[URL]http://spacecoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ladies-are-you-feeling-neglected-then-text-me-and-you-can-spend-time-with-someone-that-cares/12477427[/URL]
Printable View
[URL]http://spacecoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ladies-are-you-feeling-neglected-then-text-me-and-you-can-spend-time-with-someone-that-cares/12477427[/URL]
I am going start a thread called monger reviews. Providers can post reviews on mongers (no weenie roasts please) as to reliability, sobriety, generosity, hygiene, etc.
Then SPs can check there rather than waiting for an SP to reply.
We will see if it gets deleted and I get banned.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2440769]I am going start a thread called monger reviews. Providers can post reviews on mongers (no weenie roasts please) as to reliability, sobriety, generosity, hygiene, etc.
Then SPs can check there rather than waiting for an SP to reply.
We will see if it gets deleted and I get banned.[/QUOTE]The only thing a provider can review is the genuineness of my currency. For your own good, never forget you are the customer.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2440769]I am going start a thread called monger reviews. Providers can post reviews on mongers (no weenie roasts please) as to reliability, sobriety, generosity, hygiene, etc.
Then SPs can check there rather than waiting for an SP to reply.
We will see if it gets deleted and I get banned.[/QUOTE]Why would you even want to start a thread where provider's can review us mongers? Dumbest idea I ever heard! Did you forget that this is a monger forum? Mongers are paying for these dreams asshole!! A review thread for provider's to review mongers! Squaredick is a fucking MORON!
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2440769]I am going start a thread called monger reviews. Providers can post reviews on mongers (no weenie roasts please) as to reliability, sobriety, generosity, hygiene, etc.
Then SPs can check there rather than waiting for an SP to reply.
We will see if it gets deleted and I get banned.[/QUOTE]Worst idea ever.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2440769]I am going start a thread called monger reviews. Providers can post reviews on mongers (no weenie roasts please) as to reliability, sobriety, generosity, hygiene, etc.
Then SPs can check there rather than waiting for an SP to reply.
We will see if it gets deleted and I get banned.[/QUOTE]The purpose of this web site is for men to talk about women for sex, white knights such as yourself can trade your testicles for the hope winning some chicks affection somewhere else.
There are web sites like this for the chicks that guys can't join, you can be blacklisted and not only can't you respond you won't even know that there is something written about you. The fact that nowhere else on this forum is there a thread like this could have been a clue.
If you do it again then I will ban you.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2440937]The purpose of this web site is for men to talk about women for sex, white knights such as yourself can trade your testicles for the hope winning some chicks affection somewhere else.
There are web sites like this for the chicks that guys can't join, you can be blacklisted and not only can't you respond you won't even know that there is something written about you. The fact that nowhere else on this forum is there a thread like this could have been a clue.
If you do it again then I will ban you.
A2.[/QUOTE]White knighting? Whom was I defending? Look at the negative escort review if you want to see white knighting out of control. I make one comment defending a monger for making a legitimate complaint and I get kicked to the rat trap while they are still piling on over there.
What the hell is everyone so freaked out about monger reviews? With them on the same site you can have some verification through handle identity. But I guess you want traffic to go to a different site where we can't see it or challenge it. That makes sense. Now some of the girls do answer reviews which basically serves the same purpose so yeah the the thread is kind of redundant but I don't see what you guys are so worried about.
Savanna, I appreciate your support babe, but this was not an attempt on my part at self promotion. Your post is a good example of what I am talking about, however. Just establishing that I am not LEO, and I am not a whack job. What the Hell is so threatening about that?
Ban me if you like. My honest reviews have become a liability to me anyway.
