Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Neo12;5666652]What Org is she with?[/QUOTE]She's with GFEI. Supposedly here for about another week. Says she was here before as Aria. I found her Aria reviews and it seems she was with PC then.

[QUOTE=Vitvix;5669747]Have you browsed private delights? Most list their pricing on there.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NuttyLoon;5671183]Not sure what you mean by budget conscious.
I don't think any provider (regardless of ethnicity / skin colour) will be conscious of your budget unless you become a regular and they really like you.
If you mean easy on your wallet, as pointed out, take a look on PD, where most will at least put a starting price and you can go from there.

Of the white ladies I was interested in, lowest was four for a four period game.
Anything lower tended to grow older.

Good luck and share any reports.
Not many reports here on non-asians on a regular basis.[/QUOTE]Yes I've browsed PD before, and I keep finding ones above $400, even some more mature women.

I'll browse again and see what I can find.

Will do!

Just had an appointment with Erin. It was pretty good. She had slim arms, slim legs and torso. She had curves in all the right places. She was a natural 32 D. Unfortunately, she wasn't the same girl as on the website pictures.

I had my K-girl hunger sated not that long ago, but when I saw that Yuuka was was back at PC I made up my mind to see her at once. She was gone before I got here but I saw her reviews and knew I missed a good one. I didn't think she would return. I sheduled the day after her return. My last outing with PC and Yuuka's reviews had me optimistic. Still since its PC I was a bit apprehensive. Yuuka was very slender, not a spinner but possessed a slim athletic frame. Tanned head to toe, dark blonde or very light brown mid back hair. She had a perky b cup with erect pinky tip sized nips (circumference wise) maybe about 1/2 inch long. Completely clean shaven V. Small but nice butt. She has a super cute GND type face whose eyes always seem to smile, much like my last encounter. She resembles her pics but slimmer. Honestly I was expecting (and welcoming) the fuller frame in her ad pics but I was not disappointed at all.

Some of these ads have bullshit hype but if she was a SJ favorite before, I understand why. Very friendly and handsy from the door. Yuuka was one of the most passionate and immersive encounters I've experienced in the bay area. Gave me the brief illusion I was hers. I was mentally drowning in the scents (not sure what she wears but I'm digging it) lusty performance she put on. So amongst the current Alpaca stable, Snowflake and Yuuka are on point. Firmly in rotation and highly recommended.

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5677466]I had my K-girl hunger sated not that long ago, but when I saw that Yuuka was was back at PC I made up my mind to see her at once. She was gone before I got here but I saw her reviews and knew I missed a good one. I didn't think she would return. I sheduled the day after her return. My last outing with PC and Yuuka's reviews had me optimistic. Still since its PC I was a bit apprehensive. Yuuka was very slender, not a spinner but possessed a slim athletic frame. Tanned head to toe, dark blonde or very light brown mid back hair. She had a perky b cup with erect pinky tip sized nips (circumference wise) maybe about 1/2 inch long. Completely clean shaven V. Small but nice butt. She has a super cute GND type face whose eyes always seem to smile, much like my last encounter. She resembles her pics but slimmer. Honestly I was expecting (and welcoming) the fuller frame in her ad pics but I was not disappointed at all.

Some of these ads have bullshit hype but if she was a SJ favorite before, I understand why. Very friendly and handsy from the door. Yuuka was one of the most passionate and immersive encounters I've experienced in the bay area. Gave me the brief illusion I was hers. I was mentally drowning in the scents (not sure what she wears but I'm digging it) lusty performance she put on. So amongst the current Alpaca stable, Snowflake and Yuuka are on point. Firmly in rotation and highly recommended.[/QUOTE]Hi, I couldn't find Yuuka on the website.

Asian Eye Candy: Fail.

Contacted AEC for Jeni, PO asked for 2 ref which I stupidly was honest about not having. Then PO said I needed to book from redhot first, Lola. Read up some reviews on her and the others at redhot, all seemed old. Asked PO if I could make the rounds at Peach and others and use as references. May be some miscommunication but long story short he told me not to contact them anymore LOL. Seems like you need to go granny before they let you in:

Peach Cafe: Pass-ish.

