[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3624425]Where you fly out of, guessing Charlotte? Whats a round trip ticket cost?[/QUOTE]I try to fly out of LA when I can. I have seen rates as low as 800 out of Charlotte. Lots of time I run one way, with a prepaid ticket to Phnom Penh as my exit out...gives flexibility in visa...
[QUOTE=FrankDallas;3624754]I try to fly out of LA when I can. I have seen rates as low as 800 out of Charlotte. Lots of time I run one way, with a prepaid ticket to Phnom Penh as my exit out...gives flexibility in visa...[/QUOTE]Yeah seems most are running 800 and up. The cheapest I saw was new york offering 627 for flexible travelers.
[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3625105]Yeah seems most are running 800 and up. The cheapest I saw was new york offering 627 for flexible travelers.[/QUOTE]With the current visa scene, for me, it's 6 of one half dozen of the other if I go one way or RT. You get 30 days on arrival, but you need to show an exit (well supposedly, they have never asked me). So if I want to stay 90 days, I just run toImmigration and get my 30 days extended to 60, change my outbound to Pp to day 59, make a reservation back to here for day 89, then run to Pp on day 59 and come back in.
So this is a fun post opposed to an informative one but just something I thought about that might make you laugh when you show up for your next appointment. Anyways I have started to wonder if there is a correlation between attraction and chemistry and sex positions offered? Look at it this way, in my experience CG has almost been a unicorn. Most girls will tell you that it's not on the menu or there is an upsell for it before you even apply the cover, but why is that? On the flip side if we had a dollar for every time a girl immediately goes to the doggy position at the end of the bed after applying the cover then most likely our hobbying would pay for itself LOL. In all seriousness, I have begun to look at the hobby and our dreams as follows.
Doggy. There is little to no mutual attraction for one or both parties involved in the act. She's either disgusted that you showed up and she would never ever dream of having sex with you inside or outside of her job. She wants as little intimacy as possible and wants you to finish as soon as possible and this position is the fastest way to completion for everyone involved. On the flip side she is not what you expected and instead of starting your search again you choose to stay and again want to finish as quickly as possible with minimal contact and intimacy. I would not recommend or repeat with a girl if our session went like this.
Missionary. This is the most common and standard position that has ever been invented. I would consider this normal, neutral, or indifferent. If the provider offers mish then she probably isn't necessarily attracted to you nor is she is repulsed. You most likely fit the bill of what she has expected a client to be and from our side of things if she isn't the girl in the pics she is close enough or just as attractive. Usually this is an average to good session. Depending on the level of YMMV I may or may not repeat.
Cowgirl And More. She is either definitely a pros pro or there is some level of attraction beyond the transaction. She is relieved to see you at the door and you are someone that she surely wants to fuck and she sincerely wants to enjoy it. There's a possibility that under different circumstances and meeting another way that you wouldn't have to pay at all. She likes you as a person and enjoys having sex with you and wants you to repeat or become a regular. This position requires the most effort and focus on her part so it requires that some sort of intangible be present other than the donation. This girl is a keeper and a potential ATF candidate.
What do you guys think about my theory?
I definitely agree with you about doggie. Minimizes interaction for the lady, and for the hobbyist if the gal is not so much to his liking.
As far as CG, I think there is one other factor to consider in addition to what you mentioned. In CG the lady can control speed, depth of penetration, etc. So I think sometimes the lady liking CG is less about how she feels about you and more about liking to be in control of the action.
[QUOTE=Jlart123;3627282]So this is a fun post opposed to an informative one but just something I thought about that might make you laugh when you show up for your next appointment. Anyways I have started to wonder if there is a correlation between attraction and chemistry and sex positions offered? Look at it this way, in my experience CG has almost been a unicorn. Most girls will tell you that it's not on the menu or there is an upsell for it before you even apply the cover, but why is that? On the flip side if we had a dollar for every time a girl immediately goes to the doggy position at the end of the bed after applying the cover then most likely our hobbying would pay for itself LOL. In all seriousness, I have begun to look at the hobby and our dreams as follows.
Doggy. There is little to no mutual attraction for one or both parties involved in the act. She's either disgusted that you showed up and she would never ever dream of having sex with you inside or outside of her job. She wants as little intimacy as possible and wants you to finish as soon as possible and this position is the fastest way to completion for everyone involved. On the flip side she is not what you expected and instead of starting your search again you choose to stay and again want to finish as quickly as possible with minimal contact and intimacy. I would not recommend or repeat with a girl if our session went like this.
