Rants, Raves, and Stupid Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Bullshit

Now, both MajorSlowCum and NcPantyHose2 quit posting on Sep 10th 2015 and Sep 11th 2015 respectively and both returned posting Feb 8th 2016 and Feb 10th 2016 respectively. It's also funny how often they have both referenced PangShalom, just about every time, since they have returned to posting again. Personally, I believe both Major and Panty are the same member and now I have to wonder what their connection to Pang is (same member?).

I didn't mind Pang because he seemed legit in that the experiences did occur even though the details were sometimes "colorful" to help build the story. I do not care for Major and Panty because they both often post crap for their own entertainment; watching the board responses and sending members and guests on wild pootang chases.

09-10-15.

[QUOTE=MajorSlowCum;2611913]Had a really good time at that yucca place in carey. Got happy joy fun the other morning. It is indeed the new place for action in the triangle. Rubbed all over and it best rub ever got. Even better than the famous Mimi on capitale.[/QUOTE]02-10-16.

[QUOTE=MajorSlowCum;2792123]Interesting. Sounds like that pang dude.[/QUOTE]02-12-16.

[QUOTE=MajorSlowCum;2794896]Will miss poor pang and his long and unbelievable stories. He use to email me whole chapters that I would read before lights out. Guy did some very risky things. To much gay stories sometimes. But everybody has there demons. I wish him well.[/QUOTE]02-14-16.

[QUOTE=MajorSlowCum;2797667]And that "thick and tasty" means she-meat. Beware of some of those BP gals. They ain't really gals once they lift that skirt! At least according to Pang.[/QUOTE]09-11-15.

[QUOTE=NcPantyHose2;2612330]Oh I think a vast majority of guys on the adult bookstore thread would pay big money ($40 in their minds) to hit that up. She looks perfect for their dirty booth action and stained sofa gangbangs LOL. In fact looks like she just came from there! LOL.[/QUOTE]02-09-16.

[QUOTE=NcPantyHose2;2790537]Agreed man, Phang is a pussy lickin machine. Don't know why so many comrades dog on him. His advice has always been spot on and he has saved me from hooking with some negative shit. Give Phang credit. He is the real deal. Period. He has earned senior status.[/QUOTE]02-10-16.

[QUOTE=NcPantyHose2;2792111]ILoveDeams; first off thanks Pang for your review on her and TOFTT.

YES, thanks Pang as well. He got me more prime pussy tan anyone else on this board despite peoples concerns on his truthfullness or possible exaggeration of sexual encounters. My dick has been rock hard the last six months thanks to him.[/QUOTE]02-11-16.

[QUOTE=NcPantyHose2;2792815]Nice. Me to. Between this and Pangs cock throbbing dreams I am all juiced out tonight. Need to run to Walgreens for some more tissue and vaseline.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Purple45;2798176]Now, both MajorSlowCum and NcPantyHose2 quit posting on Sep 10th 2015 and Sep 11th 2015 respectively and both returned posting Feb 8th 2016 and Feb 10th 2016 respectively. It's also funny how often they have both referenced PangShalom, just about every time, since they have returned to posting again. Personally, I believe both Major and Panty are the same member and now I have to wonder what their connection to Pang is (same member?).

I didn't mind Pang because he seemed legit in that the experiences did occur even though the details were sometimes "colorful" to help build the story. I do not care for Major and Panty because they both often post crap for their own entertainment; watching the board responses and sending members and guests on wild pootang chases.

09-10-15.

02-10-16.

02-12-16.

02-14-16.

09-11-15.

02-09-16.

02-10-16.

02-11-16.[/QUOTE]Good work. I think you're onto something.

[QUOTE=PleasureSeeker;2798196]Good work. I think you're onto something.[/QUOTE]Not vouching for Ncpanyhose2 but after his review of the lip action at Knightdale had me making my 2 visit. I had a similar experience but a little more BBBJTC cim with spit action. From what the girl told me she was leaving that day and wouldn't return until late Feburary and wouldn't be returning to that location. So Ncpanyhose2 might not be far from the truth at least on this post.