Contacted Peach, indeed easy verification. Asked for young and no fake tits. First went to see Miso. Heavy photoshop or wrong pic, looked slightly younger than ajumma:/ Passed, then went to see Haru. Heavy photoshop or wrong pic. Doable for a pre-screen ref. Enthusiastic, up for anything. Knows a bit of English and Chinese. Baby scar. I would say early thirties.

Asian Baby Massage: Pass.

Only Chinese still operating with a working wx (can STF to find). Girls seem to come in and transfer super rapid. #1 was worse for wear than the pics, starfishy. Decent value compared to in 1st tier city in China I guess, although you'd be able to get better for 80 bux in second and third tier.

One more day, will try to make it out to Bunny if I can get verified in time. Overall, next time flying out of LAX: DD.

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;5663524]Easiest to get into is Peach Cafe by far. But the pool of girls isn't usually very great and the pics are very photoshopped.[/QUOTE]First OMG I am so jealous of you guys. I had one lady from LSC and think I wish I could buy road trip tickets to SJC just to have the girls in San Jose.

Vegas has nothing like this. Many years ago wr had ammps in Henderson that were great. They shut them down now. Vegas being a tourist place attracts guys willing to pay 300 to 400 for what you guys pay 260 for.

So like you said to help others, I messaged BGC, SA, LoveK and LSC. Surprisingly only LSC only got back to me before I left for trip. Did the work to get in and the two ladies I had were awesome. Zina and Mila.

Told PO they need to come to Vegas they would make a killing.

[QUOTE=RickJames808;5677466]I had my K-girl hunger sated not that long ago, but when I saw that Yuuka was was back at PC I made up my mind to see her at once. She was gone before I got here but I saw her reviews and knew I missed a good one. I didn't think she would return. I sheduled the day after her return. My last outing with PC and Yuuka's reviews had me optimistic. Still since its PC I was a bit apprehensive. Yuuka was very slender, not a spinner but possessed a slim athletic frame. Tanned head to toe, dark blonde or very light brown mid back hair. She had a perky b cup with erect pinky tip sized nips (circumference wise) maybe about 1/2 inch long. Completely clean shaven V. Small but nice butt. She has a super cute GND type face whose eyes always seem to smile, much like my last encounter. She resembles her pics but slimmer. Honestly I was expecting (and welcoming) the fuller frame in her ad pics but I was not disappointed at all.

Some of these ads have bullshit hype but if she was a SJ favorite before, I understand why. Very friendly and handsy from the door. Yuuka was one of the most passionate and immersive encounters I've experienced in the bay area. Gave me the brief illusion I was hers. I was mentally drowning in the scents (not sure what she wears but I'm digging it) lusty performance she put on. So amongst the current Alpaca stable, Snowflake and Yuuka are on point. Firmly in rotation and highly recommended.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the report! Is Yuuka PSE?

Long time listener here, fellas -- first time caller.

My go to girls have long left the area, and with Covid I shut myself down. Been reading and decided to jump back in. Went with LSC. Saw Ciara. Only thing I knew is that she was small and that she allowed PSE / CIP.

She's tiny. Super cute. Nice and natural -- which is how I prefer my providers.

Really, really scripted though -- little BBBJ, then mish / rcg / finished in doggy. Painted her insides with a smile.

Was a good visit based on her looks, but I'm used to a bit more flexibility.

For reference, I used to see Helen (she was a 3 hole queen, older gal, but so service oriented) but as far as I can tell she bounced awhile ago.

Does anyone know of a PSE 3 hole lady around these parts? Age isn't super important, slim and natural is.

Thanks!

Been a long time lurker down in SD, but decided to make a first post in SJ because it's so much harder to find what I'm looking for. I'm used to the brick and mortar spots, but it seems like the best option is with these agencies.