Missionary. This is the most common and standard position that has ever been invented. I would consider this normal, neutral, or indifferent. If the provider offers mish then she probably isn't necessarily attracted to you nor is she is repulsed. You most likely fit the bill of what she has expected a client to be and from our side of things if she isn't the girl in the pics she is close enough or just as attractive. Usually this is an average to good session. Depending on the level of YMMV I may or may not repeat.
Cowgirl And More. She is either definitely a pros pro or there is some level of attraction beyond the transaction. She is relieved to see you at the door and you are someone that she surely wants to fuck and she sincerely wants to enjoy it. There's a possibility that under different circumstances and meeting another way that you wouldn't have to pay at all. She likes you as a person and enjoys having sex with you and wants you to repeat or become a regular. This position requires the most effort and focus on her part so it requires that some sort of intangible be present other than the donation. This girl is a keeper and a potential ATF candidate.
What do you guys think about my theory?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jlart123;3627282]So this is a fun post opposed to an informative one but just something I thought about that might make you laugh when you show up for your next appointment. Anyways I have started to wonder if there is a correlation between attraction and chemistry and sex positions offered? Look at it this way, in my experience CG has almost been a unicorn. Most girls will tell you that it's not on the menu or there is an upsell for it before you even apply the cover, but why is that? On the flip side if we had a dollar for every time a girl immediately goes to the doggy position at the end of the bed after applying the cover then most likely our hobbying would pay for itself LOL. In all seriousness, I have begun to look at the hobby and our dreams as follows.
Doggy. There is little to no mutual attraction for one or both parties involved in the act. She's either disgusted that you showed up and she would never ever dream of having sex with you inside or outside of her job. She wants as little intimacy as possible and wants you to finish as soon as possible and this position is the fastest way to completion for everyone involved. On the flip side she is not what you expected and instead of starting your search again you choose to stay and again want to finish as quickly as possible with minimal contact and intimacy. I would not recommend or repeat with a girl if our session went like this.
Missionary. This is the most common and standard position that has ever been invented. I would consider this normal, neutral, or indifferent. If the provider offers mish then she probably isn't necessarily attracted to you nor is she is repulsed. You most likely fit the bill of what she has expected a client to be and from our side of things if she isn't the girl in the pics she is close enough or just as attractive. Usually this is an average to good session. Depending on the level of YMMV I may or may not repeat.
Cowgirl And More. She is either definitely a pros pro or there is some level of attraction beyond the transaction. She is relieved to see you at the door and you are someone that she surely wants to fuck and she sincerely wants to enjoy it. There's a possibility that under different circumstances and meeting another way that you wouldn't have to pay at all. She likes you as a person and enjoys having sex with you and wants you to repeat or become a regular. This position requires the most effort and focus on her part so it requires that some sort of intangible be present other than the donation. This girl is a keeper and a potential ATF candidate.
What do you guys think about my theory?[/QUOTE]For most men, at least those who have significant others, this is a get-my-balls-off transaction. I prefer doggy; I like the look of ass, it is very porn-like, and it makes me cum faster. I'm not looking to: gaze into her eyes" FFS. If you are confusing paid pussy with emotional attraction, you need to reexamine your strategy in life. No offense.
I am a slow learner to new gadgets and new means of social media. As places like BP, EROS, EroticReviews, etc get shutdown new avenues pop up. I understand that Twitter is becoming a preferred replacement. How are some of you using it? I understand that your favorite girl might have an account and tweet when she's going to be in town. I'm more interested if there are areas where you can search a city or town for providers, especially UTR types.
[QUOTE]Looks like Mia is back in town. If you don't know about her, stay away. Unless you like getting ripped off. She's not full service but advertises as if she is.
[URL]http://raleigh.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/505-303-2339/54445902[/URL][/QUOTE]This quote is from the BP review thread. Every time I see a review that starts with "Despite her bad reviews I thought I would give her a shot. Should have stayed home. " I want to reach through the internet and choke the guy out. Yet I'm still seeing the usual suspects posting ads regularly. Somebody has to be feeding these sorry providers money. We need to vote with our wallets and show them we'd rather have no experience rather than a terrible experience. Ok rant over.
[QUOTE=LookinGood;3639822]This quote is from the BP review thread. Every time I see a review that starts with "Despite her bad reviews I thought I would give her a shot. Should have stayed home. " I want to reach through the internet and choke the guy out. Yet I'm still seeing the usual suspects posting ads regularly. Somebody has to be feeding these sorry providers money. We need to vote with our wallets and show them we'd rather have no experience rather than a terrible experience. Ok rant over.[/QUOTE]Good luck with that cause you should know by know guys think with the little head and no matter how bad the service will always try again no matter how bad the review.
