Technology can really suck
[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;3919885]One of the main things that will identify you is your car. And your license tag. That's why I suggested parking your car around the building or off camera. Try not to tie the camera image of yourself to your car. If LEO is going to harass you they will be looking for your car. If they keep seeing your car in the area that's a problem for you.
This holds true when you're doing anything where you don't want to be recognized. Hide your car. Park somewhere else. Drive somebody else's car. Take an uber. This makes you a lot harder to track and to harass.
GB40.[/QUOTE]Technology can really suck, reading your reply it's sad what lengths one has to take nowadays just to shop, let alone play! But I would recommend using extreme caution when parking your car or traveling into conspicuous places, I was once robbed at knife point in a dark hotel parking lot, NOT FUN AT ALL!
Why Keeping a Low Profile is a Good Idea
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3919826]Its not illegal to talk to someone or give them a ride but if the police suspect they engage in illegal activity they have the right to pull you over. And if that person has drugs on them the police can charge you also. Just something to think about bc most of the SW'S if not all at least I haven't meet one that's not on drugs and some of them have ether drugs or stems or something on them.[/QUOTE]That's why I always try to discourage them from doing anything that might draw attention while they are with me. I've had some to let their titties out while with me on the road, out in plain view of everybody on the road, in areas that are well known for SW activity. That usually leads to them asking why they can't do this or that, and me thinking to myself, "Man, you really are that dumb" before trying to break it down to them in the simplest of terms.
As for the police being able to charge a non-drug user for drug possession for merely being in the company of someone who is, I am well aware of that, as much as I think of it as bs. And yeah, I'd have to agree that it would seem most SWs are on something. I've picked up a lot of them over the years, and can only think of 1 SW of whom I felt confident was not a drug user. The rest of them seemed to be on something.
What To Do If You Think Someone Has Something
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3919832]I checked WL today and all I saw was the crazy WSW with the nice body that look crazy nice body but her face tells the story and I'm sure she got herpes bad bc some time her mouth be all broke out with sores and dudes still pick her up. She was broke a little bit today. I was looking at her and she kept turning her head. I saw her one day talking real loud to her self like she was cussing somebody out. I got close to her and she was really broke out and a dude still picked her up.[/QUOTE]I think some guys just don't know how to recognize the symptoms. If I feel like there is a reason to believe someone is "infectious", as in having all sorts of sores on them, or mentally ill, I steer clear of them. And if I somehow didn't notice it at first, and pick them up by accident, I don't touch them when we find a spot. I have them show me the goods, and take care of myself. Not an ideal situation, I know, but better than catching something.
The Real Mistake That Was Made
[QUOTE=JustCurius;3920505]I know, I know, never give the money up front. I was stupid. I was in the area of RF Saturday morning and decided to ride by. Saw a nice looking AA, small BBW in a very short dress walking across the interstate bridge. Hair held up in a knit cap. When she stopped behind Raceway, I offered her a ride. She had a nice smile. I offered 25 and went for 30 when she said gave great service. She told me to take out my muscle and drive. She started a vigorous up and down -- after slipping on a cover with her mouth, something that was not in the agreement. When we got to her spot, she was already complaining that I didn't come fast enough. She asked for my phone, and I thought we were driving to her place to finish. Turn toward apartments on the other side of the bridge, where I first saw her. Then she sees a van passing, gets me to pull over, leaving her drink I just bought her in the cupholder. Says she'll be right back. Jumps in the van and gone. Never gave me her name. Better luck to you wiser guys.[/QUOTE]Although it could be said that the mistake that was made was paying up front, I'd say the real mistake was picking someone up off of RF. Most of the bad experiences I've had related to picking up SWs have been in the RF area, and because of that I may occasionally cruise by RF just to see who is out as a matter of curiosity, but I seldom pick up anyone in that area anymore. Too much non-SW related crime in that area too I think, making it one of the more dangerous SW areas to go into. Not to mention LEOs don't care if you're out to commit a real crime, or just get your dick wet because they see it as all being the same, even though I would say those are two different things. If I was going to pick someone up, it'd generally be somewhere other than RF because of those things.
