Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748340]This is the post that I refer to. This is what happens when screening is not good enough. Yes it's not a perfect system but I would much rather the bookers take as many precautions as possible if it lessens the chance of something like this ever happening again. Why don't these out of towners visit the Bay Area instead? It's much cheaper and there's virtually no real screening.[/QUOTE]Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.

I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5748396]Yes, protect the girls and the mongers. Screen as needed to ensure this.

However, I believe having a track record of booking 50+ appointments per year, for many years (without issue) and with reputable agencies that have been in business for over 5 yrs. Is the best reference you can have for another agency. I have found that many kgirl agencies already have relationships with each other or have done competitive intelligence on other kgirl orgs.

Most bookers will only verify a longtime client and they do it as a favor to that client, not because it adds to their own business.[/QUOTE]I'll add that it could add to their business because 1) it reinforces and cements the trustworthiness of each other during screening and 2) it becomes a two lane highway for potential clients as mongers have the ability to move between the two if they find girls they want to see.

[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5749218]Daisy looks like those Korean college girls you want to nail. Real cute, def recommend if you like younger. Body is closer to Pink but with full B cups. I haven't seen her since her return but booker told me she has lost some weight. I will revisit to see how she looks. You can't go wrong with her.[/QUOTE]Slimmer than before, couple of new small tattoos, new hair cut (length has stayed the same), but everyone else has remained the same. Sessions with her is unique, feels more like a coed fuckbuddy than anything else causes she just so goofy at times.

[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;5749377]I find it a little bit of a red flag with the 'new' girls coming into M's stable working elsewhere at upcharge agencies and changing prices. I actually did have an issue with Miso / Minnie wanting an upcharge for MSOG when I booked her through M. Instead of CG / Losangelesasian, luckily I have been a regular of hers long enough to be let off the hook. I told her at M. I was never charged that (but I did not complain to M). I thought (or so it has was in the past), that M's girls were always a little more exclusive and offered non-upcharge BBFS MSOG 'perks'.

So I'm a little ambivalent about it. Might TOFTT based on reports.[/QUOTE]If you're ambivalent about what services will be provided just be upfront with any booker you choose to deal with. Rather than it left being up in the air until showtime, it's better to just ask what exactly you're getting and at what price. It's part of the bookers responsibility to clearly convey and confirm this with the client. No need to be coy or beat around the Bush about it either.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5750010]I'll add that it could add to their business because 1) it reinforces and cements the trustworthiness of each other during screening and 2) it becomes a two lane highway for potential clients as mongers have the ability to move between the two if they find girls they want to see.[/QUOTE]Trust is earned not given. If they do for me then I do for them and both win.

Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?

For girls that grew up overseas especially that don't consume a western or americanized diet they tend to be smaller is size and stature. Especially Asian girls, just look at the Asian girls that grow up here, bigger chest, taller, and rounder bootys. It's not like the agencies get a giant pool of select taller girls to choose from.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged Kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]Rumor from a S. Korean girl is that and. Korean girls are short.

Totally understand why she was called Tiny. Looks young until shower time and then the age shows. Good service. Definitely not 20's. My guess is mid to late 30's or early 40's.

[QUOTE=BobLove;5750726]Rumor from a S. Korean girl is that and. Korean girls are short.[/QUOTE]I think previous poster meant to say is that rumor is that these super short girls are from North Korea. South Korean women are tall, maybe very tall depending on your reference. 5'8"+ is not unusual. I'd say 5'5" is about average for 25 and younger.

When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

Sicca at Bookergray.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw&wr_id=2639[/URL] (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5749999]I'm not sure what you have against out of towners to be so biased against their inclusion to be screened. Whether a potential client is worthwhile to screen or not will fall onto each booker / agencies' requirements and their particular situation. There's no telling where or when a bad apple will appear but all else being equal, the likelihood of one being an out of towner or a local is the same. Being a local or out of towner does not inherently make you a bad apple. Furthermore, there's theoretically a higher chance of a bad apple appearing in the local client pool than out of towners due the sheer numbers involved. Screening isn't perfect and not up to the task of evaluating how a monger will act so there will be a few who fall through the cracks.