Contacted PNC and got a same day appointment with Pink. Very cheerful and easy going PO. Got to location early, but I recommend getting there on time since I had to wait 10 minutes after appointment time for her to get ready to let me in. Easy directions from the PO, and in a couple minutes I was welcomed to a very dimly lit room. Pink welcomed me in a cute fishnet outfit and asked me to take a shower. Seems like a shower and mouthwash are required, so just take it to the chin fellas and accept. We proceeded to the room and started off with some DFK, played with her man-mades, but they were made very well. Can't tell they're fake unless you're really digging into them, which I was. Her body proportions are very much like her photos, but the face was definitely photoshopped. She looks to be in her 30's. Not much of an ass, so the party is mainly upstairs. She sucked on my nipples which I very much enjoyed, so I had her do that for a while before she moved onto BBBJ. Afterwards we went for CFS. She didn't have a lot of stamina, so I had to take lead in almost every position; Mish, DS, CG. I asked to go back to BBBJ, but it was her last condom so that was it for the CFS. The CFS was mediocre at best, so it didn't hurt that much. We went back and forth between BBBJ, DFK, Cuddling, and HJ, before I finally released with a HJ and nipple suck combination. Took a shower, got dressed, and gave her a kiss on the way out.

My first experience in SJ, and it was a 5/10. Not fair, considering I have years in SD. If she were my first time, it would be a 7 or and 8. Would I go again? If I was looking for something quick, easy, and same day maybe. Other than that, I'm still on a search to see what SJ can offer.

In my experience, asian providers tend to be skinny / spinner type with taller ones being welcome variation. Korean providers tend to be on the older / mature side, with younger ones being the welcome variation.

Kimmy was the welcome variations from all these. She is thick, not fat but thick. Large boobs and copious ass. Big boned (so not skinny legs or arms). And as far as I can tell, pretty young (in 20's).

I very much enjoy grabbing and squeazing soft thighs along with boobs and ass. She has flat abs, leading to a delicious looking pussy.

Another interesting departure from norm, she was not wearing any makeup (which hides age, so I am pretty sure about her being young). This also allowed me to enjoy her young body fully, without getting makeup in my face or tongue.

She met me a the door in a sheer dress, and let me to the room. We started by kissing and grabbing each other. Good BBBJ, while I enjoyed the view of her nice figure, and her silky smooth hair.

Got her into bed to enjoy her boobs and ass some more, leading to DATY. She responded pretty naturally, no over acting or excessive moaning. She was pretty dry to start with, got very wet towards the end. Best I could tell she enjoyed DATY, and I enjoyed getting her wet.

As I entered I was surprised by how tight her pussy was, I just stayed there enjoying the tightness. Complimented her on tightness, she responded by squeezing me further.

For second round, she gave me enthusiastic BBBJ but I am too old to get it going a second time. I enjoyed her body for a while before leaving.

The PO was responsive and helpful.

She's not listed as such on the PC website.

[QUOTE=FaceSitter;5680059]Thanks for the report! Is Yuuka PSE?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=LoveToSmack;5677729]Hi, I couldn't find Yuuka on the website.[/QUOTE][URL]https://peach.cafe/listings/l/united%20states/california/san%20jose/ad/?id=542[/URL]

Hope she stays for a while.

[QUOTE=Dk245;5678744]Asian Eye Candy: Fail.

Contacted AEC for Jeni, PO asked for 2 ref which I stupidly was honest about not having. Then PO said I needed to book from redhot first, Lola. Read up some reviews on her and the others at redhot, all seemed old. Asked PO if I could make the rounds at Peach and others and use as references. May be some miscommunication but long story short he told me not to contact them anymore LOL. Seems like you need to go granny before they let you in:

Peach Cafe: Pass-ish.

Contacted Peach, indeed easy verification. Asked for young and no fake tits. First went to see Miso. Heavy photoshop or wrong pic, looked slightly younger than ajumma:/ Passed, then went to see Haru. Heavy photoshop or wrong pic. Doable for a pre-screen ref. Enthusiastic, up for anything. Knows a bit of English and Chinese. Baby scar. I would say early thirties.

Asian Baby Massage: Pass..[/QUOTE]I think doing what you did with aec is not a good solution. Pos don't like when you ask them if you get references x and why if they will approve. It's expected that when you're asked for references, you should provide some. If you don't have them you can just say you don't have them and not waste the POs time with hypothetical questions. Most agencies here will also take your I'd as a means to verify without refs.