Correction: Airport Inn Nightly Rate is $75 Approx.
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3921016]Are you serious the airport inn is only 39.95 this chick that post online ask me to help her out and she live at the airport inn said it was 75 dollars and I gave her 80. Are you talking about the one off of 85 behind a real nice hotel??[/QUOTE]It would appear she was telling the truth. I called to double check, and was told the $39.95 rate had been discontinued, and now the nightly rate is $75. Also, the banner that hangs out in front of the lobby carport, that says $39.95 nightly, and $149.95 weekly would be false advertisement as they no longer offer rooms at these prices.
Latest Activity: Hardly Anyone Out
[B]Sugar Creek[/B] - Saw a couple of WSWs out on Reagan, of which one was pregnant. I don't know if the pregnant one was lactating, but she definitely was pregnant, and looked pretty good. A LEO passed by her before I did, and I noticed she turned her head in the opposite direction of the road in response as she continued to walk. But there wasn't anything really to be looking at in the opposite direction, of which I would take as a dead give away of being a SW because it's unnatural behavior.
Granted, they don't want to give a LEO "the look" as to bring unwanted attention to themselves, but walking in an unnatural way isn't that much better as both could be considered giveaways to being a SW. Instead of looking in the opposite direction of LEO when there really isn't any other reason to do so, other than to just avoid looking at LEO, either looking straight ahead, or down at the ground in front as to avoid possibly tripping over something, like a normal person would do, would make so much more sense. It reminds me of the SW that one time thought it a good idea to look directly into the sun as to avoid potentially making eye contact with a passing LEO. It doesn't fool anyone, and just makes them look dumb as a rock.
[B]Woodlawn[/B] - Saw a couple of WSWs sitting next to a black guy (dopehead, bf, whatever) outside of the iHop. One of them was wearing a skirt, and had her legs spread wide open, of which I appreciated the view of as I passed by. Just before that, I sighted LEO parked behind the QT, as they often like to do. Was not comfortable with the idea of doing anything with LEO in the area, and with guy sitting next to her as though he might be a bf, or pimp, or whatever.
[B]Eddleman St[/B] - Saw one rough looking WSW walking down Thomasboro, from where it intersects Eddleman St. The veins in her arms were bulging out pretty bad to the point where I wondered if maybe she was going through some sort of drug withdrawal, or overdose. Not sure what was going on there, but something definitely wasn't right as she seemed pretty angry about something. On the opposite end of Thomasboro, I saw what might have been a tranny WSW. She kind of looked good, but what scared me was not being able to completely rule out the possibility of it being a tranny. She or it, had the body curves of a woman, but the eyes, and contours of the chin struck me as being suspicious. The jaw and the eyes looked a little bigger in size than what I'd expect a woman to typically have. Looked like maybe D cups underneath the shirt being worn, but couldn't tell if they were real breasts as the shirt completely covered them. Looked tight down below, in the short shorts, with no sign of manhood, but I know that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Particularly if there had been an operation to remove the manhood. Needless to say, I passed on that one.
[B]Rozzelles Ferry[/B] - Saw a good looking WSW sitting at the bus stop on RF, in tight, short shorts, with her legs spread wide open, which was nice getting a look at upon passing. She also had what might have been a bf, or handler standing a few feet from her that made me uncomfortable with the idea of doing a pickup. Plus it was a bit too out in the open for a pickup for my liking too as anyone could see it taking place from quite a distance considering how far that segment of RF stretches in a straight line. Too much visibility there as to be able to do anything discreetly.
Airport Inn Appears to Have No Business
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3924038]Thanks for the update I'm wondering did they have a sting at the airport inn bc I no 3 chicks that was there and none of them are responding in over a week.[/QUOTE]I don't know if there was a sting over there or not. I went to check the area out thinking I might find some action over there. What I found was a ghost town. The parking lot was completely empty, and no one was outside their room or hanging out in the parking lot anywhere. It appeared as though the motel did not have any business. So those three chicks may no longer even be there.