Everyone will have different opinions but my take on helping newcomers is simple. I'll help anyone who wants to genuinely enter the kgirl scene by pointing where to find contact information and what they can expect and need to provide for screening. Whether they are local or not matters not to me. It'll be up to what references they already have, what they are willing to disclose, and the bookers evaluation of them to see if they get access or not. My helping them does not affect whether or not they will get cleared, it only eliminates a step in the process that they can do on their own by browsing here or on other forums. In addition, bookers worth their salt knows that they need to keep increasing their client pool to combat losses from attrition (mongers leaving the kgirl scene and competition / favoring other agencies) to keep their girls booked as much as possible.

I'm not sure how price increases fits into all of this in from your perspective. But price increases has been a long time coming given how flat rates have been for years. Take a moment to ponder that they increased prices during a pandemic and economic downturn. This flies in the face of any sane business model. We can only speculate on why but I think increased overhead costs started to eat at their margins or simple greed works too. Regardless, it would be naive to think it would remain the same.[/QUOTE]Sorry bud but good luck in getting into the stables we partake in!

Wish me luck, will let everyone know my thoughts. She's been so hyped up I'm curious. My favorites are Eunji and Viki so curious if she'll be added.

[QUOTE=TempletonRat;5743993]Saw NAV Pearl, and have no clue if she was the SA Sarah I saw in WLA like a year ago.

I asked about WLA and she said yea, but then asked if she was Sarah and she said "No, Pearl![/QUOTE]Could you report your experience with NAV pearl?

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5751125]When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

Sicca at Bookergray.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw&wr_id=2639[/URL] (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.[/QUOTE]She is SMART-Look at her RATE at BookerGray.

* Sicca Rate.

30 min / 240 roses.

30 min B /340 roses.

1 hr / 300 roses.

2 shots / 340 roses.

B / 320 roses * (Cheaper).

B2 / 360 roses.

30 minutes appointment is more expensive than 60 minutes appointment and that means she realized that for $20 less, she will not get cum dumped every 30 minutes.

Man, just glanced at the title, I though you complained the 40's MILF aunties invasion that have been happened lately. To me, 4'9, 4'11, Midget. NO PROBLEM.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5750237]Maybe it's just me but is there an invasion of height challenged kgirls in LA? Are they same girls rebranded then advertised at different agencies and with different pics?

You bookers and agencies reading this. Please get more kgirls 5'3"and taller!

Everyone has their taste but I personally prefer women that are taller than 5 foot. I see 4'9", 4' 11" popping up everywhere. Are they being imported on purpose or that is it just coincidence?[/QUOTE]I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).

[QUOTE=Majieroero;5751701]I'm not sure if bookers have much choice in the type of girls that are willing to get fucked by a bunch of Western mongers. If they have any choices, I personally appreciate the diversity. Petite or tall, I'm happy as long as their face, curves, and attitude are of quality. Some of them have been very enjoyable for me at least. (PKL Tiny, Teenie, Miso, Peach3).[/QUOTE]YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5751819]YMMV and everyone has their opinion. I am just making my plea anyways, just in case someone here has any sway with the k-org "bosses" or whoever selects and markets talent for employment in the LA area.[/QUOTE]Point of information. The bookers rarely if ever see the girls. They go by what they are told by the org or by the customers.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5750007]Again, I wouldn't lay offense to out of towners just because they are out of towners. No one has provided concrete proof that it was or wasn't. It's disingenuous to point fingers when we don't know the facts.

I'm not sure what screening would be enough to sniff out bad actors like this. The current system no ways addresses this as everyone whose gone vetting knows. And to pivot to measures that do would scare away business of all but incredibly dedicated and die hard kgirl fans.[/QUOTE]I think we can all agree that the more participants there are in the hobby, the chances of a psycho monger will inherently increase. That is simply how math works. The girls are obviously not hurting for business. Even the upsell BB girls are hard to book now (at least the popular ones). I think what CI is getting at is that we don't need to rock the boat and facilitate to make it easier for idiot mongers to get cleared. If these mongers are legit mongers, they will know what they need to do for screening and get cleared properly.

The issue is with the mongers who come in and have no references whatsoever and want to get cleared without having to give any references or information to provide assurances and then expecting to book only the popular girls. That is something I can't really agree with, everyone should have to earn their stripes. All the seasoned mongers know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure how many times I've seen newbie mongers standing around the front of a k-girl incall by the intercom with their phone out, pacing around. This presents the obvious concerns about protecting the hobby. Can we expect all these new people you're trying to bring into the hobby to behave accordingly and be smart about how they participate? Just food for thought.

M. Viki, Allie, Stella (WLA). Miki, Sica. (MW).

[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA). Remi, Daisy (MW). .

