Printable View
[QUOTE=RexHughes;5181675]Are there any current or recent KAngels who specifically don't offer BBFS PSE, even for a 100 tip?[/QUOTE]Short answer: All the providers on the website today are PSE.
Long answer: When you click on the provider's photo to read their dedicated page, the first paragraph states they are either "GFE" or "PSE / GFE. " Personally I gravitate toward the GFE-only girls but for the +100 guys that's how you can tell.
[QUOTE=RexHughes;5181946]Who was the worst?[/QUOTE]It was with a K-girl that had been a former superstar called Brigitte. I'd seen her in Seattle and Portland a few times and then she disappeared after the big Bellevue bust. I saw her about a year later on the east coast during a work trip and in my naive excitement I booked her for two hours. Total mistake. She had gained a lot of weight and lost a lot of fire. There was no fantasy element. She complained the entire time. I wanted at least two pops but after the first she simply lost interest and just wanted to chat. If she ever pops up back here again I'll pipe up.
[QUOTE=FrontierMan;5181368]And to add, my experience with Diana this time was also average probably for the same reasons mentioned by others.[/QUOTE]Was the reason that you didn't go for the +100 option? I never do and lately have been starting to suspect that not paying the extra results in an experience not worth the basic rate.
They're the only k-girl game in town that has the +100 option and the girls are getting more out of that so if you don't do the extra, you get less service these days unless you are a real regular and the booker warns them ahead of time. Other than my initial B&S incident, I've always had good experience with KAngels whether I opt for +100 or not. I've even had PSE without paying the extra too. It really depends on the girl. Also as far as matching names to girls, don't bother. They keep a separate list for each visitor so your Ivy!= Diana and others having Ivy=Diana experience differs. Phone number switching usually end up with different names for the same girl. I learnt that from the girls themselves.
If you want relatively consistent good service without the +100, go GSL.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182522]Was the reason that you didn't go for the +100 option? I never do and lately have been starting to suspect that not paying the extra results in an experience not worth the basic rate.[/QUOTE]With all the negative reports, seems like KAngels is definitely going downhill, and certainly not worth the $$. In actuality, they have always been way too expensive.
I hate how the agencies play musical chairs with the girls and their names. Hopefully this forum will help sift through as much BS as possible. For example: check the photos for Diana at Kangels:
[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/diana/[/URL]
Check the one where she's wearing the red swimsuit with the large hoop earings. Look familiar? That's the photo used for Brooke on the front page at LunaModels in Tacoma (continually "on vacation" these days):
[URL]https://www.lunamodels.ch/models[/URL]
That photo isn't Brooke (I've met Brooke) and I doubt it's Diana. Tho I think I remember that same photo set being used recently at Kangels for "Foxxy. " I saw Foxxy and wasn't impressed.
New girl Nana used the same name in LA:
[URL]http://www.kgirlclub.com/gallery/143[/URL]
And used to be "Nara" at BunnyClub. The search result on her photo still works but the page at BunnyClub is dead ([URL]https://bunnygirlsclub.com/bunny-nara/[/URL]).
Nina: Looks nothing like photos. I met her recently and my opinion is that she is too old, too much body fat, negative attitude, and terrible service. I suspect the only reason she still gets clients is that some guys will look past her weaknesses just to get BBFS.
Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.
Ellie: I have zero good intel.
Lumi: I have not met Lumi, but reviews for her are all over the map. From "allows facial" (not sure I believe that) to "meh. ".
Jina: I have no intel on her either, but I doubt previous comments that she is Tiana. I've seen Tiana a few times and the booker knows I like her. So when I asked if Jina was Tiana, it would be in his best interest to tell me (and he often tells me who the double-named girls are). He said she is not the same girl.
Nana: I have zero good intel.
Booker says that all the above girls are unique and haven't used previous names here. I believe him that there are actually six girls currently working here (I believe they have 3 apartments) but I'm not yet convinced that none are re-cycled names.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182846]Nina: Looks nothing like photos. I met her recently and my opinion is that she is too old, too much body fat, negative attitude, and terrible service. I suspect the only reason she still gets clients is that some guys will look past her weaknesses just to get BBFS.
Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.
Ellie: I have zero good intel.
Lumi: I have not met Lumi, but reviews for her are all over the map. From "allows facial" (not sure I believe that) to "meh. ".
Jina: I have no intel on her either, but I doubt previous comments that she is Tiana. I've seen Tiana a few times and the booker knows I like her. So when I asked if Jina was Tiana, it would be in his best interest to tell me (and he often tells me who the double-named girls are). He said she is not the same girl.
Nana: I have zero good intel.
Booker says that all the above girls are unique and haven't used previous names here. I believe him that there are actually six girls currently working here (I believe they have 3 apartments) but I'm not yet convinced that none are re-cycled names.[/QUOTE]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.
Nina used to be Superstar Christin.
Ellie used to be Lyla.
Saw them 10 years ago. Both still look sexy, but look 10 years older.
[QUOTE=Twister100;5183163]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.[/QUOTE]Micky used to go by Hannah on Kangels back in 2019. At least those pictures were used for "Hannah". If it's the same girl, Hannah gave a nice DFK, BBBJ, BLS & 69 session but didn't provide PSE at the time.
[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/grand-o-pening-young-hot-hannah-is-hot-for-u-visit-www-kangels-ch-206-450-7789/20262647[/URL]
As for Duos, I asked and the rates seems extremely high. $7 for both girls. $9 for both girls and they interact with each other. $10 for bb with both.
[QUOTE=Twister100;5183163]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.[/QUOTE]I haven't done a duo with Kangels, but I've done two Korean duos and one Thai duo. The K-girls were back in the $300/ hr Bellevue days so it was $600 for both girls for the hour. But I'd seen all four K-girls individually before the duos so I knew they were all attractive to me. The Koreans never interacted beyond touching each other, and FS was covered in both cases, but when I close my eyes and think of the hottest sex of my life, both Korean dates are always near the top. Looking down at two sets of Korean eyes locked onto mine -- one girl with my balls in her mouth while the other deep throats me, then switching, then switching again, until I came so hard in one of their mouths I almost passed out. I've got goosebumps thinking about it years later.
The Thai duo was meh. It was one teaching the other how to do a FS body rub session. Ended up just basically fucking the experienced one while the new one watched.
So if you can assure yourself a good one, it might be worth the coin just to have that memory.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182846]
Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.
[/QUOTE]I texted the original "Foxy" to check in and she's still in LA. Probably a different girl, just agency recycling of lineup aliases. Foxy and I had an after-hours FWB after our first appointment and she would totally hit me up for breakfast if she was in town.
[QUOTE=RexHughes;5180268]My back road source just reported, that Nana's body is a match to that of "since departed" Nikki.
Let's keep working together, helping each other out, an' putting these puzzle pieces together![/QUOTE]It's not Nikki, it's someone else.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5186652]I haven't done a duo with Kangels, but I've done two Korean duos and one Thai duo. The K-girls were back in the $300/ hr Bellevue days so it was $600 for both girls for the hour. But I'd seen all four K-girls individually before the duos so I knew they were all attractive to me. The Koreans never interacted beyond touching each other, and FS was covered in both cases, but when I close my eyes and think of the hottest sex of my life, both Korean dates are always near the top. Looking down at two sets of Korean eyes locked onto mine -- one girl with my balls in her mouth while the other deep throats me, then switching, then switching again, until I came so hard in one of their mouths I almost passed out. I've got goosebumps thinking about it years later.
The Thai duo was meh. It was one teaching the other how to do a FS body rub session. Ended up just basically fucking the experienced one while the new one watched.
So if you can assure yourself a good one, it might be worth the coin just to have that memory.[/QUOTE]Nice, sounds like you got the duo at the right time.
[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;5180327]Thanks Ashun. Weird. He definitely promoted that agency pretty aggressively. Either way. Hopefully he will be back soon. He provided good intel. But I never met any of them so not sure if the intel was legit. Either way. I wish him the best wherever he is and hope he returns.[/QUOTE]I have my doubts. At times it sounded like he was working for that group. On the LV forum they had issues with agencies writing fake reviews.