Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5846016]No sir. There have been many very positive reviews I've read here which recounted amazing sessions with providers that didn't seem over the top, even pertaining to providers whom I've fucked myself and didn't have comparable results. That's to be expected, as we all have different personalities and preferences etc. YMMV and all that. No, the over the top thing is kinda like the difference between a mediocre painting and a good painting: not easy to explain but you know it when you see it. (Well at least I do).[/QUOTE]One man's house painter is another's Michelangelo. Just got to give them the tools, desire and inspiration to work with.

Anyone have a go at her yet?

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5846022]Don't worry, I seldom speak for others, but I think people know exactly what you're talking about. I certainly do.[/QUOTE]And at least they know you're reading their reviews. Mission accomplished.

[QUOTE=HexenDuction;5845936]I want to start of by saying LAV is my favorite agency. The booker is very responsive and personable.

I TOFTT because of LAV's phenomenal track record for picking girls. Eunji, Remi and Nicole with Allie thrown in, could be my rotation. I had some good experiences with a couple of upcharge girls. For me the main differences are that the upcharge girls I've seen are a little bigger, but none of them engage as well as the good flat rate girls.

LAV / PKL is usually pretty good with P.S. Pictures of the actual girls, but Saige's pictures don't have any thing to do with the actual woman. I put Saige into her late 30's or early 40's. She is pretty good looking, but has a bit of snagletooth going on. She's another shorty, maybe sub five feet. Her boobs were soft, large B's. She had a shapely ass and firm legs.

She gave an intensive extended bedside BBBJ. I had to pull her off because I thought there was a chance I might pop. While groping her when she stood up she put me in for a bit, the pushed me back on the bed and got on for CG. After that I got her out to the edge of the bed for DATY, which she really got into. During that, and the standing MISH that followed, she spent much of the time rubbing her clit. I then told her to put her head on the pillow and went at various MISH positions. When I got tired and laid back, she got between my legs and gave more extended BBBJ. I figured I better go for the gusto before I ran out of energy and put out her back in MISH for the sticky-icky..[/QUOTE]Well the good news is that's she's a service queen. The bad news? Don't think there is any. I saw her when I visited Nicole and yes she is good looking with a good body but she can't be anywhere near late thirties or early forties. I know we all see things from our own perspective but I've been in the hobby for a long time and most of the girls are late twenties to early thirties with a few exceptions whose names I won't disclose and Saige is certainly in that category. There isn't much difference between late twenties and early thirties so if that age category is in your wheelhouse she certainly deserves a visit. I made up my mind to see her based on what I saw.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL]

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5845805]Side note: On this particular morning, the line-up of dudes outside the callbox was redics. Myself included, each one of us looking shady af and seedier than the next. We legit looked like all the bad guys from Robocop.[/QUOTE]Excellent review! I like the self - depreciation and references to 80's stuff, especially the one about the assholes from Robocop. I was so happy when Alex Murphy stabbed Clarence Boddicker in the neck with his data spike.

Anyway, the part about eating out Hana and getting a face full of her pussy juice was also great.

Thank you for the intel.

M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL].

[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.

[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.

Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].

SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Lucy, Dana, Tiana.

[URL]https://kbliss.net/[/URL] Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.

[QUOTE=NObserver;5845829]She's pretty old. Might be around 45+. When she started in LA last year, she had tremendous breasts: round, bloated and veiny. Unfortunately, she went on a massive diet and shrunk them down a few cup sizes -- from DD to C+.

Her pussy remains shallow, however. Once you get her worked up, she will let you go full bore on her snatch. Her preference is to control the amount of penetration through CG.

She's around 4'10, 90 lbs. She's not beautiful, but I find her attractive for her age.

On top of that, she's pretty friendly and willing to let you guide the action.

Ps - Her BBBJ is horrible.[/QUOTE]Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846023]One man's house painter is another's Michelangelo. Just got to give them the tools, desire and inspiration to work with.[/QUOTE]One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5847099]Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.[/QUOTE]I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846281]And at least they know you're reading their reviews. Mission accomplished.[/QUOTE]Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.

How good is she in services skills-wise. Does she has stamina to ride in acg long? Does she provide a deep BJ, does she dt, does she bls, does she rim.