[QUOTE=PleasureSeeker;2798196]Good work. I think you're onto something.[/QUOTE]I'll follow and say that I believe Pang is not related to Panty or Major. Pang got banned after an argument with PleasureCum on the Durham board. I do believe that NCPantyHose2, MajorSlowCum and maybe PleasureCum (banned) are all the same person.

Everybody likes a good laugh sometimes but when the truth is twisted or a post is purely fabricated or a member is harassed and all for a selfish amusement then this is member drama. The board doesn't need these antics. Panty and Major have had credible posts in the past but when games begin then the reader can't decipher on what is a credible post from what is a prank or a jab to get under people's skin. IMO this is childish behavior especially on a board where supposedly men help other men save time and resources seeking legitimate ladies offering memorable dreams from those ladies who don't.

[QUOTE=PleasureSeeker;2798196]Good work. I think you're onto something.[/QUOTE]I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).

I'm real. Just not posting. I hate that my post fell into the suspect category. Just wanted to set the record straight that I'm me and the stuff that I posted on this board really happened to me.

[QUOTE=Chavez98;2802607]I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).[/QUOTE]

I got a PM one time from NCPanty on an old profile where he asked me if I was MajorSlow. So weird if they are they same person that he'd go that far to mess with my head.

[QUOTE=Chavez98;2802607]I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).[/QUOTE]

Add on CL said she be back t Pegasus Monday lunch time. Will toftt and report afterwards.

[QUOTE=NcPantyHose2;2870285]Add on CL said she be back t Pegasus Monday lunch time. Will toftt and report afterwards.[/QUOTE]I'm guessing no show?

[QUOTE=Khris;2870952]I'm guessing no show?[/QUOTE]Add disappeared about just before I arrived. A few other guys took the bait as well. No show so went over to apex AMP.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2908650][BLUE]Why do some of you guys have such a hard time ignoring the crazy people. Yes, there is something obviously wrong with that user, who the fuck knows what it is, but who cares. Ignore them and move on.

Now, that all this attention has been brought I had to ban that name so what do you think happens now? Will it be "oh I guess I shouldn't have done that" and they go away or they IMMEDIATELY register a new name, start all over again and nobody knows who the fuck they are?

Which one seems more likely?

Add them to your ignore list, give them NO attention, and move on, that is how you get rid of trolls. They don't care what KIND of attention you give them, they just want you to respond.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE](1) One problem with the ignore list is for instance, there is a particular poster who keeps on saying this girl or that girl that I've seen has STD and I contracted them because I saw her. I don't want to miss that post because it's an attack against me and certain girls. It seems it's even gotten to the point where I didn't post for a few weeks and it looked safe that I wouldn't flag an STD post since I wasn't around so they thought it was ok to post 'Look FatLever' isn't posting, he must have an STD.

(2) Another problem with the ignore list is you ignore the crazy person disseminating misinformation and a good number of members accept and continue discussing the misinformation and accept it as true. I think this is a time where people who contribute good information feel it's necessary to step in and call out BS on the crazy poster as was the case here.

[QUOTE=FatLever;2910164](1) One problem with the ignore list is for instance, there is a particular poster who keeps on saying this girl or that girl that I've seen has STD and I contracted them because I saw her. I don't want to miss that post because it's an attack against me and certain girls. It seems it's even gotten to the point where I didn't post for a few weeks and it looked safe that I wouldn't flag an STD post since I wasn't around so they thought it was ok to post 'Look FatLever' isn't posting, he must have an STD.

(2) Another problem with the ignore list is you ignore the crazy person disseminating misinformation and a good number of members accept and continue discussing the misinformation and accept it as true. I think this is a time where people who contribute good information feel it's necessary to step in and call out BS on the crazy poster as was the case here.[/QUOTE][BLUE]First, I didn't take this as an argument fat, I get it that you're talking it out. I moved it because it needs to be here, not there.

Let me take your arguments in order.

1a. Unsupported STD accusations are a violation of forum guidelines and will be redacted, you NEVER (this is not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you only need to report them and I will deal with them.

