-
Harleigh
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0287e863-a9b5-45d0-acef-00eb4c4f3456[/URL]
Everything covered, including oral, and she told me her ppm was 700. Doesn't seem like a pro, just low volume with rules. It wasn't worth countering for me, I would have gone up to 400 for a few hours, but that's the first time I've been offered head with a cover by a girl SA that wasn't an obvious pro.
-
Tranny or just ugly
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/663f8a58-5729-4222-804f-70037281817b[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Rome400;7417220][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0287e863-a9b5-45d0-acef-00eb4c4f3456[/URL]
Everything covered, including oral, and she told me her ppm was 700. Doesn't seem like a pro, just low volume with rules. It wasn't worth countering for me, I would have gone up to 400 for a few hours, but that's the first time I've been offered head with a cover by a girl SA that wasn't an obvious pro.[/QUOTE]Some of these chicks are very entitled, but good on you for not tolerating it. You just have to walk away. She has GPS and quoted me the same and I was like nah. You can get a lot more for a lot less with other chicks just got to find them.
it makes me laugh when these chicks have rules lol. they want something for nothing but its just how women are programed to be.
I remember one chick who I was going to do a platonic meet and greet. 2 hours before she messaged me saying she wanted 200 just for the meet and greet. Obviously, she was trying to be conniving like alot of these chicks but just have to walk away. I think she is still active on seeking, her name is jules
-
Yup
[QUOTE=Banjomania;7417146]It's a new cereal. Kara Flakes. I have scheduled several meet and greet events with her and she always cancels.[/QUOTE]Haha yup, same here, she flaked on me multiple times, huge time waster, the last time she flaked she tried texting me later "oh I'm actually in the area now" and I essentially told her to fuck off.
-
Flake
[QUOTE=Banjomania;7417146]It's a new cereal. Kara Flakes. I have scheduled several meet and greet events with her and she always cancels.[/QUOTE]She flaked too. And after a month, she texted me. I said you flaked me last time, how do I trust you.
-
[QUOTE=Rome400;7417220][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0287e863-a9b5-45d0-acef-00eb4c4f3456[/URL]
Everything covered, including oral, and she told me her ppm was 700. Doesn't seem like a pro, just low volume with rules. It wasn't worth countering for me, I would have gone up to 400 for a few hours, but that's the first time I've been offered head with a cover by a girl SA that wasn't an obvious pro.[/QUOTE]I've seen her 4th Pic on a pro site before a few years ago.
-
Major changes to Seeking
So as of two days ago, Seeking abruptly disqualified my user name, photo and descriptions. Apparently now the user name needs to be a first name, the photo can't be discreet or hidden or far away, and the description (About me section etc) can't mention SB, SD or arrangements. The site is pivoting hard to be a legit dating site which is BS. They still expect members to pay for premium membership in order to use the chat function. So for me that's probably the end of my time on the site. I had a real yet discreet photo and the same name and photo since 2019. Now they made these changes abruptly and unannounced. I did email support and have been in a convo with them for two days. They are responsive but basically I said "we pay a premium membership here for discretion, if I wanted my face plastered on the internet I'd just use one of 100 free dating apps (most of which have more members and are better developed). It's complete BS. Not fair that girls I've been talking to for months trying to meet now see a new name and a blank photo and different description. Most all the sudden stopped responding. I'm going to have to find another site / app to use.
-
Yeah, I've heard that too — but honestly, I don't think they're super strict about it unless it's something really out there. Mine isn't a typical first name either and I've never had an issue. Sounds like they're tightening things up though, especially with profile descriptions. I had a similar problem trying to tweak mine and got that vague "violation" message. Kinda frustrating when it's not clear what's wrong.
[QUOTE=MPCreeper;7418192]So as of two days ago, Seeking abruptly disqualified my user name, photo and descriptions. [/QUOTE]
-
My profle
[QUOTE=FriendlyKing;7418289]Yeah, I've heard that too but honestly, I don't think they're super strict about it unless it's something really out there. Mine isn't a typical first name either, and I've never had an issue. Sounds like they're tightening things up though, especially with profile descriptions. I had a similar problem trying to tweak mine and got that vague "violation" message. Kinda frustrating when it's not clear what's wrong.[/QUOTE]I tried to change it, which said I wasn't interested in bag chasers, and would love to teach you financial independence and literacy, like opening a Roth, and they flagged it saying I was offering financial incentives for sexual services.
-
Pictures
[QUOTE=FriendlyKing;7418289]Yeah, I've heard that too but honestly, I don't think they're super strict about it unless it's something really out there. Mine isn't a typical first name either and I've never had an issue. Sounds like they're tightening things up though, especially with profile descriptions. I had a similar problem trying to tweak mine and got that vague "violation" message. Kinda frustrating when it's not clear what's wrong.[/QUOTE]Yea I'm not as worried about the names or profile description. My biggest issue is the new photo policy that eliminates our ability at discretion.
-
[QUOTE=Gabbos;7416787]Hi Guys,
Any info on this one:
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/76df89d8-5004-49e9-8308-2530762baa8e[/URL]
I like her look and the photos she sent but something tells me she's a pro.
-G.[/QUOTE]I cannot stress this enough: RUN. I saw her once, it was awful. She's missing literally all of her teeth. She smokes "daps" the whole time and then starts texting later me about how some other dude is better than me.
-
[QUOTE=MPCreeper;7418192]So as of two days ago, Seeking abruptly disqualified my user name, photo and descriptions. Apparently now the user name needs to be a first name, the photo can't be discreet or hidden or far away, and the description (About me section etc) can't mention SB, SD or arrangements. The site is pivoting hard to be a legit dating site which is BS. They still expect members to pay for premium membership in order to use the chat function. So for me that's probably the end of my time on the site. I had a real yet discreet photo and the same name and photo since 2019. Now they made these changes abruptly and unannounced. I did email support and have been in a convo with them for two days. They are responsive but basically I said "we pay a premium membership here for discretion, if I wanted my face plastered on the internet I'd just use one of 100 free dating apps (most of which have more members and are better developed). It's complete BS. Not fair that girls I've been talking to for months trying to meet now see a new name and a blank photo and different description. Most all the sudden stopped responding. I'm going to have to find another site / app to use.[/QUOTE]If I worked at seeking, I'd be more focused on writing image analysis that flagged images which are clearly being run through filters. I've only had a couple issues where I met someone in real life that didn't match their profile because of filters, but if you look at the search results, almost every single listing is using crazy filters.
-
Lily
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04624f96-c0c8-41d7-ad4f-0f0b27c11a2d[/URL]
Yo, what is going on with her legs?
-
Quinn
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f480eacc-e3d9-4f01-99a9-3cd388aaff9d[/URL]
Has anyone met Quinn?
-
[QUOTE=ThomasPl31;7416371]Met her for meet in greet at time was in Attleboro area. Pics are real. Had GPS and wanted gas money for driving 5 miles for coffee.[/QUOTE]Pics real, but how obscured is are the filters making her?