How's her attitude, is she a porn actress, a shy collegemate, a goof fob or a dead fish with gps.

If she's BBFS, how's cip and msog. She allow FIA or DATY / O. Is she a clock watcher or a staller.

Each of these provide very specific information that can be used to make an evaluation of whether a girl is worth seeing.

Many over-the-top reviews, not all. But at least a majority. Sound more like pump-and-dump hype to me then actual attempts at objective evaluation. Again, not all. There are some super verbose over the top reviews that are exceptionally detailed and describe the girl to a tee, including specific tats and real age and her filling on her 29th tooth. Those are excellent. It's like reading a good Balzac novel. But I believe Mr Sexorcist wasn't talking about those, but rather about, well, IYKYK.

[QUOTE=SharingHer;5847273]I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.[/QUOTE]I agree too. Saw Nicole recently. Cute face and hot body! Loved her big veiny boobs with big nipples! I liked her BBBJ too. Appreciated that she took time and effort to take me deeper and deeper into her mouth and throat. Not full on DT but she sure tries.

[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5847168]One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.[/QUOTE]That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5847304]Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.[/QUOTE]Why do you think we write reviews? To be read which would be more appropriate on a Korean agency BB discussion board than your verbose response.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5847469]That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.[/QUOTE]Exactly! Why buy a used car from a dealer who is "possibly" selling you a lemon when you can eschew the guesswork and seek a more earnest and trustworthy purveyor of automotive transportation? Glad we can resolve this exchange in agreement. Good day.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5846547]M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL].

[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.

[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.

Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].

SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Lucy, Dana, Tiana.

[URL]https://kbliss.net/[/URL] Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.[/QUOTE]Looking forward to reading feedback on Paige. I won't TOFTT but may be an early adopter with a good review from a trusted handle.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5847304]I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".
(…)
Many over-the-top reviews, not all. But at least a majority. Sound more like pump-and-dump hype to me then actual attempts at objective evaluation.[/QUOTE]This. It's the hyperbole for me. If one follows this board as much as I do -which is to say way too fkn much- one should know who's suspect for lacking objectivity. And they'll recognize how quick some will counterbalance a review that reads anything less than a strong recommendation. And in those cases, it's always the guy's fault for a poor session, never the girl. It's where 'YMMV' becomes weaponized ad nauseam.

It speaks volumes when one can predict how hyperbolic a review's conclusion will be by who the author is. "As good as it gets. " "Can't ask for more. " "You will get all you want and probably more than you expected. " "Can't be beat. " Are just a few random examples that sound awfully like that damn My Pillow Guy.

But who am I to talk. My writing approach always applies alliteration, like some horn dog high schooler in a creative writing class.

Hey all,

New to this forum, but not the hobby. I'm east coast and was hoping to check out the west coast business. Unfortunately, everyone I've contacted wants references and I don't have them. I contacted Gardenksecret and they told me name race age and TER or HX I'd if I had it. Then said 2 references by different bookers. So am I reading this as all of the above or have an I'd or two different references? Just trying to understand the rules.

Thanks.

[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5847511]Exactly! Why buy a used car from a dealer who is "possibly" selling you a lemon when you can eschew the guesswork and seek a more earnest and trustworthy purveyor of automotive transportation? Glad we can resolve this exchange in agreement. Good day.[/QUOTE]We have found a need for lemon laws to protect us from those "earnest and trustworthy" purveyors of automotive transportation. Unfortunately with providers we have no laws to protect us from lemons so we have to go by recommendations. There are always lemons that are "possible" which by definition means that there are always diamonds when you think a lemon exists. You use the term possibly as if it means probably and even then there is no guarantee. No we do not agree at all. Caveat Emptor. Find another source of intel.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5847304]Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.[/QUOTE]Yes the mission is to contribute to the intel and have it read. If no one reads it then why would we bother. The mission is certainly not to make verbose diatribes to make one's self feel better.

With CGLA.

Photos: I'm pretty sure it's her. I do see a strong resemblance in the face but pictures are old if it is her. See below on why.

