Printable View
[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;6094628]Agreed. Saw CG Shani, and wasn't worth the upcharge. CYA / HYA sure, but not Erica level. And SFK Erica is cheaper. Scarcely repeat with upcharge favorites, but will see a worthy non-upcharge girl almost weekly.[/QUOTE]Voting with your wallet is the most effective. I won't pay an upcharge if the vibes aren't good at the start of a session, in the rare event that I see an upcharge kgirl.
Erica is worth repeating for the visuals, maybe every other week or so.
[QUOTE=Irresponsible;6092926]Saw Berry of CG, SAG, BG and she is a serious MILF, definitely over 40 but her body is totally my type with big juicy natural tits that match the photos and a surprising grade A booty. She lacked a bit in energy, does not like to kiss, but she's a solid fuck and I love her body. BBFSCIPx2. Did not appreciate the clock being ten minutes fast however. Decent English. Said she's taking a break starting tomorrow.[/QUOTE]Looks like she's gone?
[QUOTE=Cochese;6095045]They also have a second website [URL]https://www.booker-h.com/shop[/URL].
Not sure why the need for a second site but when it first appeared the booker H site would have one or two more girls than the original site. Lately they've been exactly the same. I don't use them that often but they still are good for me when I use them.[/QUOTE]Yea I did find that weird. Bonnie was on the second site but not the first one but now she's gone too. I noticed they're probably the only website that actually removes girls when they're off or not available. The only pictures you see are the girls who are currently available. At least that part is transparent.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;6094579]He posts occasionally every so often then disappears. He lurks more than he posts from the looks of it. Besides being told on the fallacies of his arguments, he apparently sees himself as a savior for these girls. One of his recent posts, he claims to have asked them out on dates that THEY pay for. Going by this logic, if hes so charming and charismatic to woo hoes into this situation, what's he doing on a forum like this about P4 P? Something about this smells funny and it isn't a STD.[/QUOTE]I think there is an issue of semantics with this debate, and I also think some people are arguing with each other over completely different points. For one, I think we can all agree that encounters with providers are 100% transactional in that we would not be meeting with and having sex with these women without the exchange of money. Even if you have succeeded in getting OTC sex from a provider, there was still an initial and likely ongoing investment to get to that point (whether it be lavish gifts or many meetings over a period of time). I think we can all agree on that definition of "transactional." However, and perhaps I am wrong, I get the impression that some members here take "transactional" as meaning that providers are some kind of soulless sex robots who are in no way emotionally / physically affected by the idiosyncratic nature of each customer--their looks, hygiene, attitude, preferences, kinks, fucking style, dick size, etc. The mere act of reading reviews, whether here or on TER very clearly and definitively contradicts that perception of providers. The old "YMMV" exists for a reason (as well as blacklisting), and that reason is that providers are human, despite that transactional foundation of their encounters with customers.
I do agree that it is likely that on the whole, most customers are respectful and will respect a provider's boundaries. They complain about boundaries or disappointing service in reviews, and that is fine. That is their right, and they should report, for the benefit of other mongers and providers, as well. Reporting a provider's boundaries or limitations, even if it is in a negative light, will help mongers avoid girls that will disappoint them, and will help providers avoid customers who will either write them a bad review, or at worst, disrespect their boundaries, which, despite the transaction, starts to venture into the realm of rape. Also, I have had provider's tell me about being physically abused by customers. So, while it is the exception, it does happen. Luckily, bookers do a good job of banning them.
About reviews, I think that is where the discussion got taken out of context. As far as I can tell, the OP was not complaining about reviews. He was asking you guys not to railroad fuck a hot newbie. All I have to say about that is if Erica let's you steamroll her cervix, go for it! If she tells you to chill, then chill, and report back so others are in the know about her limitations.
One final thing, at TheAbc. Some guys are totally capable of charming and fucking civies, but go to providers because certain aspects of their personal life rule our civies as an option. Provider's are also capable of being charmed. I have had a couple ATFs buy me meals and small gifts. I am not saying it is because I am prince charming, but rather because I am a long time regular and there is mutual attraction, respect and chemistry between two consenting humans.
