Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=NintyNine;6005448]We have to be skeptical of these $320 girls nowadays. Might as well sit it out.

With inflation and possible recession, these agencies will have to drop prices eventually.[/QUOTE]Is it just me or does LA attract a lot of "free agent" types? Girls that come here and have no desire to make it work with any one org, or multiple orgs since this is a MBPG market. I understand that bills must be paid, and slow business doesn't help. But with CG especially, I'm never surprised to see a girl pop up and leave within days of each other.

A great exception to this observation would be Dana SFK. Been in LA for a whole damn year. And unless I'm mistaken, never booked through another org. Funny thing is I remember when OG Hana made 300 a thing. Then 9 months later Dana pushes it to 320. And here we are.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6005589]I've said it before that if they are $320 off the bat all inclusive, they are either on the older stock or on the bigger side. It's usually a combo of both so they know they can't demand a premium and hence charge accordingly. I haven't heard of a recent report of someone hitting the jackpot lately. If they did, it's on the DL. Time will tell if the agencies will actually adjust. They got really greedy in the past years. It's a mind boggling 44% increase in the past 2-3 years in terms of rate increase. I'm sure as hell don't see them employing those hot ass girls like in this video to justify the extra charge.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNoAL5Exarw[/URL][/QUOTE]Meanwhile the Bay only increased 18% during this time span. 220 then, 260 now.

[QUOTE=GooseMan2792;6003534]Just moved over to LA, contacted the booker for a few of the sites mentioned on here and they are asking for a ton of screening information since I don't have references, that I am not comfortable sharing, like my full ID, paystubs or work verification, copy of mail with my current address, etc.

Is this typical for screening / client verification? I feel like providing all this info is just asking for my identity to be stolen or to be blackmailed.[/QUOTE]Yes it is typical in the current times. It was more laxed, if you can call it that, pre-COVID. Blackmail and identify theft are the potential consequences (skin in the game so to speak) for access. Move on if you don't like how the scales tilt.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;6005589]I've said it before that if they are $320 off the bat all inclusive, they are either on the older stock or on the bigger side. It's usually a combo of both so they know they can't demand a premium and hence charge accordingly. I haven't heard of a recent report of someone hitting the jackpot lately. If they did, it's on the DL. Time will tell if the agencies will actually adjust. They got really greedy in the past years. It's a mind boggling 44% increase in the past 2-3 years in terms of rate increase. I'm sure as hell don't see them employing those hot ass girls like in this video to justify the extra charge.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNoAL5Exarw[/URL][/QUOTE]I'll start out by saying I don't like price increases either. And some of the changes in recent years are hard to stomach.

But I also realize it's not a one-sided affair and tried to look at it holistically. The overhead that comes with the operation of a kgirl business and the logistics cost associated with bringing the girls here all affect a portion of the final price charged to mongers. Therefore, regardless of the legality of it all, it is in fact a bona fide business. Of which, business fundamentals can be applied to. More importantly, the forces that affect such fundamentals can help determine how appropriate and fair the hikes in price has been. As a baseline, I have set $250 (the average hour price between LA and OC) as the baseline cost for 2012. Using any CPI-benchmarked inflation calculator, it'll spit out a range between $300-320 in buying power as of 2022.

I just see the rapid increase in recent years as more of a market correction to keep abreast of historic inflation levels. Ideally, commensurate COL adjustments at work should be helping to absorb inflation here and everywhere else. But you know how that goes. I won't go into whether BB should be included in the base price or as an upcharge as it's too contentious a topic and doesn't apply to the point I'm making here.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6003595]Anyone care to speculate on why Dia / Maisie CG (formerly Ella LKS) went down to 320 all inclusive?[/QUOTE]Competition, plain and simple. I've touched on how the amount of kgirls has rebounded to CV-era levels in a previous post. While there's no way for me to determine if the monger pool has changed, you can infer by this change that the amount of mongers may not be adequate to provide the demand necessary to satisfy the supply of kgirls available. One of the tried and true tactics to attract customers is the good old price drop. To be clear, certain girls may be fine with the low to average volume of customers they are seeing and won't change anything but hopefully more are like Ella / Maisie / Dia / Dahya and will follow suit. I see this as a good change from my perspective as a monger.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6003595]Anyone care to speculate on why Dia / Maisie CG (formerly Ella LKS) went down to 320 all inclusive?[/QUOTE]I've meaning to see this girl but with decrease in entry, finally pulled the trigger! She is amazing! She's tiny just how I like and pretty tight box! Exploded real hard and deep! Nice attitude but definitely left 10 minutes early. No initiation of 2nd round offered but I'm just a 1 rounder.

It's typical now for newbie. I think you can join Humaniplex and bang a few girls to level up then contact the bookers on Humaniplex for Kgirls. There are HX girls worth seeing and you shouldn't have to see old fat girls to level up. You shouldn't need to provide references if you saw enough HX girls or at least level 1. I never had and will retire if bookers ask me for such info.

