1 photos
I know about condoms but "Black Flag"?????
You can't make this stuff up......
After all my years of mongering I thought I saw it all.....I mean I saw home made porno where you could actually see the crabs crawling on the girls pussy. But this past week I connected with a CL escort who had no pics so after a few sent and received emails I asked to see a pic . She obliges and sends me a not very clear head shot. She looked like a cow..so I try to be gentle and tell her I prefer redheads..well she turns into a pushy sales person and lowers her price by $50 and sends me what she thinks is a sexy hot pic of her pussy and ass saying this can be yours! I almost met up with her just to pay her for making me laugh so hard. Sloppy seconds to a "fly" anyone?
Stay safe and play safe,
TH
PS: BB, watch out she is from Maine.
I think this type of request could transform the board
While I understand why some of our members might think it crazy to post a request like this one, I would love to see the board change to the type of place where information on providers is commonly exchanged (without paying a fee) amongst our members.
Incidentally, I know Haley, and she is great.
I suggest that instead of writing posts about overweight pregnant INEXPENSIVE women who no longer provide services (i.e., Tess), we focus on the girls who are not reviewed in TER (e.g., the CL girls) whom our fellow members might enjoy meeting.
I, for one, often look at hot photos on CL and wonder which ones are worth the bother. Which ones are going to going to result in an arrest and the ruin of my career, etc. But our members scoff at queries about girls on CL, even though I know from experience that there are many diamonds there.
I am proposing that each and every member of this board faithfully report on each and every encounter with a provider. And, when a fellow member asks a question (do you know "so and so"), that we provide him with the information that he seeks.
I don't know about you guys, but I am always (ALWAYS) looking for new girls who are great in the sack, pretty and not LE. Your help is always appreciated, even though most of my requests for information have gone unanswered.
I suggest the following: When you find a good girl, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! If you find a bad one, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! Don't waste our time chatting about the combat zone in '84, but focus on spreading the word about the good experiences possible in Boston. I know that there are many great gals out there, and dream that one day this board will be a place where I can go to and get a recommendation of two for some great sex!
[QUOTE=Ericmcq]Does anyone have experience with either of these 2 ladies?
First is Haley (may also go by Lindsay or Amy):
[url]http://www.independentladies.net/escorts-boston-haley.htm[/url]
[url]http://boston.craigslist.org/sob/ers/843787932.html[/url]
[url]http://boston.craigslist.org/sob/ers/843283644.html[/url]
[url]http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/ers/842217929.html[/url]
Second is Sam or Samantha (see pics).
Also, what about a girl that goes by Amy Smart (just4u200969... is her email address).
Any input on these specific ladies would be much appreciated.[/QUOTE]
In general I agree however
[QUOTE=Forest]While I understand why some of our members might think it crazy to post a request like this one, I would love to see the board change to the type of place where information on providers is commonly exchanged (without paying a fee) amongst our members.
Incidentally, I know Haley, and she is great.
I suggest that instead of writing posts about overweight pregnant INEXPENSIVE women who no longer provide services (i.e., Tess), we focus on the girls who are not reviewed in TER (e.g., the CL girls) whom our fellow members might enjoy meeting.
I, for one, often look at hot photos on CL and wonder which ones are worth the bother. Which ones are going to going to result in an arrest and the ruin of my career, etc. But our members scoff at queries about girls on CL, even though I know from experience that there are many diamonds there.
I am proposing that each and every member of this board faithfully report on each and every encounter with a provider. And, when a fellow member asks a question (do you know "so and so"), that we provide him with the information that he seeks.
I don't know about you guys, but I am always (ALWAYS) looking for new girls who are great in the sack, pretty and not LE. Your help is always appreciated, even though most of my requests for information have gone unanswered.
