Def her in the pics, just a while ago
She has put on some weight and her body doesn't distribute that weight to the proportional areas that we like to see. She isn't bad looking and is friendly enough. I'd repeat if she wasn't still in that private residence with the cameras. There is nothing like watching the glow of the camera's IR lights staring right at you while you're trying to get the deed done to kill the mood. On the plus side, she did have a nice feel to her kitty. Still some walls in there to be knocked loose. BBBJ was solid but not exactly my cup of tea really- personal preference. I like girls like Sugar that like to be throat fukked hard and treated like a little slutt. -F904.
[QUOTE=PlayTiem;4556125]Wait, like the pics aren't her at all, or they're just from a better, bygone time when she looked more like them?
As for cameras, remember that a lot of TVs they're selling these days have video cameras IN them. Because, apparently, nobody actually bothered to read 1984.
Also, standalone cameras are getting so small that soon you'll have to assume they're there but you just can't see them, and (unless you wear the special tin foil hats that make them not work) that you're being recorded. As it is, a small pile of clothes or a makeup bag are plenty big to hide one in in a hotel room now.[/QUOTE]