[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Eunji, Ami, Josie, Nicole. (WLA) Remi, Daisy (MW). .

Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/................[/URL].

SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Dana, Viki, Tiana. WLA.

Thinking about seeing one of these two when I visit OC this week but just cannot decide.

Saw Mio when she was in LA back to 2019 but now sure how she looks now but cannot find her recent information.

Yuna has a nice review but the buggy eyes scared me a little.

Just want to see who would you guys recommend.

Thanks a lot guys.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5751125]When I posted about the "new" girls at M, I was curious about Sica. It seems Bookergray has her as Sicca (noticed the extra C, not sure if it's on purpose or a typo). Someone mentioned she went by Jessica and used fake pictures. It seems no one has tried her yet and she's on the cheaper end price point which in my experience tends to be an older one and they know this and charge accordingly. I hope I got it right with the names and possibly the right girl, I hate this annoying nonsense to reinvent themselves as "new" girls.

M's Sica.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

Sicca at Bookergray.

[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw&wr_id=2639[/URL] (Fake pictures indicated by someone esle).

CandgirlsLA's Jessie.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

I tried a reverse image search and nothing came up. I tried searching the board under Jessica, Jessie, Sica and no reports so it looks like no one has seen her under these names. I'm half tempted to TOFT.[/QUOTE]That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT [I]and[/I] posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5752507]That's a substantial height difference between what M lists compared to the other 2. Could be a typo. Gray using fake pictures is expected so who knows who is behind the door but considering that M and CGLA seem to be sharing different pictures of the same set, the likelihood that it's the same girl is high for M and CGLA.

It's unfortunate we don't have more people that TOFFT [I]and[/I] posts reviews. New starlets will get deluged with business cause of those TOFFT review (s) but I'm positive more goes undiscovered that certainly warrant the same attention but didn't because there were no reviews.[/QUOTE]If anyone wants to donate me their $300 I'd glady take one for the team. Mickey from M for is really resonating with me that that was the Mickey from PKL that I had a really disappointing time with. Her face on the first photo closely resembles the PKL Mickey I saw in person.

[QUOTE=WillardJ;5752038]I think we can all agree that the more participants there are in the hobby, the chances of a psycho monger will inherently increase. That is simply how math works. The girls are obviously not hurting for business. Even the upsell BB girls are hard to book now (at least the popular ones). I think what CI is getting at is that we don't need to rock the boat and facilitate to make it easier for idiot mongers to get cleared. If these mongers are legit mongers, they will know what they need to do for screening and get cleared properly.

The issue is with the mongers who come in and have no references whatsoever and want to get cleared without having to give any references or information to provide assurances and then expecting to book only the popular girls. That is something I can't really agree with, everyone should have to earn their stripes. All the seasoned mongers know what I'm talking about.

I'm not sure how many times I've seen newbie mongers standing around the front of a k-girl incall by the intercom with their phone out, pacing around. This presents the obvious concerns about protecting the hobby. Can we expect all these new people you're trying to bring into the hobby to behave accordingly and be smart about how they participate? Just food for thought.[/QUOTE]I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to crowd the kgirl space with new mongers. It will make it even more difficult to book good girls and horrendous to book popular girls. Everyone, including myself, has experienced this. But I also attribute the difficulty to the fact that the quality and number of good kgirls has drastically dipped in recent years. As a prime example, even in Megan's heyday it wasn't particularly difficult to book her because of a good selection of contemporary talent that help dilute that demand. Compare that to booking Hana, Ara, Subi, most of the PKL roster of late and you can see that quality and quantity has dropped all around. Mongers have flocked to these tiny pockets of talent and supply and demand being what it is, we get a clusterfuck of fully booked girls and blue balled mongers.

If the bar you set to distinguish between an idiot and legit monger is knowing what is needed for screening and getting cleared properly then it is an extremely low bar you have established. That information is readily available here, on other forums, and even by the booker themselves if you text without it and they are in need of new mongers. As I've mentioned before on another post, that single step in helping a newcomer know where to look has an almost inconsequential affect on whether he gets cleared or not. That will depend on what references he has already, what he's willing to disclose, or a combination of the two.

I will say that the issue you have in regard to newcomers coming in with no references or information provided and seeing only popular girls is a non-issue. No competent booker in their right mind should ever consider such a monger. It risks the girls, other mongers, the booker, and the entire agency. If such an agency exists, they should be blacklisted by mongers. The only case where I can see this happen is if they are vouched in by a regular of that agency. But at that point, even if he is completely new, the regular should clearly inform him of what the expectations, rules, and etiquette are because it will reflect heavily on his standing with said agency depending how this newcomer acts.