I Wouldn't Rule Out The Possibility of Arrest
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3925407]I checked arrest. Org I didn't see their mugshots but something happened to them bc they don't answer their phones. Kinda strange for 3 chicks to vanish at the same time that lived in the same place.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't rule out arrest as a possibility. The arrest. Org. Website has some inconsistencies in it that I believe makes it less than 100% reliable. Meaning, if you see a mugshot, then yeah, it means they were arrested, but if you don't, I think it's still possible that they might have been arrested, and it not show up for some reason.
Some problems with the site I've sometimes noticed are:
* when searching for arrests under a specific charge, such as prostitution, sometimes results without that charge will appear in the results (such as DUI, but no prostitution charge).
* when not doing a search under a specific charge, such as prostitution, prostitution arrests that did not show up in search for that charge, will show up in the more general search results.
* when comparing the number of male arrests against the number of female arrests for prostitution for a month, the numbers don't always match up. Yet, for each incident of prostitution, there should be two arrests as it takes two people for that to happen.
I'm not sure why this is, or if anyone else has experienced it, but because of it, I wouldn't consider the site 100% reliable, and I'd agree, three people disappearing all at the same time is a bit odd.
How to Use The Arrests. Org Website
Poking around at the arrests. Org website, I happened to noticed something that might be helpful to any monger trying to look up someone on the site. It would appear that LEO can go after SWs for any number of charges. So obviously, a search for females in the county of interest would be a good start, but from there, a streetwalker could be arrested under any number of possible charges that wouldn't necessarily be sexual in nature such as possession of drugs, loitering, or trespassing, etc. Take for example Woodlawn's Snowy. At about the time I heard talk of the office park behind the Quality Inn banning all SWs, I see a mugshot of Snowy, not under a prostitution charge, but under a trespassing charge. So that makes me wonder how many of the arrests for trespassing actually are for SWs of whom LEO could not find anything else to charge them with in order to arrest them, and apparently don't need anything else in order to arrest them.
Also, if you happen to be curious who the trannies of Sugar Creek, or other areas of Charlotte are, I've found using the search criteria of mecklenburg for county, male for sex, and prostitution for charge brings up some people that look like they are female based on hairstyle, but are listed as male in the arrest records along with what would appear to be fellow hobbyists. And of course, if you search for female with prostitution charges, that's rather self explanatory.
How Stings & Trannies Affect Arrest Numbers
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3926839]Well when it comes to chicks in motels that post ads online it wouldn't be 2 people arrested for prostitution bc it would be a sting with a undercover cop. And you right a lot of people that get arrested don't be on arrest. Org or other sites like it. But once you click on female and county you can search for all charges if you like instead of one particular charge and all the females will show up that's listed.[/QUOTE]I didn't think about that, but could see where you have a point there to where there could be an uneven number of male-to-female arrest numbers. That along with any arrests that stem from tranny SWs. In that case, it'd affect the arrest numbers by probably adding two to the number of males arrested. And doing a general search for all females recently arrested in the county for any charge would be a good way to search for familiar faces, which would make sense for what you were wanting to know. I guess a mores specific search using "prostitution" as the search criteria for charge would be useful if you wanted to learn the names of providers for some reason, such as being able to look them up on social media.
Latest Activity: President in Town
Noticed the president in town, and a lot of LEOs providing escorts, and assisting with security. With that being the case, I'd imagine LEO's top priority for today, and tomorrow that the president is suppose to be in town, is in providing security for the president, which might make for a more opportune time than usual for mongering with at least some of LEOs resources being tied up into that. At least you'd hope it'd be more important to them to focus on protecting the president than to go after a guy who's only crime is wanting to get his dick wet anyway.
[B] Woodlawn Area [/B] - Saw 3 WSWs out at the intersection of Exmore St, and Nations Crossing (behind Captain Ds). One looked rather ugly with maybe B cup breasts, a big pot belly overhang, and tight shorts. The other woman looked a bit older, and a little nicer in a dress. Also saw Snowy out in shorts, and looking better than she has in the past. I still wouldn't pick her up though due to my experiences with her in the past, and the sores that I had seen on her in the past even though they would appear to have all been cleared up at this point. At first I wondered if they were BSWs because of their dark skin tone when I first saw them from a distance, but upon getting to see them at a closer view passing by, it'd appear they've been doing some tanning too. All of them appeared to be wearing dirty clothes as well as though they might have been wearing the same outfit for several days.
