Sugarbabies?

[QUOTE=BDiddy19;3739206]Has anyone actually met this broad? Been going back and forth with her (she's already asked for $300) but has sent some additional pics. Not sending her a dime but she appears hot and talks a good game. Am curious if anyone has actually bed her down?[/QUOTE]The word is SCAM.

This is a group of at least two (2) girls and one guy that work out of Ashland, KY.

Here's the old Columbus one: [URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/d76a7afd-598a-4a0e-b358-49fcd0688d81[/URL] (614) 382-0314.

This is the last Cincinnati one: [URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/cc07e992-84dc-42dd-9081-e68ed74304cd[/URL] (513) 437-1517.

And the PayPal for both: [EMAIL]lexisweety27@aol.com[/EMAIL].

Text\Sext with them long enough and you can tell when the "shift" changes and as always, she has no gag reflex, no limits, everything is on the menu, etc, etc, etc.

A friend of mine got their source IP (Spectrum Ashland KY) and got both a burner (606 AC) number and a real (606 AC) because they didn't setup Google Voice correctly and when they called.

It went through their Android dialer, not voice.

Here's some of the normal batch of pics they send, feel free to add to the collection:

I had a slow work day and I've been screwing with whoever these girls are all day. Just totally messing with them every time they beg for money. I thank the people on this board who tipped me off and giving them a dose of their own medicine is worth it.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;3739384]The word is SCAM.

This is a group of at least two (2) girls and one guy that work out of Ashland, KY.

Here's the old Columbus one: [URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/d76a7afd-598a-4a0e-b358-49fcd0688d81[/URL] (614) 382-0314.

This is the last Cincinnati one: [URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/cc07e992-84dc-42dd-9081-e68ed74304cd[/URL] (513) 437-1517.

And the PayPal for both: [EMAIL]lexisweety27@aol.com[/EMAIL].

Text\Sext with them long enough and you can tell when the "shift" changes and as always, she has no gag reflex, no limits, everything is on the menu, etc, etc, etc.

A friend of mine got their source IP (Spectrum Ashland KY) and got both a burner (606 AC) number and a real (606 AC) because they didn't setup Google Voice correctly and when they called.

It went through their Android dialer, not voice.

Here's some of the normal batch of pics they send, feel free to add to the collection:[/QUOTE]

Saw this one last week. Would not recommend. Strange personality and some hygiene issues. Better choices out there.

She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/b19e2bdb-fab4-429d-aa85-4ae31bfafc3d[/URL]

[QUOTE=JizMan;3743604]She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/b19e2bdb-fab4-429d-aa85-4ae31bfafc3d[/URL][/QUOTE]Did you partake? Were services good? Allowance she is asking for?

[QUOTE=JizMan;3743604]She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/b19e2bdb-fab4-429d-aa85-4ae31bfafc3d[/URL][/QUOTE]We were chatting pleasantly and I was about to make my offer. She asked to see my picture. I shared a disguised photo and she blocked me. It may be sour grapes but she does seem awfully innocent and, at 18, is a bit under my normal cutoff.

Bam.

Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.

[QUOTE=BamBam;3744044]We were chatting pleasantly and I was about to make my offer. She asked to see my picture. I shared a disguised photo and she blocked me. It may be sour grapes but she does seem awfully innocent and, at 18, is a bit under my normal cutoff.

Bam.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CinMiner;3744086]Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.[/QUOTE]Yes, there seems to be a lot of naïve 18 &19 yr old, ingénues on the site lately who think someone is going to pay them just for their companionship. However, as we all know, there are guys out there who contribute to that perception. This one seemed ready to go for 200. I am not that attracted to her and the distance is an issue as well, so I will not pursue, but she seemed sincere to me.

My experience was a bit different. I connected with her shortly after she appeared. Good conversation for a dozen texts or so. She is a student at Miami in Oxford and open to P4 P. Then she said that since she has no transportation it won't work. And she can't host, either. No pic was shared and our chat was quite benign. Not sure why she bagged.

As for girls that disappear after pix are shared, I find that to be pretty common. I'm neither super good looking nor super bad looking. Pretty average but I'm thinking many of these girls, especially those who are on here looking for gifts because, they just "know" they "deserve" them, tend to think that the SD they "deserve" should look like Mr. Clooney. And I'm no Clooney!! Already unrealistic expectations on the part of millennials fueled by SA fantasy stories result in low success rates.

[QUOTE=CinMiner;3744086]Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JLZ61;3744262]My experience was a bit different. I connected with her shortly after she appeared. Good conversation for a dozen texts or so. She is a student at Miami in Oxford and open to P4 P. Then she said that since she has no transportation it won't work. And she can't host, either. No pic was shared and our chat was quite benign. Not sure why she bagged.

