she drinks, but no drugs.
Idlehands has just discovered the philosophical division on the board
[QUOTE=IdleHands1;7175221]Why would anyone entertain paying an unreliable, sloppy woman in her 40's, who advertises on a site that caters to a lower class of woman trying to make a dollar or two? Especially one that offers unsafe services. This is the kinda stuff that comes free in a singles / dive bar or grocery store. Remember fellas, Wrap That Rascal.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/ohio/cincinnati/181738852[/URL][/QUOTE]There is a group of guys on this site who actively seek out (mostly obese) middle-age women. I'm not sure if these gentlemen are extremely advanced in years, perhaps? I'm in my 50's, and I would have zero interest in the woman at the link.
I also see that there is a bunch of tittering about Jodi again, in multiple posts below:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/jodaci-2[/URL]
The men who cheer for these ladies invariably hoot about their "eagerness". Why not look for a woman who is "eager", under 35, and also conventionally attractive? It's almost as if these guys *only* feel comfortable / confident around women who are older and unattractive.
I mean, probably none of us is Tom Cruise. But we can raise the bar a little bit, perhaps? Just saying.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Many of us find the older, they are more skilled at the trade, they complain far less than many younger ones. Many are open to doing something younger woman will not. And frankly many don't like a woman who has a pussy that has the grab as a pair vice grips. Some like the wetness and softness of escorts like Marley or Cierra and it seems like everyone who has had an encounter with Little Sexy me raves about her. Many times the face is not what turns me on. It could be the look and shape of her boobs, it could be the look of her pussy I like the ones with big butterfly wings and going down with a lady with a large clit. Sometimes it is the twinkle in her face. I like them from skinny to meat on there bones. That is my preference. And why should anyone care who I see as long as I give an honest review. So to help others decide if they want to see her or avoid her.
[QUOTE=IdleHands1;7175221]Why would anyone entertain paying an unreliable, sloppy woman in her 40's, who advertises on a site that caters to a lower class of woman trying to make a dollar or two? Especially one that offers unsafe services. This is the kinda stuff that comes free in a singles / dive bar or grocery store. Remember fellas, Wrap That Rascal.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/ohio/cincinnati/181738852[/URL][/QUOTE]
Perhaps it's a frustration with the current market
[QUOTE=BigBusiness;7175647]Curious as to why you care what another guy's taste in women is? I don't see your point. Personally I'm not interested in women under 35 or spinners. I understand there's lots of guys who do, but does that mean we should change our choices to fit yours?[/QUOTE]Yes and no, Big Business. This isn't quite like preferring strawberry ice cream to vanilla ice cream and vice versa.
There is a such thing as conventional beauty standards. Playboy, Miss America, etc: there is a reason why these have long been dominated by young, fit women: that is what the vast majority of men prefer. While I wouldn't describe a predilection for overweight middle age women as an aberration, it is arguably a fetish.
The larger issue, for many of us, is that so few of the women reviewed here conform to anything approaching conventional beauty standards. If you don't like them old and / or overweight, it's slim pickings right now.
On the contrary: I wish I could be satisfied with the over 40, heavyset providers. Because those women are always the first to enter the market and the last to leave.