Looks: Cute GND look (the posted pictures actually make her appear more mature than she is in person), sports jet black hair, late 20's to early 30's, not quite MILF but neither is she young, 5'5", natural C's which provides a nice firm resilience, pretty large ass for a kgirl (I attribute this mainly to her weight, looks good but not bubble butt), some stubble near pussy. Pale skin tone and no tattoos. You won't find the slim frame displayed in her pictures. I'm assuming it's COVID weight, a good 15+ lbs. She carries it well but she's more of an average body type with a bit of tummy now.

English: Pretty decent, pronunciations a bit off at times but still understandable.

Attitude: Bubbly but gets quite passionate when things begin.

Service: Overall somewhere between above average and a notch below top tier. For the cons, she has a habit of twisting and pinching my nipples that I don't care for, some acting that while not over the top comes off as too manufactured, and (I can't believe I'm counting this as a con) she gets overly aggressive when kissing. I enjoy kissing as much as the next guy but I do want my lips and yours to be doing other things. She really wanted to be lip locked constantly. LFK / DFK was great, passionate and overbearing a bit at times though. Great BBBJ: good lubrication and suction, slurping sounds, BLS and DT. She takes it up a notch by alternating BBBJ to wet fast action HJ that is well choreographed. Receptive to DATY. Good audio feedback. Very much engaged and interactive in all positions. Will fuck you back if you let her. I did not go for upcharge.

Expense: $300.

Repeat: Yes for me. Some may not like her current weight class but I don't mind and actually prefer a girl with a little meat on her to a super skinny kgirl that have ribs jutting out. As a point of comparison, she's similar to MissX but slimmer or Cona but with slightly more meat. In addition, her bubbly and laid back attitude made it feel more like a fuck date with a GF than anything else.

Does someone mind explaining how to book a girl thru CGLA and what to expect? Complete newbie here. Visiting LA on business trip.

[QUOTE=Gojoyutaji;5847827]Does someone mind explaining how to book a girl thru CGLA and what to expect? Complete newbie here. Visiting LA on business trip.[/QUOTE]They ask for DL, selfie, proof of employment, proof of mailing address. Good luck.

Haru was suggested by Missk booker as a new petite cutie with amazing service. She is definitely cute with big eyes and smiley attitude. Also her voice is really cute and adds to the experience. Damn, she fucked the shit out of me. I just laid back and let her do her thing. DFK BBBJ all on point and CIP. She pounded me in cg it was dope. It was worth the trip.

[QUOTE=KevinHokage89;5848085]They ask for DL, selfie, proof of employment, proof of mailing address. Good luck.[/QUOTE]Thanks! Will they accept my driver license and paystub if I blur out my name and address?

M. Stacy, Ava, Viki (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) [URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf.[/URL].

[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Remi, Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.

[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Saige, Nicole, Remi (WLA) . MW.

Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/.[/URL].

SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Lucy, Viki.

[URL]https://kbliss.net/[/URL] Jessica, Lucy.

Recent transplant to this area but have traveled to LA for years. I understand this is a small sample size but in my last handful of visits, I had 2 borderline grandmas whose posted picture looked like they stole them from their granddaughters social media, 2 who were middle age but posted pics from their peak years, and then about 2 more who were pretty but looked nothing like their posted pics. Are all the cute and beautiful providers now non-bb or elsewhere? I remember last year going into appointments being shock and surprised for the best reasons possible and this last round has been a complete opposite experience. I use to book with confidence knowing I would get at least a fair version of what I was seeing but I'll likely not see anyone new unless I see a positive post. What's concerning is I come from the east coast in an area where the kgirls go to retire and I'm starting to see a troubling pattern. Hopefully it's just a bad run? Hopefully. Appreciate any feedback. I know I should have walked on some of these but driving a hour to the location and don't want be labeled as a last minute canceller.

EZ creampie Seulgi. Very good looking spinner. Must be 90 lbs soaking wet. Small perky tits and nice attitude. Recommend.

Is this the same Suzy that was upcharging for BBFS before at another booker and now no more upcharge?

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL]

[QUOTE=Member#2210;5848505]Is this the same Suzy that was upcharging for BBFS before at another booker and now no more upcharge?

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL][/QUOTE]Same person, she's still doing the same upcharge. 300 hr, 100 bb upcharge, 40 extra shot.

The booker is helping her sister booker advertise her.

