SA is not TER for a reason
[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;2720389]
Now the new idea for here would be to follow the Cincinnati, Knoxville, and several other Sd forums that provides actual links and info to all of these SB that everyone seems to have here. That makes for much more entertaining reading. Just my thoughts.[/QUOTE]Sharing SB info too freely will drive some out when they realize we are comparing notes -- they will feel like ******.
Chatting with an RVA gal who has an SB mentor -- one girl might not realize a bunch of guys are conspiring to bang her like a drum for the lowest possible price, but two are sure to figure it out and get super careful.
Looking for some advice / input
Traveling to Boston next week. Have two POTs lined up, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Things look really great for both but want some feedback on a couple of things:
POT 1 (afternoon): mid 20's student, curvy white / latina with youthful features (she looks 21). Seems to have some minor body issues and doesn't appreciate how amazing her body is, so I am more than happy to help build that confidence. . Also likes a dominant but caring guy and that is me. We've had some great conversations, lots of pic exchanges, etc. Lined up to meet at my hotel, I offered to meet for a drink and she said, "why not just meet at your room?" So that's great. Nothing UTR about this girl in her profile or in our conversations. You can see the meager college / grad student furnishings in the background. No discussion of arrangement, actually. We've generally talked about meeting up as an opportunity to relieve some holiday / finals stress. So question 1 is whether there is a sugar expectation.
But question 2 is the more interesting one. As we were talking today she asked about using condoms, noting that she was clean per a test last month but not on Birth control. I said "of course" but as we continued to chat she made it clear that she likes being teased by a bare cock. Not full bareback fucking, but just wants me to tease and maybe put in "just the tip". Dare I play with fire (say in the second round when I am not worried about an accidental discharge)? Or just play it safe? My gut says play it safe for 79,000 different reasons. And maybe just enjoy withholding from her something that she would really like, which would turn me on as well. Certainly for the first meeting. Given how much it turned her on I was wondering whether there is some sort of specific fetish about being teased in this way that I didn't know about. I know the risk of getting her pregnant would be pretty damn small, particularly on round 2 when I can control, but that is a really stupid risk to take, right?
POT2 (evening girl): late 20's white girl, college grad and career oriented. Curvier than the first girl but still within my wheelhouse. Down for meeting at hotel bar for drink and going up to room if there's a connection. (Hope I can get the hotel staff to change the sheets and towels during my intermission! Definitely getting a dd / lg vibe from her (which I like). She's a first timer, but talked about she fantasizes about a man taking care of her every need and making her happy. The most recent conversation was mostly sexual. At some point it seemed to turn a little bit toward the sugar discussion, but when she asked "what do I get if I'm a good girl" I responded "what would you like" and she said she wants me to choose. The whole thing is vague enough that I really don't know whether we were still talking about sex stuff or something else. I shifted to focusing on fulfilling physical and affection needs and everything continued on. So, again, any obligation or expectation of sugar on my part?
I should note that in my time doing this I have had quite a few sugar-free encounters (at least 50%) and apparently my game is pretty strong particularly when I tap into our mutual kink. It never seemed to deny me a repeat visit or three. I'm a little reluctant to just leave each girl with a base $--don't want to insult them and would also rather give them nothing and make it up to them the next time. And cash is frankly tight on the home front. But it is Christmas.
Grinch or St. Nick?