I suggest the following: When you find a good girl, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! If you find a bad one, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! Don't waste our time chatting about the combat zone in '84, but focus on spreading the word about the good experiences possible in Boston. I know that there are many great gals out there, and dream that one day this board will be a place where I can go to and get a recommendation of two for some great sex![/QUOTE]
I must disagree with several points. While concentrating on CL girls in this forum is important due to the general lack of information out there on them I disagree with de-emphasizing other ladies just because they are not 'CL' ladies. Besides the fact that there are a lot of CL ladies that are reviewed 'there' we all know that many of those reviews are written either by someone who needs days in their bank or by those 'friendly' to the lady. Getting first hand info on non-cl ladies has been and will continue to be important to all of us. Not to mention that not all of those on this forum belong to the other board and they cannot see the full 'review'.
Also being a monger from way back in the 70's I enjoy the occasional look back to the good ole days of the combat zone and the old massage places that used to be around. And I don't think that it takes away from the info presented here. If your not interested in folklore then just ignore the posts.
I do vehementally agree that when 'established' members ask for info on someone in particular then those of us that can help them out should. After all that is how we started. I have asked on many occasions including yesterday about someone and in general have gotten back some sort of info just as I reply to members when I know. There sometimes is a little too much witholding of info but I know some of the reasons why including being asked to by the lady or by not wanting to put her in possible danger. I disagree with keeping the info private just to keep her to yourself however. Keep in mind that I said 'established' members.
As far as Tess is concerned I don't remember seeing any posts recently but just as an FYI she is back and seeing gents again so she is relevant. Just my .02! SO
I agree too....kind of....
[QUOTE=Forest]While I understand why some of our members might think it crazy to post a request like this one, I would love to see the board change to the type of place where information on providers is commonly exchanged (without paying a fee) amongst our members.[/QUOTE]
Change? This board has been used for that since it's inception.
Keep in mind that we're admitting to criminal activity when we provide info.
[QUOTE=Forest]Incidentally, I know Haley, and she is great.
I suggest that instead of writing posts about overweight pregnant INEXPENSIVE women who no longer provide services (i.e., Tess), we focus on the girls who are not reviewed in TER (e.g., the CL girls) whom our fellow members might enjoy meeting.[/QUOTE]
Tess was last mentioned in this thread 150 posts ago, when AZN Monger mentioned that she was BACK providing services in Mass.
[QUOTE=Forest]I, for one, often look at hot photos on CL and wonder which ones are worth the bother. Which ones are going to going to result in an arrest and the ruin of my career, etc. But our members scoff at queries about girls on CL, even though I know from experience that there are many diamonds there.[/QUOTE]
We all wonder that, who wouldn't?
As far as scoffing goes, maybe the people creating yet another screen name to ask about an escort are asking about someone that no one has info on? Or maybe someone has already reported on her and would prefer that people do a little research so they don't have to repeat themselves?
[QUOTE=Forest]I am proposing that each and every member of this board faithfully report on each and every encounter with a provider. And, when a fellow member asks a question (do you know "so and so"), that we provide him with the information that he seeks. [/QUOTE]
I'm no review factory myself but you've posted 4 reviews in 3 years while using 19 of 35 posts to ask for information and you're proposing that? Keep making suggestions like that and you'll be pegged for a cop, ham-handedly looking for info.
I agree as far as answering queries go but reporting on every encounter, no, no way am I connecting myself to every provider I visit or SW that I pick up. I might as well just call 911 and tell them to come and get me.
[QUOTE=Forest]I don't know about you guys, but I am always (ALWAYS) looking for new girls who are great in the sack, pretty and not LE. Your help is always appreciated, even though most of my requests for information have gone unanswered. [/QUOTE]
We all are my friend and I would have happily answered more of your questions if I had the answers.
[QUOTE=Forest]I suggest the following: When you find a good girl, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! If you find a bad one, SHARE THE NEWS!!!! Don't waste our time chatting about the combat zone in '84, but focus on spreading the word about the good experiences possible in Boston. I know that there are many great gals out there, and dream that one day this board will be a place where I can go to and get a recommendation of two for some great sex![/QUOTE]
I just counted back almost 200 posts in this thread without a zone reference before my patience ran out so let's toss that out the door with the Tess thing shall we?