[QUOTE=Chris5;2440833]Why would you even want to start a thread where provider's can review us mongers? Dumbest idea I ever heard! Did you forget that this is a monger forum? Mongers are paying for these dreams asshole!! A review thread for provider's to review mongers! Squaredick is a fucking MORON![/QUOTE]Hey A2, I thought ALL CAPS got deleted automatically. Chris5 you were unfair to Michelle in your earlier rant. Call her out for actions or lack thereof, but a personal attack like yours was childish and unnecessary.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2441123]Hey A2, I thought ALL CAPS got deleted automatically. Chris5 you were unfair to Michelle in your earlier rant. Call her out for actions or lack thereof, but a personal attack like yours was childish and unnecessary.[/QUOTE]So you are Michele favorite white knight huh douchebag? I stand by my comments about Michele. Fuck her dumb ass and fuck you for defending her squaredick. End of story Mr Michele favorite white knight!
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2441058]White knighting? Whom was I defending? Look at the negative escort review if you want to see white knighting out of control. I make one comment defending a monger for making a legitimate complaint and I get kicked to the rat trap while they are still piling on over there.
What the hell is everyone so freaked out about monger reviews? With them on the same site you can have some verification through handle identity. But I guess you want traffic to go to a different site where we can't see it or challenge it. That makes sense. Now some of the girls do answer reviews which basically serves the same purpose so yeah the the thread is kind of redundant but I don't see what you guys are so worried about.
Savanna, I appreciate your support babe, but this was not an attempt on my part at self promotion. Your post is a good example of what I am talking about, however. Just establishing that I am not LEO, and I am not a whack job. What the Hell is so threatening about that?
Ban me if you like. My honest reviews have become a liability to me anyway.[/QUOTE]Dude you are whining like a female. Shut up already!! You need to go and join a female site where you can join in with them and discuss us mongers Mr nice and honest review guy! You squaredick are part of the problem here in Orlando. Douchebag.
[QUOTE=MoreMike147;2439998][URL]http://spacecoast.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ladies-are-you-feeling-neglected-then-text-me-and-you-can-spend-time-with-someone-that-cares/12477427[/URL][/QUOTE]LOTS of lonely women out there that would hire this guy. Too bad most are probably fat and / or ugly but hey, that's the Service Provider business. Have any of you guy had similar thoughts of providing GIGOLO services? I had the fleeting fantasy myself once, never acted on it.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2441058]White knighting? Whom was I defending? Look at the negative escort review if you want to see white knighting out of control. I make one comment defending a monger for making a legitimate complaint and I get kicked to the rat trap while they are still piling on over there.[/QUOTE]You were trying to curry favor with every chick on the forum, "see baby, I'm the guy trying to give you a voice here. " Every post has a "report post" button, use it, if they are fucking up I'll take care of it.
[QUOTE]What the hell is everyone so freaked out about monger reviews? With them on the same site you can have some verification through handle identity. But I guess you want traffic to go to a different site where we can't see it or challenge it. That makes sense. Now some of the girls do answer reviews which basically serves the same purpose so yeah the the thread is kind of redundant but I don't see what you guys are so worried about.[/QUOTE]Some guy says, "Swags gave me the best blowjob I've ever had. " Swags comes on the forum and says "Oh honey, you say the nicest things. " Verified. You tried to open that thread to start shit, that's why you ended the post with a challenge, words to the effect of ban me if you don't like it.
[QUOTE]Savanna, I appreciate your support babe, but this was not an attempt on my part at self promotion. Your post is a good example of what I am talking about, however. Just establishing that I am not LEO, and I am not a whack job. What the Hell is so threatening about that?[/QUOTE]What Swags did is what chicks have ALWAYS been allowed to do, thank guys for nice reviews. Chicks are even allowed (and I encourage them) to respond to negative reviews in this manner "I'm sorry you didn't have a good time, I really pride myself on my skills, if you ever want to give me another shot I'll make sure it works out well. " Doesn't mean they are ever going to see that guy, especially if he shows up nasty, it's just good customer relations, and it provides verification. I would even be ok if they adopted the informal code of "gimmy a call and let me try again" if the guy was ok and "I'm sorry I guess I'm just not your kind of girl" if he showed up with shit hanging out of his ass and they didn't want to see him again. Kind of like you guys use the word vacation for chicks in jail. But again, that's not what you started, you wanted them to EVALUATE their customers and that's not what we do here. It's not what we have ever done here, and without so much as a "what do you think?" PM you put it up, KNOWING it was coming down, why else the verbiage of "if it gets deleted and I get banned" you knew you were starting shit.
