Sugar Daddy Sites

[QUOTE=UnknownSD;7128369]Google Pay doesn't work anymore. They'll ask you to verify your account after payment. If your name is blacklisted, you won't pass the verification.[/QUOTE]Google pay worked for me. There was no need for verification. The only issue was I tried to use a fake public picture and it was flagged and I was required to picture by scanning the front and back of my driver's license. A few minutes later my profile was active with my real age. After my membership expired I created a different profile using Google pay (5 days ago) with no issues or verification.

I'm still not sure how they have blacklisted me? I was denied creating a profile by using my name and CC but I was able to create a profile by using Google pay and I'd verification?

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7130284]Until we know what the full process will be like. It sounds like it's only a quick video selfie to match your uploaded photos. And it says it's private. Meaning only for Seeking's temporary use and their eyes only. Not meant to show the selfie video on public profile. There's no mention of hard PII info such as SSN, Name, Address, etc. being gathered. So a bit early to get paranoid over it. And it may not be required of long established members. It said for new users/members.

I think it's a great thing as well. Get rid of bots, catfishes, spammers, etc. It may not reduce it 100% but it's a good start. The only thing it won't work against is full on prostitutes signing up as a fresh sugarbaby. The pro will simply do the selfie video. Then again though there are career sugarbabies that keep returning. Which at that point I call them prostitutes as well. Side gig or main gig as a prostitute.[/QUOTE]"video selfie to match your uploaded photos".

Loser right off. My uploaded photos aren't me for real. I would never put my real photos on any dating site, in my case b / c I have a SO. I'd recommend anyone else also refuse to do it. Seeking needs to continually keep in mind that half its paying customers are married, and facilitate their being on the site (payments, requirements) .

I have two profiles, both a few years old. I am pretty observant of all the rules, I don't think I ought to get banned, yet I did get spanked a about a year ago, and had to watch their TOS video. I presume I am on probation, meaning any future transgression and I am instantly banned. We all know what a big deal it is to get banned. So, I don't think this is a great thing. It might be neutral. The same things that keep scammer 'girls' off will keep me off. And I pay, they don't.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7128413]Yeah, I need to use a prepaid, I can't take any risk at all of that charge on my IRL card and the site having my actual name. The AM hack and all.[/QUOTE]According to their support, any prepaid MC works now, with VISA coming in about 2 weeks.

[QUOTE=Jendabaze;7130418]Google pay worked for me. There was no need for verification. The only issue was I tried to use a fake public picture and it was flagged and I was required to picture by scanning the front and back of my driver's license. A few minutes later my profile was active with my real age. After my membership expired I created a different profile using Google pay (5 days ago) with no issues or verification.

I'm still not sure how they have blacklisted me? I was denied creating a profile by using my name and CC but I was able to create a profile by using Google pay and I'd verification?[/QUOTE]What I meant was the Google Pay payment will go through but afterwards they'll ask you to upload your Driver's License to verify yourself. Some users will be asked and some not. I'm not sure if it's random.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7130484]"video selfie to match your uploaded photos".

Loser right off. My uploaded photos aren't me for real. I would never put my real photos on any dating site, in my case b / c I have a SO. I'd recommend anyone else also refuse to do it. Seeking needs to continually keep in mind that half its paying customers are married, and facilitate their being on the site (payments, requirements) .

I have two profiles, both a few years old. I am pretty observant of all the rules, I don't think I ought to get banned, yet I did get spanked a about a year ago, and had to watch their TOS video. I presume I am on probation, meaning any future transgression and I am instantly banned. We all know what a big deal it is to get banned. So, I don't think this is a great thing. It might be neutral. The same things that keep scammer 'girls' off will keep me off. And I pay, they don't.[/QUOTE]Then we'll have to wait and see if it's required of established members which for the moment sounds like it is not. I don't have an issue using real pics even if I did have a SO. The only time I might consider using fake pics is if I had young children that are not 18 yet. I wouldn't want to hurt them if caught. But adults are adults and there's a reason people cheat, shit happens. Having young kids is a different story.