[QUOTE=GooseMan2792;6003534]Just moved over to LA, contacted the booker for a few of the sites mentioned on here and they are asking for a ton of screening information since I don't have references, that I am not comfortable sharing, like my full ID, paystubs or work verification, copy of mail with my current address, etc.

Is this typical for screening / client verification? I feel like providing all this info is just asking for my identity to be stolen or to be blackmailed.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6005820]Competition, plain and simple. I've touched on how the amount of kgirls has rebounded to CV-era levels in a previous post. While there's no way for me to determine if the monger pool has changed, you can infer by this change that the amount of mongers may not be adequate to provide the demand necessary to satisfy the supply of kgirls available. One of the tried and true tactics to attract customers is the good old price drop. To be clear, certain girls may be fine with the low to average volume of customers they are seeing and won't change anything but hopefully more are like Ella / Maisie / Dia / Dahya and will follow suit. I see this as a good change from my perspective as a monger.[/QUOTE]Agreed. Perhaps Ella et al's new found success will influence others. Time will tell.

LA attracts a lot of "rebrand" types. You think a girl is leaving when they may just rebrand or change org. I think the problem is they are not hot enough or not good enough as pleaser. The OGs love pleaser and will write tons of reviews for them. Some younger inexperienced girls also may not be able to handle LA load. Some were upset cause I made them too busy.

There are girls worth seeing but if nobody write good reviews for them then how would others know to try them? There were many more reviews in the old days.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6005696]Is it just me or does LA attract a lot of "free agent" types? Girls that come here and have no desire to make it work with any one org, or multiple orgs since this is a MBPG market. I understand that bills must be paid, and slow business doesn't help. But with CG especially, I'm never surprised to see a girl pop up and leave within days of each other.

A great exception to this observation would be Dana SFK. Been in LA for a whole damn year. And unless I'm mistaken, never booked through another org. Funny thing is I remember when OG Hana made 300 a thing. Then 9 months later Dana pushes it to 320. And here we are.[/QUOTE]

I think the boss reuses Jackpot's pics. I notice some girls using other girl pics before. I am just waiting for 7/9 to put SAG IB and SAG Lisa2 in rebrand thread. I believe they will offer Greek for extra.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6005572]Lisa's pics were use by girl named Jackpot.

At Peach. Cafe / Alpacas in the bay.

Reviews weren't terribly good iirc. She wasn't even BB when she started there three years ago or so.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CreamFire;6005819]I've meaning to see this girl but with decrease in entry, finally pulled the trigger! She is amazing! She's tiny just how I like and pretty tight box! Exploded real hard and deep! Nice attitude but definitely left 10 minutes early. No initiation of 2nd round offered but I'm just a 1 rounder.[/QUOTE]Going to wait until she allows three shots, have other girls to visit in the meantime.

[QUOTE=Member#2210;6001658]5'1, 101 lbs, 34C. Anyone seen her yet? Searched in the ReBrand thread but nothing came up. TIA for any info.

https://myalbum.com/album/Yb77hNMuHTjK.......[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen Yuri Yet?

I can not afford to TOFT because the funds are limited, she seems to have a very generic stats like 5' ish, 100 lbs ish and C ish. Way too typical.

But her pictures does look cute but also look professionally shopped.

Please share your review, thanks.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6005858]LA attracts a lot of "rebrand" types. You think a girl is leaving when they may just rebrand or change org. I think the problem is they are not hot enough or not good enough as pleaser. The OGs love pleaser and will write tons of reviews for them. Some younger inexperienced girls also may not be able to handle LA load. Some were upset cause I made them too busy.

There are girls worth seeing but if nobody write good reviews for them then how would others know to try them? There were many more reviews in the old days.[/QUOTE]Bookers know to rebrand. It's not the girls. They know we fall for new listings every 3 weeks and it prevents us from keeping information and tabs on the ones that may not be a good value.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6005964]Has anyone seen Yuri Yet?

I can not afford to TOFT because the funds are limited, she seems to have a very generic stats like 5' ish, 100 lbs ish and C ish. Way too typical.

But her pictures does look cute but also look professionally shopped.

Please share your review, thanks.[/QUOTE]Don't sell yourself short my guy. If you could afford to see a girl with 5 glowing reviews, you could afford to see her with no reviews.

But don't listen to me, I'm just reminiscing on the days when dudes would swordfight to TOFTT in M's stable.

[QUOTE=DashingD;6005595]Anyone seen Miso or have info?

