Likely pictures only at best
[QUOTE=SRH59;5752958]Kindmadame.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1a973670-0936-4c18-92c3-fa9fbcecaab1[/URL]
Odds favor scam but she shared some pictures that matched the one (and only one) picture on her profile. Tried to sell me them first, then just sent them. She's open to meet but I haven't pressed it. She also hasn't pressed selling them, or directly asked for money since, so who knows.[/QUOTE]Did she contact you or did you make 1st contact? I've been contacted by 2 or 3 women out of Delaware who were trying to sell pictures. I don't think it's a Delaware thing just a distance thing. They may figure they can string you along with some promises and use distance as an excuse, IMHO!
Your instincts were right
[QUOTE=Pleck2;5766494][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/31041552-9c23-478a-ad99-22ec001a0b96[/URL] Very cool girl. Easy to correspond with. Smart, good sense of humor. North PHL. I allowed the correspondence to trail off because she seems to spend more time in Harrisburg than PHL, doesn't look like she can host and there's some inconsistency with the photos. I'm not doubting she's real; I'm just saying that I hope the one photo is dated. 300.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3692a0e7-0690-4568-91d5-7143c93833da.[/URL] Caution. Inconsistency with photos. Seems to be in a hurry to exchange cell numbers (her area code was Portland, which she acknowledged) but, as mentioned previously, I'm skeptical about quickly wanting to jump to cell contact, so I asked some local knowledge of where she said she lived and, surprisingly, she passed with flying colors. But one of her photos wasn't good and I let it fade. And I'm glad I did because she now lists her location as Utah.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c9eee8d5-b6b5-4f83-88a2-ed896fdc99c6.[/URL] Beautiful girl. Friendly. But 2 of her photos seem to be of someone else. When she mentioned my photos, she particularly loved my dog. Who isn't in any of my photos. Which I mentioned (nicely) before getting the dial tone.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f0f3d008-7e74-4619-9032-7920ed0b46cc.[/URL] She's a live one who initiated correspondence after I simply "favorited" her profile. Seems to be more interested in sharing (OK probably selling) videos. Will supplement later.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/67db1f2a-951c-48fe-b9a9-8a4349cac648.[/URL] She's a slam-dunk. If you want it. Lively conversation. Interested in meeting yesterday. I faded after she sent me her private photos. I wasn't good. For me at least. But she lives in Bucks and commutes to Center City. Which seems like where she wants to meet.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b55b018a-56fc-4332-aa77-8832f1026e2a.[/URL] So far so good. Good back and forth. 400 and can host near Temple you.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b5ad87c1-85f6-4a4a-9d43-d8d94a615246.[/URL] Cool girl. I actually met her a long time ago at a hotel. She couldn't host then. But this is a new profile -- and I didn't recognize her face -- so I reached out. She doesn't waste time in responding and setting the ground rules, but they're fair. I recommend, especially if you want a quick turn-around. She may even be open to hosting if some trust is established. She's in Delco.
And now I can't find the eros link for a Brazilian I met on Friday. Aline. Ridiculous body if you like the curvy Brazilian thing. Smart. I went through with it because of the pictures and 4 star reviews on E Monkey. Glad I got it out of my system but won't be back. She was initially too into it and then not enough. Also, the language barrier still exists even though one reviewer said it wasn't bad. If I find the link, I'll send it. She'll be back in June.[/QUOTE]I think everyone but one has a deactivated profile.
Re: Your instincts were right
[QUOTE=ReadyToTumble;5769832]I think everyone but one has a deactivated profile.[/QUOTE]Some of the URLs have a period at the end. You have to delete it manually.
SA to de-emphasize "Sugar Dating"
Per this video:
[URL]https://youtu.be/sx3Dg_igqVg[/URL]
Looks like founder Brandon Wade is getting married and intends to totally de-emphasize the "sugar dating" part of the website! Now it is "suppose to be" just a 'dating website!
Wonder if the heat is getting turned up on the site as a venue for prostitution and now that he's getting married, wants to further insulate himself from FOSTA-SESTA type liabilities? Any one think things will change on the site? More stringent BOT reads of emails and any mention of sugar or anything that the BOT thinks is compensation will get you booted? Will girls fall off if there is no sugar?
But clearly Wade is an idiot! He violated one of the primary "rules" - NEVER fall in lover with a Hooker! No pre-nup? LOL!