[QUOTE=LandOfKGirls;6095166]Voting with your wallet is the most effective. I won't pay an upcharge if the vibes aren't good at the start of a session, in the rare event that I see an upcharge kgirl.
Erica is worth repeating for the visuals, maybe every other week or so.[/QUOTE]I want to vote so badly, I guess I have to wait as a first timer.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6093446]Sfk / kbliss on deck.
Sfk Arisa Viki Erika.
Kbliss Jessica arisa Erika.[/QUOTE]Any chance for a reference for Erika? I messaged your inbox.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6094438]Real and accurate photoshop pics. Prettier than 95% of Kgirls in SoCal. Probably as pretty as any prettiest current Kgirl you know. I prefer looks and inexperienced young girls over service so she's perfect for me. Only con is magnums should avoid her cause you and her won't have a good time.
She smiled every time we made eye contact. BBBJ and mish with eye contact but she closed her eyes sometimes. The way she initiated kissing is the way I kiss cute girls. Made the whole experience felt very GFE. Did everything I asked with a smile. Great attitude and a submissive pleaser.
Orgasm easily as CaptCaveman99 said. She did tell me to be soft on DATY and no FIV. I easily adjusted and made it enjoyable for her. She seemed nice and friendly. Pretty good English. Someone else can train her with repeat visits. Already good enough for me and may get better with repeats.
Whether she can grow out of her shell depends on repeated mongers with the tolerant and patience to teach her new tricks. She's not so GPS that she won't try.[/QUOTE]This was my experience with Erica as well. She was very friendly with me and submissive / willing to please. My only nitpicks are that she wasn't as slender / petite as I prefer. Her face is very pretty especially her eyes but her complexion isn't that great. Better than Baby Sky's though. Her body could use some toning as it seems like she doesn't work out. Her tits are all natural and they feel great. Some people may not like the way her tits look though. They have a natural sag. She also has a patch of pubic hair whereas I prefer cleanly shaven. These are all nitpicks though and I will continue to repeat with her because of her price point and the fact that she's damn adorable. I still think Jean and Daisy look better overall though.
[QUOTE=Tony1628;6095138]Thinking about do a multi-session with my fav kgirl. Any thought or recommendations?[/QUOTE]With all the talks about Erica, I will definitely try her, but my personal favorite was choi and sweet.
[QUOTE=KingSenpai;6095658](Erica) could use some toning as it seems like she doesn't work out. Her tits are all natural and they feel great. Some people may not like the way her tits look though. They have a natural sag.[/QUOTE]
Despite her face being her money-maker and heartbreaker, I agree her body can use toning. I thought this was most obvious in her ass which was meh and made her appear on the older end of the HYA spectrum. Her boobs are indeed MM tho. Decently well-done ones, as your take is a testament to that. I didn't test them as much as Bitna's, but I don't think her sag was enough to fail the pencil test.
I too can lose a boner with a pretty face if the service is too meh. The solution is to save your baby batter for at least 4 days.
Erica was more sweet girlfriend than erotic. I rate her a 7 between ice queen and voracious (1 to 10). That was because my balls were drained by another girl before seeing her. Who know what may happen if she sees a super solid boner and if you make her horny? On TER I would rate her 9 for looks and 9 for service (cause I forgot it was a service).
Our bodies entwined like two snakes in heat. I boned her vigorously and was congratulating myself I might be able to pound her for more than 20 minutes. But then she exclaimed in my ears "I am cumming!" All the blood and sensitivity went into my boner for the happy pussy feeling and I lost my load. FML! That was my last shot!
We didn't use lube. I would say her pussy get wet naturally. It was very hot inside her. She might close her eyes but I felt like she was dreaming about my boner in her. Fake moaning and interaction would kill my boner. Her little touches and kisses here and there with soft moaning felt like genuine love making.