One of her pics from asianvibe and garden secret looks familiar like an old cakdoll girl.[/QUOTE]Just google the archive, and Ctrl+F her. She's been extensively reviewed here. But I did see her recently; not good. Dyed blonde hair, same length with two tacky chest tattoos. Service was not as good, and she pinned me in Mish saying it was too painful. Think I might be done with her.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6005807]I'll start out by saying I don't like price increases either. And some of the changes in recent years are hard to stomach.

But I also realize it's not a one-sided affair and tried to look at it holistically. The overhead that comes with the operation of a kgirl business and the logistics cost associated with bringing the girls here all affect a portion of the final price charged to mongers. Therefore, regardless of the legality of it all, it is in fact a bona fide business. Of which, business fundamentals can be applied to. More importantly, the forces that affect such fundamentals can help determine how appropriate and fair the hikes in price has been. As a baseline, I have set $250 (the average hour price between LA and OC) as the baseline cost for 2012. Using any CPI-benchmarked inflation calculator, it'll spit out a range between $300-320 in buying power as of 2022.

I just see the rapid increase in recent years as more of a market correction to keep abreast of historic inflation levels. Ideally, commensurate COL adjustments at work should be helping to absorb inflation here and everywhere else. But you know how that goes. I won't go into whether BB should be included in the base price or as an upcharge as it's too contentious a topic and doesn't apply to the point I'm making here.[/QUOTE]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6006134]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation.[/QUOTE]My morning brain read this as cip inflation LOL.

SFK- [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL].

Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

Kbliss- [URL]https://kbliss.net[/URL].

Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;6003548]Do you have proof?

I am Asian, and born 1980, and there is no fucking way she is only 4 years old than me. I can tell, because I'm Asian.

1966 I would believe.

Famous Rebecca was probably born 1976, and Pepsi is a lot older in the face.[/QUOTE]Pepsi is Dragon Chinese year. So she will be born 1964 not 1966. I don't think her is 58.1976 seem more right.

Looks like CG finally added another PO x0211. Either that or it's still just the one but double-fisting like it was last call for happy hour.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6006964]Looks like CG finally added another PO x0211. Either that or it's still just the one but double-fisting like it was last call for happy hour.[/QUOTE]It's interesting that they separate it into iphone and android users. Still, I'm impressed that Sophia was able to handle such a large roster while providing prompt back and forth communication. Hopefully, the new PO (if it is someone else), maintains the same standard.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6005737]Meanwhile the Bay only increased 18% during this time span. 220 then, 260 now.[/QUOTE]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6006134]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.[/QUOTE]I'm merely arguing that the kgirl model is just like any other business bowing down to the pressure of inflation. Based on that premise, the rates we're seeing today falls in line with an inflation adjusted price point. Regardless of what you think about the price point, I'm just offering an explanation that's both plausible and reasonable.

Attributing price increases to only supply / demand dynamics oversimplifies and takes a lot of nuance away IMO. By that logic, the few years following FOSTA / SESTA and preceding COVID should have seen a massive surge in price as kgirl numbers dwindled and tapered off. Only when COVID was in full force and inflation started to rise dramatically, did we see increases across all agencies. Don't get me wrong, supply / demand plays a huge part but inflation has a sizeable role too.

I'll make the case that inflation is built into the rates already. CPI, the government's measure of inflation as experienced by consumers, comprises of many market baskets. Three of which is directly applicable our situation: Shelter, Housing Supplies, and Transportation (specifically the Motor Fuel subset). I'm not sure if you've ever had the unfortunate and very awkward experience of being at an incall when they are restocking. For one thing, it's unexpected. Secondly, it's jarring how the ajummas are rather nonchalant about the whole thing. I was pretty much ignored while they were hauling up and unloading Kirkland body wash, water bottles, boxes of Okamotos, and other toiletries from a mini-van. I share this as it relates to the Housing Supplies market basket portion of the CPI. All three baskets have been hit hard during COVID. So when property management comes back when your incall lease ends with a take or leave it 10% or more increase in rent, all manner of housing supplies cost more, and fuel prices are at an all time high, the increase in overhead has to go somewhere. The bosses could be feeling charitable and take less of the profit and absorb the cost but that is incredibly unlikely. So the portion the house takes to cover these expenses increase. Consequently, the rate as a whole increases. I would imagine even durable goods (beds, mattress, mirrors, towels, etc.) would be factored in.

Now these are just observations and musings of a random monger and may or may not accurately reflect what is really is happening. I'm just connecting the dots of what I see of the scene, my buying experiences, and publicly available data points about the current economy. This could be very much be utterly useless and worth jack shit to some but I hope that others can appreciate a better understanding of or at least an approximation of the what may be happening behind the scene. Personally, I find it satisfying when I can piece together a puzzle that makes sense to me even if I'm completely wrong about it. Take of it what you will.

[QUOTE=JoyTraveller;6006744]SFK- [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL].

Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

Kbliss- [URL]https://kbliss.net[/URL].

Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.[/QUOTE]Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?