[QUOTE=Member#2210;5848505]Is this the same Suzy that was upcharging for BBFS before at another booker and now no more upcharge?

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL][/QUOTE]Same Suzy, same upcharge, according to booker.

[QUOTE=Member#2210;5848505]Is this the same Suzy that was upcharging for BBFS before at another booker and now no more upcharge?

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/m6tjXZyk8xXW[/URL][/QUOTE]Suzy is still asking for $100 an up charge; at least for now. She got another booker because her business is probably slow and she is not still realizing that the issue is not the additional $100 but rather market is not willing to pay for it.

[QUOTE=Jujuju1010;5848545]Same person, she's still doing the same upcharge. 300 hr, 100 bb upcharge, 40 extra shot.

The booker is helping her sister booker advertise her.[/QUOTE]Any feedback on her service?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5847779]We have found a need for lemon laws to protect us from those "earnest and trustworthy" purveyors of automotive transportation. Unfortunately with providers we have no laws to protect us from lemons so we have to go by recommendations. There are always lemons that are "possible" which by definition means that there are always diamonds when you think a lemon exists. You use the term possibly as if it means probably and even then there is no guarantee. No we do not agree at all. Caveat Emptor. Find another source of intel.[/QUOTE]You apparently missed the sarcasm. The "possible lemon" and the "more earnest and trustworthy purveyor" were simply in reference to dismissing a review which could "possibly" be embellished (possible lemon) for other reports which read as more realistic and less A: shilling for the provider B: self glorification or C: both (more earnest and trustworthy purveyor). Of course, that all depends upon the perception of the person reading the review so that decision has everything to do with me and nothing to do with anyone else. Good day sir.

[QUOTE=GoJoyutaji;5848298]Thanks! Will they accept my driver license and paystub if I blur out my name and address?[/QUOTE]Nope, k-man will visit you at your home, if 2nd payment is needed.

[QUOTE=TheSexorcist;5848643]You apparently missed the sarcasm. The "possible lemon" and the "more earnest and trustworthy purveyor" were simply in reference to dismissing a review which could "possibly" be embellished (possible lemon) for other reports which read as more realistic and less A: shilling for the provider B: self glorification or C: both (more earnest and trustworthy purveyor). Of course, that all depends upon the perception of the person reading the review so that decision has everything to do with me and nothing to do with anyone else. Good day sir.[/QUOTE]I guess you must have missed the sarcasm in my reply. It was emphasized by quotation marks. Instead of categorizing others reviews as shilling or self glorification it is best not to read them if that's where it leads you. Just write your own reviews and hope you're not put into that proverbial box. All I can say about my reviews is that I've received many thanks from many mongers for the intel.

[QUOTE=AbelForSure;5848604]Any feedback on her service?[/QUOTE]Found some recent reviews. Thanks for the search function.

That's how many girls are currently listed on CGLA's website. There can't possibly be that many different girls currently available. I'm sure half if not more are just re-brands of the same girl.

It makes it just that more difficult to keep track of who's who. I'm starting to think this is by design sadly. I remember back when the agency just started there were only just 6-8 girls listed! The good ole days.

Now we live a world where we have to navigate the re-brands, fake pics, upcharges etc.

[QUOTE=Ramen25;5848908]That's how many girls are currently listed on CGLA's website. There can't possibly be that many different girls currently available. I'm sure half if not more are just re-brands of the same girl.

It makes it just that more difficult to keep track of who's who. I'm starting to think this is by design sadly. I remember back when the agency just started there were only just 6-8 girls listed! The good ole days.

Now we live a world where we have to navigate the re-brands, fake pics, upcharges etc.[/QUOTE]They have a Romanian girl! Might check her out tbh.

Her rate is 350 but I need to double check! LOL but yes they have a huge selection.

[QUOTE=GoJoyutaji;5848298]Thanks! Will they accept my driver license and paystub if I blur out my name and address?[/QUOTE]I doubt it. They were pretty particular with the images. Booker grey might have an easier verification, but I haven't tried yet, you can find poor communication stories across the forum with booker grey. Once you're in Cgla, they are professional and responsive with booking and instructions. GL.

They need to bring it back! I got into the hobby seeing so many different girls on here. LOL.