Local politicians are just a bunch of hypocrites
Hi Sosurf,
Your arguments make a lot of sense, but your local politicians have always been just a bunch of hypocrites. They are fearful that their ugly wives will slice their balls off for touching prostitution proposals, and the dumb old ugly sexless women, who love to hang out at voting stations, would stick knives in their backs.
These fucking pol's would much sooner entertaining gambling proposals than anything related to prostitution. Remember sex is the primal motivation for everything in life. I did not discover it. Freud proved it. Women need sex more than food, or even air. They would put up a big fight against any possiblity that their hubbies can easily buy sex and let their pussies hang out to dry!
To legalize prostitution, perhaps we should start campaigning in cities that already legalized gambling. The chances for success would be better. Us mongers need better representation in local governments to get our needs filled. Perhaps a few mongers shouldstart running for local offices in cities such as Compton, Inglewood, Bellflower, Industry...We would love to patronize your sex industry and pay your special taxes. Just promise you will look after the poor girls in the business.
Indian tribes can do whatever they want in their reservations, right? The chicas should offer their tricks there. I met a few squaws who were absolutely beautiful. They seem to have very stern attitudes though.
I remember a jealous squaw in Arkansas, who went into a motel with her husband, got drunk on fire water, proceeded cut off his penis, disembowed the guy, and slept with the bloody corpse overnight until discovered the next day by the cleaning crew.... Just some advanced warnings to you studs....
[QUOTE=sosurf]through zoning and you can limit it to industrial areas where
there are no kids around. Also, no street hoes. Do like
Amsterdam and some Counties in Nevada. Red light districts
in industrial areas. The houses would pay business and
health permits. The girls would require licensing which
would include regular testing, finger printing, and attending annual
sex education classes. Owners of the houses would have
to clean criminal records like casinos do. There would
be a limit on how many ho houses of city could have per
square mile. Street hoing and other unlicensed hoing
would remain illegal. We the consumers would be assured
of a safe environment to enjoy our thing.[/QUOTE]
sum CL a hole opinions(dark blk holes)
Being a conusuier of the female ass myself, the only female ass i like are the young petite sweet smelling and tastey ones(25yo/105lb or less spinners). Not these fat,stinky,smelly,and hairy dark grand canyons we see on CL(ewwww). They could be black holes.These asses we see advertised are enough to scare away the mighty king kong while he's in heat, lol.
smack is in
asain ucker is out
A Consumer guide to prostitution!
[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10879309/[/url]
Angelica is a shade over 5½ feet tall. She is in her late 20s, and she has straight brown hair down to the middle of her back. She has an athletic body with surgically sculpted breasts. She sports a few tattoos but no pubic hair, and her belly button is pierced.
For the right price — which she pegs at $350 an hour, to start — Angelica will have sex with you. She will perform unprotected oral sex, and she will usually agree to anal intercourse. She will, if you have the money, bring a second lady with her, and they will have sex with each other for your enjoyment. Or, if you wish, she will set up an S&M scene.
We know all this about Angelica because she is a professional escort, and you can read what her customers say about her on Web sites where men who purchase such services gather to review and rate thousands of working ladies like her.
Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a great deal more — very explicit and very detailed — about Angelica and what she does in her profile on The Erotic Review, the largest of the escort-rating Web sites. In its aim and practice, it essentially is a consumer guide for prostitutes and johns.
“I know from an escort’s point of view the review boards really, really help a lot, because everyone always asks, ‘Well, do you have reviews?’” said Billie, an escort in a Midwestern state whose name, like those of all other escorts cited in this report, has been changed. “If they’re bad, that’s not good, but when they’re good ones, it really helps an escort get established when she’s just starting out.”
Not all escorts sell sex. Some sell sensual massages or even actual, non-sexual dinner companionship. But law enforcement officials estimate that 90 percent to 95 percent of the escorts listed on the Web sites are selling sex. And there is very little the police can do about it, even when it is openly discussed on sites like The Erotic Review.
Related story
Sites stay several steps ahead of the law
Pursuing ‘the hobby’
Many men make a lifestyle out of patronizing escorts. They call it “the hobby,” not prostitution, and they are “hobbyists,” not johns. They consider themselves connoisseurs of fine women, and they are eager to learn from their fellow hobbyists who will provide exactly what they want.
What they want is generally very clear: They want a centerfold model who will hang adoringly on their every word in public, then perform any sex act in any position with professional skill in private. The combination — a romantic dinner date followed by uninhibited sex — is called the “girlfriend experience,” or GFE. Of Angelica, a reviewer wrote, “The term GFE should be based on what she is.”
How this story was reported
The names of all escorts in this report have been changed, and their locations have been withheld. An MSNBC.com reporter wrote or called them through the contact information provided in their reviews on The Erotic Review, for which he registered using his real name and his MSNBC.com address. He immediately identified himself as a reporter and explained the nature of the articles to every woman who was approached for an interview.