I remember Chloe. My first visit with Erica was better than my first visit with Chloe. When I said comfortable, I meant she made me felt comfortable in doing what I like. All I need is for a girl to be submissive to my whims. That's why I don't care if a girl is inexperienced.
[QUOTE=NintyNine;6094533]Reading all these things about Erica, I'm a little hesitant.
Are any of you like me? I can lose a boner with a pretty face if the service is too meh.
So some questions. ...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KingSenpai;6095658]This was my experience with Erica as well. She was very friendly with me and submissive / willing to please. My only nitpicks are that she wasn't as slender / petite as I prefer. Her face is very pretty especially her eyes but her complexion isn't that great. Better than Baby Sky's though. Her body could use some toning as it seems like she doesn't work out. Her tits are all natural and they feel great. Some people may not like the way her tits look though. They have a natural sag. She also has a patch of pubic hair whereas I prefer cleanly shaven. These are all nitpicks though and I will continue to repeat with her because of her price point and the fact that she's damn adorable. I still think Jean and Daisy look better overall though.[/QUOTE]Do you have links for Jean and Daisy? I've never seen them before. Thanks.
I liked Bella but didn't like it when she started upcharging. I saw her long before she was Bella but I agree she might be too Vanilla for people here.
While I was happy Erica was as good looking as pics, I was more impressed with her attitude for such a pretty girl. No GPS detected. I think she's better looking than Jean, Daisy, and Sweet. Her body looked fine to me but I wasn't looking for flaws. I may see things differently with repeats.
I didn't intend to shill for her in this thread but you guys doubted her service so I had to opine. This will be the last post for her in this thread. I meant to post about her in HYA thread where she belongs.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;6094569]Bella was less than spectacular, I think a guy here Francesco or something loved her for some reason. Erica might be up my alley in terms of GFE but just about has a train ran into her every time she is working. It was mentioned a few times this year about girls complaining that things were slow. Yeah, slow for them but the free market suggests otherwise with Erica. There's obvious demand and I think Erica being booked fully for days on end since her arrival supports my theory that talent is the problem as we've been saying all this time. She's hitting the perfect blend of price + looks + service (YMMV on the service part) trifecta. The girls / bookers are just getting greedy. I'm only looking at the perspective that matters to me, my own and fellow guys who go. Without trying to sound like a cliche, but I'll always vote with my greenbacks since that's the only thing that matters in this industry. I hope Erica is still around in a few months time.[/QUOTE]
I think she was in LA before with the BB special as Sun or someone I didn't pay much attention.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6095049]You are right about being a rebrand, but which one? Time will time if she shows up as it looks like her pics have been in Vegas agency for the past 2 weeks or so.[/QUOTE]
We need to write more reviews on TER or here. I would review if I can write as well as Darth_Diggler and Bastard Chorum. It's disappointing when I see more reviews for MILFs than HYAs.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6094513]And while you guys are at it, it's not's a bad idea to include TER. Particularly for those unfamiliar to this thread.[/QUOTE]
Hey Gents, with all these Erica talk, has anyone tried Ran from KGLA? She is another D cup but I couldn't find any review just yet. Her stats shows 5'3, 110,34 D, these stats look very similar to Allie in a way, anyone tried? Thanks.
[QUOTE=DankDonk;6096128]Do you have links for Jean and Daisy? I've never seen them before. Thanks.[/QUOTE]They're not working anymore.
I had zero issues with Erica's service. She was sweet, playful, and attentive. Her eyes were on me the entire time and we were laughing and joking with each other for most of the session. She has a great attitude and told me she wants to stay here for a while (to make money). I usually don't tip the first time I see a new girl to gauge her reaction and she didn't bat an eye when I didn't. She was sweet throughout. I didn't get an inkling of GPS from her.
I'll have to inspect further next time if those tits are MM because they looked and felt extremely real.
Her Bush imo can only be rated "de minimis", her flower gets wet enough, she engages well both physically and is able to converse in english. Erica is no pro but give it some time and she'll pick up all the carnal knowledge that us horndogs would want her to exhibit. She definitely has the prettiest face on the kmeat market in wla.
