Printable View
[QUOTE=Zomby;2062273]I suspect it would get quite a few clicks.[/QUOTE]I'm thinking about finding some kind of awesome drop shipping company and setting something up and placing an ad here (on the forum, not here here in the Octagon) and calling it my retirement account.
It would have to be something with an extensive catalog, that wasn't some kind of douchey MLM scam, that gave good service, sold useful shit, at a good price. I think that might make me a couple bucks.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2062012]If nobody ever made derogatory remarks about the businesses that support the forum so everybody can keep enjoying it free of charge. They pay the bills so you guys can have this. I don't know how to do it, but I wish we had a NASCAR culture here regarding sponsors. Because they do it, you guys would click on the banners and look at the products with an open mind.
Yeah scroguard is a little off the beaten path but we have close to 500,000 registered members now. Who knows how many might be looking at this thinking, "yeah, that makes sense" it's also latex, there might be some guys that would use it just for that.
I'm speaking to the minority here I know, but since you guys like the forum and get a benefit from it why don't we treat the people that actually lay down the cash to pay the bills with a little respect.
For what it's worth.
A2.[/QUOTE]I will have to agree with A2 about this in a couple of regards 1) not gratuitously knocking the advertisers who pay the bills for this 2) believing that there's probably a market for this product. I am probably not going to buy it. But the reality is I'm sure there are some guys who will. And, honestly, I can't think of a better place to advertise it or a market that's more likely to need it. Mock it as you might, you should know that a condom is not going to protect you against Herpes, while this most likely will. Honestly, there are women I've seen who I wish I'd been wearing one of these suckers, or quite possibly the whole-body rubber from Naked Gun.
[QUOTE=LilaBella;2061916]I'm not like any other woman you have ever encountered before. I'm mature, articulate and discreet. I'm the trure lady you won't be embarrassed to be seen with and have been waiting for. A fine bottle of wine and great conversation for starters. I'm a very petite blonde with remarkable blue eyes and a sassy personality. I enjoy being a premier provider of companionship, but with a twist of PSE. Don't let my tiny figure fool you. I am the classic beauty with sophistication you have been looking for. I have no tattoos and only two piercings: a dainty Monroe piercing and my navel is pierced.
513-806-7426.
[URL]www.lilabella.indyfiles.com[/URL
YChat lila. Bella77.[/QUOTE]Ok. When will you come to Memphis and get in front of my camera for some Glock Shots. I am ready. Sinful Dreams was up for it. What about it. I can afford what ever you want.
[QUOTE=Glockman;2062443]Ok. When will you come to Memphis and get in front of my camera for some Glock Shots. I am ready. Sinful Dreams was up for it. What about it. I can afford what ever you want.[/QUOTE]Glockman generosity. She runs 6/7 adds in different cities around Cincy. Southern hospitality can't beat it.
[QUOTE=Chateau;2061836]This is a "get laid" page. How about you send the numbers to people who ask or piss off. If you don't want to send them, don't post that you got them.
She's a street working girl, I see her daily so there's probably a pretty good chance she's going to get thrown in jail at some point anyways. Try this one on guys and in lieu HL if you want some action in Cov, just hang out by the gas station (u know which one I mean) and they will find you. I counted seven yesterday, including Mary.
Happy hunting.[/QUOTE]Well I can do what I want I've been on this site for a while I've given out plenty of numbers but I'm not going to do the work for some guy who's scared to go out on the streets, or who is to lazy to look for himself. I know nothing about people who just started posting and just because this girl is on the streets or drug addicted doesn't mean I should do my part by helping her get locked up or injured in some way. So I guess I'm going to have to piss off, because its guys like you that think they are better than other people, I don't wish jail on anybody unless they do something to deserve it and I don't think selling pussy is something a person needs to go to jail for. And I've bought pussy all over the greater Cincinnati area even in cov I don't need anybody to tell me where to get pussy. So Mr. Chateau I would appreciate if you handled the phone numbers you get the way you want, and I will handle the numbers I get the way I want, and since I am a full grown man I think that's something we should agree on. Be safe HL29. Oh and if you see her daily then you give her phone number out, newbies pm Mr Chateau for Sarah's number I'm sure he has it since s he sees her daily.
[QUOTE=UtrInOhio;2059060]We wish her luck and success!
You all know what a great girl she is...enjoy!
She is handling her ads, calls and appt setting.
Please do not ask us for her number!
She will post when she is ready.
Good luck baby girl.
Buddah;.[/QUOTE]My dream has come true! Cupcake may want to eventually go independent but for the summer at least we are keeping Cincinnati's Best Duo Together!