Before review sites came along, hobbyists had no way to protect themselves, said David R. Elms, president of The Erotic Review, which began in 1999 and claims that it gets 350,000 unique visitors a day.
“I’m a hobbyist, and I was getting ripped off,” Elms said. “There was no way to hold people accountable for their actions.
“There had to be a way to get this information out,” he said. “If a guy got ripped off or he received good service, then he could tell somebody. We treat it as something equivalent to going out on a hot date and telling a hundred thousand of your closest friends.”
Officially, review sites insist that it is just the hot date that men are paying for — in other words, companionship and conversation, not sex. Whatever happens beyond that “is purely a matter of personal choice and personal preference between two or more consenting adults,” says a disclaimer on Big Doggie, another nationwide escort review site. The Erotic Review goes further: “You can give it away for free, but you can’t sell it.”
But interviews with working escorts across the country and with review-site operators, activists for prostitutes’ rights and law enforcement officials bear out what is evident in the reviews themselves: Sex is the “it” being sold.
“‘Escorts’ — right,” said Master Sgt. Bruce C. Woodbury, head of the Vice/Morals Unit of the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office in Tampa, Fla., which mounted an ultimately unsuccessful sting operation against Big Doggie in 2002. “Nudge, nudge, wink, wink.”
For escorts, a complicated relationship
Professional escorts have a love-hate relationship with The Erotic Review and Big Doggie, where, for a monthly or quarterly fee, men can find out exactly what a woman’s customers think of her.
The sites represent the ultimate commodification of women, who are impersonally rated by anonymous men in much the same way they would judge a sports car or a racehorse. Some find it demeaning, but most acknowledge that it’s a fast, easy way to build a reliable client base.
“It’s a double-edged sword,” said Helen, a $350-an-hour escort in a Western state, who said she was in the business to make enough money to go to graduate school so she could teach.
Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Yes, it does give you exposure that you may not otherwise get,” she said. But at the same time, an escort can find her livelihood held hostage to the whims of a customer who doesn’t get exactly what he wants, at the price he wants to pay.
“This lady spoke to a client she considered a friend, and she was apparently very upset because the guy had threatened to post a bad review,” Helen said. “I’ve personally never had it happen, but I know it has happened.”
The sites serve another purpose, too: They make prostitution a little safer, because women can challenge unfair or inaccurate reviews in forums on the sites and they can lodge complaints with site administrators.
Much more than streetwalkers or prostitutes who are controlled by pimps, a professional escort has a significant element of control, because she can screen potential clients, who already know how pricey her services are — top-dollar escorts in New York have been known to command $2,000 an hour.
That control is elevated when a client comes to her through a review site. Reviewers earn credibility by the accuracy of their reviews, so over time, an escort can essentially rate the men who are rating her.
Robyn Few, a former prostitute who lobbies to decriminalize prostitution as executive director of the Sex Workers Outreach Project in San Francisco, said that on a personal level, “I hate it” that women are “being reviewed and rated like some subhuman.”
But she added: “The Erotic Review and Big Doggie took some of the danger out of it. When providers have a bad client, they write about it. ... It’s one way to out the bad guys.”
Billie, who said she got at least 90 percent of her business through The Erotic Review and a similar local review site, said: “I haven’t had a bad experience at all. The people that I have seen, or whatever, they have all been professionals — really upper-class people.”
Cleaning up prostitution
If nothing else, Few and many escorts say, the success of The Erotic Review and Big Doggie demonstrate that prostitution can be a respectable business. For the first time, the women are not victims, they say — they are not walking the streets, and they are relatively protected, and they run their own business affairs.
Now it is the customer who must solicit the prostitute, not the other way around, as it has always been through history. From the safety and relative anonymity of their living rooms, highly rated independent escorts like Billie and Helen can pick and choose from hundreds of potential clients.
“I pretty much have regular clients now,” said Billie, whose ratings are consistently 8 to 10 (out of 10) for both appearance and “performance.” These are men whom she has screened and whom she trusts, and she thinks that’s why “I’ve never been cheated or anything.”
In the future, the balance of power will shift more and more to women who approach prostitution as a profession and can take advantage of advances in technology, said Few, the sex workers advocate.
“We are not going to stop prostitution. We are not going to stop it,” she said. “It is not going to be abolished. It is not going away. And the Internet has connected us around the world.”
Said Helen, the escort from the West: “Technology increases exponentially. So who knows what’s going to be out there in 10 years?”
3 photos
My saturday Harbor Report
Hey guys,
I just wanted to post some pics of a girl I saw at 76, I picked her up, and she wanted 12 and ended up with 2, on her (over paid by at least 4, boy was I stupid.), but she did model a new uni I got in my travels, Lets Go Rams? Anyway she did give a good mic check, and was great sliding between the mountains, as she licked and kissed, but was average in all other areas, and was weak with the closer. I would recomend her but not for 12 unless she includes extras, which she did not. I like a box lunch, and she refused to give me one. I would not be with her again.
