OC Sugarbabies

[QUOTE=WhoWouldKnow;7190601]I agree with you bud. I was mongering since I was 29 and I was the young gun and would get freebies or more for my money because I looked young and the ladies seemed to like that. I not 44 and have given up since 2 years ago. I go on this forum for fun and entertainment now. LOL Not much has changed except for the pricing LOL inflation at it's finest.[/QUOTE]I'm about the same age, and this week I was with one of my regulars, whom I met through SDM. Of course, she's seen a few other guys from the site (she's open about it), anyway, we're talking and she tells me that many of the guys she talks to on the site are in their 20's and 30's. I started on Seeking in my late 30's, and it seems I was one of the younger guys there then.

I wonder what's changed in the last 10 years?

Just wondering if anyone knows these two? I'm usually looking ladies who mention things like "PPM" or "mutually beneficial" in their profiles. I'm going to LA next month for work and though I'd try contacting them. Wondering if anyone has seen them or if they're scammers?

Kayla 24, Fullerton (and Bay Area).

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=72660437&nsp=1[/URL]

"mutually beneficial arrangement. Also stay in the Bay Area" (so maybe a professional sugar baby?

SpoiledgF25,25, Lake Forest.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=63553207&nsp=1[/URL]

"full time mom. Mutually beneficial".

Including pictures in case anybody recognises them from Seeking or SugarLife. I'll update if I hear back from them.

From the new sites posted, is seeking dead?

[QUOTE=JasonVee;7272810]From the new sites posted, is seeking dead?[/QUOTE]I went ahead and got a membership on SugarLifeNow, and so far, the number of profiles is like 100 x less in my area. So there's that.

I have been using WhatsYourPrice, and the main problem is their financial model. You offer a girl 100 to meet (if she was a keeper, I'd have a gift up to that much anyway), you have to give the site 20 credits, which is like $10. There are some on there who ask the max for a meet, 500. If that included FC it could be worth it, but of course YMMV.

My max for the initial meet has been 111, no one has taken me up on that. I have had a few accept at 69 and 99. The most common number I see is 150, that must be the default when a girl sets up her profile. Their credit charging model is weird, $49 'incentive' costs 10 credits, but $50 costs 15 credits, and the same all the way to $99. But $100 is 20 credits.

What I like about WYP is that it would be a decent way to get a date when traveling, which might just be pleasant company, or it could be a FC trip. Not the hassle of setting up and paying for a seeking profile.

I am getting a seeking profile for May, I've been active though my membership is not paid, and just from favoring people locally and where I am traveling, I have like 85 messages (from scratch). I always carpet bomb when I have a profile. I see a lot of the usual suspects on there, and I mostly avoided them. There is always new talent on seeking, some of it actually real.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7273147]I went ahead and got a membership on SugarLifeNow, and so far, the number of profiles is like 100 x less in my area. So there's that.

I have been using WhatsYourPrice, and the main problem is their financial model. You offer a girl 100 to meet (if she was a keeper, I'd have a gift up to that much anyway), you have to give the site 20 credits, which is like $10. There are some on there who ask the max for a meet, 500. If that included FC it could be worth it, but of course YMMV.

My max for the initial meet has been 111, no one has taken me up on that. I have had a few accept at 69 and 99. The most common number I see is 150, that must be the default when a girl sets up her profile. Their credit charging model is weird, $49 'incentive' costs 10 credits, but $50 costs 15 credits, and the same all the way to $99. But $100 is 20 credits.

What I like about WYP is that it would be a decent way to get a date when traveling, which might just be pleasant company, or it could be a FC trip. Not the hassle of setting up and paying for a seeking profile.

I am getting a seeking profile for May, I've been active though my membership is not paid, and just from favoring people locally and where I am traveling, I have like 85 messages (from scratch). I always carpet bomb when I have a profile. I see a lot of the usual suspects on there, and I mostly avoided them. There is always new talent on seeking, some of it actually real.[/QUOTE]What does FC stand for?

[QUOTE=StubbornMule;7275912]What does FC stand for?[/QUOTE]I think he meant to type FS or Fucking. If "FC" was "Football Club", then that sounds like some kind of gang bang LOL.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7279751]I think he meant to type FS or Fucking. If "FC" was "Football Club", then that sounds like some kind of gang bang LOL.[/QUOTE]I believe FC stands for Fuck Chamber. Lame term for me but that's what I remember.

I am still seeing women ask me to sign up for their "online for a week then in person meets" with "verified by selfie" profiles. Also implausibly beautiful, some exotic women posted on local dumps of cities. Theres a Brazilian model in stanton? What?. Also maybe its me but it seems like a number of women block as soon as they see my opener. Sometimes I its the same guy fat Russian guy running a network these just cutting his losses and blocking me. Also I have no online in my profile so maybe they just block and move on since they know I won't bite.

[QUOTE=NutritionFacts;7292392]I am still seeing women ask me to sign up for their "online for a week then in person meets" with "verified by selfie" profiles. Also implausibly beautiful, some exotic women posted on local dumps of cities. Theres a Brazilian model in stanton? What?. Also maybe its me but it seems like a number of women block as soon as they see my opener. Sometimes I its the same guy fat Russian guy running a network these just cutting his losses and blocking me. Also I have no online in my profile so maybe they just block and move on since they know I won't bite.[/QUOTE]I mean I usually exercise some common sense and rational analysis.

Like. If it looks like bullshit, sound like bullshit, smell like bullshit. Probably is bullshit LOL.

Doesn't matter if its verified or what not.

[QUOTE=JasonVee;7292409]I mean I usually exercise some common sense and rational analysis.

Like. If it looks like bullshit, sound like bullshit, smell like bullshit. Probably is bullshit LOL.

Doesn't matter if its verified or what not.[/QUOTE]Yeah, my point is its not much better "verified" or not LOL. Its worse now in some ways.

Here you go OC folks.

Claire is sexy, flirty, super sexual, no tatts, large naturals.

Certainly experienced and a little larger than I prefer, but she'll do ANYTHING you like with a smile on her pretty face.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e5e39bee-3990-42f7-946c-56f77747a870[/URL]

Don't be sexual when texting with her, just focus on getting her to show up and you'll be well rewarded.

[QUOTE=RanManCan;7302551]Here you go OC folks.

Claire is sexy, flirty, super sexual, no tatts, large naturals.

Certainly experienced and a little larger than I prefer, but she'll do ANYTHING you like with a smile on her pretty face.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e5e39bee-3990-42f7-946c-56f77747a870[/URL]

Don't be sexual when texting with her, just focus on getting her to show up and you'll be well rewarded.[/QUOTE]She looks great. What was the damage if you don't mind me asking?

Hot new SLN Girl, Alexis 23.

[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/alexiswynner/[/URL]

New SLN Girl Juliette 27.

[URL]https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/Sophiajuliette/[/URL]

Highlight of the weekend was a young Latina from Seeking. Mia, 22 from Newport. Drinks and hotel fun. 5 oo, open to BBFS, 2 rounds of fun. Also no mention of "Don't cum in me" which was a nice bonus.

Hoping to bring some life to this thread, as I prefer the OC Sugar Bowl.