[QUOTE]Ban me if you like. My honest reviews have become a liability to me anyway.[/QUOTE]Stop crying and do something about it, use the contact us link and ask for your account to be retired or start reporting the posts where guys are giving you shit for honest reviews. Without having looked at any of them my money would say that they aren't just "honest reviews" my money says that in most of them you are using an "honest review" to antagonize somebody. Like I said, I haven't checked, I might be wrong, but I'd bet on it.
[QUOTE=AncientOne;2441177]LOTS of lonely women out there that would hire this guy. Too bad most are probably fat and / or ugly but hey, that's the Service Provider business. Have any of you guy had similar thoughts of providing GIGOLO services? I had the fleeting fantasy myself once, never acted on it.[/QUOTE]Is this more of your golden intel Mr distinguished monger? Your posts are dumb as fuck! Please shut up already douchebag! Oh wait I'm sure your buddy otwist will come to your defense.
Fucking great, now I want curry.
[QUOTE=A2]You were trying to [B]curry[/B] favor with every chick on the forum, "see baby, I'm the guy trying to give you a voice here. "[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MuffLuva;2441742]Fucking great, now I want curry.[/QUOTE]Now that is funny! Thanks for the chance to laugh at a serious thread.
[QUOTE=Chris5;2440833]Why would you even want to start a thread where provider's can review us mongers? Dumbest idea I ever heard! Did you forget that this is a monger forum? Mongers are paying for these dreams asshole!! A review thread for provider's to review mongers! Squaredick is a fucking MORON![/QUOTE]SD had a bad idea but I bet he knows the difference between the words there and their. Chris5, you remain the worst person on the board and easily the most ignorant.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove homosexual references in the text[/u]. Please do not post homosexual references in the Forum. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
[QUOTE=Otwist;2441768]SD had a bad idea but I bet he knows the difference between the words there and their. Chris5, you remain the worst person on the board and easily the most ignorant.[/QUOTE]I take your word's a a compliment douchbag.
On anoThER site. That I refuse to use anymore due to them artificially sweetining reports. There is a way that providers can "whitelist" mongers. I agree with admin that there are several sites where we can be blacklisted without our knowledge.
[URL]Nationalblacklist.com[/URL] is one. No recourse for us there if they lie or an altered mentation due to candy causes a false report. Trust me, they talk here to vet us and one who good people are.
Just my. 02.
[QUOTE=Chris5;2442539]I take your word's a a compliment douchbag.[/QUOTE]You're welcome Angry Young Chris. Spell check can be your friend.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2441210]Without having looked at any of them my money would say that they aren't just "honest reviews" my money says that in most of them you are using an "honest review" to antagonize somebody. Like I said, I haven't checked, I might be wrong, but I'd bet on it.[/QUOTE]What's your wager, A2?
[QUOTE=Swaganna;2441663]Yeah, I think if I were them I wouldn't want to contact me either for ANYTHING! Hey, didn't I see you once?
Xoxox,
Savanna.[/QUOTE]Savanna my love ignore the idiots! They are not worth the time of day my love.
Miss you.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2443069]What's your wager, A2?[/QUOTE]I honestly feel you are intentionally trying to get banned from here! Even I am not stupid enough to sit back and argue with A2! Just retire your account already and move on dude.
No one wlll miss you douchebag.
[QUOTE=SquareDick;2443069]What's your wager, A2?[/QUOTE]Dinner at Rodizio.
