"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6246791]There is a web version of [URL]seeking.com[/URL], right? I use it almost exclusively, I don't have to pay for web access, whereas the bandwidth on my smart TracFone I do pay for. You can also disable your profile on seeking (on the web version, IDK about the app, as I don't use it anymore. I did at one time. However, didn't the app stores stop including 'trafficking' applications a while back?[/QUOTE]Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.

[QUOTE=HollywoodGuy;6246268]Try dating something besides white girls. Tell me I am wrong. Its my opinion that all the karens that get guys banned from seeking are white. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]All women have varying tiers of crazy.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6247161]Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.[/QUOTE]This is not true. The girls used to have a thing on their profiles for their allowance expectations. They went from practical to extravagant or some such, and then elsewhere on the site, there was a 'key' that told you what the monthly was for those descriptors. I think the lowest one, practical, was like 2 K. So SDs learned to ignore those completely. Girls communicate that same thing on their profiles these days, they just do it with coded language. High maintenance, etc.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6247161]Yes I only use the web version too. Seeking is in the google app store I just checked. Also I think the rebrand to "dating up" is additional cover so they maintain anti trafficking or anti prostitution compliance even though absolutely nothing has changed about the site and how users use it.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure why they aren't in the Apple app store, because there are lots of apps there that are blatantly branded sugar daddy dating apps.

Maybe it has more to do with billing practices or limitations.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6246777]Maybe this will help:

The other thing I like about bumble is there's just a lot more volume especially if you are in a big city and are located near the city center. Seeking, depending on your location, can be sparse; I see too many of the same girls. On seeking I typically run a 30 day membership and then quit for 3-4 months and wait for a fresh crop to come in. Also you can use bumble in a desktop web browser ( I hate smart phone apps)

Oh another thing about bumble, you can easily disable your profile / make yourself invisible when you want to take a break. This is all without paying anything.[/QUOTE]Thanks, yes the image is helpful, but I'm wondering if that actually filters the inbound messages, preventing you from getting messages past the range, or does it simply to broadcast your preference? Maybe a better question, do you ever get messages from women over 45? For me, the filter would be set much lower simply because I've found that the farther they get past 25 the more they are going to want something real from me instead of just sugar, and I'm already covered there.

Also does it require real name etc?

I also do like the idea of good desktop web support. Mobile apps have their place but for me they aren't efficient for high volume "big city pussy hunting". I have a system of tracking my interactions with girls in volume that really requires a computer, mouse etc. I will say that both my phone and iPad Pro are tools with a significant role in the overall game, but more for having access to the information I've already captured than the capturing of data.

[QUOTE=LouisHernandez;6245814]I'm going to fire up bumble next week after I take some new pics. I've been dieting pretty hard core for the past 8 weeks. One tip I recommend is using [URL]photofeeler.com[/URL] , post your pics and get them rated. I learned I'm my own worst critic / fan when it comes to my own pics.

I'll get back in the sugar bowl after new years b / c I'm pretty much running dry. The last SB put on 15 pounds from my previous encounter and I simply can't hit that again. Weight gain is the most annoying thing with these girls forcing me have to go fishing in the bowl again. It sucks b / c she had no rules and was trustworthy, a rare thing to find.[/QUOTE]How's Bumble for dating if you're married? Who's had success on there as a married guy?

[QUOTE=SgtHappyEnding;6247803]How's Bumble for dating if you're married? Who's had success on there as a married guy?[/QUOTE]You should also checkout WhatsYourPrice. I've had decent success with that site / app. Very similar to Seeking but no membership to join. You window shop, submit an offer, if she accepts you have to "unlock" messaging via credits.

[QUOTE=CrempieLover;6248054]You should also checkout WhatsYourPrice. I've had decent success with that site / app. Very similar to Seeking but no membership to join. You window shop, submit an offer, if she accepts you have to "unlock" messaging via credits.[/QUOTE]How does payment exchange hands? So let's say she accepts whatever the offer is. If I understand, I then have to pay to contact her and then pay her for a date which may or may not get me laid?