As for girls that disappear after pix are shared, I find that to be pretty common. I'm neither super good looking nor super bad looking. Pretty average but I'm thinking many of these girls, especially those who are on here looking for gifts because, they just "know" they "deserve" them, tend to think that the SD they "deserve" should look like Mr. Clooney. And I'm no Clooney!! Already unrealistic expectations on the part of millennials fueled by SA fantasy stories result in low success rates.[/QUOTE]It is true that there is some of that in every local bowl. The one's you need to be seeking out are the girls who really are into older guys. They likely have some kinda kink, and it's your job to figure that out. Lots of girls in the bowl are submissive, I ask early on if they are the type that 'likes their man to be in the lead'. Subtle, but often they just blurt right back 'I'm very submissive'. Those, you'll not get turned down based on your photo provided you're really not gross. They *want* an older guy. They know what we look like. I have done many that are ⅓ my age.

You're absolutely right. I've been lucky enough to have found a few of those, mostly by blind chance than any crafty strategy on my part. And these are not girls really looking for $$, somewhat shockingly. Case in point, recently came across an 18 yr old (yes, I checked her identification) that simply had a daddy kind. No money, just fun. Tight and firm in all the good ways but fairly inexperienced, which of course allows me to demonstrate my "prowess". LOL.

Many of these girls are just tired of asshole guys their own age. I remember what I was like then and I have to admit, I agree with their assessment.

On with the hunt!

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;3744405]It is true that there is some of that in every local bowl. The one's you need to be seeking out are the girls who really are into older guys. They likely have some kinda kink, and it's your job to figure that out. Lots of girls in the bowl are submissive, I ask early on if they are the type that 'likes their man to be in the lead'. Subtle, but often they just blurt right back 'I'm very submissive'. Those, you'll not get turned down based on your photo provided you're really not gross. They *want* an older guy. They know what we look like. I have done many that are ⅓ my age.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/60d45235-0890-43b1-918e-e1e4dbb4c390[/URL]

Went to text fairly quickly. Agreed to meet, said all she would to was a "BJ" (her words). Price for said BJ: $250, says she has never gotten less than that for a BJ. I told her that was at or above market price for full service. She offered to meet and greet to negotiate if I would compensated her for her time. I didn't bother to ask how much that cost. Declined!

[QUOTE=CinMiner;3745127][URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/60d45235-0890-43b1-918e-e1e4dbb4c390[/URL]

Went to text fairly quickly. Agreed to meet, said all she would to was a "BJ" (her words). Price for said BJ: $250, says she has never gotten less than that for a BJ. I told her that was at or above market price for full service. She offered to meet and greet to negotiate if I would compensated her for her time. I didn't bother to ask how much that cost. Declined![/QUOTE]Yes severe case of GPS.

Previosuly she expected $1000 for a meet.

Had a dream about her earlier this week. Very enthusiastic, enjoys what she does. Clean notel room, no smoke smell. She was dressed in a sexy little outfit. Don't know who wrote earlier that she was with LEO, but I don't think so. I will repeat.

Anyone seen Sierraxoxoxox? She's been on the site for a few years. Been talking to this one and appreciate any intel.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/6a2585a8-a6f5-d286-f44a-77d84127874e[/URL]

She is legit, we met for $. 5, she has an awesome rack, nice tight box. Face is a little homely but the rest is top shelf. She stays in hotels with her GF that is butt ugly!!! Stay safe.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/82361ac7-7480-4d68-b667-786063205d2e[/URL]

She is legit, spinner type, cannot host works till early afternoon. She's a good time, open menu no bb, $$.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/messages/inbox/96d45b61-0403-4435-b477-9d54ec1d7c80[/URL]

Nice body but a little "puffy" for my taste. She's a great time, lots of fun, staying near downtown. Asked for $$$, settled for $$

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/987e36e2-b631-1487-0896-05a04b2eb383[/URL]

She's a regular poster, will meet for $. 5, BB on the menu but I wouldn't BB with any of these women. She has had a couple kids but still has good physique. Lives north of Dayton off Benchwood. Good time for a one time use.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/100d5a10-bfc5-4682-adfb-9ad1c127b9c7[/URL]

I understand some are in the bowl to get some cheap fun, but this one really makes me understand why some females on SA quickly run away.

This 'sugar daddy' offered a fair amount of sugar, so after an afternoon of frolicking he produced his sugar. A 1 Lb back of Domino sugar.

Lets try to keep the bowl civilized please.

Been in contact with this one. 200 per and wants long term. Anyone else in contact or met?

