Printable View
I don't think Kupcake Sia is Marie Sia. Kupcake Sia is more well known. I like both but Kupcake Sia is younger and better looking.
Even though Hapa has great imagination to think her pic looks like a dude, that pic with the pink top is the best representation. There is no mistaking her gender with those beautiful tits in the pics.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4924364]She also is on as "Sia" in LA with booker Marie in K-Town. I will give her a spin when she goes back to LA.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4924568]I don't think Kupcake Sia is Marie Sia. Kupcake Sia is more well known. I like both but Kupcake Sia is younger and better looking.
Even though Hapa has great imagination to think her pic looks like a dude, that pic with the pink top is the best representation. There is no mistaking her gender with those beautiful tits in the pics.[/QUOTE]So this isn't the Sia formerly known as Monika?
[QUOTE=TWill182;4923551]Agency said no BBFS. I think it's a YMMV experience. If you've gotten it before I would assume she wouldn't upcharge. How's her looks, age and body for the gents that seen her before?[/QUOTE]The face pictures they posted is her but little darker and older. She's a MILF for sure. When I last saw her, she's wasn't skinny nor fat, cute MILF. Easy bb, and repeated a few times. But since she's switching diff agencies, I'm guessing she can get more with bb so not sure if her regular will get bb without up charge. Haven't pull the trigger to visit her again yet LOL.
[QUOTE=Jmrz4;4925154]So this isn't the Sia formerly known as Monika?[/QUOTE]She has the distinguishable mole / birthmark. If you know then you know.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4923721]When you first look at Mi Rae's pic in pink tank top on the kupcake doesn't she look like a dude? LOL.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that's a bad photo. She is 100% woman. And this is from a guy who truly believes that a lot of these providers that bounce around and have V-shaped backs, low voices and weird twats are TG despite all the rave reviews. I keep saying be careful and taking heat for it.
I've seen Sia many times and she is a hot little minx.
[QUOTE=MarkBreas17;4925419]She has the distinguishable mole / birthmark. If you know then you know[/QUOTE][URL]mykupcake.com[/URL]
Sia aka mirae I have done pse in the past with her but last time in LA she was all "time for cover". Is she bb again?
I was talking about Kupcake's Sia / Monika, the only notable Sia in the past few years.
Marie's Sia is not her. Marie's Sia pics are real when she was younger and didn't have work done on her face. I can recognize her in the pics. Tight slender body and her pussy got me rock hard like few others. Still have flashbacks from her CG and tight pussy.
[QUOTE=Jmrz4;4925154]So this isn't the Sia formerly known as Monika?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4925837]I was talking about Kupcake's Sia / Monika, the only notable Sia in the past few years.
Marie's Sia is not her. Marie's Sia pics are real when she was younger and didn't have work done on her face. I can recognize her in the pics. Tight slender body and her pussy got me rock hard like few others. Still have flashbacks from her CG and tight pussy.[/QUOTE]MilkeAndHoney on HX also has Sia. Is that Marie's Sia that you are referring?
[QUOTE=HornyToad75;4926537]MilkeAndHoney on HX also has Sia. Is that Marie's Sia that you are referring[/QUOTE]Kupcake and MilkandHoney are booking the same girl named Sia with the birth / beauty mark. It's the same girl.
[QUOTE=MarkBreas17;4927012]Kupcake and MilkandHoney are booking the same girl named Sia with the birth / beauty mark. It's the same girl.[/QUOTE]If its Sia with birthmark on left boob area she is not BBFS.
I think MilkAndHoney and Kupcake book the same well known Sia. I was talking about the New Sia in LA currently. I saw both of them. I seek the young and gorgoeus but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy the rest.
Her reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/sia-tira-2133029145-346943](Click here)[/URL].
[QUOTE=HornyToad75;4926537]MilkeAndHoney on HX also has Sia. Is that Marie's Sia that you are referring?[/QUOTE]
With the ongoing posts about sia being booked by two bookers, I was checking out Dahee from sugarcake based on recommendation from another member and dahees photos are a pretty good representation of Nana, who I saw. Nanas photos don't have face or anything, but based off reviews of both I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same as well! Menu, rate is same and in tustin.
Yes, I do believe Dahee is Nana and that Dahee pics are a good representation of the real girl. I didn't mention before because it was only a suspicion.
[QUOTE=MisterBox;4930781]With the ongoing posts about sia being booked by two bookers, I was checking out Dahee from sugarcake based on recommendation from another member and dahees photos are a pretty good representation of Nana, who I saw. Nanas photos don't have face or anything, but based off reviews of both I wouldn't be surprised if they are the same as well! Menu, rate is same and in tustin.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4931301]Yes, I do believe Dahee is Nana and that Dahee pics are a good representation of the real girl. I didn't mention before because it was only a suspicion.[/QUOTE]Dahee is not Nana. I saw Nana long time ago in MW and these two girls are different girls.
I think Sugarcake Dahee is also LovelyGirls Nana and LovelyGirls Nana is not MidWilshire Nana. Things like reviews, names, and pics are not sacred anymore. I can't even guess if Dior at PG was the same Dior that was at PG previously LOL.
MidWilshire Nana was also at FirstAsian till yesterday and might have changed name to Nara. Most guys may not care so I only bring it up when others asked.
[QUOTE=Jack926;4931886]Dahee is not Nana. I saw Nana long time ago in MW and these two girls are different girls.[/QUOTE]