[QUOTE=KingSenpai;6095658]This was my experience with Erica as well. She was very friendly with me and submissive / willing to please. My only nitpicks are that she wasn't as slender / petite as I prefer. Her face is very pretty especially her eyes but her complexion isn't that great. Better than Baby Sky's though. Her body could use some toning as it seems like she doesn't work out. Her tits are all natural and they feel great. Some people may not like the way her tits look though. They have a natural sag. She also has a patch of pubic hair whereas I prefer cleanly shaven. These are all nitpicks though and I will continue to repeat with her because of her price point and the fact that she's damn adorable. I still think Jean and Daisy look better overall though.[/QUOTE]
Is mini working in another city now?
I tried to go to couple korgs yesterday in LA that I was already screened with the bookers like 3-4 years ago but things changed and they want to re screen me. Which agency is the easiest? Or is all? I'm confused because I have all the text msg saved from the bookers and I screen shot to let them know I already fucked there women but they said they have to screen again. One korg told me I have to see 1 or 2 girls before seeing a popular girl. This never happened to me only one time when the famous Hana was around. I try to see Hana but she was so popular that the booker told me I had to see Piper first. This was last year I believe early last year. Lmk what to do!
[QUOTE=TheAbc;6094569]Bella was less than spectacular, I think a guy here Francesco or something loved her for some reason. Erica might be up my alley in terms of GFE but just about has a train ran into her every time she is working. It was mentioned a few times this year about girls complaining that things were slow. Yeah, slow for them but the free market suggests otherwise with Erica. There's obvious demand and I think Erica being booked fully for days on end since her arrival supports my theory that talent is the problem as we've been saying all this time. She's hitting the perfect blend of price + looks + service (YMMV on the service part) trifecta. The girls / bookers are just getting greedy. I'm only looking at the perspective that matters to me, my own and fellow guys who go. Without trying to sound like a cliche, but I'll always vote with my greenbacks since that's the only thing that matters in this industry. I hope Erica is still around in a few months time.[/QUOTE]I have been told by Erica's bookers that she can only be booked 1 day before my appointment.
Are you prebooking her for days ahead of your appointment? Through what booker?
[QUOTE=WhyOhWhy;6096464]I tried to go to couple korgs yesterday in LA that I was already screened with the bookers like 3-4 years ago but things changed and they want to re screen me. Which agency is the easiest? Or is all? I'm confused because I have all the text msg saved from the bookers and I screen shot to let them know I already fucked there women but they said they have to screen again. One korg told me I have to see 1 or 2 girls before seeing a popular girl. This never happened to me only one time when the famous Hana was around. I try to see Hana but she was so popular that the booker told me I had to see Piper first. This was last year I believe early last year. Lmk what to do![/QUOTE]I usually won't waste my time or money with orgs like that. "Sorry sir, you have to pay for the roast chicken and the tofu steak before you can have the filet mignon. " Fuck that. Also, it is likely the person behind the phone number is not the same person who booked and screened you before. Strangely, I had to re-screen with MKC when I saw Sunlight when it had only been a year since I'd last booked with them. The booker said "I don't have any past correspondences with you in my phone," which implies it was a different person because most bookers don't delete customers from their contacts. I was annoyed, but it wasn't invasive screening and that booker is very courteous. But if the re-screening is invasive and they won't let you book the girl you want immediately, I would personally just go elsewhere.
Which org was this, anyway?
Sfk / kbliss on the daily.
Sfk Arisa Viki Erika.
Kbliss Jessica Arisa Erika.
For sweet new to the biz experience call on Erica.
For that all pro service queen experience see viki.