[QUOTE=TheWolverineJP;3746738]She's a regular poster, will meet for $. 5, BB on the menu but I wouldn't BB with any of these women. She has had a couple kids but still has good physique. Lives north of Dayton off Benchwood. Good time for a one time use.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/100d5a10-bfc5-4682-adfb-9ad1c127b9c7[/URL][/QUOTE]I wouldn't go as far as to say good physique but she is nice and does not seem like a time waster. I may repeat.

Anyone have any intel on this one? Talks a good show, is reasonably open but has been very direct so I'm not sure if it is naivete or not.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/703f158e-4cc5-4510-8c70-5a68dd6fdc61[/URL]

I also had great conversations with her. But when push came to shove, she got cold feet. That said, I caught her very early in her SA tenure so she may have since changed her perspective.

Good luck and let us know how it goes. She is smart, cute and articulate; could be a good catch.

[QUOTE=SstevenEvets;3749530]Anyone have any intel on this one? Talks a good show, is reasonably open but has been very direct so I'm not sure if it is naivete or not.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/703f158e-4cc5-4510-8c70-5a68dd6fdc61[/URL][/QUOTE]

Not sure what to make of this one.

Obviously these two SBs are one and the same. The deniseblack profile appeared last week and the sandra profile appeared this week.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/36c5e070-4ed9-4318-a93b-6ac072c225f4[/URL]

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/4bf7e7dd-d3f9-4347-b759-8331d6cbe7dd[/URL]

I connected with her as deniseblack237 last week (sandra had yet to appear) and quickly moved to texting. Her responsiveness varied a bit but there were some good strings of texting and we got to brass tacks relatively effectively. Cost agreed to $. 5. I picked her up at her house in Norwood in the evening. She is definitely the girl in the photos. Cute and young. Very young. We hung out for a while and I ended up giving her a little cash for her time and taking her back home. I didn't do anything beyond talking.

Here were my concerns.

One is that it seems as though the person who wrote the profile and the person I saw are two very, very different people. The person who wrote the profile was somewhat assertive in sexuality (she wants to be "naughty"). Some of the texts were in the same vein, yet some were decidedly less so. I initially chalked it up to youth and related inconsistency. The person I picked up, however, was very shy and demure and most certainly did not come across as the "naughty" girl portrayed in the profile. She seemed to be a good kid and honest. Her speech patterns and overall approach were definitely different from what was portrayed in the profile or that came across in some of the texts.

Furthermore, she is very young-looking. When I asked for her identification, she said she lost it. She looked sufficiently young that I was kind of concerned about her being under age.

Anyway, when I dropped her off, she was extremely nervous, kept looking back at the house and scurried back as soon as she could politely escape. It was relatively late so I don't think there would have been concerns about anybody seeing her. It very much seemed as the issue was related to whoever was in the house.

We continued texting for a bit with the same biphasic oddness on her end. Sometimes the texts were decidedly forward and blunt sexually. Sometimes they were very demure.

Bottom line is a very strong feeling of unease plus her unconfirmed age made me bail. It almost seems like she's being pimped out by someone she is afraid of. Maybe some of you have bigger balls than I do but this is not a situation for me.

If anyone has any input, I'd be curious to know. Maybe I'm wrong. But my gut said get the hell out! So I did.

Anyone seen this one.

Asking 200 $ per meet.

[URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/aee40c08-4fce-9716-5b04-827c5fa25bbb[/URL]

Username: JessT07.

Any info is much appreciated.

[QUOTE=JLZ61;3749671]Not sure what to make of this one.

Obviously these two SBs are one and the same. The deniseblack profile appeared last week and the sandra profile appeared this week.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/36c5e070-4ed9-4318-a93b-6ac072c225f4[/URL]

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/4bf7e7dd-d3f9-4347-b759-8331d6cbe7dd[/URL]

I connected with her as deniseblack237 last week (sandra had yet to appear) and quickly moved to texting. Her responsiveness varied a bit but there were some good strings of texting and we got to brass tacks relatively effectively. Cost agreed to $. 5. I picked her up at her house in Norwood in the evening. She is definitely the girl in the photos. Cute and young. Very young. We hung out for a while and I ended up giving her a little cash for her time and taking her back home. I didn't do anything beyond talking.

Here were my concerns.

One is that it seems as though the person who wrote the profile and the person I saw are two very, very different people. The person who wrote the profile was somewhat assertive in sexuality (she wants to be "naughty"). Some of the texts were in the same vein, yet some were decidedly less so. I initially chalked it up to youth and related inconsistency. The person I picked up, however, was very shy and demure and most certainly did not come across as the "naughty" girl portrayed in the profile. She seemed to be a good kid and honest. Her speech patterns and overall approach were definitely different from what was portrayed in the profile or that came across in some of the texts.