[URL]http://www.rodizio.com.ar/espaniol/locales_puertomadero.html[/URL]
I'm going to audit your account now and throw all relevant flags. I haven't looked at it yet, this is a good faith bet. To be clear, since I don't drink, the dinner only includes the food, not the booze. You would have to pay for that yourself.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2443252]Dinner at Rodizio.
[URL]http://www.rodizio.com.ar/espaniol/locales_puertomadero.html[/URL]
I'm going to audit your account now and throw all relevant flags. I haven't looked at it yet, this is a good faith bet. To be clear, since I don't drink, the dinner only includes the food, not the booze. You would have to pay for that yourself.
A2.[/QUOTE]I looked, you have 54 posts so that would mean that 27 of them would have to be douchey to qualify as "most. " I only counted 8 where you were using a review to try and antagonize a guy. That doesn't make you a complete douchebag but it makes you enough of one that if you ever come down here I'll just give you the price of a dinner at Rodizio, I'm not hanging out with you while you eat it.
A2 pays his bets, when I'm wrong I'm wrong.
A2.
[QUOTE=Chris5;2443204]Savanna my love ignore the idiots! They are not worth the time of day my love.
Miss you.[/QUOTE]That's so sweet.
[QUOTE=Admin2;2443277]I looked, you have 54 posts so that would mean that 27 of them would have to be douchey to qualify as "most. " I only counted 8 where you were using a review to try and antagonize a guy. That doesn't make you a complete douchebag but it makes you enough of one that if you ever come down here I'll just give you the price of a dinner at Rodizio, I'm not hanging out with you while you eat it.
A2 pays his bets, when I'm wrong I'm wrong.
A2.[/QUOTE]And I owe you some apologies as well. I can't type much right now but I'll get back with you on Thursday. Take somebody to dinner who's not so much of an asshole.
I provided the links to "Camera3" and others about Celtic Shelby's plea deal of one year on her charges that were reduced from "Pre-Meditated First Degree Murder" to 'Manslaughter with a firearm".
There was no minimum time for the use of the firearm.
She in fact served only about 6 months jail time.
Hope this post puts any mis-information in your minds to rest.
VS.
That is the common name for Florida Statute 775.087 which gives mandatory sentences of 10 years for displaying a firearm while committing a crime, 20 years for firing it and 25 years if you hit someone. Judges have to follow the guideline. Only prosecuters can wave the minimum as part of a plea deal. You got to figure that she had one amazing lawyer who got a charge of premeditated murder with an automatic minimum 25 years down to a few months in the county jail. I want his card.
C3.
[QUOTE=VerySlowly;2444208]I provided the links to "Camera3" and others about Celtic Shelby's plea deal of one year on her charges that were reduced from "Pre-Meditated First Degree Murder" to 'Manslaughter with a firearm".
There was no minimum time for the use of the firearm.
She in fact served only about 6 months jail time.
Hope this post puts any mis-information in your minds to rest.
VS.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Chris5;2443204]Savanna my love ignore the idiots! They are not worth the time of day my love.
Miss you.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Swaganna;2444230]
You luv, Always have my full attention.
Xoxox,
Savanna[/QUOTE]I see these two "love birds" are at it again!
I got the scoop on that "dinner date" of theirs. Here's how that shit went down:
1. This is the Savanna that Chris5 thinks he will meet. She may have looked like that decades ago.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375554[/ATTACH]
2. Horny Chris5 gets ready for his date with the Bat-Shit Crazy Savanna.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375555[/ATTACH]
3. Savanna gets ready for her date with the young bull, Chris5. She needs to make sure there is ample room for the young bull to fit. At least that's what Chris5 would like us to believe, but he forgets what he once said about the pussy of gals like her: "pussy is probably old and loose anyway from the decade's of fucking".
