Arrangement Reports

[QUOTE=JustinFields;5613173]Never really have experience with any pros, that being said some of the girls from SA that I have been with I suspect to be pros.

Everyone is difference but is there a difference in.

Price?

Multiple pops?

GFE experience?

Time spent?

Does it feel more transactional with pros?

You figure getting a pro to cum is probably much harder being they are seeing multiple dudes a day and don't want any sensitivity down there.

How have you experiences been when comparing pros to SA girls that do ppm?[/QUOTE]Pros target different populatio. If you are a busy professional or are married with limited time to play, they don't play games and you will get laid. They also can host if this is an issue and you can factor in the price if you are paying for a hotel. They offer limited time, I do 1 hr, much less likely if at all to offer BBFS and less GFE. You obviously don't get dinner or drinks with them.

They are a good option in certain occasions, SA are better if you are single with time on your hands. I go after the 300 $ - 400 $ range and you can get 1 - 2 pops depending on the provider. They charge by the hour.

[QUOTE=SawBoy1740;5616732]Do we have a link?[/QUOTE]If you go a few pages back you'll see the profile was linked in a different comment.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5...7-afcb0da1a7b1[/URL]

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/85bf0d4e-3704-424b-85c4-abaa853448b2[/URL]

Bigger than pics indicate. Tight but not my type. Will negotiate. Would not repeat.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/274e080c-1901-4d99-afb0-f71dd157fa70[/URL]

Can host but not my type didn't even talk numbers with her.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/0554c248-7eb5-41cb-9df8-634c55a6eef5[/URL]

Asking for 600 didn't even bother to negotiate. She is cute but not that cute.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5875af12-e662-4fa8-a156-6fc5e631b512[/URL]

Probable pro hosts in Downtown.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/558b09a7-a49f-480c-93a2-1b48f08fae04[/URL]

Been wanting to fuck this one agreed to 300 but always flakes.

Will do 300 x 1 hour.

[QUOTE=HoffmanOliver;5572522]

Vicky [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/cfd378f2-7a03-4393-ac10-9eaedb778543[/URL].

350, fun girl. Has a trashy look to her that I love. Saw her twice, now I'm done so have at it. She will meet NW suburbs.

[/QUOTE]I received a few DMs about Vicky. Someone posted on this thread about her being a thief. I have no reason to doubt him. I didn't find any other 1st person reports. I was not aware of this when I connected with her. I probably would have passed on her.

That being said, I have seen her multiple times and have had zero issues. She appeared to arrive alone (can't be sure someone else wasnt in the care, she was driving). We smoked weed and had a nice conversation. She has a trashy look that I love, was fun and mostly accommodating. She insisted on cfs, which was not a problem as that is one of my rules too. I would not have any issues with seeing her again but of course would not recommend her now with that report. If I see her again, I might bring it up if I can skillfully bring into the conversation (I can't really imagine how though). All I can write is YMMV.

Nia [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a9febf3a-6e80-4dd7-b3fb-ed97872bbfa5[/URL].

She's been discussed recently, and I concur with that review. She is definitely moody.

Paige / Becca [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/69a0bbbe-4017-4fe7-ab9c-f38bf3b77abe[/URL].

She's dtf and can host. She just lives out in the middle of no where. Her story changes a lot, so I don't trust her much (don't really trust SB all that much to begin with). There is a guy who waits in the parking lot. He was there when I got to her apartment and when I left each time I saw her. I believe this is her "boyfriend", who she claims stole all her money and is abusive. If you can look past those red flags, she's always needing money.

Request for info:

Jayme [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/4209696a-9acf-449f-9d96-85631f868b45[/URL].

I lost her number recently, if anyone can share I would appreciate it. DM me, thanks.

[QUOTE=HoffmanOliver;5621990]I received a few DMs about Vicky. Someone posted on this thread about her being a thief. I have no reason to doubt him. I didn't find any other 1st person reports. I was not aware of this when I connected with her. I probably would have passed on her.

