General Reports

[QUOTE=Longjblues; 1572687]If the IRS were going to be involved, they would be already.

Alexis won't have any assets left after this criminal proceeding is involved, even if she beats the rap. Her attorney / legal fees and living expenses will exhaust what little she has right now.

IRS doesn't go after someone unless they can justify their time with actual revenue collected.[/QUOTE]I am no expert, but who's to say the IRS isn't already involved in gathering & collecting information on Alexis Wright & perhaps her partner aslo?
Not sure & I could be wrong, but I don't think the IRS tends to issues warnings to those they are investigating, at least not till you get the summons to appear before them.

Though I tend to agree with you LB that the IRS shouldn't waste their time & our tax dollars going after revenue that would seem hard to collect.
However I would never underestimate what the IRS will & will not do, as they have shown too, if not a unpredictability, then at least a propensity to try & collect revenue on what assets you have today & what you may also have in future assets.

You can google any amount of high profile celebrities issues with the IRS, such as Chris Tucker, Wesley Snipes (did or doing jail time) , Nicholas Cage, Willie Nelson, etc the list goes on.

A not so high profile case Edward & Elaine Brown were indicted in the United States District Court in New Hampshire for numerous federal tax violations: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_and_Elaine_Brown[/url]

Frontline has all kinds of reports on IRS issues, both from dealing with the little guy up through very large corporations: [url]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/tax/shelter/[/url]

I have friends that were well off financially, got into trouble with the IRS in 1989, lost their case in 1994 & are in financial ruin now & probably will be for the rest of their lives.

Whether or not the IRS gets involved reamains to be seen.
I can only say with certainty that out of all the dogma aspects of law enforcement, the TAXMAN is the one I don't want on my ass!

The IRS is ruthless. Some azzwipe called the IRS on a friend who owns a body shop, they destroyed him. He did "sidejobs" for cash. They went through all his purchases and determined that the amount of supplies, like paint, was far in excess of what would be used for the job tickets he had. They figured his income based on that. They also claimed his lifestlye, house, cars and boat couldn't be supported on the income he claimed. He had to sell everything in order to pay the tax and penalties they tacked, rather bolted, on.

They went after pizza places a few years back. X amount of sauce equaled Y numbers of pizza yet only z was claimed, pay up.

With the uptight, lily white, missionary only legislatures prodding the IRS they'll go after her. Getting restituation will be secondary to setting an example to other providers what could happen to them.

Took a page from LB & as he stated i didn't want to post this in the MP Reports forum

[QUOTE=French;1574092]Hope all works out as sex for a fee is a misdermeanor vio,[/QUOTE]If sex for a fee is a misdemeanor, then with the new laws inplace in Mass I would not want to be convicted and found guilty!

[url]http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section53A[/url]
[ Text of section as amended by 2011, 178, Sec. 25 effective February 19, 2012. For text effective until February 19, 2012, see above. ]
(b) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay another person to engage in sexual conduct, or to agree to engage in sexual conduct with another person, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years or by a fine of not less than $1, 000 and not more than $5, 000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

A little more info on the new laws: [url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3725-General-Reports/page5[/url]
Have fun stay safe

Hey All,

If you have not seen any of the Zumba girl's vids (they are readily available on the net, and with excellent videography) , and have to pick one, it just has to be the popsicle one. (Some of the other vids, we have all seen plenty of screwing ones so those do not add much.)

What she can and does do with the popsicle is enticing, even if some is predictable. Some is not predictable. All of it is sexy. Zumba girl has a great body, but that little scarring problem on her face. It goes on for about 7 minutes, and make sure you watch to the end. What she does at the end of the video comes out of right field, WTF.

Thought I read somewhere that she came to this Country as a foreign exchange student? She looks Latino but I never detected an accent on a couple of her Porn Videos that I recently watched. Also, I read that she just got married. Apparently her boyfriend (now her Husband) was always aware of her Escort & Porn Business and in fact participated in a few of her kinky videos. After all this media coverage, when it's all said and done, the Judge will make an example out her and sentence her to prison for a brief stint.

[QUOTE=Skatar018; 1573381]I am no expert, but who's to say the IRS isn't already involved in gathering & collecting information on Alexis Wright & perhaps her partner aslo?

Not sure & I could be wrong, but I don't think the IRS tends to issues warnings to those they are investigating, at least not till you get the summons to appear before them.

Though I tend to agree with you LB that the IRS shouldn't waste their time & our tax dollars going after revenue that would seem hard to collect.

However I would never underestimate what the IRS will & will not do, as they have shown too, if not a unpredictability, then at least a propensity to try & collect revenue on what assets you have today & what you may also have in future assets.

