KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=RandomActOffAp;5626701]So to add to this. I'm a concerned about the verification process. How does having an image of me help their operation? It seems that it puts me at unreasonable risk and is of no benefit to them. How are these files utilized on their end? Is there any way to satisfy their verification process while also minimizing exposure?[/QUOTE]When Chloe (Amanda's friend) used to run [URL]girlfriendinseattle.com[/URL], they required my state issued I'd + business card or employee I'd card + previous provider's name & phone number + and they actually contacted my company and requested to be transferred to my office + also they actually did a soft pull. However, considering all the risks they are exposed to: robbery, assault, abduction, murder, rape, threat, and, STD, physical injury, and, on top of everything, the sting operations of local and federal law enforcements, honestly, what they are requesting is minimum.

[QUOTE=RandomActOffAp;5626701]So to add to this. I'm a concerned about the verification process. How does having an image of me help their operation? It seems that it puts me at unreasonable risk and is of no benefit to them. How are these files utilized on their end? Is there any way to satisfy their verification process while also minimizing exposure?[/QUOTE]They send your ID photo to the provider so she can do her best to match the photo to the dude on the other side of the door's peep hole. I've seen the images on the girls' phones. If you can find some other way to verify without ID, it's way safer.

[QUOTE=RandomActOffAp;5626701]So to add to this. I'm a concerned about the verification process. How does having an image of me help their operation? It seems that it puts me at unreasonable risk and is of no benefit to them. How are these files utilized on their end? Is there any way to satisfy their verification process while also minimizing exposure?[/QUOTE]They can match the photo with the guy standing in front of the door through the peep hole.

And I've seen at least one "k" agency do this (saw my photo on her phone) and another lady (told me she would).

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5626998]they actually contacted my company and requested to be transferred to my office + also they actually did a soft pull.

honestly, what they are requesting is minimum.[/QUOTE]Everyone determines their own risk horizon, but should they decide to. They own you. You are aware that these are criminal enterprises and not just some poor girl in a hotel room, right?

Yesterday I was going to see Chloe at lollipop girls. So texted both the new lollipop girls number and the GSL new number. No surprise they are maintained by the same person. I had also sent several screenshot text messages from the previous number. Then she asked for my age and ethnicity. No other info required. Unfortunately Chloe was booked at the time I was available so I texted Kangels and booked one hour with Coco. One door closes and another door opens up. Coco just started Monday. She is here for 2 weeks. She is based in LA and has been here in USA for 7 months. English is a little limited. She said she is 22 years old and I believe that is probably true. She said she is from Seoul but she has the big round Busan face that Aussie Furry likes (from previous posts). She has pretty large natural breasts and the body of a 22 years old. She is petite. Neither skinny nor chubby. Cute smile and pretty eyes. MSOG available. The massage is probably the weakest part of her game. I would give her a thumbs up.

[QUOTE=WillShookSpear;5627184]Everyone determines their own risk horizon, but should they decide to. They own you. You are aware that these are criminal enterprises and not just some poor girl in a hotel room, right?[/QUOTE]This is said more about the same Evil Triad who owns all those massage parlors in Snohomish County: That they are an Evil Triad.

Same with who owns KAngels. A different, but still evil triad.

I am pretty sure I have seen the pictures of Kangels Tia somewhere else before.

Was it Yoko from Kpleasures. ? Anyone?

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

[QUOTE=SeattleDoctor;5627409]Yesterday I was going to see Chloe at lollipop girls. So texted both the new lollipop girls number and the GSL new number. No surprise they are maintained by the same person. I had also sent several screenshot text messages from the previous number. Then she asked for my age and ethnicity. No other info required. Unfortunately Chloe was booked at the time I was available so I texted Kangels and booked one hour with Coco. One door closes and another door opens up. Coco just started Monday. She is here for 2 weeks. She is based in LA and has been here in USA for 7 months. English is a little limited. She said she is 22 years old and I believe that is probably true. She said she is from Seoul but she has the big round Busan face that Aussie Furry likes (from previous posts). She has pretty large natural breasts and the body of a 22 years old. She is petite. Neither skinny nor chubby. Cute smile and pretty eyes. MSOG available. The massage is probably the weakest part of her game. I would give her a thumbs up.[/QUOTE]Great intel. Thanks! Adding her to my want to-see list.

And speaking of Busan faces, I spent an hour in pure Joy (GSL) today. Pigtails by request. Nobody rides CG / RCG better. Tomorrow is her last day and I'm bummed. Straight up superstar.

[QUOTE=HorseEngnine;5627721]I am pretty sure I have seen the pictures of Kangels Tia somewhere else before.

Was it Yoko from Kpleasures. ? Anyone?[/QUOTE]FWIW, she's Tiana in San Jose.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5627877]FWIW, she's Tiana in San Jose.[/QUOTE]Thanks Aussie.

However, it looks like there're more than one Tiana in the bay area. (in different agencies).

Can you please give another pointer?

Or any review / previous experience?

Thanks again!

[QUOTE=HorseEngnine;5627967]Thanks Aussie.

However, it looks like there're more than one Tiana in the bay area. (in different agencies).

Can you please give another pointer?

Or any review / previous experience?

Thanks again![/QUOTE]She was with SecretAngels agency (reverse image search found her) but I don't have any personal experience with her.

[QUOTE=Meorme;5627044]They can match the photo with the guy standing in front of the door through the peep hole.

And I've seen at least one "k" agency do this (saw my photo on her phone) and another lady (told me she would).[/QUOTE]Wonder how the photo matching to face works now that most of us would be walking to the door with masks on. Do they ask you to take off your masks so they can see you thru peephole?

Or it is just something they have done for security purposes before and continue the process. Still think it's invasive to send picture of your self over to a questionable destination. What happens if you are unable to follow thru. Now they have your picture (assuming you sent a real one) and who knows how it would be used.

but to each their own I guess.

[QUOTE=CoolStud;5628963]Wonder how the photo matching to face works now that most of us would be walking to the door with masks on. Do they ask you to take off your masks so they can see you thru peephole?

Or it is just something they have done for security purposes before and continue the process. Still think it's invasive to send picture of your self over to a questionable destination. What happens if you are unable to follow thru. Now they have your picture (assuming you sent a real one) and who knows how it would be used.

but to each their own I guess.[/QUOTE]Every lady I've seen this year, including several Korean and several Thai ladies, were all in "secure" apartment buildings requiring me to "buz" into the building.

Property management had cameras around the exterior of the buildings and all entrances, at the very least. I think some have cameras in the elevators and hallways.

At least two, I know, had cameras on the call box, were they could see you before buzzing you in. And, presumably, could capture that image if they wanted, I'm sure.

Once you are at the door, they are either opening it or not. There's no talking, arguing, etc going on while you are in the hall.

[QUOTE=CoolStud;5628963]Wonder how the photo matching to face works now that most of us would be walking to the door with masks on. Do they ask you to take off your masks so they can see you thru peephole?

Or it is just something they have done for security purposes before and continue the process. Still think it's invasive to send picture of your self over to a questionable destination. What happens if you are unable to follow thru. Now they have your picture (assuming you sent a real one) and who knows how it would be used.

but to each their own I guess.[/QUOTE]I wish they accepted other verification like references from other sites. No way I'm sending a real photo to this or any provider. I'm surprised others have been so willing to hand that over.