Positive Escort Reviews

Well lets just say after some issues falling asleep me and the beautiful Charlisa were able to link up and dream. She met me at the door in a nice outfit we chatted for a sec or two and she put me to sleep. I dreamed she started with a CBJ that did not last long as I'm sensitive. Switched to some k9 and oh my she had a heart shaped booty that would bring a tear to your eye. After a few min of that we moved to the end of the bed and we did some off the bed stand up missionary. She has a great looking body and natural boobs that looked great jumping around. Her sounds were very encouraging and helped in the entire dream. I feel she was very into it. Before I new it I woke up from this amazing dream. I will definitely be a repeat. Yall should go and check her out.

[URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/98/posts/1-Independent-Escorts/1-Independent-Escorts/24390--EX-TiC-CHARLISE-1OO-R-a-Upsc-Playmate-G-.html[/URL]

I had the pleasure of seeing Jenn back to back days. Once at her place and once at my hotel.

Very easy to communicate with. Our dreams consisted of BBJ, CG, doggy, and mish. My second visit she allowed a double pop session. Anyways, she is a very pretty, laid back, girl with a nice body. I can't wait to come back to Orlando and see her again.

Well, as much as I wanted to see this girl, I just couldn't make it work. She lives far away and my time is limited in order to maintain "safety" from this hobby from you know who.

I asked her to do a couple of things but she thought I was setting her up; understandable, but sometimes a request is just a request LOL.

I need a regular UTR somewhere around the airport area with similar stats to jenn if anyone has any recommendations. Please pm me.

And jenn if you somehow see this and change your mind let me know. I harbor no ill feelings and what we texted about still stands.

[QUOTE=RoadWarrior2K;3219954]Got to say, Harley must be a one in a million service provider. So good, in fact, that after a visit with her, mongers decide to become a forum member and write a review.[/QUOTE]Both are real.

So, Under The Radar (UTR). What does this exactly mean? In terms of NOT POSTING AD's, Jenn would be considered UTR right? Because she is certainly not LOW VOLUME. While I was on a visit with her, she answered a couple of texts and the phone was going of the hook. Not to mention, there was another monger waiting to see her after I left.

When I think of UTR, I assume low volume. A couple of mongers a day. Needleymango and DoctorGod reviewed a latin hottie, Sophie / Sophia. She only see's mongers here and there when her schedule permits. Those are what I consider UTR. & BTW, I got a chance to see Sophia. Wow. If you're looking for a UTR (low volume) this is the Gal to see. Especially if you LOVE latin women. I can share intel with OG SR MEMBERS ONLY.

Many times I find myself in a dilemma after reading reviews on girls and then deciding to see them after the reviews. The words "drop dead gorgeous, Beautiful, sexy, hot, fine gorgeous. Etc etc" are used to describe some of these providers. Then when I get there, I come to a brutal awakening that they are not. (In my nerdy eyes). So help a monger out a little. On a scale 1-10 How would you rate the following based on looks?

Marina, Jenn altamonte, Sexy&Foreign Persian Michelle, Dahlia, Charlise, Jackie Grey (body rub), Farrah4 u , Baby Jamie, Avalon & Gia (Body Rub)

[blue]Deleted by Admin

You need to take another look at the name of this thread.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=ThaaAtOne;3220762]So, Under The Radar (UTR). What does this exactly mean? In terms of NOT POSTING AD's, Jenn would be considered UTR right? Because she is certainly not LOW VOLUME. While I was on a visit with her, she answered a couple of texts and the phone was going of the hook. Not to mention, there was another monger waiting to see her after I left.

When I think of UTR, I assume low volume. A couple of mongers a day. Needleymango and DoctorGod reviewed a latin hottie, Sophie / Sophia. She only see's mongers here and there when her schedule permits. Those are what I consider UTR. & BTW, I got a chance to see Sophia. Wow. If you're looking for a UTR (low volume) this is the Gal to see. Especially if you LOVE latin women. I can share intel with OG SR MEMBERS ONLY.[/QUOTE]Jenn hasn't been a UTR for months now. She doesn't place ads because almost every review on here gives 2 thumbs up (and with good reason) which is the best kind of advertising. Sophia right now is UTR only because of her schedule. If she gets more free time to " play " she too will lose the UTR label. I have seen Jenn and Sophia and IMO Sophia is prettier, more personable, has a better body and a better all around dream. Just wish Sophia would comprehend the English language a little better as I have had a dream not happen because she didn't understand a simple text message I sent her. This is not a knock on Jenn at all, she is 1 b with Sophia being 1 a.

[QUOTE=ThaaAtOne;3220805]Many times I find myself in a dilemma after reading reviews on girls and then deciding to see them after the reviews. The words "drop dead gorgeous, Beautiful, sexy, hot, fine gorgeous. Etc etc" are used to describe some of these providers. Then when I get there, I come to a brutal awakening that they are not. (In my nerdy eyes). So help a monger out a little. On a scale 1-10 How would you rate the following based on looks?

Marina, Jenn altamonte, Sexy&Foreign Persian Michelle, Dahlia, Charlise, Jackie Grey (body rub), Farrah4 u , Baby Jamie, Avalon & Gia (Body Rub)[/QUOTE]I have had a chance to meet exactly half of the fine ladies you list above. I don't know that you could compare even 2 of them together much less that whole list. Of the half I have met they are all GREAT providers in different ways. Marina and Dahlia are both a hot cup of salsa but in two very different ways. I'm not sure there could ever be an answer to that question unless you find out for yourself. All of the girls in you list that I have met have real (recent) photos of themselves in their adds. If looks is ALL you are looking for then look at the photos and choose accordingly. But I am here to tell you that looks are different for everyone and is certainly not the only priority you may want to consider in your selection. Enjoy them all I say!