That being said, I have seen her multiple times and have had zero issues. She appeared to arrive alone (can't be sure someone else wasnt in the care, she was driving). We smoked weed and had a nice conversation. She has a trashy look that I love, was fun and mostly accommodating. She insisted on cfs, which was not a problem as that is one of my rules too. I would not have any issues with seeing her again but of course would not recommend her now with that report. If I see her again, I might bring it up if I can skillfully bring into the conversation (I can't really imagine how though). All I can write is YMMV.[/QUOTE]She is a cool chick who is ghetto. I wouldn't necessarily put it past her, but that being said I had no issues. She is funny and cool. Not the best experience I have had but def not the worst. She does see a bunch of dudes and is a semi pro / pro.

This gal is not usually my type, but location, availability and price was all in my favor, so I said fuck it! She's easy to talk to and very direct. She initially asked for 350 ppm, but talked her way down and she took it. Communicated via text and she's responsive.

She does not host. Nice tits, cute face and a little gut. Not distracting at all as she carries it well. She's kinda tall / big. Pierced nipple was little weird because of the ring / barbel spikes. Gives great BJ, snuck my finger in her kitty and it was soaking dripping wet. Great lay for the buck for sure.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/82452868-b828-451f-8761-10132b5b7a7d[/URL]

The quality of women on SA has gone down alot. These girls are fuckin backpage girls asking top dollar.

Going to' be a longg winter.

[QUOTE=LolBoat;5622589]The quality of women on SA has gone down alot. These girls are fuckin backpage girls asking top dollar.

Going to' be a longg winter.[/QUOTE]Whenever I go to the new signups the chicks are 80% overweight, ghetto, or with more ink and piercings than a sideshow freak. Then the next 19% have profiles that read like someone picked up a copy of English for Dummies to write it. For 100 bucks a month its a pretty poor deal that they can't do a better job getting rid of those fake profiles, but then again if they did, it would expose what a complete and utter sausage fest that place either has become or is.

[QUOTE=FeldSpot;5622610]Whenever I go to the new signups the chicks are 80% overweight, ghetto, or with more ink and piercings than a sideshow freak. Then the next 19% have profiles that read like someone picked up a copy of English for Dummies to write it. For 100 bucks a month its a pretty poor deal that they can't do a better job getting rid of those fake profiles, but then again if they did, it would expose what a complete and utter sausage fest that place either has become or is.[/QUOTE]Man, I guess I'm pretty lucky. Last year I had (3) good lineups / in rotations and so far this coming up winter 2021 my lineup is pretty good as well. Dropping (2) old and so far I found (1) new one and she's a gem. Hoping to find (1) more new one 🤞127995; within next week.

I'm in the western suburbs and (2) of them are within 10 mile radius and the other one is within less than 10 mile radius from my office.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e7808369-fa08-4d4e-aa05-72bf4e2cdb47[/URL]

[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/jenna6996[/URL]

But definitely looks worth it! Might have to give her a run.

Seeking has irritated me. Why did they remove the friends with benefits criteria? Searching with that and no strings attached always eliminated a significant number of girls who weren't interested in hooking up straight to the point. Always got great results. Too bad. Still might renew for a month as it still can be a fun game but not what it used to be.

[QUOTE=Meddic80;5622640]Man, I guess I'm pretty lucky. Last year I had (3) good lineups / in rotations and so far this coming up winter 2021 my lineup is pretty good as well. Dropping (2) old and so far I found (1) new one and she's a gem. Hoping to find (1) more new one 🤞127995; within next week.

I'm in the western suburbs and (2) of them are within 10 mile radius and the other one is within less than 10 mile radius from my office.[/QUOTE]I have met a few good ones lately also. The problem with me is I drop them and love getting new Pussy. Plus keeping 3 SB's a month is going to cost 4 K and I hate spending that kind of money.

[QUOTE=Southp2;5623018]Seeking has irritated me. Why did they remove the friends with benefits criteria? Searching with that and no strings attached always eliminated a significant number of girls who weren't interested in hooking up straight to the point. Always got great results. Too bad. Still might renew for a month as it still can be a fun game but not what it used to be.[/QUOTE]They are under scrutiny from the feds I believe. There is alot of censorship and changes / rules.

The only way to run a successful sugar dating site is to domicile it offshore.