[QUOTE=CrempieLover;6248054]You should also checkout WhatsYourPrice. I've had decent success with that site / app. [/QUOTE]By success, do you mean sex? If so, is it like Seeking where you come to an agreement for ppm / allowance or was it just natural progression like a regular date?

[QUOTE=OliverNP;6248261]How does payment exchange hands? So let's say she accepts whatever the offer is. If I understand, I then have to pay to contact her and then pay her for a date which may or may not get me laid?[/QUOTE]The amount you submit is really only to get their attention. If she accepts whatever the amount is that you offer no money is exchanged at that point. It only open's the ability to contact them via pm after unlocking them with credits. You can agree to whatever amount or service but I would highly suggest you take those kind of detailed conversations to another platform (text or whatever). Also note that after any exchange information is given you can not receive a credit refund from WYP if the "date" doesn't workout. Good rule of thumb is to feel them out with a pm and if it sounds like you two are on the same page take the convo elsewhere.

[QUOTE=DArrow404;6248295]By success, do you mean sex? If so, is it like Seeking where you come to an agreement for ppm / allowance or was it just natural progression like a regular date?[/QUOTE]In my dreams in the past both of what you said are true. Not everyone on that site is looking for the same thing. Some want a regular allowance and to be spoiled a little before giving it up, others are game for a ppm and skip all the boring stuff.

I don't normally do this. But I had to share because this is just so classic. First things first you need to call her Empress. And then she's going to vet you and make sure you are a provider, because she has certain standards that need to be upheld. Then you need to make sure that you don't want to have sex with her so come to her correct and make sure you have your intentions in line. And you know what it really doesn't matter if you're good looking or ugly because you can just send her an allowance because that's what she prefers. And you need to make sure you treat her like a princess. I mean in what freaking world do these delusional women live in? What the hell is the man supposed to get out of it? These women want more than a wife or girlfriend would get. And they want to give less than a wife or girlfriend would have to give in a relationship. And that's exactly what I tell them when they reach out to me and say these things to me or it's in their profile. That they are out of their goddamn minds. Of course I only do that off of the site and I block them immediately. And then block them on the site immediately.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?userId=71590888[/URL]

Don't miss your chance. 🤣.

[QUOTE=OliverNP;6247684]Thanks, yes the image is helpful, but I'm wondering if that actually filters the inbound messages, preventing you from getting messages past the range, or does it simply to broadcast your preference? Maybe a better question, do you ever get messages from women over 45? For me, the filter would be set much lower simply because I've found that the farther they get past 25 the more they are going to want something real from me instead of just sugar, and I'm already covered there.

Also does it require real name etc?

I also do like the idea of good desktop web support. Mobile apps have their place but for me they aren't efficient for high volume "big city pussy hunting". I have a system of tracking my interactions with girls in volume that really requires a computer, mouse etc. I will say that both my phone and iPad Pro are tools with a significant role in the overall game, but more for having access to the information I've already captured than the capturing of data.[/QUOTE]You can make your name up but it does ask for a real one. Same with birthday, just like seeking. As far as matching goes, that's a good question. My guess is it only matches the girls you see based on your selection criteria. However Girl X who is 45 will still see you if fall in her age and distance criteria.

Remember this is a swiping app like Tinder and not a window display app like seeking. Unless you pay you have no idea who has liked you unless you happen to have liked them also.

Another little trick if you are technically savvy like I am, is if you use chrome you can override your latitude longitude (GPS location) that it sends to bumble. So if you wish to search a different radius within your own city or search an entirely different city, it's easy to do and it's 100% free.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/899e8bca-2729-49f1-b3c8-2d00645286e9[/URL]

Curious to know. If anyone had good experience with her?

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;6247536]This is not true. The girls used to have a thing on their profiles for their allowance expectations. They went from practical to extravagant or some such, and then elsewhere on the site, there was a 'key' that told you what the monthly was for those descriptors. I think the lowest one, practical, was like 2 K. So SDs learned to ignore those completely. Girls communicate that same thing on their profiles these days, they just do it with coded language. High maintenance, etc.[/QUOTE]Right. All the rinser / gold digger coded words that tell me to avoid them at all costs.