[B]Sugar Creek [/B] - Saw just 1 BSW out over by the Shell station on Reagan. She kept walking back and forth along the side of the road from the Shell Station to the Oasis, which isn't very much of a walk at all.
[B]Eddleman St[/B] - Saw 1 skinny WSW out on Eddleman. Thought she looked okay, but nothing to write home about. The police tower by the Wendy's just down the road from there on Freedom Drive is also gone now. Didn't see any SWs over there at that time.
[B]Rozzelles Ferry[/B] - No one out that way on the latest trip.
Latest News: No More Fun at The Oasis for A While
Didn't see much of any SWs out on Sugar Creek during my last trip. Did see two LEO patrol cars parked in the Oasis Building parking lot facing the building with their bright lights on it. (The Oasis Building is on Reagan behind The Royal Inn for newcomers.) It appeared they were waiting for backup to arrive before walking behind the building, which is where some of the SWs have been hiding whenever seeing LE pass through. Previously, on some of my pass-troughs I've noticed like 9 SWs, and a black guy hanging out over there in front of the building, and sometimes going back behind it to hide. Except, this last time I'm thinking they probably got caught hiding back there, and possibly arrested, which would lead me to think there may not be any action in that spot again for a good while. The Oasis spot seemed like a good alternative to the McDonalds spot for the brief time that it lasted. Not nearly as many cameras over by the Oasis as there are over by the McDonalds. Also noticed 1 BSW trying to keep as low of a profile as possible outside the McDonalds as LEOs were out all over the area. I guess with the departure of the president, there was a glut of LEOs on the clock, and the LEO supervisors wanted to put them to good use if they were no longer needed to assist with security for the president. All other SW areas appeared deserted as well. Actually, I take that back. There also appeared to be 1 rather young WSW on Oregon St with what I thought might have been a handler on Oregon St in the Rozzelles Ferry Area. He was standing next to her, and she appeared to be obediently sitting.
I'd Stay Away From Woodlawn's Linda Too
[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3930120]I saw Linda about a week ago looking good had a dress on no panties legs was a turn on gave the best BBBJ cim ever. I saw her a couple days ago and she look like she been dropped off a building she was in front of the office building as I drove by she said hey you want to fuck didn't even no who I was. Drugs and street life a *****. You see them chicks one day and they look good see them again and still got on the same cloths from days ago looking dirty. I had planned on taking Linda to a motel and see how the pussy is but when I saw her I rode on she was looking to bad.[/QUOTE]If it's the same WSW Linda on Woodlawn that I'm thinking it is, I would have passed on her too. The first time I picked her up several months ago, she had some sores on her that I didn't notice at first as I was more preoccupied with ways LEO could sneak up on us from where I was picking her up at than on how she actually looked other than the part of her not wearing a bra underneath a white tank top, which got little head's attention. (She was taking her time talking to me through the passenger side window, and looking obvious as hell, which made me nervous about the possibility of LEO sneaking up. So I urged her to hurry up and get in.)
But after I picked her up, and got to look at her more closely, I regretted doing so after seeing the sores on her body, and opted to give myself a handjob looking at her tits rather than allowing her to touch me even though she tried, and seemed to think my fear of catching something was funny by doing things like asking for a kiss, offering to share her drink, hold hands, and handshake with me while laughing at my reaction to idea of catching anything she might have. Other than than, she seemed nice, but not someone I'd care to ever pick up again.
Woodlawn looking rough / SC Hispanic
SC / Reagan: I too saw this Hispanic in SC, she looked good from a far. Hopefully not a TS, was not able to pick up that day and have not seen her since.
Woodlawn: activity is still in the area, it they look like a bunch of zombies. I mean, it's bad. Most laying in the road / sidewalk obvious as can be. I wouldn't touch them with somebody else's dick. $20 or not.