Printable View
I was puzzled by that also. They have Flynn aka Petra so same org as ours. Also spectrum may refer to an area in Irvine so maybe posted in wrong region.
[QUOTE=SdfitLife;5060538][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/192[/URL]
Anyone know what the deal is? Is this a different agency? I haven't seen them advertise before.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SdfitLife;5060538][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/192[/URL]
Anyone know what the deal is? Is this a different agency? I haven't seen them advertise before.[/QUOTE]It's not a San Diego handle. It's an OC agency that has a relationship to the SDAG agency.
The Spectrum ref was just them reaching out and it was also posted in OC.
Flynn in OC (Petra in SD) is sometimes posted under StunningAsian when she's in OC, but currently under FirstAsians at the moment. I'm probably wrong. But I used to think that whichever girl was put under which handle communicated which complex they were at. But also recently seen that's not always the case. Meaning Costa Mesa vs the Tustin location.
Hi,
Does anyone know about the new SDAG girl Sony / Sonya? If no intel by tonight, I am going to TOFTT.
[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;5059831]Why would you identify yourself in this way? I wonder the same thing when people write reviews and are specific with when they saw someone. You should do your best to stay anonymous or isolate your online identify from the bookers / talent.[/QUOTE]Thought this was an interesting topic you brought up.
I've seen it discussed a few times on other competitive sights and I've written them both ways (too much detail & just highlights) - but for me personally, when a review doesn't go into specific details past just someone's personal subjective opinion of what a person looks like and which acronyms they do or don't do, I find it to be useless. For the things I'm looking for. I totally understand a lot of people just want to know if a girl might DFK, GFE, CIM, BB, or whatever they're fishing for. And that's cool for them. But I also find these things can be YMMV and typically I just have to go in to find out for myself anyways because it's still not saying much. For example, after a string of high-level not so good reviews on Bliss and Peach. I had a gut feeling that they were YMMV girls and went in to see and now glad I did. Both turned out to be faves and if I just went off the posted generic notes, I wouldn't have found out how epic they were.
Maybe just me personally, but I'm fishing for more than an acronym and script. I really do appreciate reviews when a little character building is intact. Not so much of what the monger thinks, but more insight of what the provider did outside the norm script.
So back to your point. I was just curious on your take of the why?. Or why not? Concern for the girls finding out or the Agency or both? For me, the girls that read this stuff can tell it was me when they read it and bust me, but it's usually something to do with jealousy because they'll compare to what write about other girls. But that's not enough reason to sand bag my reviews. Regarding the agency. They all know who I am because I used the same name on all the sites and I've had a string of bad times here and there that I covered publicly but, they seemed cool about it. BTW. Not to freak anyone out. But even for you generic reviewers and posters. This is there lively-hood and they invest a lot of time on this and they figure this stuff out somehow. Maybe not everyone, but try it if you don't believe me. Bring up someone's review with a girl one day. I bet she knows exactly who it is. On another comparison, some of the indie providers want your handles to back ground check you and may not see you without you giving it up. Probably why HX got to be the chosen site after CV went down years ago.
I know there's no one-size fits all and for the most part, this hobby is all about the anonymity.
We all have to do what makes each of us feel comfortable, but I vote. Mo' details.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5060186]First time I've found a fellow Emi fan. She was one of my ATFs back in the day, and I was sad to see her go. Not sure whether she's still in the game or not, but she's been on my short list of ones I keep hoping reappears. Omari was another one, but they were very different. Emi was pretty much one of my ideal body types, and a real sweetheart to boot.[/QUOTE]Yeah, Emi was great, not just performance wise for me but we also made a deeper, personal connection. She was definitely one of my ATFs since I started in the hobby. I've looked around the LA scene after she left SD but never saw her (or at least her pics) in any agency in either LA or OC. I assumed she was out of the business. As for Omari, I think I saw her pics recently from one of the agencies in LA, so she's maybe still around. I guess a lot of the providers don't like coming to SD. Still waiting for Ash to return.
[QUOTE=Dolan85;5060106]Can someone who has access to sdag do me a huge favor and pm me the password? Looks like the booker changed it and he hasnt replied to my texts.[/QUOTE]They ask that people don't share passwords since they use them to screening people out all the people they don't want accessing it (bad customers, LE, competition, etc.). When it gets shared it potentially has more serious repercussions than someone sharing a PornHub user name / password.
If they're unresponsive it's generally because someone incurred their disfavor. Depending on whether or not you can figure out why the agency might blacklist you, you might want to email them.
The one time in 7 years that they were anything other than immediate w / a reply, I'd earned a friendly, but frank, talking to over a less than flattering (not insulting in any way) review. But we quickly got things back on track after coming to an understanding.
[QUOTE=TootsieJoe;5060852]Yeah, Emi was great, not just performance wise for me but we also made a deeper, personal connection. She was definitely one of my ATFs since I started in the hobby. I've looked around the LA scene after she left SD but never saw her (or at least her pics) in any agency in either LA or OC. I assumed she was out of the business. As for Omari, I think I saw her pics recently from one of the agencies in LA, so she's maybe still around. I guess a lot of the providers don't like coming to SD. Still waiting for Ash to return.[/QUOTE]I saw Emi's pics being used for a little while after she left SD in Vegas, but then I stopped looking and ultimately a little later took a break from the scene. I never had anything other than a great time w / her. I'm torn between the nostalgia of ladies like Emi, Bryn, Omari, and such that were favorites of mine, with the reality that (a) even if they're still around, they've probably changed, (b) service might not be as amazing as it used to be, (c) they probably wouldn't even remember me after all these years. Haha.