[QUOTE=Camera3;3218206]I had a narrow window in the morning on the next day and contacted Jenn. She is always easy to communicate and reliable with appointments (give or take a few minutes). Lots said about her, some true and some total fabrications by guys she has declined to see, so here is the real story with pictures to back it up. Her incall is in a safe up-scale gated community and from where she had me park to her apartment there were no nosey neighbors. She usually walks to the parking lot to greet guests and walk us to the door. It is fun to watch her walk. I have never seen a bra or panty line. Ever. When the door closed she greeted me with a "welcome home, honey" type kiss. She is a very sweet young and pretty college student just working her way to earn her degree, low volume, UTR. The more I see her the more we learn about each other. Her hair was still wet from a fresh shower, something that is a turn on for me. We went to her room, got comfortable and worked our way through the alphabet. DFK, BBBJ, attention to the boys, DT, DATY, FIP, CFS, CG, Mish, K9, ended with 69. LMNOP. She enjoyed it probably three or four times (I lost count) and I enjoyed myself enough.

So, the pics, which she said I may post, show that spinner body. As an aside, she is very tight. I gave her my shirt after we were done to keep her warm, and note the pic of the works of art. The feet pics show she has clean feet (damn, I hate that we even have to have this part of the conversation) and, also, nice looking feet for those into that. Smoke? Yes, slight smoke smell in living room, not in the bedroom and not on her breath. Housekeeping? She is a college student so there is some clutter but not dirt. Odor? Nope. I would have to say a sweet taste, kinda fruity.

As always, YMMV.

Contact her through her membership here at JennCiCi. I hear donations are $. 4 hhr and $. 8 hr.

Play safe,

C3[/QUOTE]Spot on C3. I think she's a Gem!

I got the chance to visit Paige over the holidays it was my first time meeting her. All of her reviews Are spot on. She was easy to communicate with. Was freshly showered on arrival. Easy laid back chick that makes you feel relaxed. She has big softies that I enjoyed a bunch. Started with BBJ and went in to a couple positions. She doesn't mind it a little hard either. Had a great time and the damage was 1. 25 for the time we spent. We don't watch a clock so I am not sure exactly how long I was there but it was enough.

Thanks Paige. See ya soon!!

[QUOTE=ThaaAtOne;3220805]Many times I find myself in a dilemma after reading reviews on girls and then deciding to see them after the reviews. The words "drop dead gorgeous, Beautiful, sexy, hot, fine gorgeous. Etc etc" are used to describe some of these providers. Then when I get there, I come to a brutal awakening that they are not. (In my nerdy eyes). So help a monger out a little. On a scale 1-10 How would you rate the following based on looks?

Marina, Jenn altamonte, Sexy&Foreign Persian Michelle, Dahlia, Charlise, Jackie Grey (body rub), Farrah4 u , Baby Jamie, Avalon & Gia (Body Rub)[/QUOTE]These types of questions yield answers that are way too subjective for adults to answer. I just posted about Jenn, in that one monger calls her an undeveloped boy. To me, she is fine as he* I have not seen everyone on the list above, but to me the ones I have seen are fine and pretty, and would be too good to date my ugly ass in real life. I will add that there are a couple of Tara's Angels that also fit that description.

To me, Anna Nicole Smith was my dream girl at one point. I had guys call her a pig and that they wouldn't touch her. Same with Pamela Anderson pre-Kid Rock and Tommy Lee. Guys said, "without makeup she's a bow wow. " Maybe today that's true, but not in the Baywatch Days (anyone here old enough to remember that shit? Unfortunately, I am. Had to watch it on Armed Forces Network in Darmstadt).

All women are beautiful. Some more than others.

[QUOTE=Miketastic69;3221105]These types of questions yield answers that are way too subjective for adults to answer. I just posted about Jenn, in that one monger calls her an undeveloped boy. I will add that there are a couple of Tara's Angels that also fit that description.

All women are beautiful. Some more than others.[/QUOTE]Yea, I agree about Tara's angels. Nikki would be top of that list I assume? Those nips, that rack and lips. Yum! She used to have a girl by the name of Adri. Man, she was sultry and spicy as well. Then there was Eve. (who now does adverts on CL).

Just trying to get a feel for what mongers conisder "Gorgeous & Beautiful". If a person calls Nikki (Tara's Angels) gorgeous and then turns around and calls Jenn Drop Dead Gorgeous. Then I'm lost. LOL.

[QUOTE=ThaaAtOne;3221193]Yea, I agree about Tara's angels. Nikki would be top of that list I assume? Those nips, that rack and lips. Yum! She used to have a girl by the name of Adri. Man, she was sultry and spicy as well. Then there was Eve. (who now does adverts on CL).

Just trying to get a feel for what mongers conisder "Gorgeous & Beautiful". If a person calls Nikki (Tara's Angels) gorgeous and then turns around and calls Jenn Drop Dead Gorgeous. Then I'm lost. LOL.[/QUOTE]Nikki is beautiful. I met her solo before she was with the Angels outfit. She's a Beverly Hills party girl type, and I did Incall. It was very nice.

At Tara's There was a spicy chick there with a long braid on the phone. I did not get her name, but she almost made me cancel who I was with. But I also love the GND. They can be as beautiful to me, and feels more real to me. Chicks I can hang out with. Jenn to me, from what I've read represents the total package, and getting a quality time is perfection. I have heard good things about Katie too.

[QUOTE=Miketastic69;3220738]Both are real.[/QUOTE]Thank you for verifying that (:

It's nice to have someone on my side.

Sucks being new in this industry.