So, I don't even have a profile picture. If challenged, think I should hold up a picture of a gray silhouette in front of my camera? LOL.

I'm in FFA's boat. I trust existing members are exempt. While I agree such a process makes sense for an unpaying member (all SBs), It doesn't make sense for a paying member (most SDs). The problem with Seeking is there is no barrier to entry for SBs, therefore all the bot, scammers etc.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;7130484]"video selfie to match your uploaded photos".

Loser right off. My uploaded photos aren't me for real. I would never put my real photos on any dating site, in my case b / c I have a SO. I'd recommend anyone else also refuse to do it. Seeking needs to continually keep in mind that half its paying customers are married, and facilitate their being on the site (payments, requirements) .[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;7130851]So, I don't even have a profile picture. If challenged, think I should hold up a picture of a gray silhouette in front of my camera? LOL.

I'm in FFA's boat. I trust existing members are exempt. While I agree such a process makes sense for an unpaying member (all SBs), It doesn't make sense for a paying member (most SDs). The problem with Seeking is there is no barrier to entry for SBs, therefore all the bot, scammers etc.[/QUOTE]You do realize this was implemented more for the sugarbaby side than for the sugardaddy. To reduce fake, bot, catfish sugarbabies. Also if you think about it. If you're a sugardaddy using fake pics. Then you're contributing to the catfish issue as well. Because you're a catfish as well using fake pics of yourself. I'm pretty sure the real sugarbabies would appreciate also knowing the sugardaddy they're talking to is using pics that accurately represent who they're taking to.

Plus remember you can keep your pics private until you choose to reveal them to a POT. It's not like they need to be kept public on blast for anyone to view.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7130891]You do realize this was implemented more for the sugarbaby side than for the sugardaddy. To reduce fake, bot, catfish sugarbabies. Also if you think about it. If you're a sugardaddy using fake pics. Then you're contributing to the catfish issue as well. Because you're a catfish as well using fake pics of yourself. I'm pretty sure the real sugarbabies would appreciate also knowing the sugardaddy they're talking to is using pics that accurately represent who they're taking to.

Plus remember you can keep your pics private until you choose to reveal them to a POT. It's not like they need to be kept public on blast for anyone to view.[/QUOTE]If 'girls' had to pay like $1 to get a profile, this would seriously cut down the fake profiles.

You do know of the AM hack, right? Never exclude this could happen on seeking. Though they are better than most dating sites.

I don't try to hornswoggle girls. I have a photo of someone who does look like me and is about my age, it isn't George Clooney. If you need to find a photo of someone who looks like you but isn't you, you can use some of the facial recognition sites. I have to run my IRL photos that I supply to POTs through those sites sometimes, just to make sure no one out there has something that finds the real me. It is interesting that there are guys out there who do look sort of like me, and I wouldn't be uncomfortable putting those pics up there if I had to. So, I don't believe I contribute to any issues w / catfishing. I want a real / enjoyable relationship w / my SBs, I am not trying to fake anyone out.

I chop off the top of my face of my 'fake' pics, so it is difficult to prove absolutely that they aren't me.

One virtue to video verification. You don't get something, even if you have the actual photo in electronic form, that you can use with a facial recognition site to find someone's IRL identity.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7130891]You do realize this was implemented more for the sugarbaby side than for the sugardaddy. To reduce fake, bot, catfish sugarbabies. Also if you think about it. If you're a sugardaddy using fake pics. Then you're contributing to the catfish issue as well. Because you're a catfish as well using fake pics of yourself. I'm pretty sure the real sugarbabies would appreciate also knowing the sugardaddy they're talking to is using pics that accurately represent who they're taking to.

Plus remember you can keep your pics private until you choose to reveal them to a POT. It's not like they need to be kept public on blast for anyone to view.[/QUOTE]On the baby side, this is going to scare off the tranny catfishes and the Chinese / indian scammers and bots (no change in supply). On the daddy side, it's going to scare off the married guys and some of the extremely socially awkward (less demand). Sounds like a win for the single dirtbags! El yay!