[QUOTE=WhyOhWhy;6096464]I tried to go to couple korgs yesterday in LA that I was already screened with the bookers like 3-4 years ago but things changed and they want to re screen me. Which agency is the easiest? Or is all? I'm confused because I have all the text msg saved from the bookers and I screen shot to let them know I already fucked there women but they said they have to screen again. One korg told me I have to see 1 or 2 girls before seeing a popular girl. This never happened to me only one time when the famous Hana was around. I try to see Hana but she was so popular that the booker told me I had to see Piper first. This was last year I believe early last year. Lmk what to do![/QUOTE]Do whatever they ask for. If a girl is booked through multiple POs, you may get a different answer from each one. Being asked to see less popular girls first is not uncommon, however undesirable that may be. The "easiest" agency could very well be the one that's most responsive to you.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;6096957]I have been told by Erica's bookers that she can only be booked 1 day before my appointment.
Are you prebooking her for days ahead of your appointment? Through what booker?[/QUOTE]Don't believe the hype other chicks are better.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;6096957]I have been told by Erica's bookers that she can only be booked 1 day before my appointment.
Are you prebooking her for days ahead of your appointment? Through what booker?[/QUOTE]Some dude on that other site gave a tepid review of Erica. I am guessing he has balls made of frozen mochi. The other two reviews were off the charts clout chasing throne sniffing types.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6096381]Her Bush imo can only be rated "de minimis", her flower gets wet enough, she engages well both physically and is able to converse in english. Erica is no pro but give it some time and she'll pick up all the carnal knowledge that us horndogs would want her to exhibit. She definitely has the prettiest face on the kmeat market in wla.[/QUOTE]Is Erica cute with solid service? Yes but so is Sammy, sweet, Lisa2, Chungha, Elena, Noah, Miso, Stacy, Sienna / Sydney, Remi, Bitna, Dana, Eunji, Daisy, Shani, and those are the comparison points that come to mind but there's many more. I would also put out there some of these names are cuter or better service or both than Erica. Is she a solid repeat? Sure but the way you hyped her I was expecting a JYP trainee behind the door. Again, not a knock against Erica but my standard is if a provider gets 3-4 pops out of me and I have to run away from them because it's too much. Several of these girls I listed qualify but than others have the "cute / natural" look which is my preference. I have 5 mentioned or not mentioned in my normal rotation and about 5 more I hope return I did or did not mention. My UTR is my 3 hole princess and she's a legit sub 20 (checked DL) - please don't message me for details and she's my cute / service standard. I stretch out in advance and try to bring as much man juice possible to those sessions. My opinion only and YMMV as always.
Went to see what all the fuss is about. Well we're sorta alike, I lose a boner quick if a girl shows discomfort or fakes it, doesn't matter how pretty a girl is. Erica certainly doesn't fake it but will show signs of discomfort if you're packing. Had to slow down several times, even though the deed was already being done slowly, she would still say either too deep or that it was hurting her, so end up going semi-flaccid few times, she would still try to be sweet and accommodating tho, but meh, going soft then hard in an almost endless cycle until I eventually popped, ruined the full on PSE / semi PSE sessions I tend to prefer. Didn't bother with DATY, but she did let me know post coitus that she doesn't like it when dudes are rough with DATY nor does she like FIV. She mentioned starting at 11 am sometimes, so if you think you're not first at 11, there's a chance you could be LOL. May repeat but I like to be rock hard the entire time we're fucking until completion so I'm on the fence about going back again. But everything else is spot on. Real pics with some brush up, sweet personality, GFE, can't handle big size, blah blah etc etc, go check her out, worth a turn.
[URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/model-erica-58453[/URL]
[QUOTE=NintyNine;6094533]Reading all these things about Erica, I'm a little hesitant.
Are any of you like me? I can lose a boner with a pretty face if the service is too meh.
So some questions. .
Would you even characterize erica as erotic? Or is her default behavior and routine vanilla? I mean is she kinda reserved? Or can she feign some enthusiasm? There is a range between ice queen and voracious (1 to 10), and I wonder what you would rate her on this scale.
Does her pussy get pretty wet naturally? Usually I do gentle FIV to get juices flowing, but erica is no FIV. (I remember my visit with Saki last year, and she was so dry I had to pump a lot of lube into her.).
