Limited Law Enforcement Ability Against Consenting Sex Workers and AMPs
Regarding law enforcement and prostitution or other sex for money offences, you have to remember that State law, not Federal law addresses these issues. That is why you can have legal prostitution with no Federal involvement in some counties in Nevada. Thus, the Feds are only going to get involved in cases where there is trafficking across States lines and in these cases the focus in not on the individual customers nor the women providers but the bosses or organisers.
When it comes to State and local law enforcement, unless they can get a recorded conversation, they generally need a stronger case than just an officer saying that he and the lady in question agreed to exchange sex for money. Otherwise, you just have a "he said she said" situation, and prosecutors and the courts consider this a very flimsy case not worth the effort to move forward with. That is why providers warn prospective customers not mention details on the phone, and AMPs never raise the issue immediately and wait until you are good and naked demonstrating you do not have on a wire. Table showers exist for a reason beyond just nice service.
Remember the Florida State government law enforcement charges against NFL Patriots Owner Robert Kraft for his alleged prostitution activities at an AMP. This only became a case because the police allegedly had recordings of the exchange. However, the courts in general do not like and do not approve broad electronic surveillance against what would be a stream of customers, considering it violation of constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizures, I. E. Privacy rights. If I remember correctly, Robert Kraft had the courts suppress the surveillance video, effectively beating the charges because the courts ruled that them inadmissible. As a result, just remember state and local law enforcement are very limited in their ability to build prostitution and other sex offence cases against consenting adults which is why you do not see them very often trying to crackdown.
[QUOTE=SlowBlo;4981473]Since this is sex trafficking it would most likely be handled by the FBI. I'm sure they know who all the Agencies are and who runs them just like they know who all the Mob bosses are and the people who work for them. But they don't go after them unless they are told to by a higher authority. Just think how easy it would be to bust so many working girls in Springfield. Just make an appointment and when they take the money arrest them. But they don't unless the Hotel starts complaining. It could happen any day that these agencies could all be taken down. Investigations can take years then they take them down quickly and have access to all the information you gave them to get approved. I stay away.[/QUOTE]
LF was not very good to begin with
[QUOTE=LuckyLuciano00;4981889]I HATE nosy neighbors who don't mind their own business. This is how LF got caught. Thanks for sharing.[/QUOTE]LF was a poorly-run agency. They would book appointments back-to-back, leaving no leeway for instances of when clients would show up late. As a result, I had to wait 15 minutes in the parking lot after the agreed-upon time. Also, the instructions to the room were very confusing. Instead of telling me the room number, they tried giving me step-by-step directions to the room over the phone. This further added to the delay from the agreed-upon time.
And finally, LF did NO screening. I was able to get an appointment the same day that I contacted them. I do not recall them asking me for any information.
I never visited them again because of such a poor first experience. The girl I saw was very average looking. She even rushed me towards the end, because the next guy was right around the corner (again, due to their poor booking practices). However, it's still a shame that they are not around. Their rate was competitive (it was 200 around the end of 2018), and they had a girl I wanted to see (Michelle), but I never got around to seeing her.
People who notice high traffic aren't nosey
[QUOTE=LuckyLuciano00;4981889]I HATE nosy neighbors who don't mind their own business. This is how LF got caught. Thanks for sharing.[/QUOTE]You can't blame someone for seeing a lot of traffic on his hall coming in and out of one apartment. How does he know if it's an escort agency or a drug dealer, or even a dealer with addicted girls working on site? Once a neighbor sees it, it's been made his business.
Agencies have a responsibility to be discreet so the neighbors don't notice the activity.
If it's busy enough that you notice it during your visit, that's a good reason to stay away.