I'm not sure how the behavior of new mongers have become my responsibility. For one, let's not kid ourselves, mongers behaving stupidly who should know better have existed long before my entry into this space. Secondly, we're all adults here. As such, personal agency and understanding how to appropriately conduct oneself when engaging in this hobby should be a pre-requisite. But those are ideal cases and the spectrum of mongers coming in is essentially infinite. The perspective of a new monger can vary wildly. There are those that go it alone, don't read up etiquette, and aren't aware or don't care that their behavior draws attention to themselves and may have an impact on the hobby. And then there are those with enough self awareness to understand that this hobby isn't legal, read up on do's and don'ts, and take appropriate precautions. No one, even bookers, have control of those actions. It's falls upon personal responsibility. That's why I advocate helping the new guys, point them to good places to read kgirl SOP, etiquette, how best to put yourself forward in screening and when seeing the girl. It's much more likely to keep the hobby safer than letting them run rampant trying to figure it on their own and that's if they have the motivation to begin with. Like it or not, there will always be an influx of new mongers coming into the kgirl scene.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5752634]I can understand the sentiment of not wanting to crowd the kgirl space with new mongers. It will make it even more difficult to book good girls and horrendous to book popular girls. Everyone, including myself, has experienced this. But I also attribute the difficulty to the fact that the quality and number of good kgirls has drastically dipped in recent years. As a prime example, even in Megan's heyday it wasn't particularly difficult to book her because of a good selection of contemporary talent that help dilute that demand. Compare that to booking Hana, Ara, Subi, most of the PKL roster of late and you can see that quality and quantity has dropped all around. Mongers have flocked to these tiny pockets of talent and supply and demand being what it is, we get a clusterfuck of fully booked girls and blue balled mongers.

If the bar you set to distinguish between an idiot and legit monger is knowing what is needed for screening and getting cleared properly then it is an extremely low bar you have established. That information is readily available here, on other forums, and even by the booker themselves if you text without it and they are in need of new mongers. As I've mentioned before on another post, that single step in helping a newcomer know where to look has an almost inconsequential affect on whether he gets cleared or not. That will depend on what references he has already, what he's willing to disclose, or a combination of the two.

I will say that the issue you have in regard to newcomers coming in with no references or information provided and seeing only popular girls is a non-issue. No competent booker in their right mind should ever consider such a monger. It risks the girls, other mongers, the booker, and the entire agency. If such an agency exists, they should be blacklisted by mongers. The only case where I can see this happen is if they are vouched in by a regular of that agency. But at that point, even if he is completely new, the regular should clearly inform him of what the expectations, rules, and etiquette are because it will reflect heavily on his standing with said agency depending how this newcomer acts.

I'm not sure how the behavior of new mongers have become my responsibility. For one, let's not kid ourselves, mongers behaving stupidly who should know better have existed long before my entry into this space. Secondly, we're all adults here. As such, personal agency and understanding how to appropriately conduct oneself when engaging in this hobby should be a pre-requisite. But those are ideal cases and the spectrum of mongers coming in is essentially infinite. The perspective of a new monger can vary wildly. There are those that go it alone, don't read up etiquette, and aren't aware or don't care that their behavior draws attention to themselves and may have an impact on the hobby. And then there are those with enough self awareness to understand that this hobby isn't legal, read up on do's and don'ts, and take appropriate precautions. No one, even bookers, have control of those actions. It's falls upon personal responsibility. That's why I advocate helping the new guys, point them to good places to read kgirl SOP, etiquette, how best to put yourself forward in screening and when seeing the girl. It's much more likely to keep the hobby safer than letting them run rampant trying to figure it on their own and that's if they have the motivation to begin with. Like it or not, there will always be an influx of new mongers coming into the kgirl scene.[/QUOTE]I don't know what all the fuss is about. These girls are advertised on websites with contact information. If someone wants to make an appointment all he has to do is call or text the number or if there is an email address send an email. The booker will respond or not. I wouldn't give my recommendation to anyone and if they used my handle I'm sure the booker would check with me. They have a system and that system works 99% of the time with very, very few exceptions. If bookers didn't want new business they wouldn't advertise the girls and we don't have to worry about it.

Recently have been booking through CG and in my opinion, she is probably the best to book through in regards to communication and other general correspondences.

