Printable View
[QUOTE=BlueFox141;4306173]She has specifically asked me not to share with anyone I do not know and only allowed me to share with two guys I have known on here for years.
Blue.[/QUOTE]If you ever feel ok giving me the number please pm me I'm very respectful.
[QUOTE=BruinsFan44;4307520]If you ever feel ok giving me the number please pm me I'm very respectful.[/QUOTE]I've gone through your posts and would have no problem giving out a number I have been given permission to give out. I Cannot give it to you. If I ever have someone you're interested in whose permission I have, remind me of this post. Sorry.
Blue.
[QUOTE=BlueFox141;4307647]I've gone through your posts and would have no problem giving out a number I have been given permission to give out. I Cannot give it to you. If I ever have someone you're interested in whose permission I have, remind me of this post. Sorry.
Blue.[/QUOTE]Thanks Blue.
So I was lucky enough to have my 8 year reunion with Lady M (thanks BlueFox141). I have to admit even though I have pictures of her, I would not have recognized her and I am sure she would not have recognized me. One thing that has not changed over 8 years, she is still very service oriented. She gets off by making sure you are completely satisfied. We were supposed to use her place but something came up and we ended up with a car date.
Started with some very sensual DFK and mutual undressing. Followed by a CBJ (my choice) while I fingered her perfectly shaved and fragrant giner. First time together so I kept it simple missionary. She was moaning and groaning while I was pumping her and she declared I'm cumming just as I blew my load. I finished my business and told her she was a good actress. She tells me she was not faking and I didn't quite believe her until I felt how wet my dick and her pussy was. Who knows but who really cares.
So to be perfectly honest and I think she would agree she is much skinnier and not as hot as she was 8 years ago (who is) but she is pretty enough and her personality and willingness to please is beyond reproach. I'll be seeing her again.
Thanks again Blue.
Later,
Vegas.
[QUOTE=WhenInVegas;4316307]So I was lucky enough to have my 8 year reunion with Lady M (thanks BlueFox141). I have to admit even though I have pictures of her, I would not have recognized her and I am sure she would not have recognized me. One thing that has not changed over 8 years, she is still very service oriented. She gets off by making sure you are completely satisfied. We were supposed to use her place but something came up and we ended up with a car date.
Started with some very sensual DFK and mutual undressing. Followed by a CBJ (my choice) while I fingered her perfectly shaved and fragrant giner. First time together so I kept it simple missionary. She was moaning and groaning while I was pumping her and she declared I'm cumming just as I blew my load. I finished my business and told her she was a good actress. She tells me she was not faking and I didn't quite believe her until I felt how wet my dick and her pussy was. Who knows but who really cares.
So to be perfectly honest and I think she would agree she is much skinnier and not as hot as she was 8 years ago (who is) but she is pretty enough and her personality and willingness to please is beyond reproach. I'll be seeing her again.
Thanks again Blue.
Later,
Vegas.[/QUOTE]My pleasure, Vegas (no, it was yours actually). Yes, she is a lot of fun, especially the GFE. And she has told me that she does not and will not fake it. It's just under the right circumstances she can't help it. We have met a number of times and after some experimentation, I believe her. Right now she's only let me give out the number to a few, but will do more in the future. But, she's out there guys. Look for a tall one.
Blue.
[QUOTE=BlueFox141;4317838]My pleasure, Vegas (no, it was yours actually). Yes, she is a lot of fun, especially the GFE. And she has told me that she does not and will not fake it. It's just under the right circumstances she can't help it. We have met a number of times and after some experimentation, I believe her. Right now she's only let me give out the number to a few, but will do more in the future. But, she's out there guys. Look for a tall one.
Blue.[/QUOTE]Also saw her thanks to Blue. Right about how tall she is! Very happy to have seen her. I agree I don't think she is faking it! Very sweet and clearly liks what she does.
Just got back from the loop. The whole area is dead, undercovers driving around, smells like a sting. Do yourself a favor and sit this night out.
For those of you who know Monica she is away on a state sponsored vacation I expect it may be an extended vacation.
