Here is the new agency that I did not know about it.
[URL]http://tiffanyshome.escorts.biz/models/[/URL]
I have seen Kelly while back ago and she is NOWHERE near the photos-I recommend a PASS on Kelly.
Printable View
Here is the new agency that I did not know about it.
[URL]http://tiffanyshome.escorts.biz/models/[/URL]
I have seen Kelly while back ago and she is NOWHERE near the photos-I recommend a PASS on Kelly.
M. Nuri, Hera, Mini, Karen.
Sexy Angels. Luna, Chanel.
Newtopasian. Ruby, Min.
Sexyfunkgirls. Nina.
[QUOTE=KGirlsRule;4682656]Have seen Chanel 4 x now and thought I'd share a little. Chanel is very cute, looks and feels young, is skilled and a very active partner. It takes her just a bit to warm up to you and when she does it gets hot fast. Chanel will dial the enthusiasm up or down to your taste. I've seen her at both ends of the spectrum, depending on the mood I'm in. Pics are close enough. She's got the routine down well and maintains eye contact and treats me like a long-lost lover now.
Luna is also good but I've only seen her 1 x because I'm sort of addicted to Chanel now.[/QUOTE]Wanted to see Chanel because of the great comments, but she was booked so I went with Luna and not disappointed. Pics are fairly accurate and was very accommodating to please me. Her body isn't tight but not flabby either. Typical routine, but when I went down for some DATY I got her all wet and ready for some cock insertion. No mention of a condom even though I saw them on the night stand. Multiple positions and unloaded my seed into her. A weak massage, but I wasn't there for a massage. She grabbed my cock and got me going again. Second round and pop number 2. Overall good experience and would repeat, but if Chanel is available I'm going with her instead.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4684147]Here is the new agency that I did not know about it.
[URL]http://tiffanyshome.escorts.biz/models/[/URL]
I have seen Kelly while back ago and she is NOWHERE near the photos-I recommend a PASS on Kelly.[/QUOTE]Thanks to Jack926 for the Kelly update. So now I must ask: Anyone have the stats on Julie? Are those pics real? Hmmm.
[QUOTE=Alex60;4684280]Thanks to Jack926 for the Kelly update. So now I must ask: Anyone have the stats on Julie? Are those pics real? Hmmm.[/QUOTE]Upon closer inspection, I just noticed the agency is using the SAME secondary pic for both Kelly AND Ally! DUH! Makes me doubtful about anything of theirs now.
Thank you Mr BA for the update! Seeing her very soon.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4683628]Her real pic below. I didn't like her pics but she changed my damn mind with the first visit. My visits were porn movies worthy. She blasted me like a geyser. I was drenched with sweat and juice. It was fucking hot pounding her bare back with my boner awash in her hot pussy juice. Just want to recomend her again because some guys were not able to see her as Hana with Jewelry but now she is Suzie at HX Hotkiss77.
[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/los-angeles/female-escorts/1672367[/URL]
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/hotkiss77[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KGirlsRule;4683846]Is Nina / Haven still around?
If so, where / which org / web site link?[/QUOTE]Sexyfunkgirls.
[QUOTE=NooGooGee81;4683160]I'm also deciding to refrain from seeing any providers in general based off that Korean Air Stewardess article. I haven't confirmed but it's been said that the Korean media has identified that the stewardess stayed at the intercontinental Hotel. The flight attendant departed from ICN to LAX on flight KE017 on 2/19/20 2:30 pm and arrived in Los Angeles at 8:30 am. Stayed at the Intercontinental Hotel in downtown Los Angeles and left LAX to ICN on flight KE012 on 2/20/20 10:40 pm arriving 2/22/20 at 5:10 am.
They also have info on the places in K-Town she ate at.
The list:
Honey Pig, Hanbat Suluntang, Hanshin Pocha, Ahgassi Gopchang, Hangari Bajirak Kalguksu.
Again, I haven't confirmed this but better safe than sorry.
Link to Koreantimes article
http://www.koreatimes.com/article/20200225/1297893?fbclid=IwAR0Xvcg4hGJ9XanxB-OaiOI7x3L7yk4MxbtW_Az580lSrVnZ-gI5BtcNMGc[/QUOTE]Oh my lord, I went to these places couple days ago.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4682600]She will be with Sexyfunkgirls starting Feb. 29.[/QUOTE]I've seen her when she first came down from bay in OC, check my post. She's worth a visit.
[QUOTE=Juice1;4684171]Wanted to see Chanel because of the great comments, but she was booked so I went with Luna and not disappointed. Pics are fairly accurate and was very accommodating to please me. Her body isn't tight but not flabby either. Typical routine, but when I went down for some DATY I got her all wet and ready for some cock insertion. No mention of a condom even though I saw them on the night stand. Multiple positions and unloaded my seed into her. A weak massage, but I wasn't there for a massage. She grabbed my cock and got me going again. Second round and pop number 2. Overall good experience and would repeat, but if Chanel is available I'm going with her instead.[/QUOTE]So is there any truth Chanel going on vacation? I heard mixed responses. If Chanel is indeed going in vacation, I guess Luna would satisfy my cravings for now. Cona still out and supposedly coming back by April.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4684524]I've seen her when she first came down from bay in OC, check my post. She's worth a visit.[/QUOTE]This is going to start to get confusing. Kandi with SFK is also listed as Candy at ca-kdolls. Same pictures so I'm assuming same girl. There's also another Candy at top girls right now.
And top of all that, Princess from jewelry was at M under Sienna, but now she’s at KTE as baby princess? And there’s also a princess at Top girls as well...
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4684524]I've seen her when she first came down from bay in OC, check my post. She's worth a visit.[/QUOTE]Fuckin photoshop. The bricks behind her are warped.
She's not really that curvy, is she. Thick in middle? Like stumpy?
She looks like she would be a fantastic fuck though.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4684153]M. Nuri, Hera, Mini, Karen.
Sexy Angels. Luna, Chanel.
Newtopasian. Ruby, Min.
Sexyfunkgirls. Nina.[/QUOTE]Luna? She glows at dark! She's worth.
[QUOTE=Peter321;4684740]This is going to start to get confusing. Kandi with SFK is also listed as Candy at ca-kdolls. Same pictures so I'm assuming same girl. There's also another Candy at top girls right now.
And top of all that, Princess from jewelry was at M under Sienna, but now shes at KTE as baby princess? And theres also a princess at Top girls as well...[/QUOTE]Confusing? Christ, it's become insane! Could some entrepreneur out there resurrect a ******** clone?
[QUOTE=NintyNine;4684829]Fuckin photoshop. The bricks behind her are warped.
She's not really that curvy, is she. Thick in middle? Like stumpy?
She looks like she would be a fantastic fuck though.[/QUOTE]Wow, What a keen sense of observation. You must be an architect or a structural engineer!