Basically, for any issue you can just say my bad and that you'll work on it.

Not having refs.

Having refs that don't answer.

Not wanting to send ID.

Are all OK as long as you're courteous, curt and don't spam Pos with texts. I've had instances where PO wouldn't accept my refs. I've came back in another few weeks with different refs and all was good. And sometimes I've came back with same refs, knowing it was slow season and was approved.

Arguing with PO before you're even verified usually doesn't end up well. I say this as an extremely argumentative person too.

Cheers.

[QUOTE=FaceSitter;5680059]Thanks for the report! Is Yuuka PSE?[/QUOTE]YMMV. No cip for me.

Saw Jade at Cara Angels the other day. Rooming with Sharon now, might be an epic double.

Jade was fun. Energetic, happy, great petite body. She seemed to respond pretty well to having her starfish rubbed, anyone ever try for the backdoor?

Help a brother out. I will be visiting the Bay Area in general and from my research on these boards SJ seems to be the area with the best options. From what I can tell the agencies are your best bet for decent, young-ish providers, with PC being the easiest to get in the door with their screening. Any other helpful tips? I am really looking at young Kgirls. Any AMPs that might have you g kgirls or the agencies the only options? Thanks I'm advance for any help.

Wasn't argumentative at all, I was straight up and he recommended I try granny. After I refused, he first told me to go somewhere else (now I assume sarcastically?) and after I did he got upset. Anyway dealt with Koreans all my life, know how (some) of them are. Also standard supply / demand rn, in the lean years they will be more coop.

Have fun guys, back in Asia. Hmu if any of you make it out.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5682048]I think doing what you did with aec is not a good solution. Pos don't like when you ask them if you get references x and why if they will approve. It's expected that when you're asked for references, you should provide some. If you don't have them you can just say you don't have them and not waste the POs time with hypothetical questions. Most agencies here will also take your I'd as a means to verify without refs.

Basically, for any issue you can just say my bad and that you'll work on it.

Not having refs.

Having refs that don't answer.

Not wanting to send ID.

Are all OK as long as you're courteous, curt and don't spam Pos with texts. I've had instances where PO wouldn't accept my refs. I've came back in another few weeks with different refs and all was good. And sometimes I've came back with same refs, knowing it was slow season and was approved..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;5663518]...If you like younger girls, I've found Jamie (BGC) to be fairly attractive. Zina (lsc) and Mila (lsc) were attractive enough too (but all 3 of them are close to GND pretty not like celebrity pretty. But then again, I'm not sure if you'll ever get that LOL).

If you're into taller busty but not chubby girls, snowflake (peach) was great (face is okay, body is amazing imo).

Think bella at SA was pretty too but its been quite a while sicne I've seen and kinda forgot.

Thats prob as best as I can help atm.

If you do any travelling, there are some pretty providers I've seen in NOVA and ny (I've found these areas to have more attractive providers than the bay area in general. And my top three ATF all are actually located there.[/QUOTE]I like your selection, my taste as well. I would add Nixie from BCG and Jazmin from AEC to that list. I liked Snowflake at PC, and Bella is not Korean. She is Thai, pleasant and GND.

Apparently LSC has a policy that you have to have 3 visits in 3 months to be able to pre-book. I was a regular not too long ago so not sure how continuously active you have to be to still be considered a regular.

[QUOTE=Dk245;5686546]Wasn't argumentative at all, I was straight up and he recommended I try granny. After I refused, he first told me to go somewhere else (now I assume sarcastically?) and after I did he got upset. Anyway dealt with Koreans all my life, know how (some) of them are. Also standard supply / demand rn, in the lean years they will be more coop.

Have fun guys, back in Asia. Hmu if any of you make it out.[/QUOTE]The PO threat was legit, maybe you'd be forgiven if you take on a granny, they'll likely not respond to you.

There are some cool POs, but there are POs that are dicks. I would tend not to rock the boat with POs as they can be quick to ban or bl. It's more of a one way street with certain POs.

