Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=AussieFury;4692633]Seattle. But there's almost zero Seattle-based Kgirl intel these days.[/QUOTE]OK, are they BBFS?

Jessie. WLA. 5'2" Natural B.

M. [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/2xmwidEPDDNF[/URL].

Sexy Angels. Luna, Chanel, Jessie.

Sexyfunkgirls. Kandi, Nina.

[QUOTE=Ramboy9;4692413]Intel.

Acetown.

Isabella. Petite slim, decent face, no tits and no ass.

Mimi. Steer clear. A little thicker but not latina like at all. Not worth the money in this hobby (there's an expectation as far as look go when dropping money like this)..[/QUOTE]Nice intel on Mimi. I was curious on her and always wondered if her photos are REAL. I am glad that I did not TOUGHT it OUT on that her. I have heard from 3 different hobbyists not so good or dismal report on Mimi look.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4692860]M. [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/2xmwidEPDDNF[/URL].

.[/QUOTE]When you go to the website for M, it says Roc-girls on HX. There is no such handle. The phone number leads to calikgirls, which is not really used on HX. Does she use HX at all?

Chanel return is indefinitely postponed because of a Coronavirus. For those who were awaiting her return (me included), it is truly disappointing. She mentioned that she may not come back at all. She was a legend in my book as I really liked her body type, her service and her orgasmic nature; Truly a great lover all around.

[QUOTE=WearAThai;4692978]When you go to the website for M, it says Roc-girls on HX. There is no such handle. The phone number leads to calikgirls, which is not really used on HX. Does she use HX at all?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/ROK-Girls[/URL]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;4692005]It's so hard to find info on the Kbeautypops girls when they change they name all the time.

Current lineup at [URL]https://kbeautypops.com/models/[/URL] is:

- Love (aka Aileen. Good info on this thread says to avoid).

- Clio (I recognize some of those photos from WAY back, and I think she's Brigette. Who has been around too long and has zero enthusiasm).

- Hazel: No info.

- Summer: No info.

- Crystal: No info.

If anyone recognizes any of those last three and can provide intel, I would appreciate it. I hate rolling the dice, especially when at least 2 of the 5 are no-gos for me.

Thanks and play safe out there.[/QUOTE]Hazel is a bait and switch for love, and crystal is a bait and switch for summer. That agency only ever has 2 girls at a time, and I believe Clio is not there at all.

Would one of you fellow mongers kindly message me the contact information and website for M? I'm having trouble tracking it down. Much appreciated in advance!

[QUOTE=TheRealCost;4692451]I'll take a little time to explain but my session with Luna today can be summed up in four words: L ame you nderwhelming and ever A gain! Face was okay, cute but the kind of cute you'd see on a chick in K-town and wouldn't find yourself thinking "Oh wow, she's cute!" Body was very average and nothing to get excited about; it wasn't bad and it definitely wasn't BAD. She's got something going on with her teeth. A slight discoloration and crookedness going on, but nothing that would be a major turnoff. Nice enough disposition and even though I was not into her sexually at all I still found her kinda charming. She sucked my dick like a toothless granny and wondered why I wasn't getting rock hard. Laid there like she was in a coma as I DATY, emitting random little moans that seemed only intended to let me know she was still conscious. Nice chick and it's nothing personal towards her but how anyone could rave about her is beyond me. Either they've got a lower criteria for provider hotness than I or maybe I got a different chick? Tattoo right below her navel? Whatever. Win some lose some and before anyone says it again for the gazillionth time, let me say it for you: it's always YMMV. Indeed, oh indeed.[/QUOTE]Automated spellcheck botched my acronym for Luna: Lame Underwhelming Never Again!

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[u][b]EDITOR's NOTE[/b][/u]: [blue]This report was edited or deleted to [u]remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales[/u]. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=WearAThai;4692978]When you go to the website for M, it says Roc-girls on HX. There is no such handle. The phone number leads to calikgirls, which is not really used on HX. Does she use HX at all[/QUOTE]Just click on the link and scroll down.

Just spoke to her and she said her return has been delayed because of COVID-19. Sounds like she must have gone to Korea and now is stuck there for a while. I know someone said that she was just traveling around the USA So maybe she decided to extend her travels. All I know is that she said she was going to Korea before she left and is saying the same thing now.

Is she that hard to get into? I'm new (after Megan, cona, Lucia were active) and was able to get a booking (sienna) no problem. Is it really that hard to get into her stable? I keep reading this from various mongers.

[QUOTE=JungleFun;4693102][URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/ROK-Girls[/URL][/QUOTE]

Wanted to try my first BBFS experience with CIP and didn't want to pay up charge so contacted this Booker to try and get Luna after the rave reviews. Only Chanel was available at the time I wanted so went for it anyways even though I saw some reviews saying no CIP with her. I was very pleased with the experience. Her pics show two different faces and glad that she turned out to be the prettier one. She was total GFE and was all over me like if I was her lover she hadn't seen in a while. Lots of dfk from her and only a short break in the action for the whole hour. Things got hot and she hopped right on without even mention of a cover. I was expecting her to at least ask. I eventually released inside of her since she also never asked me to pull out. Ended up doing it twice. Thanks for the intel on this agency. I'll have to try the others if I can convince myself not to see Chanel again.