Is it Love? / Keep'them hungry
Hoya-Smelly gave a great discussion of your situation. But I'm of the opinion that it would not serve you well to rock this lovely boat your are on. If you dash her dreams of the future her attitude could possibly change. Let it be and let her dream. You will benefit 1000 times over.
OTOH, if she asks specific and directed questions about your future together, you should tell her the reality. If you string her along at that point she could go nuclear if you were misleading her purposefully.
Prepay trial worked out, but a lesson learned:
I did not have change a while back so I advanced my SB 2 weeks sugar instead of the PTP. She paid off and all is good, but she had conflicts, etc and dragged things out for 10 days. Daddy got horny. I think we need to keep some babies hungry and dependent on the next payday. Sadly, we often think these girls can't wait to get their pussies filled by Daddy, but the reality is they just need the $$. I trust her not to stiff me, but I do not trust her to keep to the schedule if she is momentarily flush. If they are looking for the next week's grocery payment and have to eat they will go out of their way to see us.
Name, identification, noun, etc.
[QUOTE=RealMan2000;2706758]That's what I thought.[/QUOTE]To clarify, the SB / SO was referring to how I like certain "baby" names. By "baby" I'm referring to the cultural more of naming a human fetus or young infant.
Perhaps us bros really are deviants and assh0 les. Myself included. This has to be the funniest post I've had in here. LOL.
Of Mistresses and Sugar Babies
[QUOTE=LikeMike1963;2705887]We all have different wants / desires from our SB's so I will explain mine. I have not had a steady SB for about 3 years. I in general I prefer a single LT (long term) SB. Yes I have had some short timers too usually because of the weeding process. I have to admit I hate it but I have a very narrow field of what is attractive to me. I hate it because I can see many SBs and say they are attractive and certainly understand why someone would hit it but I just have a narrow niche of interest. I have belonged to the sites and those have always ended up being short term (ST) . Since I am narrow minded with my interest I almost always approach the POT with my intention of a LT situation and discuss monthly allowance usually early (maybe not specific amounts) and if it ends then I just quit the allowance. With that said my preference is LT. So. I have had 3 LT and looking to have my 4th LT SBs. By this I mean 1. 5 yrs plus. 3 of the 4 I met "off the grid" Meaning these were girls who were not on any SB search and for each our situation was their 1st experience. (Incidentally for all the dumb luck my ATF was from SD4 M of all places and we had a genuine connection and would of loved to keep her but we were 25 yrs apart (I was single at this time but still choose the sugar GF route) . She wanted kids. I did not she said it would all workout but I felt like I would be stealing some of her life if that materialized for us. Soo you say yeah. Yeah. She's all into until the money stops. So I tested that. I told her I had a drastic change in income and would not be able to help her out. BTW her monthly allowance was only $600 and we met 6-10 x a mth. So for the next 3 mths she still came to visit at which time I reinstated her allowance. She lived an hour away. This is a chick who was on an academic and athletic scholarship too!. I would slide her some gas money and many nights (they were almost always overnights) I would say we probably just need to stay in because of budget and she would cook for me. Etc). Annnyway. The other 3 were met by other means. One was a school mentoring program another was a bartender and this current one is a bartender.
NOW. I am not saying these are sweet innocent virgin girls but none had ever had an SD before. All of the above I approached with a very soft approach and let them know we would proceed at a pace they are comfortable with. I followed though with that promise and ALL turned out to be good investments. The prior 3 I had helped them each time we met to varying degres. Maybe a gift card for a spa visit. A gas card etc. Usually $50 - $100 each meet. The first 3 I would say I invested 500 700 (5-8 meetings) before the "panties" hit the floor. In not ONE of the situations did I EVER say. Hey we need this to move along or the sugar stops. They definitely considered it more of dating. I was never grabby. Never said how hot they were. (not until later when there is dirty bedroom talk) . But I would spend time asking about them. And usually did not even give a physical compliment until meeting 4 or 5 and that was in more of a simple manner not the BS lines they here when out at bars etc. This whole routine elevates them and helps them feel good as a whole about themselves which most young women have a void with. Soooo are you ready for your jaws to drop? Over the course of 7 weeks I have invested about $1200 on my current POT. And we have met for lunches and dinners about 9-10 times (FYI I do have an SO so yes this has been with some caution and risk) . After the 3rd meet she texted how she really wanted to be more affectionate with me and if that was ok. She was so at our next meeting. Move forward several meetings and she asked. When can we get some more time together. Maybe an overnight?. My whole point is it all is what you are wanting but my experience with some prepay has worked very well for me. But it has been with girls I have found in non traditional methods and has provided long fruitful situations. Sooo we have something scheduled at a hotel dinner etc this Friday (SO is out of town) . She kinda knows about the SO but thinks we are getting divorced, and no. She does not know my real name thus figuring out the whole fake name hotel sign in stuff.
Well that's my story if you made it this far. I will be pre booking a room and taking that chance but outlook is good. Wish me luck brotherhood and I will update. Oh. We have talked allowance. I communicated I could help her out about 700 month. She works (23 yrs old) has a younger child.[/QUOTE]LikeMike,
What you really described is the original process of a man, having one or more mistresses. Some of them are full time, some are part time, some long term, some sort term. When we (in Asia) refer to a girl as a Sugar Baby, it usually indicates either a big gap in age (25+ years) or it is obvious to everyone that the girl is in The Arrangement only for the Money. In these cases, it is always. The girl is exclusively for The Man. I really like your approach and have a similar outlook.
As for the hotel, I recommend using [URL]www.hotwire.com[/URL]. They have a very good selection of discounts by almost all top brand hotels.
The experiment is underway!
Gentlemen,
My "alternate profile / seeking a third for me and my baby" experiment is in full swing, and I can barely keep up! I have two stock messages I'm sending out; one is straightforward and targeted to those little fish who indicate on their profiles that they are looking for women as well as men. The other one is worded towards babies who don't say anything about women, but are hot just the same and I would love to fuck.
It contains some language along the lines of "I'm not sure what I'm looking for is something you'd be interested in or not, but I felt like I had to contact you just in case because I am so drawn to your looks and what you say about your ideal connection. " I am astonshed at how many closet bisexual or bi-curious babies there are out there. I may just abandon my other profile for a while and concentrate on this new one.
Now granted it's only been up for two days, but I must have 20+ active fish on the line at this point, and more keep contacting me every hour or so.
I share this with you not to brag, but to encourage those among you who have a current SB who might entertain a threesome to forge ahead. I admit that no panties have hit the floor just yet, but I am confident they will shortly. After all, I only went live on Friday.
To those of you who can work this angle, tally ho!!
More anon,
Scott.
Hooked the wife up with a "toy"
Wow. Sounds amazing.
[QUOTE=Thresh;2711501]Scott,
I have done this about a dozen times thus far in the past year. This works extremely well on both those who have men / women listed as well as those who solely list men on their profiles. I have even hooked the wife up with a "toy" and my SB played it off just fine. This is some good stuff, so keep it up. It will work without a doubt!
Cheers: Thresh.[/QUOTE]
Is this the only sugarbaby forum?
I am in Phila PA area and was wondering if there are any SB forums in PA / NJ / Dealawre?