Furthermore, she is very young-looking. When I asked for her identification, she said she lost it. She looked sufficiently young that I was kind of concerned about her being under age.

Anyway, when I dropped her off, she was extremely nervous, kept looking back at the house and scurried back as soon as she could politely escape. It was relatively late so I don't think there would have been concerns about anybody seeing her. It very much seemed as the issue was related to whoever was in the house.

We continued texting for a bit with the same biphasic oddness on her end. Sometimes the texts were decidedly forward and blunt sexually. Sometimes they were very demure.

Bottom line is a very strong feeling of unease plus her unconfirmed age made me bail. It almost seems like she's being pimped out by someone she is afraid of. Maybe some of you have bigger balls than I do but this is not a situation for me.

If anyone has any input, I'd be curious to know. Maybe I'm wrong. But my gut said get the hell out! So I did.[/QUOTE]Follow the gut.

In this case you never know what the possible outcome might have been from hooking up.

BTW, post a partial number or whatever just in case any of us trip over another iteration.

W.

OH area code. Xxx-4563.

(Of course, that's easy enough to change on her part.)

FWIW, I really hope I misread that situation. It bothers me a good bit.

[QUOTE=WarlockKy;3750303]Follow the gut.

In this case you never know what the possible outcome might have been from hooking up.

BTW, post a partial number or whatever just in case any of us trip over another iteration.

W.[/QUOTE]

Have not met, yet. Exchanged texts. Lots of time goes by before I get a response. Not sure what to make of her yet.

[QUOTE=Allas123;3750174]Anyone seen this one.

Asking 200 $ per meet.

[URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/aee40c08-4fce-9716-5b04-827c5fa25bbb[/URL]

Username: JessT07.

Any info is much appreciated.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CinMiner;3750613]Have not met, yet. Exchanged texts. Lots of time goes by before I get a response. Not sure what to make of her yet.[/QUOTE]I had a number of message exchanges with her two years ago then she went ghost.

I messaged with her back and forth year or two ago. We meet for coffee but didn't go to bed. Her face pic is accurate and back then she was carrying a bit of extra weight. I saw her again within last 6 months and she suggested meet at hotel. I should have realized something was up. She arrived having gained huge amount of weight. We did the deed which was ok but she is very, very big. I have no interest in repeating.

KC.

[QUOTE=Allas123;3750174]Anyone seen this one.

Asking 200 $ per meet.

[URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/aee40c08-4fce-9716-5b04-827c5fa25bbb[/URL]

Username: JessT07.

Any info is much appreciated.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=EuroInCincy;3748665]I understand some are in the bowl to get some cheap fun, but this one really makes me understand why some females on SA quickly run away.
This 'sugar daddy' offered a fair amount of sugar, so after an afternoon of frolicking he produced his sugar. A 1 Lb back of Domino sugar.
Lets try to keep the bowl civilized please.[/QUOTE]I just saw this girl post a rant on FB about this incident. I don't remember her sugar handle but I can share the rant via PM.

Babykaykay2152 is a SB / Escort.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/e67c5f10-864b-4222-93a8-1ceedf92201d[/URL]

[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/[/URL]#cincinnati / photos /5136229824/25867149.

[QUOTE=JoeBogus;3750971]I just saw this girl post a rant on FB about this incident. I don't remember her sugar handle but I can share the rant via PM.[/QUOTE]Found her SA profile - [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/e2e4df5e-440c-48ef-b8a6-5624f150c7e1[/URL].

I got a SA membership 2 days ago. Today I tried to send a message and the site told me. " Unable to send message due to spam limit". Does anyone know what that means? SA of course has no contact number. Just thought someone on here might beable to explain this to me.

[QUOTE=Italian666;3752075]I got a SA membership 2 days ago. Today I tried to send a message and the site told me. " Unable to send message due to spam limit". Does anyone know what that means? SA of course has no contact number. Just thought someone on here might beable to explain this to me.[/QUOTE]Did you try the HELP option on the site? Not trying to be rude, but I can't believe I needed to ask that.

CFG.

Of course I tried that. Got no answer. So I guess you didn't have to ask that. Did you?

[QUOTE=Italian666;3752971]Of course I tried that. Got no answer. So I guess you didn't have to ask that. Did you?[/QUOTE]What a dick, why ask for help if you won't accept any. Good luck with that!

Easy big steve. Your info was a bit obvious and didn't help. And I did figure it out.

[QUOTE=Italian666;3752075]I got a SA membership 2 days ago. Today I tried to send a message and the site told me. " Unable to send message due to spam limit". Does anyone know what that means? SA of course has no contact number. Just thought someone on here might beable to explain this to me.[/QUOTE]You sent too many emails to girls and past your limit go to the sent folder and delete some emails that was read or ignored should fix the problem.