[QUOTE=WayWardWind4;4012589]Thanks you Scarlette I will post it. This argument going on on the board is boderline ridiculous to me because there are a multitude of ladies that possibly could have HIV. There are multitudes that have used needles. Testing one lady will protect no one- If hobbyist is doing bareback. This lady you are referring to has been tested and has come up clean. She was in the hospital a month ago for illness and asked to have blood tested. But she is not willing to trust these men with her real name. Plus this knowledge does not protect the hobbyist. That is reason I have not mentioned it.
They are hiding behind false illusions if they think that this one lady is a totem for STDS, while all the others that are active syringe users are safe. If she uses drugs she is one of a hoard of ladies and what do these men think they are going to get when they patrol Street Walker section of the review. - which is a very active thread on the board. MammieJammer has even taken it to the level that certain test are not adequate. Which is probably right. But these men need to drop the hobby if they are going to cry foul and then do BB. The ones that want BB have little room to complain. They know the risk and there has been no STD outbreak I know of in the Huntsville area. Plus this lady bc she has been tested is one of safe ones. For now. All of the ladies that use drugs could be safe as far as I know. But thank you for the information.[/QUOTE]Hello WWW4.
When hobbyist finds an ad and meets the provider, it is up to him to evaluate the situation and decide to take a risk or not.
When another hobbyist introduces a utr provider, one might assume that the girl has some qualities that other providers do not have, such as being on time and clean and safe. If not, what is the point in going with a provider introduced by you? The realtor avent makes bis homework before selling a house, and the car dealer offers a guarantee on pre-owned cars, don't they?
