Yes she has 19 hits on Tin Eye
[QUOTE=Jojo69; 1504716]Any info on this chick? I have seen her on BP for awhile now and she looks too good to be true!
[url]http://massachusetts.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-real-specials-100-real-specials-100-real-specials-20/20033427[/url][/QUOTE]In other words FAKE
Michigian & South Shore in MAatsame time? She does have skills
Saw this ad this morning for Brockton / Braintree.
[url]http://southcoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/flaming-hot-girl-24/20621638[/url]
Google found ads all over the country with same pics & girl but then found this ad posted in Michigan this morning, LOL.
[url]http://michigan.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/get-it-well-its-hot-24/9393672[/url]
Too bad because she really is hott
1 photos
Don't bother with TinEye, Use Google
[QUOTE=Joe Fish;1505935]Pardon my ignorance but would someone please tell me how to use this? So if a pic has alot of 'hits, ' that a bad thing? Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE][url]Http://www.google.com/imghp?hl=en&tab=ii[/url]
Use Google reverse image search to see if the images in an ad are used elsewhere. The more hits, the more likely they are pictures "borrowed" from another provider, or model, or sometimes even actresses.
You can drag and drop an image to the search field, or copy the image url and paste it in.
Example, the post just before yours mentions a sting warning. Drag and drop one of the images, and it shows up as being from a London escort. The others are as well. Does it make sense that an escort from London, with her own website, would be traveling to Salem, MA and posting on Backpage under many different names? No, it doesn't. It tells me it's at the very least a bait and switch, or in this case, a police sting. I wonder how Chelsea of London feels about her pictures being used for a sting op? Maybe I should give her a heads up.
Clicking "all sizes" gives you a thumbnail gallery of the results.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]189816[/ATTACH]
I think it's about time I wrote up a tutorial on this.
Houston, we have a problem
[QUOTE=Mr Deeds; 1506292]Wow finally some real pics.
Today I visited a girl By the name of Dream from Backpage. I called her around noon this afternoon. She answered on second ring and confirmed she Was free. I arrived to her hotel which I found the location very nice and upscale. She she opened the door to her room I gagged. I couldn't believe how accurate her pictures were. Her face was absolutely stunning and she didn't have on much make up. Her rack was even better. She said she wore a 36 DD and they were natural. Also she had the kim kardasian butt to match. She started the session off by askin me to get comfortable and I did so by undressing. She instantly put a condom on my cock. At first I was dissapoint because I found her to be clean and I wanted a explosive bbj session but forgot to ask before arriving. Her cock sucking game was crazy! She moaned as she swallowed my cock down her throat HUGE TURN ON. After a fifteen min BJ she told me she was ready to filled my cock. I jammed my cock in her pussy and found it to be the warmiest and wettest pussy ever. Soon as I enter her body I knew I was going to cum quick because of how great her pussy felt. She talked dirty to me the whole time and did everything I wanted to do. Her doggy style veiw from the back was incredible! I was done her session in 20 mins even tho I paid for half. She offered I stay for the rest of session but I declined bcuz my dick was way to sensitive. I left a happy man! Can't wait to fuck her pretty ass again.
[url]http://posting.boston.backpage.com/online/classifieds/VerifyAd?oid=oid[/url]
%
[url]3A20500470&id=www-c06f229a313ebec86b8263605a1dc426-1342217952[/url][/QUOTE]Ummmm, Mr Deeds? I'm new here, and far be it from me to overstep my boundaries, but there's a serious glitch in your report for Dream.
The link you provided is for ad verification and management. Now, I've never posted an ad on Backpage myself, so I could be wrong, but wouldn't that seem to indicate that the link you were trying to post was your own ad?
Also, the fact that the only three posts you have are the same exact text in two different threads (duplicate posts in the Hartford thread) , all within the past two days makes things more confusing. The Hartford post has a link that's 404.
If I'm wrong, please explain it to me.
Admin, if I'm out of line, please let me know.