[QUOTE=Chupacabra;7131020]On the baby side, this is going to scare off the tranny catfishes and the Chinese / indian scammers and bots (no change in supply). On the daddy side, it's going to scare off the married guys and some of the extremely socially awkward (less demand). Sounds like a win for the single dirtbags! El yay![/QUOTE]LOL I feel ya on the single daddy side of things. I still civie date girls but don't have one I call a serious GF at the moment. Whenever I've had a true loving GF. I don't cheat. No need to when you have a beautiful woman that loves you and fucks you right at home. Free pussy is the best pussy.

Plus I really don't understand guys sometimes that have a SO being paranoid about shit when they're cheating. A woman is actually way more sneaky, way better at covering their tracks and 10 steps ahead of us as men in the cheating game. Some guys here sneaking around like they're CIA secret agents thinking they're actually covering their tracks. I've fucked enough women that had SOs such as BFs and husbands. Sometimes even in their own homes and on their bed.
And heard their stories knowing that their man is cheating on them. But they don't say anything for one reason or another. Fellas you can do all you want to try and cover your tracks. But trust your SO probably knows you're cheating. They can even smell another woman's scent on you and another woman's pussy on you from a mile away. No matter what you do showering wise and mouthwash wise.

[QUOTE=Lexx1;7131185]Fellas you can do all you want to try and cover your tracks. But trust your SO probably knows you're cheating. They can even smell another woman's scent on you and another woman's pussy on you from a mile away. No matter what you do showering wise and mouthwash wise.[/QUOTE]This is so true, they are like bloodhounds and as we all know (by now) they have an extremely guilty conscious and paranoia because they are 10 X more shady, disloyal and selfish than any man could ever dream. LOL The better half, my ass! I look back on my old white-knight younger self and just smh. I have never felt such relief mongering after I got divorced and didn't have to hide anything. Heavy perfume? No problem! Can you put massage oil on me? Why of course, that sounds great! Threatening in broken engrish to come behead me and my family for "wasting your girl's time"? By all means, good sir, please stop by! Why? Because I'm freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I'm the William Wallace of paid poon.

I haven't aged a year since I've been single. Sleep like a baby too.

IDK how some make such categorical statements. There are as many attitudes / sensitivities as women. I had a SO who had been relentlessly cheated on by an ex-hubby. For the first 15 years of our relationship, she constantly accused me of stepping out on her. It was never true. Then I realized, she has no clue. And there was not the right sort of intimate relationship. So I then began to (very discreetly) see others. She was very very rarely right. She suspected when I was innocent, and vice versa.

[QUOTE=Chupacabra;7131307]This is so true, they are like bloodhounds and as we all know (by now) they have an extremely guilty conscious and paranoia because they are 10 X more shady, disloyal and selfish than any man could ever dream. LOL The better half, my ass! I look back on my old white-knight younger self and just smh. I have never felt such relief mongering after I got divorced and didn't have to hide anything. Heavy perfume? No problem! Can you put massage oil on me? Why of course, that sounds great! Threatening in broken engrish to come behead me and my family for "wasting your girl's time"? By all means, good sir, please stop by! Why? Because I'm freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I'm the William Wallace of paid poon.

I haven't aged a year since I've been single. Sleep like a baby too.[/QUOTE]

I 2nd this motion!

I'm younger now than when I got divorced. And I look it too!

"By all means, good sir, please stop by!" !!!

Not having any luck on SB, and it seems you have to limit how many you can interact with or it gets pricey.

Does anyone have info on someone in Phoenix? Have to go there for work next week.

Happy to trade.

[QUOTE=MrBlueSea;7131836]Not having any luck on SB, and it seems you have to limit how many you can interact with or it gets pricey.

Does anyone have info on someone in Phoenix? Have to go there for work next week.

Happy to trade.[/QUOTE]Yes, I have plenty but this is not the Arizona thread so I didn't post here.