So it's been a while since I've dabble into this. But picked up a fairly attractive blonde. Goes by name Candy. Good head game. Definitely on something LOL. But aren't they all? Was really trying to run into the infamous Lady M, that's honestly the reason why I did partake. Also it is no joke with the security with phones. I have a friend that's a cop in town he called me like 3 times trying to get a hold of me. He didn't text for obvious reasons but told me in a way that I knew what he was talking about saying "you shouldn't text and drive in Waterbury and you should definitely shut off your phone".
[QUOTE=Bradford007;4322282]So it's been a while since I've dabble into this. But picked up a fairly attractive blonde. Goes by name Candy. Good head game. Definitely on something LOL. But aren't they all? Was really trying to run into the infamous Lady M, that's honestly the reason why I did partake. Also it is no joke with the security with phones. I have a friend that's a cop in town he called me like 3 times trying to get a hold of me. He didn't text for obvious reasons but told me in a way that I knew what he was talking about saying "you shouldn't text and drive in Waterbury and you should definitely shut off your phone".[/QUOTE]Hey Bradford, trying to understand what you meant about the phones?
[QUOTE=BigDog9;4320998]For those of you who know Monica she is away on a state sponsored vacation I expect it may be an extended vacation.[/QUOTE]This could be the best thing for her she was wasting away to nothing. Still the best head ever winner!
Poo.
That's high praise coming from you. Quite the honor.
[QUOTE=ILoveThatPoo;4323690]This could be the best thing for her she was wasting away to nothing. Still the best head ever winner!
Poo.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MrHappyPants;4323418]Hey Bradford, trying to understand what you meant about the phones?[/QUOTE]There are is an area around the loop that tracks cellphones etc. I forgot what street it's on but it clearly states something like cameras and internet security is done for safety to track cellphones etc. I saw it and thought it was fake until my cop friend said something. So what I think my buddy was telling me if you are to look for women around the loop shut off your phone. I think they can see you on camera in certain spots and if they pick up your GPS on phone they can go bust you while your getting headache relief LOL.
[QUOTE=MrHappyPants;4323418]Hey Bradford, trying to understand what you meant about the phones?[/QUOTE]Your smart phone is always looking for a wifi network to connect to, and so it shakes hands with any and all wifi signals. Police can I. D. your specific phone EIN with a fairly simple capture device. They are often used in High crime areas to cross reference with security cameras and probably license plate capture cameras. The data I assume, would be stored forever. Really paranoid? Get a cell phone with removable battery; Most phones are not all the way off when turned off, a handy feature if lost.
My post in NH section: [URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4969-Streetwalker-Reports&p=4284337&viewfull=1[/URL]#post4284337 .
I do not know what Wtby or other depts have specifically but there have been a shitload of Stingrays sold to local LE. The Stingray has enormous abuse potential and there are many instances of it being used to shred the 4th Amendment.
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellphone_surveillance[/URL]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker[/URL]
Yeah, it's real.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/14/opinion/bluetooth-wireless-tracking-privacy.html[/URL]
As you shop, "beacons" are watching you, using hidden technology in your phone.
EXCERPT:
Imagine you are shopping in your favorite grocery store. As you approach the dairy aisle, you are sent a push notification in your phone: "10 percent off your favorite yogurt! Click here to redeem your coupon. " You considered buying yogurt on your last trip to the store, but you decided against it. How did your phone know?
Your smartphone was tracking you. The grocery store got your location data and paid a shadowy group of marketers to use that information to target you with ads. Recent reports have noted how companies use data gathered from cell towers, ambient Wi-Fi, and GPS. But the location data industry has a much more precise, and unobtrusive, tool: Bluetooth beacons.
These beacons are small, inobtrusive electronic devices that are hidden throughout the grocery store; an app on your phone that communicates with them informed the company not only that you had entered the building, but that you had lingered for two minutes in front of the low-fat Chobanis.
Most location services use cell towers and GPS, but these technologies have limitations. Cell towers have wide coverage, but low location accuracy: An advertiser can think you are in Walgreens, but you're actually in McDonald's next door. GPS, by contrast, can be accurate to a radius of around five meters (16 feet), but it does not work well indoors.
Bluetooth beacons, however, can track your location accurately from a range of inches to about 50 meters. They use little energy, and they work well indoors. That has made them popular among companies that want precise tracking inside a store.