This was a team decision the 3 of us have made.
Sorry for the confusion. The blame is on me for premature posting!
Buddah.
[QUOTE=TNT101;2062542]Glockman generosity. She runs 6/7 adds in different cities around Cincy. Southern hospitality can't beat it.[/QUOTE]I've noticed that. But her photos are pretty good. I'm guessing they are taken by a pro. But they are not Glockshots. I like to think of my shots as being "tastefully explicit," as the photo of Cherry Pie Sara below demonstrates.
[QUOTE=Glockman;2063082]I've noticed that. But her photos are pretty good. I'm guessing they are taken by a pro. But they are not Glockshots. I like to think of my shots as being "tastefully explicit," as the photo of Cherry Pie Sara below demonstrates.[/QUOTE]Glockman shots are no doubt the best. Mercy and WOW!
And want to see just how fucking stupid people can be. Go check out the Detroit Backpage Advertisers thread.
Unfuckingbelievable.
A2.
[QUOTE=Bucks97;2062421]I will have to agree with A2 about this in a couple of regards 1) not gratuitously knocking the advertisers who pay the bills for this 2) believing that there's probably a market for this product. I am probably not going to buy it. But the reality is I'm sure there are some guys who will. And, honestly, I can't think of a better place to advertise it or a market that's more likely to need it. Mock it as you might, you should know that a condom is not going to protect you against Herpes, while this most likely will. Honestly, there are women I've seen who I wish I'd been wearing one of these suckers, or quite possibly the whole-body rubber from Naked Gun.[/QUOTE]There's guys that would fucking love a latex diaper that has a hole for their dick, are you kidding me? They might not talk about it, but I know some people are clicking through, and not just because they are worried about STD's.
From the intended use side? If I was married, rich, and liked to hobby with rough chicks, no question. I'd order a box. Here's the scenario, you got married young, now you have a pot full of assets, you still like the old lady enough but you're both bored with each other and you like car dates. So you bang suzie rotten crotch (no offence ladies) and a week later you're telling the old lady, "Sorry honey, that bundle of blisters there on my nut sack, or down at the base of my cock is herpes and you probably have it to." Say goodbye to a whole potful of money then.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2063247]There's guys that would fucking love a latex diaper that has a hole for their dick, are you kidding me? They might not talk about it, but I know some people are clicking through, and not just because they are worried about STD's.
From the intended use side? If I was married, rich, and liked to hobby with rough chicks, no question. I'd order a box. Here's the scenario, you got married young, now you have a pot full of assets, you still like the old lady enough but you're both bored with each other and you like car dates. So you bang suzie rotten crotch (no offence ladies) and a week later you're telling the old lady, "Sorry honey, that bundle of blisters there on my nut sack, or down at the base of my cock is herpes and you probably have it to." Say goodbye to a whole potful of money then.
A2.[/QUOTE]And, realistically, the world being full of widely varied fetish tastes, I am betting there's a market for guys who just want to wear the thing.
[QUOTE=TNT101;2063095]Glockman shots are no doubt the best. Mercy and WOW![/QUOTE]I thought were the lonesome dove. Patience is a good thing.
Can imagine the look on a provider's face seeing someone drop their drawers, watching the plastic tube grow out with flashing caution lights. Parts of me want to fuck ya but they certainly don't want to touch ya. If it's selling product that's all that matters.
Glockman, are all these shots from Tennessee? That last one is what Clint Eastwood did for western movies.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2063238]And want to see just how fucking stupid people can be. Go check out the Detroit Backpage Advertisers thread.
Unfuckingbelievable.
A2.[/QUOTE]
Damn plumbers, futtin up shit all the time. I did like some of those provider's ads from Detroit rock city.
[QUOTE=NKY747;2063641]Glockman, are all these shots from Tennessee? That last one is what Clint Eastwood did for western movies.[/QUOTE]Unless specified, they are all from Memphis. Here are two more from Cherry Pie Sara, one where is she about to extract a DNA sample.
Are my hero.
[B][U]By the way, my current count of sisters is doubles 5 times and three once[/U][/B]
A2.
I bow to the master.
[QUOTE=FunkyFun25;2064182]Are my hero.
[B][U]By the way, my current count of sisters is doubles 5 times and three once[/U][/B]
A2.
I bow to the master.[/QUOTE]No one wants to hear how fucking lucky you are, Braggart! LOL, jk! What do you have a 4-Leaf Clover tattooed to your nutsack or something? You have to be one of the luckiest fuckers I've ever heard of. Well done! --sa007.