[QUOTE=GardenBae;6008202]Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?[/QUOTE]It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.

I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.

New org entry and I read reporting on another chat. The tattoo art covering many parts of her body was new to find on an rather skinny Asian provider. If you fantasize Anime girls, her looks will not disappoint. Her service is so so. She does not enjoy well endowed man. I was not disappointed but the rather high price did not match expectations. It was like being with a girl who is part of the Yakuza. Interesting experience. Recommend for Anime fans.

Remi is another provider I am trying to see with this booker. Timing was not my friend for Remi, Yara was recommended by the booker. This lower price comforts my chance in seeing someone with low reviews. Pleasantly surprised with Yara and our DFK fest led to a passionate experience. There was action from the minute we entered her room. I had to pee and did not realize her restroom was located just outside the room. She escorted me and wiped me clean after. Girls should Escort us more often. Her pleasing attitude continued and she gave me a naughty wink during BBBJ. 2 pops and I think she would have gone for 3 if time permitted. Great time for the price and I would return.

[QUOTE=EyceeRaw;6008207]It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.[/QUOTE]I asked because SFK still has Joah on their list. When I asked about her, booker said she was gone. Like not even on vacation gone. Thought maybe the OP had inside info but yeah, imma just ask the booker myself.

[QUOTE=Kent747;6007740]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.[/QUOTE]This forum -like others- is a locker room, so I'm less critical about dudes tryna look cool. But noble? Big yikes. That's a no for for me dawg. Still, even if dudes were hush about flashing cash, the girls would not be.

All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.

Back in the day the BBFS apartment K-girls had to compete with some massage parlors with high quality K-girls. Specifically, in Inglewood that had several places with younger K-girls. Oriental Acupressure on Manchester just east of the 405 had young K-girls willing to offer BBFS for a 100 tip with the house fee of 80 (I think) for the hour. Nearly the same service minus the privacy of an apartment and the higher standard of the space (I. E. Bed, shower, etc). Now days K-girl MPs all seem to be staffed by the old timers and most MPs seem to be staffed by Chinese girls either providing only rub-and-tugs or they are laundry lady cum dumpsters trying to hit loads per day quotas set by their boss.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;6008569]All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.[/QUOTE]Those pics are from a Korean model's Instagram (e_seoa). What does Shani really look like?

[QUOTE=RandySteel;6008466]I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.[/QUOTE]Seems hella easy to waste $400 these days.

[QUOTE=Kent747;6007740]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.[/QUOTE]How ironic. Bay area has a higher cost of living too. Yet they get cheaper girls.

I'm voting with my wallet. I haven't seen a girl in just over 6 months. Just masturbating for free in the meantime.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;6005500]That new girl Angel at M must be stocky, judging by the amount of photoshop distortion in the photos.[/QUOTE]Not stocky. Not super thin like Miso, but not a dough ball either. More curvy. Cute girl. Didn't blow me away with service, but left satisfied. Could see others repeating if there was good chemistry.

[QUOTE=Pussypoety;6004232]For a bit of context, I am new to this whole K-BB scene, having fucked only 3 girls now: here and I like it.
[/QUOTE]Great honest review. Just had a session with Remi. Tits on a stick describes her well. Youngish and submissive but lacks any personality whatsoever. Hard to make a connection for a memorable experience. Also highly doubtful she's Korean from the looks, accent, darker skin. Could be a mix of Thai or Philippino. Just guessing though. Based on your review Tiana is more my cup of tea. Now to get the PO to reply back!!

I believe joah / joa booked by sfk and m initially may have gone back to the norcal market. Overall she was a very sweet and cute girl, I think she lacked clients down here. Her as popped up at caddygirl site for a few days then it went down. M delisted her pics awhile back but I think sfk just doesn't update their site as it still shows leah but she's gone too.

[QUOTE=GardenBae;6008513]I asked because SFK still has Joah on their list. When I asked about her, booker said she was gone. Like not even on vacation gone. Thought maybe the OP had inside info but yeah, imma just ask the booker myself.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RandySteel;6008512]Remi is another provider I am trying to see with this booker. Timing was not my friend for Remi, Yara was recommended by the booker. This lower price comforts my chance in seeing someone with low reviews. Pleasantly surprised with Yara and our DFK fest led to a passionate experience. There was action from the minute we entered her room. I had to pee and did not realize her restroom was located just outside the room. She escorted me and wiped me clean after. Girls should Escort us more often. Her pleasing attitude continued and she gave me a naughty wink during BBBJ. 2 pops and I think she would have gone for 3 if time permitted. Great time for the price and I would return.[/QUOTE]Does yara face look better than mini? Mini got puffing face, more like Vietnamese / Abg looks.

Any reviews on June? I've seen some on TER but I'm not sure if they are reliable or not, they range from very good to very bad.