If you don't have references you'll likely not get through (except lower tier orgs) so you're wasting the POs time, they'll tell to F off.

[QUOTE=ChocoNap;5689296]Apparently LSC has a policy that you have to have 3 visits in 3 months to be able to pre-book. I was a regular not too long ago so not sure how continuously active you have to be to still be considered a regular.[/QUOTE]They must be busy.

GFEI has that policy but it's more reasonable every 6 months.

Other orgs I haven't encountered that.

[QUOTE=JRPoke;5685435]Help a brother out. I will be visiting the Bay Area in general and from my research on these boards SJ seems to be the area with the best options. From what I can tell the agencies are your best bet for decent, young-ish providers, with PC being the easiest to get in the door with their screening. Any other helpful tips? I am really looking at young Kgirls. Any AMPs that might have you g kgirls or the agencies the only options? Thanks I'm advance for any help.[/QUOTE]There are no AMP's in the Bay Area with young looking Kgirls. You will only get older Asian women who aren't attractive and can be on the thick side. Your best bet are the K-agencies. PCafen8's a good place to start.

So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?

Every now and then GFEI, SA and Peach Cafe will mine a gem or two. The aforementioned LSC and BGC seem to be fairly consistent in their 20's offerings.

[QUOTE=JRPoke;5685435]Help a brother out. I will be visiting the Bay Area in general and from my research on these boards SJ seems to be the area with the best options. From what I can tell the agencies are your best bet for decent, young-ish providers, with PC being the easiest to get in the door with their screening. Any other helpful tips? I am really looking at young Kgirls. Any AMPs that might have you g kgirls or the agencies the only options? Thanks I'm advance for any help.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Neo12;5690256]So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]This comes with the territory, and is why forums like this exist to share intel.

[QUOTE=Neo12;5690256]...I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]Indeed bait and switch has been happening for quite a few years with the Korean agencies. In my opinion, it will continue, and may get worse as long we customers tolerate that BS.

I would say her face was PSed on top of the bodys, as the pics do not show A cups.

Still, definitely a spinner and the shortest provider I've had the pleasure to impale.

Pretty dark room, but would say her age range to be late 20's to mid 30's.

On CW, she preferred to sit on her heels while on my thighs, as opposed to straddling me.

It wasn't an issue, as she was so light, I barely felt pressure on my thighs.

Loved to kiss and didn't stick her tongue out for any FK.

Would definitely repeat with her.

[QUOTE=Jdog831;5682837]YMMV. No cip for me.[/QUOTE]Wondering if this is the same Yuuka from last year or a Peach B&S.

If it's the same girl, then worth a visit.

Any recommendations for younger girls in the area? Preferably BBFS CIP, thanks.

Who knows the cheapest Asian MILF or GILF for bbfscip? What about any with fat boobs that sag?

[QUOTE=Machita;5687723]I like your selection, my taste as well. I would add Nixie from BCG and Jazmin from AEC to that list. I liked Snowflake at PC, and Bella is not Korean. She is Thai, pleasant and GND.[/QUOTE]Oh yeah I forgot about them because its been so long since I've went to see them haha but Nixie and Jazmin are also young and pretty as well. Nixie has a little bit shyer personality from what I remember and Jazmin more of the confident I know I'm attractive personality haha.

Hot little kitten. Saw her again not long after.

[QUOTE=Gatignon;5693155]Wondering if this is the same Yuuka from last year or a Peach B&S.

If it's the same girl, then worth a visit.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Neo12;5690256]So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]That's pretty much standard, coast to coast. An authentic picture of the actual girl is pretty rare. A recent picture of the actual girl is almost non-existent. The girls like their privacy, so don't expect anything more than a passing resemblance, at best. You have to go to the appointment, knowing that the pictures are not accurate. Don't have high expectations, or your session will probably be a big let down. Enjoy your time with the girl, and be thankful that you have options. Much of the country is a barren wasteland, for this hobby.

