Too Many Safe Sex Commentaries
So for those of you who don't know (or care) here it is straight from Jackson:
No Safe Sex Complaints Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads. Any such "safe sex complaints" posted in the general discussion threads will be deleted without comment. However.
No Safe Sex Bragging Members may not repeatedly post about or otherwise taunt other Members regarding their refusal to follow safe sex procedures. Specifically, references to having sex without a condom may be made only by incidental reference and shall not be the focus of any report. Such "safe sex taunting" reports will be deleted without comment.
If you want to criticize another member for not following what you consider to be safe sex practices, then send him a PM.
It does no good to criticize members for not following what other members may consider to be safe sex practices for the following reasons:
1. It never serves to change any one's behavior.
2. It's a disincentive for members to contribute.
3. It almost always leads to arguments.
4. It provides a "cover" for Serial Antagonists to provoke other members.
To address the usual arguments:
1. If a guy wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's his risk and his business.
2. If a girl wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's her risk and her business.
3. If YOU want to protect yourself from either or both of the aforementioned parties, then YOU should use a condom for sex all the time and thus YOU will be protected from the allegedly unsafe sex practices of the other parties.
Too Many Safe Sex Commentaries: Outstanding post from Cleveland Report
[QUOTE=Cleveland Report; 1145563]So for those of you who don't know (or care) here it is straight from Jackson:
No Safe Sex Complaints Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads. Any such "safe sex complaints" posted in the general discussion threads will be deleted without comment. However.
No Safe Sex Bragging Members may not repeatedly post about or otherwise taunt other Members regarding their refusal to follow safe sex procedures. Specifically, references to having sex without a condom may be made only by incidental reference and shall not be the focus of any report. Such "safe sex taunting" reports will be deleted without comment.
If you want to criticize another member for not following what you consider to be safe sex practices, then send him a PM.
It does no good to criticize members for not following what other members may consider to be safe sex practices for the following reasons:
1. It never serves to change any one's behavior.
2. It's a disincentive for members to contribute.
3. It almost always leads to arguments.
4. It provides a "cover" for Serial Antagonists to provoke other members.
To address the usual arguments:
1. If a guy wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's his risk and his business.
2. If a girl wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's her risk and her business.
3. If YOU want to protect yourself from either or both of the aforementioned parties, then YOU should use a condom for sex all the time and thus YOU will be protected from the allegedly unsafe sex practices of the other parties. [/QUOTE]All viewers of this forum need to be aware of its rules, which are clearly set out by Jackson as noted by Cleveland Report. There is indeed a "Safe Sex" thread on this forum, but because there are more than 3,000 posts to the Warren Massage Parlors thread, it is a magnet for off-topic propaganda. Those spewing safe sex panic, LE gossip, and self-righteous, anti-sexuality drivel here don't even attempt to be rational when they are pushing agendas to hijack this thread and subvert this forum.
You can report such offenders to Jackson. Don't feed the trolls by responding to their nonsense.
LR.
It's Lisa ... Almost for sure
Update: I haven't been there yet, but a few Lansing-area mongers have and one asked if she was from 4S and she said she was. His report sounded on spot for I'd'ing her, from all indications. I hope to get there Sat. Or sometime soon. But I'd say 95 percent chance it's our friend Lisa / Mickie.
[QUOTE=TwistedBrother;1145152]Wow, that's epic that she's in my area. I've sort of been on a mongering hiatus, due to an LTR, but that would be too good to pass up. I'll have to see when I can get there. Maybe Saturday.[/QUOTE]
Jun's Return and the new girl
[QUOTE=Bluer138;1147219]If, that's true (Jun's back) it's good for all of us, Sammy, Jun and me. Without a doubt Jun is a true gem.[/QUOTE]Well, I met up with the new girl yesterday. Her name is Coco / Cola. She has a nice tight body which reminded me of Sun's Tina. Actually she looked like she could be Tina's sister. She's very friendly and willing to please; fresh and new. You guys can teach her all your kinks while she works them out as well.
Sammy told me that Jun was starting today, Monday. So right now the line up is Ruby, Bobbie, Tina, Coco / Cola, and Jun.