Saw Maxii, Ring, Suzy and must say that all three are on the higher end in terms of looks. I would re-visit even if they raised their prices. Probably unfair that they are receiving the same amount as other girls.

Great experiences all throughout the booking / visit process. I've experienced other agencies / bookers in LA so glad to have found a reliable one such as CG.

Hope everyone enjoys the weekend.

[QUOTE=AL9822;5752692]Recently have been booking through CG and in my opinion, she is probably the best to book through in regards to communication and other general correspondences.

Saw Maxii, Ring, Suzy and must say that all three are on the higher end in terms of looks. I would re-visit even if they raised their prices. Probably unfair that they are receiving the same amount as other girls.

Great experiences all throughout the booking / visit process. I've experienced other agencies / bookers in LA so glad to have found a reliable one such as CG.

Hope everyone enjoys the weekend.[/QUOTE]True, I've never had any problems with CG booker or booking a Kgirl. With options at KPL and SFK like Daisy, Helena (gone), Remi, Jean, Dana and a couple other girls. 440 for BBFS with msog is ridiculous that CG is asking for! For that much I rather see the BBFS hX girls with QOD.

Saw Maxi and thought she was a definite HYA with kind manners and does her best during service. Might be my oversight, but mildly curious as to see why there aren't as many mentions of her in threads.

Everyone does have their own styles when it comes to these agency girls, but I would describe Maxi as a girl who you might be able to see working in night life in actual Korea and still be considered as very pretty and cute.

Look-wise and all around for that matter, miles ahead of most other agency girls.

Only my opinion and I know everyone has different tastes so I hope my post doesn't cause any friction between us members, but I think most members would agree.

Would be interested to hear what other members who happened to see her thinks of her as well!

Thanks for reading guys; hope all of us can get the desired hours we need for paying these agencies who should def care less about servicing us than their main objective of booking us.

Cheers.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5752673]I don't know what all the fuss is about. These girls are advertised on websites with contact information. If someone wants to make an appointment all he has to do is call or text the number or if there is an email address send an email. The booker will respond or not. I wouldn't give my recommendation to anyone and if they used my handle I'm sure the booker would check with me. They have a system and that system works 99% of the time with very, very few exceptions. If bookers didn't want new business they wouldn't advertise the girls and we don't have to worry about it.[/QUOTE]Couldn't agree more. Who are we to decide who should see the girls or not. The kgirls have a reference system and / or I'd, selfie. So if they believe that is sufficient then so be it. Or they could be like M who would just ignore everything. Either way I'm not invested emotionally into this. I'm just there to shoot my load and go home.

[QUOTE=GXOracle;5753157]Saw Maxi and thought she was a definite HYA with kind manners and does her best during service. Might be my oversight, but mildly curious as to see why there aren't as many mentions of her in threads.

Everyone does have their own styles when it comes to these agency girls, but I would describe Maxi as a girl who you might be able to see working in night life in actual Korea and still be considered as very pretty and cute.

Look-wise and all around for that matter, miles ahead of most other agency girls.

Only my opinion and I know everyone has different tastes so I hope my post doesn't cause any friction between us members, but I think most members would agree.

Would be interested to hear what other members who happened to see her thinks of her as well!

Thanks for reading guys; hope all of us can get the desired hours we need for paying these agencies who should def care less about servicing us than their main objective of booking us.

Cheers.[/QUOTE]Any Senior members second this opinion on Maxxi?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5751962]Point of information. The bookers rarely if ever see the girls. They go by what they are told by the org or by the customers.[/QUOTE]Customer feedback is the most reliable. Since several bookers tell me that they go by what the boss says and the boss says all their girls are "beautiful? LOL.

[QUOTE=SuperMan333;5753203]Couldn't agree more. Who are we to decide who should see the girls or not. The kgirls have a reference system and / or I'd, selfie. So if they believe that is sufficient then so be it. Or they could be like M who would just ignore everything. Either way I'm not invested emotionally into this. I'm just there to shoot my load and go home.[/QUOTE]Well said, sir. If a monger wants to control who sees the girls all he has to do is either start his own org or become a booker. Otherwise, let the experts do their job. Most of them are very good at it and, if not, they probably won't last long.

Can you imagine being a booker and dealing with a bunch of rude horny guys jockying to fuck the girls you represent? Shit work if you ask me, funny at times for sure, but shit work.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5753276]Any Senior members second this opinion on Maxxi?[/QUOTE]B cups? No thankyou. I require C cups, minimum, or pussy destructor is not available.