It's understandable even of we as clients don't like it. One monger with reference to the real Laduree had it explained by a PO. F you were in a foreign country under flimsy to false purposes, you probably wouldn't want your real pics online announcing to the world that you're smashing for cash. If the girls were to get caught those real pics would also make it laughably easy to make a case against them. I only wish the pics at least resemble the chicks in face or body at least. Some are legit. The most recent examples I've seen were Crystal at SA, Barbie at GFEI, Snowflake at PC (photoshopped but close enough) and Yuuka at PC (photoshopped but close enough. The ones in the silver bikini more accurate). I think all of us have been on the shitty end of the AAMP ads but its part of the game. I'm curious if the sites that require passwords are more forthcoming with actual pics. At some of the AMPs in Dallas some girls would allow mongers to take pics to drum up customers. Damned if it wasn't effective.

[QUOTE=Neo12;5690256]So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Neo12;5690256]So I've been having a dilemma lately. Almost all of the local K- agencies are pulling bait and switches. The girls pics that they advertise are not the girls you will meet. The only actual accurate pics are of Snowflake and Hera from PCafe. Also, at PCafe NG106 and 103 were not the ones in their pics. I also read here that Laduree was also not the same girl as in the pics. Went to FtasticKGirls to see Erin. The girl I met wasn't Erin in the pics. Went KLvrs twice and the same thing. The girls I met weren't the ones in the pics. Also happened at AEyeCandy with Melody. She wasn't the one in the pic. Also twice at AAngels with Tiana and another girl. They weren't the same ones in the pics.

I'm not trying to talk crap about any KAgencies. Just sharing what I observed and my frustrations.

Any thoughts?[/QUOTE]Broski, I've been banging this same drum for years.

OK, the faces are a privacy liability. Sure. But why are the bodies different? Why can't the body of a fat girl be actually chubby / fat in the pics? Why do we have to find out ourselves, especially those of us who don't read all reviews?

There is no privacy excuse when it comes to body types. Even the low-rate Chinese joints with gilfs have more truthful pics in terms of body type closeness.

Basically, you need to have very good research. Some people will say (removing all fluff) : stfu and eat what you're given we should be thankful blah blah because compared to some other place we have it better. How about nah, try to improve shit when so many disappointments happen? Especially with latest price hikes.

This take it or leave it attitude only worsens the snowball. Many orgs think they can put out whatever pics they want no matter how fake and we'll eat them up. The aspect of being truthful and respectful of customers time and money is being lost. You'd think that if pics are completely different they'd freely allow customers to walk if their blind date was a lie. But no, they get mad and threaten to bl you. And many mongers hence are hesitant to find out if it's a bluff or not.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5697836]

...OK, the faces are a privacy liability. Sure. But why are the bodies different? Why can't the body of a fat girl be actually chubby / fat in the pics? Why do we have to find out ourselves, especially those of us who don't read all reviews?
There is no privacy excuse when it comes to body types.


...The aspect of being truthful and respectful of customers time and money is being lost.

...You'd think that if pics are completely different they'd freely allow customers to walk if their blind date was a lie. But no, they get mad and threaten to bl you. And many mongers hence are hesitant to find out if it's a bluff or not.[/QUOTE]I agree, no excuse for presenting pics with fake body types. Since they use photoshop so much, they can easily hide the face of the girl if they care about privacy. I don't think they care about their customers period.

Yeah, walking has been a no-no for as long as I remember.

I think the best solution at this time is for mongers to report the fake pics. I have seen quite a few fake pics at SA, so much so that I would not go see any of their girls, unless I have firm intel.

Speaking of which, anyone know this c org? The sf / peninsula ones are garbage right now, was thinking about trying my luck in sj.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/san-jose/female-escorts/2046752[/URL]

[QUOTE=Sdfg1;5698977]Speaking of which, anyone know this c org? The sf / peninsula ones are garbage right now, was thinking about trying my luck in sj.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/california/san-jose/female-escorts/2046752[/URL][/QUOTE]These are usually b&s places. I'd steer clear.

[QUOTE=ChocoNap;5689296]Apparently LSC has a policy that you have to have 3 visits in 3 months to be able to pre-book. I was a regular not too long ago so not sure how continuously active you have to be to still be considered a regular.[/QUOTE]I can't see them now because someone decided to record and ruin it for the rest of us.