1b. There has never nor will ever be an attack against you on this forum. Some asshole, might try to troll the username FatLever, YOU are not FatLever, YOU are YOU and FatLever is a username on a fucking pussy board there is nothing to defend. If some asshole does that, report the post and I'll take care of it. (Are you spotting this whole "report the post and I take care of it" trend?)

2. I'm sorry but the answer to two is simply no. Ignoring trolls is always the way to go. They are looking for your attention. If you can see they are a crazy person then sooooo can everybody else you do not (again not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you especially do not need to call out BS. Do you understand what I mean when I say it's not a suggestion? Here let me spell it out for you

Crazy person posts but doesn't violate the guidelines --> You respond and do violate the guidelines = Who gets the flag? Answer, You. Why? Because there will always be crazy people on the internet and if break the guidelines then you just became one of them.

Ok, where does this leave us? Fat if you continue to do this (call guys out, not discuss shit with me in a reasonable manner such as you have done here), I will continue to throw flags at you, which will get you on moderation.

I hope this helps.

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=Admin2;2911425][BLUE]First, I didn't take this as an argument fat, I get it that you're talking it out. I moved it because it needs to be here, not there.

Let me take your arguments in order.

1a. Unsupported STD accusations are a violation of forum guidelines and will be redacted, you NEVER (this is not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you only need to report them and I will deal with them.

1b. There has never nor will ever be an attack against you on this forum. Some asshole, might try to troll the username FatLever, YOU are not FatLever, YOU are YOU and FatLever is a username on a fucking pussy board there is nothing to defend. If some asshole does that, report the post and I'll take care of it. (Are you spotting this whole "report the post and I take care of it" trend?)

2. I'm sorry but the answer to two is simply no. Ignoring trolls is always the way to go. They are looking for your attention. If you can see they are a crazy person then sooooo can everybody else you do not (again not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you especially do not need to call out BS. Do you understand what I mean when I say it's not a suggestion? Here let me spell it out for you

Crazy person posts but doesn't violate the guidelines --> You respond and do violate the guidelines = Who gets the flag? Answer, You. Why? Because there will always be crazy people on the internet and if break the guidelines then you just became one of them.

Ok, where does this leave us? Fat if you continue to do this (call guys out, not discuss shit with me in a reasonable manner such as you have done here), I will continue to throw flags at you, which will get you on moderation.

I hope this helps.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I think FatLever and I can get on board with your point here. The only thing I'll add to the discussion is that it is annoying to see newcomers be led far astray by crazy or manipulative posters. Things like, "She's definitely working with LEO" or "She'll rob you. " etc. , when this may be the best provider around at the time. Just not cool, but I guess if you say just report that stuff, that may work.

This site needs as much traffic as possible to get more advertising revenue. The real contributing members want a site that is free of jerks.

If the site wanted to they could ID those who get banned and come in with a new name. Every hacker worth anything knows how to do that. So let's stop the pretenses.

In order to survive and provide the site it needs advertisers, so the jerks generate users and traffic. Without that the site cannot exist since advertising revenue would take a hit.

Hows that for a Conspiracy. We will see if this post gets deleted, even though it meets the guidelines and is in the proper place.

So the site has determined that to survive they need to not ban the jerks.

[QUOTE=Jimjim77;2911448]This site needs as much traffic as possible to get more advertising revenue. The real contributing members want a site that is free of jerks.

If the site wanted to they could ID those who get banned and come in with a new name. Every hacker worth anything knows how to do that. So let's stop the pretenses.

In order to survive and provide the site it needs advertisers, so the jerks generate users and traffic. Without that the site cannot exist since advertising revenue would take a hit.

Hows that for a Conspiracy. We will see if this post gets deleted, even though it meets the guidelines and is in the proper place.

So the site has determined that to survive they need to not ban the jerks.[/QUOTE]I doubt that admin needs trolls posting false info to drive up revenue.

Banning him / them and us calling him / them out, only stokes their fire. This is a free forum. Dealing with trolls is just the price we have to pay to exchange the information like we do. I have faught with the troll and argued with admin about it. And after fillowing the advice of "ignoring" him / them. It doesn't bother me anymore. If trolling is ruining the board, well then I'm sure that there are pay sites that police more stringently. Not trying to ruffle any feathers, just my opinion.