The Rat Trap

[QUOTE=JitsuPlayer71;2225646]Great Idea, lets think about that for a second. There are over 6000 posts in that section, if on average each post takes 30 seconds to read it would take over 50 continuous hours of reading to get through it all. Maybe you have time for that but as a self employed small business owner I don't. On the car sites I frequent we have a top 20 1/4 mile thread and HP thread, why not have something like that with a voter link. Could be very helpful, but I understand. No point in making suggestions and evolving the forum to better the community.[/QUOTE]Everyone has a different top 20 so that's why read the forum find a monger that has the same taste as yours I. E. Spinner, curvy, black, white, latin, fetish, donation, easy of access, location, blonde, brunette, red, bald, hairy need I say more. It's really not that time consuming because some of these girls come and go within months so your freshest reviews are one of the better sources. There are only a handful that advertise here and to my experience they are legit. My ATF is not everyone's ATF. Happy hunting.

You were married to my second wife?

C3.

[QUOTE=Swaganna;2226418]I was married to king of douchebags for 13 years,

Swaganna.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JitsuPlayer71;2225965]Don't get me wrong, I know there is value in the forums, otherwise I wouldn't be here. I don't think having a list like the one I suggested would take any value away from the forums, but only add to it.[/QUOTE]There might be a list made of the top 10 or 20 but there want be any digits, links or info with it. So you better start taking the time to read and post reviews if you want the intel from other seniors.

[QUOTE=Camera3;2226512]You were married to my second wife?

C3.[/QUOTE]C3, your always make me laugh.

[QUOTE=Quilino;2225916]Perhaps A2 could modify the "Add a Report" tab to have two options, "Add a Review" or "Add a Comment". That way each member would have both a "reviews count" and a "comments count". As a group we can monitor / flag whether a post is really a review or just a comment or some other bs. If we did that you could better note which members actually contribute reviews. Understood that some comments are very useful, especially to newbies but everyone needs to ante up every once in a while. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]The only problem with this idea is everyone would have to start over at zero with their counts because I'm fairly sure A-2 is not going to go through every members post to see how many reviews & comments they did and recalculate them all. That would take years to figure out.

[QUOTE=BuffGuy111;2225620]It use to be mongers increasing post counts by piggy backing off someone else's post. Now most counts are on the rise more from bickering than actually reporting pussy. If it wasn't more work for A2, I would like to see a post count only increase if a monger is reporting a dream. If it isn't a dream involved or directly related to info about pussy then the post count shouldn't increase. Still, if the need arises to call out a monger, do so but the post count should not increase. Quantity of post counts don't mean shit when you talking about bull shit. Quality should be what counts which is what I use to base whether or not a monger is considered, "trusted".

Just my. 02.

BG111.[/QUOTE]I often find myself screening a hobbyist posts to see what other providers he has seen and most of the time they are just commenting on other comments and have never really seen or at least reported a provider that I might be able to count on for a reference.

Xoxo.

Sophia.

[QUOTE=Jazak;2226522]The only problem with this idea is everyone would have to start over at zero with their counts because I'm fairly sure A-2 is not going to go through every members post to see how many reviews & comments they did and recalculate them all. That would take years to figure out.[/QUOTE]True. It would be like giving the forum a fresh start for everyone. Kind of drastic, but going forward you would have a better sense as to who's who.

Also agree that no way A2 would go through old posts. You could just keep the total post count going for whatever that's worth. The new review vs comment posts counts would start as of a specific date.

It would be interesting to see what Admin / A2's thoughts are on this. I'm sure that cost, server issues and member reaction (particularly from old timers) would greatly impact any change.

Everyone doing his job. But he doesn't have to promote someone to SM just because they have a certain post count. He can in effect do it by waiting until they have realistic count before promoting to SM. Of course we might have a few regular members with 100 post count. LOL.

[QUOTE=Quilino;2226729]True. It would be like giving the forum a fresh start for everyone. Kind of drastic, but going forward you would have a better sense as to who's who.

Also agree that no way A2 would go through old posts. You could just keep the total post count going for whatever that's worth. The new review vs comment posts counts would start as of a specific date.

It would be interesting to see what Admin / A2's thoughts are on this. I'm sure that cost, server issues and member reaction (particularly from old timers) would greatly impact any change.[/QUOTE]Keep in mind that just because a member post a review does not mean it is legit or worth a shit. We have that problem a little now members posting fake reviews just to get their count up so they can become seniors. I personally think the forum should stay just the way it is. If a member does not have the time to go through and read all the reviews and decide for himself what is legit and what is crap then he probably is not going to take the time to post a good legit review in the first place. I think A2 does a fairly good job of deciding who gets to become a senior.

[QUOTE=Jazak;2226925]Keep in mind that just because a member post a review does not mean it is legit or worth a shit. We have that problem a little now members posting fake reviews just to get their count up so they can become seniors. I personally think the forum should stay just the way it is. If a member does not have the time to go through and read all the reviews and decide for himself what is legit and what is crap then he probably is not going to take the time to post a good legit review in the first place. I think A2 does a fairly good job of deciding who gets to become a senior.[/QUOTE]I personally don't give a crap about the process in becoming a senior. I'm more concerned with the quality of post from a member being senior or regular. I will share info with a contributing legitimate regular as well as a solid proven senior. At this point I don't trust easily at all whether it be senior or regular.

My. 02.

BG111.

[QUOTE=BuffGuy111;2226935]I personally don't give a crap about the process in becoming a senior. I'm more concerned with the quality of post from a member being senior or regular. I will share info with a contributing legitimate regular as well as a solid proven senior. At this point I don't trust easily at all whether it be senior or regular.

My. 02.

BG111.[/QUOTE]Being a senior means nothing to me. There are members I trust here and those I do not. There are seniors on this board that are LEO? That is my opinion. I never trust any member who is asking about an AMP or provider. Go and find out yourself. Is this not the reason we are in this hobby? The element of surprise. I have always followed that policy. You have to use the PM CAREFULLY also. For all you know, you are sending a PM to LEO. Let's face it, this board isnot private. You can tell who is legit by the postings. Just my two cents!