Does it look like erica is daydreaming when you're pounding her? Because that's what it sounds like. Sounds passive. I like more horny interaction and some initiative, even if not PSE..[/QUOTE]
Only 1 day prebook with Erica it seems and she's only being handled by SFK. It's a chance that it's a combination of some regulars coming back again and again since she started and the org going through the list and accommodating those who haven't seen her yet. Eventually it'll slow down a bit for her, just bottle neck process right now because she's the new shiny playtoy.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;6096957]I have been told by Erica's bookers that she can only be booked 1 day before my appointment.
Are you prebooking her for days ahead of your appointment? Through what booker?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;6096993]Sfk / kbliss on the daily.
Sfk Arisa Viki Erika.
Kbliss Jessica Arisa Erika.
For sweet new to the biz experience call on Erica.
For that all pro service queen experience see viki.[/QUOTE]So that means Arisa is only good for being the fluffer?
Not going to spend too much time as she's not (advertised as) a bb girl, but has been mentioned before on this thread under her old moniker 'Gyubeché' (TER: 336682). She's a friendly service-forward all natty spinner, who may or may not have been a ballerina in the past. Photos are real but dated.
Had some time this Saturday so I scoped out the scene and found Shani. Saw her as the first girl slotted and decided to do some research and figured a confirmed HYA for a bargain price was worth the gamble and I was once again rewarded for my efforts. Reviews previous about her stats are true as she's a tiny thing (5'1), most likely 22 or so as her face was like a baby, and has some nice C cups that look even better on her tiny frame. Girl definitely has improved from I suppose my fellow monger visits as definitely was a session to remember with regards to her performance. She must've received some pointers as girl upon entry had on some skimpy lingerie and had me at the door pants down with a BBBJ that her roommate almost walked in on which startled me but gave us a good laugh LOL. Solid BBBJ with lots of tongue rolling and depth for such a tiny woman. Got close to completion so I picked her up and carried her to the room she pointed to and tried to start rolling before I even showered. She did a few camel slides which was as slick as a baby seal but ushered me to the shower with s playful tease as it was very obvious I wanted to have her already.
BT and shower seem like a blur because all I could focus on was on the events to come. Decided to skip dart as I was feeling selfish that day and had her reacquaint her self with junior and saw she was playing with herself while on her knees. Haven't noticed it all that much from providers to actively pleasure themselves during it but it was hot getting to see and that's when I bent her over to see how much I could squeeze into her and she took it like a champ. Started slow but definitely got up to some solid strokes that she eventually just succumbed to the face down ass up position to transition to a standing reverse carry which she hadn't done apparently but appreciated as she was rubbing herself vigorously until she got an O and nearly fell on the floor mid convulsions. Caught her though so we're still good LOL. Wanted her to get on top and she obliged which impressed me further as she was able to work her self all the way down and the DFK was deep and grinding was slippery with my stomach being literally soaked in her juices. Started fucking back and that's when she collapsed again twitching and I finished inside from the bottom. We laid there for a minute and she hops off to clean herself up and laughs that she needs help walking to the bathroom. Not sure if it was part of the routine to stroke my ego but I let it anyways and left feeling a little lighter.
Will repeat as ATM I have no idea of where you can find a HYA for that price w / a non-burnt out kgirl.
Even though not BB glad to see that she is back, she's been here since earlier this month. Was lucky enough to catch her on her first day, first appt. , but because of this, I was only 3/4 of the way in tight Kitty before the tip made a full stop inside her, as much as we forced my dick in, with her consent of course, 1/4 of Jr. Was left hanging LOL according to her, right as we were about to fuck, she was sex months without six. Wait, you guys know what I mean hopefully by now she's been fully stretched. Will make another pit stop soon and test out her tightness again. P.S.** for those who knew her years ago, she got a little ink work done now, HAWWT!