[QUOTE=FunkyFun25;2064182]Are my hero.
[B][U]By the way, my current count of sisters is doubles 5 times and three once[/U][/B]
A2.
I bow to the master.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SecretAgent007;2064204]No one wants to hear how fucking lucky you are, Braggart! LOL, jk! What do you have a 4-Leaf Clover tattooed to your nutsack or something? You have to be one of the luckiest fuckers I've ever heard of. Well done! --sa007.[/QUOTE]I still want to do bisexual identical twin 22 year old barbie dolls. Yeah it's sick as fuck but to be a little trite, that's how I roll.
You guys should check out Motor City Mayhem in Detroit. A2 is kicking ass and taking names. There is also a bit of a conundrum happening. We have a forum first. Apparently some chick that's really fucking good created an alias group to defend herself and try to drum up business. That's never happened before. Every other chick that ever did that was really terrible at the job.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064229]I still want to do bisexual identical twin 22 year old barbie dolls. Yeah it's sick as fuck but to be a little trite, that's how I roll.
You guys should check out Motor City Mayhem in Detroit. A2 is kicking ass and taking names. There is also a bit of a conundrum happening. We have a forum first. Apparently some chick that's really fucking good created an alias group to defend herself and try to drum up business. That's never happened before. Every other chick that ever did that was really terrible at the job.[/QUOTE]If the twin thing is sick, then I've got the same illness cause its on the top of my bucket list.
[QUOTE=FunkyFun25;2064239]If the twin thing is sick, then I've got the same illness cause its on the top of my bucket list.[/QUOTE]I've done twins that did me. I want twins that do each other as well. That's the sick part.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064246]I've done twins that did me. I want twins that do each other as well. That's the sick part.[/QUOTE]Oh that's exactly what I want. I actually knew a pair of bi twins but I was never able to work it out with them.
[BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE]
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]Ok I may be new here but not to forums as a whole, and I can't think of any place at all where shit like that is allowed to fly, you've handled it beautifully so far without being rash.
With what little my opinion is worth now I applaud your quick action.
First and most important you are the one responsible for maintaining, and we the mongers and ladies who use this board have to succeed to your rules or find another board. As the person charged with making the rules and enforcement you must exercise the power necessary to maintain that control. Look, you are not going to have us all standing up in applause, but you have to call it as you see it, and then enforce it.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]First off, I think you were well within your rights and responsibilities as admin.
If you let people do as they please on here and not follow the rules, this site will go down in flams eventualy.
Whe someone is told specificlly not to do something, and they do it, daring you to carry out your end, you have to respond or end up looking like a pansie ass.
Now as far as being a dick, I'm sure there will be some that think so, but you can't please everybody.
And are you a "power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur", well I'll reserve judgement on that until some day when we may meet. Hard to tell without getting to know you.
Keep up the good work!
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I think you did the right thing. If you didn't keep the board in line, everyone would be taking advantage and doing things they shouldn't. You gave more than a warning with the very first post. You are the boss and people shouldn't undermine you just because.
I don't think you're on a power rush or anything. The thing that differentiates this board from some of the crap board like NR is the moderation and time you put in to keep it reasonably clean. If a provider is masquerading as a monger she needs to be booted. If she is working really closely with a "regular member" who is new with just a few posts he should be booted as well. I would cut a Sr. Member a little slack with a warning or two. The threat of going back to moderation should straighten him out.
For those of you who don't know, A2 is the ALL POWERFUL and sits in COMMAND CENTRAL which is a large room with about 15 large screens scrolling each post as it is entered into the system. He has his keyboard in the middle with a KILL button on his left and a BLUE TYPE key on his right. There is a dedicated computer that matches each IP address with the user name to assure we don't have rogue posters. Actually, there are 16 screens but the 72" screen in the middle is dedicated to porn. -- Just kidding. A2 is a dedicated moderator who sits in a more modest setting and just works his ass off for all of us "users." The most impressive part of his office is the stripper pole that is located nearby. This co-location is on purpose so he can continue to moderate the boards while the stripper parties are in full-on action.
Thank A2 .
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]
Work backwards on this.
Independent of why, in your role as site admin, you made a field call. No comments / post / whines about this particular provider. You were clear in the consequences. Once gets a warning, twice gets moderation. Then some guy comes along and pretty much overtly says "F**k you". Not once but twice. That's pretty much saying "I dare you" to moderate me. Personally, moderation is probably a light sentence for this one since you probably framed up the punishment for inadvertent mentions. Not purposeful like this. But whatever, moderate that boy.