So looking through backpage it's becoming more common than not that I don't find a single provider who I am attracted to, with the exception of the TGTBT photos. I'm starting to wonder if I need to be exploring the world of larger chicks. Every time I consider pulling the plug I think to myself, that I should be able to get a fat chick to fuck me for free.
[quote=joelooking;3651080]so looking through backpage it's becoming more common than not that i don't find a single provider who i am attracted to, with the exception of the tgtbt photos. I'm starting to wonder if i need to be exploring the world of larger chicks. Every time i consider pulling the plug i think to myself, that i should be able to get a fat chick to fuck me for free.[/quote]rofl
[QUOTE=JoeLooking;3651080]So looking through backpage it's becoming more common than not that I don't find a single provider who I am attracted to, with the exception of the TGTBT photos. I'm starting to wonder if I need to be exploring the world of larger chicks. Every time I consider pulling the plug I think to myself, that I should be able to get a fat chick to fuck me for free.[/QUOTE]You know, the TGTBT postings have gone through the roof in recent weeks. I'm starting to think scammers / spammers have figured out that BP requiring social media links to post means a new way to suck people in via Instagram / etc.
I have already gotten some Snapchat scams on CL so it's in the realm of possibility.
[QUOTE=Amateur11;3655506]You know, the TGTBT postings have gone through the roof in recent weeks. I'm starting to think scammers / spammers have figured out that BP requiring social media links to post means a new way to suck people in via Instagram / etc.
I have already gotten some Snapchat scams on CL so it's in the realm of possibility.[/QUOTE]'Tis the hollidays season; 3 things four sure.
1. Everyone wants more for their buck (us wanting the picture to be truthful) Busty my ass more like big mamma's house.
2. Where there's cash you will find scammers lurking for dudes thinking with the little head.
3. Scammers and bullshitters are in full swing through the holidays because they know guys have that Christmas Cash in their pockets with vacation time to burn so they bait the web and see who will bite.
So the moral of the story is be a smart shopper. Happy Shopping!
[QUOTE=XHippie;3655767]'Tis the hollidays season; 3 things four sure.
1. Everyone wants more for their buck (us wanting the picture to be truthful) Busty my ass more like big mamma's house.
2. Where there's cash you will find scammers lurking for dudes thinking with the little head.
3. Scammers and bullshitters are in full swing through the holidays because they know guys have that Christmas Cash in their pockets with vacation time to burn so they bait the web and see who will bite.
So the moral of the story is be a smart shopper. Happy Shopping![/QUOTE]Yeah but I guess where I was going with that is 1) all the strippers / hookers / pimps are on social media, especially IG, of course FB and now moreso SC. 2) BP started requiring SM links before posting ads 2 or 3 months ago. 3) The TGTBT ads have skyrocketed in just the last 2 weeks. Conclusion? What a great way to boost your SM followers and then suck them in with pics+paypal+google wallet scams. No meetup required for the heist!
This is not the same as "holiday TGTBT" increased traffic. This is a different and new kind of traffic and it dovetails with social media and BP specifically. In light of the new requirements. Not a coincidence.
For over a decade, I've found that you get a LOT more traffic this time of year due to the holidays. And it's been filled with mostly LEGIT traffic. LOTS of single moms needing Christmas, etc. This year the LEGIT traffic from what I see is at a record low, but what appears to be SCAM traffic. And in a new BP SM format, is out of control.
Many of you may know this, some may not. Anytime you saw an ad in the past that said things like "No Blacks", "No Black Under xx Age", "No Mixed Races", "Caucasian Only", "No Hispanics", "No Men Under / Over xx Age", these were very important indicators. Many women who say "No Blacks", would actually see black men all day, they simply used the statements to stand out as being legit. These statements did NOT guarantee that the pics were real, they did NOT guarantee that you were safe from being robbed and they certainly did not indicate the level of service you would be getting. However, these statements DID indicate one very important thing. The ad was NOT placed by an Uncle. Uncle's can NOT, under any circumstance make such statements that target or exclude specific races or ethnicity's in a sting a attempt! Therefore, I always took note to the more experienced ladies who knew this and I took them at least as being legit. I can not help but to think that State and Federal Uncles have put pressure on websites to eliminate the ladies' ability to type messages in their ads. It really wreaks havoc on guys trying to sniff out Uncle troubles. Anyways, if the ladies would wisen up and insert a photo with specific lines of text in them, they would fare much better IMHO. I hope more ladies catch on.