I could've sworn I saw Omari's pics not too long ago in the LA / OC area, but then for whatever reason, I felt like I got turned around and confused her w / Petra / Flynn, as far as the old pics go, but unsure. I know I have a review for Omari from several years back where she left me on the verge of proposing to her after she rocked my world. (Kidding about the proposal part, but I'm looking at the review, thinking, hot damn!
[QUOTE=BrtinJoker;5060661]Hi,
Does anyone know about the new SDAG girl Sony / Sonya? If no intel by tonight, I am going to TOFTT.[/QUOTE]Report back, I'm curious as well.
[QUOTE=RChangDatyKing;5057648]If you've used SDAG as long as I have, you probably remembered Missy. She too was one of my favorites back in the days.
Yes, I definitely love being with Bryn. She had / has an amazing body and sex drive. After I started seeing Petra I stopped seeing Bryn.[/QUOTE]My ATF At sdag was Sophie. This is going back. God. 10+ years.
Thanks for the trip down memory lane.
[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5061253]The one time in 7 years that they were anything other than immediate w / a reply, I'd earned a friendly, but frank, talking to over a less than flattering (not insulting in any way) review. But we quickly got things back on track after coming to an understanding.[/QUOTE]This is my point about writing reviews. My suggestion is to not put anything in a review that can connect your online identity with your real identity. The bookers read this site, they can connect the dots. Wait a few days to write a review after seeing someone, don't say what specific day you saw someone, don't say things like you have an appointment set for tomorrow, etc. If you do, then these are the types of issues you have to deal with.
This is just my recommendation, but people are free to do whatever they want. But there can be repercussions. You may not say it is fair, but it is what it is.
The convenience, quality, experience, safety, etc. Provided by FEC and SDAG, and also Sandra99 is important to me. So I try to do whatever I can to prevent anyone from connecting the dots from my online persona to the identity they know me by.
What Trusty says is very good advice and those rules really go back to beginning of mongers posting reviews on any site. Mongering 101. Never leave a trail.
[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;5061725]This is my point about writing reviews. My suggestion is to not put anything in a review that can connect your online identity with your real identity. The bookers read this site, they can connect the dots. Wait a few days to write a review after seeing someone, don't say what specific day you saw someone, don't say things like you have an appointment set for tomorrow, etc. If you do, then these are the types of issues you have to deal with.
This is just my recommendation, but people are free to do whatever they want. But there can be repercussions. You may not say it is fair, but it is what it is.
The convenience, quality, experience, safety, etc. Provided by FEC and SDAG, and also Sandra99 is important to me. So I try to do whatever I can to prevent anyone from connecting the dots from my online persona to the identity they know me by.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;5061725]This is my point about writing reviews. My suggestion is to not put anything in a review that can connect your online identity with your real identity. The bookers read this site, they can connect the dots. Wait a few days to write a review after seeing someone, don't say what specific day you saw someone, don't say things like you have an appointment set for tomorrow, etc. If you do, then these are the types of issues you have to deal with.
This is just my recommendation, but people are free to do whatever they want. But there can be repercussions. You may not say it is fair, but it is what it is.
The convenience, quality, experience, safety, etc. Provided by FEC and SDAG, and also Sandra99 is important to me. So I try to do whatever I can to prevent anyone from connecting the dots from my online persona to the identity they know me by.[/QUOTE]I could not agree with you more.
Typically the more specific I am in one area, the less specific I am in another. For example, if I name the person I saw, what they were wearing, if the shop was very busy, etc. Then I get less specific on when I went and will wait a few days or a week or two to post a review and say something like "the other day. " If I don't know the name of the girl (like at an AMP) and she was wearing simple clothes not worth mentioning, or something to that effect, then I get more specific (went around mid afternoon, wasn't very crowded) and might post a review sooner.
I don't visit agencies, so less likely for them to identify who I am. But I have been surprised at how specific some people get. Sometimes (at least saying) they just returned from a visit, and spilling all the details.
[QUOTE=BrtinJoker;5060661]Hi,
Does anyone know about the new SDAG girl Sony / Sonya? If no intel by tonight, I am going to TOFTT.[/QUOTE]So did you see her? How was she?
Saw Sony with SDAG this morning and had a great time. She is in her late 30's (my Asian guess) and a very friendly lady visiting from Dallas, TX. Speaks excellent English. 5'4" 130 lbs and very nice all natural C cups. Greeted me with a nice LFK at the door and took me to the shower and blue toast. Very thorough scrubbing of my entire body. Back in the bedroom she asked me what I liked, and said I love BBBJ with DT. She scoots down to my balls and ask me is I like them licked too? Yes ma'am, I do. Then licked the taint and asks me if I like rimming? Yes ma'am I do. Gave me a good 5 minute deep rim and then back to the BLS, BBBJ and DT. She was able to get all of it into her throat, felt amazing. She then switched around for 69 and she has a very tasty pussy. After ten minutes or so she started a camel slide and her pussy felt so good and wet. She was grinding on me and started saying "I want to fuck you now!" I quickly grabbed the condom and flipped over doggie style and started slow. She kept saying "faster and harder baby". Yes ma'am!! Her encouraging me on had me about to bust. I asked for CIM and she said "yes please cum in my mouth", ripped the cover off and unloaded in her mouth. I collapsed on to the bed. 1 shot guy, so took a shower and was on my way. She is here 7 more days. Face is a 7, performance is a 9.
Cheers.