As to the death sentence, it goes to intent. Doesn't matter if she gives the best or worst BBBJ in town, this board is about playing it straight and posting as a monger for any reason is off limits.
So I'd say you're two for two on this one. No dick moves here in my book.
Separately, I appreciate that you (in your all powerful blue A2 font) feel comfortable in here asking for advice on something like this. A true "PMNFC w / DoG" would never consider the possibility that this might be a dick move and that fact that you look to us as a sounding board is a great comment on the fact that we might actually be a sane group. Note that I said "might". LOL.
Have a great day.
Dz.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I value your discretion in keeping the board honest from the providers to the members. We depend on the posts here being accurate and honest and, I for one, appreciate calling a liar a liar and banning them. This "Meleah" character has got to go. Teeth and all.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
[/BLUE][/QUOTE]Your playground, your rules.
Take your ball and go home.
I'm a big believer in crowd sourcing. Any large group will always be more correct than any one expert. It's a fine line we walk here. Obviously the forum is for the use of the community. If the community isn't engaged it goes away. At the same time we have to pull some semblance of order from the chaos (especially in a free vs paid subscription model) I don't want to lean to heavy into being the 'rules' guy either.
Of course I would involve you guys. This was the first fight club and you guys understand more than anybody that on this thread I'm just another asshole and you can tell me I was wrong. I place enormous value in the opinions of the mongers in my beloved adopted city.
Thanks,
A2.
[QUOTE=JohnGalt10;2064674]I think the board works well with your rules. Is it true you command drones that see all?[/QUOTE]I'm not at liberty to comment on this issue.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064279][BLUE]In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult)
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I think the board works well with your rules. Is it true you command drones that see all?
In another city I discovered a provider that had 7 aliases where she was posting as a monger to solicit business. Per forum SOP I pronounced the death sentence on the chick. Nobody was allowed to post reviews about her. I specifically warned the seniors that if somebody did it once I would warn them, if they did it twice I would put them back on moderation. Some guy (long time member) who liked this chick decided to give me a big fuck you and the next two posts in the thread immediately following mine, were from the same guy saying I shouldn't do this and she's a good provider.
In other words, I said "don't do it twice" and he said, "ok, here's two times." So I put him on moderation.
Since you guys don't have a dog in the fight what say you? Should I not deny the benefit of the forum to chicks that make fake profiles and post as mongers? Should I not prohibit guys from writing reviews about chicks that do that? Was putting that guy back on moderation a dick move? Even though this is written in blue, if you think I was a power mad nazi faggot cocksucker with delusions of grandeur you can say that. (that's my most commonly received insult).
Your responses will weigh heavily in how we go forward on this issue forum wide.
O matter our personal.
A2.
I think we do have a dog in the fight. Rules are made for a reason it makes for a somewhat even playing field. Ultimately you have final say in what is and what is not allowed. When one breaks the rules even after being told twice there needs to be ramifications. It is what makes us all safer here. IMHO there is no room for this type of behavior here. Like has been said its your playground we have permission to play here as long as we do it by the book. No different than any other pastime we may partake in. I like a tight ship!
[QUOTE=TheGoodSh;2064704]Large groups are almost always wrong, over time. Not all experts are created equally, of course. But in general, by this logic, all the great leaders and thinkers of our species count for less than the mass of idiot sheep.
Large groups are horrible at making intelligent choices. Why do basic human rights take so long to systematize, even in a representative republic? Why do we not just have a strict democracy in this country (US)? Because rule by strict majority (the "largest group knows best" mentality) is not just or right.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.ics.uci.edu/~qliu1/MLcrowd_ICML_workshop/Papers/ActivePaper4.pdf[/URL]
This guy has math and shit saying why.
Seriously, with respect, I disagree. The forum is a community, when the issue is "what's best for the community" then the collective wisdom has to be better than the few, with the exception of The One who is known as Jackson. There is some stuff we do by decree but at other times I think respecting the wishes of the membership is a good idea. The difficult part is threading the needle between the two.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2064677]I'm not at liberty to comment on this issue.[/QUOTE]Explain how his post 3012 appeared before post 3013 posted which it quotes, just proof that A2 has powers to see what you are thinking. a2 is modest but commands exceptional powers
So the balance of comments were to ban the chicks user group but not to disallow discussion about her. So I decided to reverse myself. Even though the actions of the guy were most certainly a big fuck you admin, had I not made my original decision then it would have never happened, so I got to accept responsibility for the whole tree after my first choice. I took him back off of moderation.
A2.