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6097658]Not going to spend too much time as she's not (advertised as) a bb girl, but has been mentioned before on this thread under her old moniker 'Gyubech' (TER: 336682). She's a friendly service-forward all natty spinner, who may or may not have been a ballerina in the past. Photos are real but dated.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EssentialMnger;6097664] I scoped out the scene and found Shani. Saw her as the first girl slotted and decided to do some research and figured a confirmed HYA for a bargain price was worth the gamble.[/QUOTE]You lost me at "bargain price. " Sounds like a hot time tho.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.[/blue]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6097658]Not going to spend too much time as she's not (advertised as) a bb girl, but has been mentioned before on this thread under her old moniker 'Gyubech' (TER: 336682). She's a friendly service-forward all natty spinner, who may or may not have been a ballerina in the past. Photos are real but dated.[/QUOTE]So YMMV on BB repeat visits or strict with no BB? I assume dated photos means older MILF from the sound of things. How about the service? Standard fare of more GFE than PSE? DFK or LFK or no kissing? Rim? Complainer about position changes? Sorry for the long demand, I'm just curious. Erica will be out of the question for me for awhile since everyone wants to go see her.
I wouldn't know about Arisa. Haven't seen her, there was some posts maybe during the beginning of this month about Arisa being from NorCal or she bounces around a lot with name changes.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6097591]So that means Arisa is only good for being the fluffer?[/QUOTE]
LOL, where in the world in any of my posts did I rave her beautiful or service to something similar to a jyp trainee?
As for some of the girls you listed, I've seen them too, they are cute or good looking. But the kicker is 3 of them maybe 4 is totally not on the market. Then there's the upsell girls, majority of the guys here are over that ala carte menu.
As for your utr 3 hole ****, why did you even bother putting that on the thread especially of you're going to tell everyone don't pm you and you won't tell. Waste of useless info that can't be utilized by anyone.
[QUOTE=NovaThings;6097221]Is Erica cute with solid service? Yes but so is Sammy, sweet, Lisa2, Chungha, Elena, Noah, Miso, Stacy, Sienna / Sydney, Remi, Bitna, Dana, Eunji, Daisy, Shani, and those are the comparison points that come to mind but there's many more. I would also put out there some of these names are cuter or better service or both than Erica. Is she a solid repeat? Sure but the way you hyped her I was expecting a JYP trainee behind the door. Again, not a knock against Erica but my standard is if a provider gets 3-4 pops out of me and I have to run away from them because it's too much. Several of these girls I listed qualify but than others have the "cute / natural" look which is my preference. I have 5 mentioned or not mentioned in my normal rotation and about 5 more I hope return I did or did not mention. My UTR is my 3 hole princess and she's a legit sub 20 (checked DL) - please don't message me for details and she's my cute / service standard. I stretch out in advance and try to bring as much man juice possible to those sessions. My opinion only and YMMV as always.[/QUOTE]
Strict no BB.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;6097786]So YMMV on BB repeat visits or strict with no BB? I assume dated photos means older MILF from the sound of things. How about the service? Standard fare of more GFE than PSE? DFK or LFK or no kissing? Rim? Complainer about position changes? Sorry for the long demand, I'm just curious. Erica will be out of the question for me for awhile since everyone wants to go see her.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NovaThings;6097221]Is Erica cute with solid service? Yes but so is Sammy, sweet, Lisa2, Chungha, Elena, Noah, Miso, Stacy, Sienna / Sydney, Remi, Bitna, Dana, Eunji, Daisy, Shani, and those are the comparison points that come to mind but there's many more. I would also put out there some of these names are cuter or better service or both than Erica. Is she a solid repeat? Sure but the way you hyped her I was expecting a JYP trainee behind the door. Again, not a knock against Erica but my standard is if a provider gets 3-4 pops out of me and I have to run away from them because it's too much. Several of these girls I listed qualify but than others have the "cute / natural" look which is my preference. I have 5 mentioned or not mentioned in my normal rotation and about 5 more I hope return I did or did not mention. My UTR is my 3 hole princess and she's a legit sub 20 (checked DL) - please don't message me for details and she's my cute / service standard. I stretch out in advance and try to bring as much man juice possible to those sessions. My opinion only and YMMV as always.[/QUOTE]If you do not share then why should anyone share with you?