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375556[/ATTACH]
4. Chris5 proudly arrives, all decked out in the brand new suit he said he bought just for the occasion.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375557[/ATTACH]
5. After dinner, it's time for desert back at Savanna's place.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375558[/ATTACH]
6. Chris5 ends the skanky relationship rather quickly when he found out JUST how OLD his Sweet Savanna is. Little lasting power for our young bull, but we're all proud of him for trying this "decades old skank". As Chris5 himself once said: "OLD to me is typically any woman over 30 and also a woman with a decade or more experience in the hobby"!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375559[/ATTACH]
7. Chris5 doesn't want to go to sleep "empty-handed", so he turns to his best friend for relief.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375560[/ATTACH]
8. Meanwhile, back at the Oasis.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]375561[/ATTACH]
Roll Tide, Roll!
Now I don't care who you are, that shit is FUNNY!
[QUOTE=Camera3;2444570]That is the common name for Florida Statute 775.087 which gives mandatory sentences of 10 years for displaying a firearm while committing a crime, 20 years for firing it and 25 years if you hit someone. Judges have to follow the guideline. Only prosecuters can wave the minimum as part of a plea deal. You got to figure that she had one amazing lawyer who got a charge of premeditated murder with an automatic minimum 25 years down to a few months in the county jail. I want his card.
C3.[/QUOTE]She got that plea deal with a PUBLIC DEFENDER as her attorney. It was in the links I sent you and and I specifically pointed it out to you. I'll be happy to send anyone else the same information.
Sometimes you're just wrong bro, learn to admit it. Ever think she just might have been justified (Her face was smacked) and took the deal rather than go before a jury of central Florida intellectuals and risk everything.
Who wants to be judged by 12 people who aren't smart enough to get off jury duty.
VS.
[QUOTE=Camera3;2444570]That is the common name for Florida Statute 775.087 which gives mandatory sentences of 10 years for displaying a firearm while committing a crime, 20 years for firing it and 25 years if you hit someone. Judges have to follow the guideline. Only prosecuters can wave the minimum as part of a plea deal. You got to figure that she had one amazing lawyer who got a charge of premeditated murder with an automatic minimum 25 years down to a few months in the county jail. I want his card.
C3.[/QUOTE]Only certain charges carry that penalty. Here's some info I copied and pasted Florida's "10-20-Life" law is a law that requires courts to impose a minimum sentence of 10 years, 20 years, or 25 years to life for certain felony convictions involving the use or attempted use of a firearm or destructive device. If the firearm is an assault weapon or machine gun, they must impose a sentence of 15 years, 20 years, or 25 years to life. The penalty is in addition and consecutive to the sentence for the underlying felony conviction (Fla. Stat. § 775.087).
Courts must impose the mandatory minimum sentences in convictions for committing or attempting to commit any of the following felonies, regardless of whether the use of the weapon was an element of the crime:
1. murder;.
2. sexual battery;.
3. robbery;.
4. burglary;.
5. arson;.
6. aggravated assault;.
7. aggravated battery;.
8. kidnapping;.
9. escape;.
10. Aircraft piracy;.
11. Aggravated child abuse;.
12. Aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult;.
13. Unlawful throwing, placing, or discharging of a destructive device or bomb;.
14. Carjacking;.
15. Home invasion robbery;.
16. Aggravated stalking;.
17. Drug trafficking and capital importation of cocaine and other illegal drugs; and.
18. Possession of firearm by a felon.
[QUOTE=VerySlowly;2444705]She got that plea deal with a PUBLIC DEFENDER as her attorney. It was in the links I sent you and and I specifically pointed it out to you. I'll be happy to send anyone else the same information.
Sometimes you're just wrong bro, learn to admit it. Ever think she just might have been justified (Her face was smacked) and took the deal rather than go before a jury of central Florida intellectuals and risk everything.
Who wants to be judged by 12 people who aren't smart enough to get off jury duty.
VS.[/QUOTE]The last line of this post slays me. (so true). If I ever receive a jury duty summons in the mail it goes str8 into the trash, I dare someone to challenge me on this! LOL.