You can google any amount of high profile celebrities issues with the IRS, such as Chris Tucker, Wesley Snipes (did or doing jail time) , Nicholas Cage, Willie Nelson, etc the list goes on.

A not so high profile case Edward & Elaine Brown were indicted in the United States District Court in New Hampshire for numerous federal tax violations:

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_and_Elaine_Brown[/url]

Frontline has all kinds of reports on IRS issues, both from dealing with the little guy up through very large corporations:

[url]http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/tax/shelter/[/url]

I have friends that were well off financially, got into trouble with the IRS in 1989, lost their case in 1994 & are in financial ruin now & probably will be for the rest of their lives.

Whether or not the IRS gets involved reamains to be seen.

I can only say with certainty that out of all the dogma aspects of law enforcement, the TAXMAN is the one I don't want on my ass![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Djtuck;1577030]Thought I read somewhere that she came to this Country as a foreign exchange student? She looks Latino but I never detected an accent on a couple of her Porn Videos that I recently watched. Also, I read that she just got married. Apparently her boyfriend (now her Husband) was always aware of her Escort & Porn Business and in fact participated in a few of her kinky videos. After all this media coverage, when it's all said and done, the Judge will make an example out her and sentence her to prison for a brief stint.[/QUOTE]She talked in the videos? Must have missed it. Guess my mind was on something else. Have to check it out again. And if you could go home everynight to a woman of her looks, body and talent wouldn't you overlook a few things?

[QUOTE=Stressed Out;1577121]She talked in the videos? Must have missed it. Guess my mind was on something else. Have to check it out again. And if you could go home everynight to a woman of her looks, body and talent wouldn't you overlook a few things?[/QUOTE]Her mom still lives in Ma as well

[QUOTE=Ccup2;1577143]Her mom still lives in Ma as well[/QUOTE]Ma? I thought she originally was from Wells, ME

Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url]

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1577163]Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url][/QUOTE]It goes well with my new t-shirt.

"I took Zumba classes and all I got was this louzy t-shirt!"

And seeing her in the video just enhances my opinion that she was a hot chick! And those nice white teeth...guess cum is a good whitner!

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1577163]Didn't take long LOL

I bet you the guy reflects the opinion of the majority of the male population of the United States.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48qT_neSctE[/url][/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing, White boy can't rap for shit, but still funny.

Am emailing with a 43 year old black woman from CLCE in boston who wants two guys. Anyone interested pm me

[QUOTE=Stressed Out; 1577173]It goes well with my new t-shirt.

"I took Zumba classes and all I got was this louzy t-shirt!"

And seeing her in the video just enhances my opinion that she was a hot chick! And those nice white teeth. Guess cum is a good whitner![/QUOTE][url]Http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981748897[/url]

[QUOTE=Rito1;1592590][url]Http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474981748897[/url][/QUOTE]Look at the 4th paragraph of the article. Read the whole paragraph. Now check this: instead of writing something like 'Hopefully, we will learn from these mistakes, make amends, etc, etc." they wrote what?

Human hypocrisy especially that of the righteous, knows no bounds.

Good point. Unbelievable self righteous attitude, like wright is the one and the only one responsible for. For what? People will say it's ok for someone to get a job because they did really well in that interview (ie, had charisma, ie, had sexual magnetism, ie, got hired because the f-ing interviewer was enthralled by, attracted to them on some level, even if it was an astrophysics position and the candidate was some old white haired man, but with the charisma of carl sagan. What a bunch of hypocritical be. S.).

Why do the puritans think it's somehow nobler to have a society that discriminates against the less attractive people? Who is the news anchor? The tv star? The magazine cover girl or guy? It's the person the puritans find sexually attractive, want to f-ck, etc. So why is it ok for the world to allow the nba star to get girls galore, but the short balding not-rich guy can't get it because he doesn't have the power, status, fame, and he should therefore according to the puritans be content not to get any p-ssy. Such hypocrisy. Why not let him pay for it. Everyone does anyway one way or another. The puritan be. S. Is a lie and I can't believe wright's life is going to be screwed because of this. Such be. S. I'm not some short fat balding buy by the way, I'm actually tall, dark, and handsome, (LOL) , but I loathe the witchburners. There is nothing fair about the puritanical society that rules on such matters.

[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1592761]Look at the 4th paragraph of the article. Read the whole paragraph. Now check this: instead of writing something like 'Hopefully, we will learn from these mistakes, make amends, etc, etc." they wrote what?

Human hypocrisy especially that of the righteous, knows no bounds.[/QUOTE]