[QUOTE=AL9822;5752692]Recently have been booking through CG and in my opinion, she is probably the best to book through in regards to communication and other general correspondences.

Saw Maxii, Ring, Suzy and must say that all three are on the higher end in terms of looks. I would re-visit even if they raised their prices. Probably unfair that they are receiving the same amount as other girls.

Great experiences all throughout the booking / visit process. I've experienced other agencies / bookers in LA so glad to have found a reliable one such as CG.

Hope everyone enjoys the weekend.[/QUOTE]I agree CandyGirlLA is by far the most professional and LEAST dickheaded booker. Dealing with some of the other K bookers feels dealing with Tuco Salamanca. The only problem is, the rates are so ridiculous that I refuse to use their service. The price is near 500 bucks for a standard hr of BB with a backrub and 2 shots, how the fuck did we get from 280/ hr to that!? It seems to me that some men have no limits to what they will spend for a few minutes of hanky panky, I on the other hand have my limits before I'd rather just jerk one out to a pornhub vid for zero bucks and call it a day.

[QUOTE=SuperMan333;5753203]Couldn't agree more. Who are we to decide who should see the girls or not. The kgirls have a reference system and / or I'd, selfie. So if they believe that is sufficient then so be it. Or they could be like M who would just ignore everything. Either way I'm not invested emotionally into this. I'm just there to shoot my load and go home.[/QUOTE]Anyone who is complaining about anything really just comes down to money. If you can afford this hobby you will get a hit or miss and just keep it moving until you find your ATF. You want a regular? Go get a sugar baby or just date. So weird to constantly see people complaining about this or that when we all know what this is about.

People out here booking once every few months talking about quality over quantity. These are the type of mongers that are killing the business. These agencies needs constant cash flow and regular customers to keep the business alive. If you can't afford to book girls on the regular, who are you to say what the agency should and should not do? They need new customers and there are people willing to pay.

$400-$500 too expensive? Go find a girlfriend or any other business and you will find yourself paying exponentially more money and worst of all, your time.

Trust any of the real mongers that bookers will treat you like a king if you spend more money. They are super nice to me and I have no complaints aside from Billy from NAV who is like a robot. Still like his professionalism though.

Anyone know if she is rebranded somewhere? I enjoy her squeals and moans.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5752673]I don't know what all the fuss is about. These girls are advertised on websites with contact information. If someone wants to make an appointment all he has to do is call or text the number or if there is an email address send an email. The booker will respond or not. I wouldn't give my recommendation to anyone and if they used my handle I'm sure the booker would check with me. They have a system and that system works 99% of the time with very, very few exceptions. If bookers didn't want new business they wouldn't advertise the girls and we don't have to worry about it.[/QUOTE]Agreed! Some of you guys should seek therapy.

Quick review. I'd probably peg her at late 20's to mid 30's at most. Pleasant, very GND and minimal makeup. Speaking a language she knows helps open her up (Korean, some Chinese) but her english is minimal but enough.

F: 7 - GND cute. Maybe even a 6. 5 but def cute for most. Pretty, maybe, small features, cute nose.

B: 7. 5 - Larger around the hips, the slightest amount of residual fat (looks like she lost some weight) around her belly, soft and full Bs. Short, like 5'1" maybe. Not super toned, soft skin. Has a little butt that is flattish but wide-ish.

A: 8 - Very cute attitude. A little service like at first and really no preview during shower. Opened up with DFK and some dialog and became much warmer. Will chat with you instead of cuddling too much. Seems pretty "real" but also will not seem to try to be your gf.

S: 8 - Very good service for me, slower and sensual BBBJ no DT. Good DFK, may not love DFK that that much but she tries. Flexible, tight pussy, probably not OK for magnum. CG riding 8/10 - can't really disconnect the hips too well but she is so small she can really get into it and grind away, she O'd, hard. Great service during the D, semi playful afterwards but not super GFE.

English seems marginally OK.

Repeat: Yes, but Tier I, not Tier Superior. Would not be disappointed if I saw her again.

M. Viki, Allie, Stella (WLA). Miki, Sica. (MW).

[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Eunji, Ami, Nicole. (WLA). Remi, Daisy (MW). .

[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Eunji, Ami, Nicole. (WLA) Remi, Daisy (MW). .

Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/.................[/URL].

SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Dana, Viki, Tiana. WLA.