NoVA SugarBabies

[QUOTE=ErnestLl;6098637]Its her real name.

The actor who played Annakin Skywalker.

And.

The blonde sister in law in Mel Gibsons The Patriot.

All mashed up.

Her latest post was some stupid tik tok video saying how Victoria's Secret and College cheerleading all prey on sexualizing young women for profit, with a copy of the mag article about her lawsuit as the background.

I posted a comment "How is this different than you selling your company to wealthy older men on [URL]seeking.com[/URL] and posted her link. Not sure anyone saw it before she deleted the comment and sent me a nasty DM![/QUOTE]Her Linkedin says she works for the latest and greatest third party. You should have asked her if she got her job by sugaring for Andrew Yang, or if he chalked up her NU life experience as "job experience", I. E. , a way of baiting donors. Or Hell, using her as a honeypot for digging up dirt on politicians...

I should've recognized it by the generic username but I got hypnotized by them titties LOL. But this one's a fake / scammer. Asks for a $100 "validation fee" upfront.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ab1ae291-ee04-4230-8c26-1baf279db492[/URL]

She went back to Europe.

[QUOTE=Mcsylv;6102091]Too bad she turned off her account, I would have liked to get with her. I think I did message her a while back but either got ignored or just not seen.
[/QUOTE]

That's what I was thinking. $200 is insulting to offer a SB, if you want to get any quality, comes across as offering to a low end pro ho.

[QUOTE=LikesGirls;6102286]I don't think $200 is a reasonable number for this area and that might've been the reason she acted like that.

I've seen her before, she's had at least a couple different profiles on SA. She seems like a really interesting person who opens up slowly if she's not treated like an object. If it's just transactional she will most likely act accordingly.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HornyTwist;6101888]Has anyone seen this one? She gave her number after 1st message on SA and really blew up my phone. She was down for everything within minutes. Seemed like someone on speed. I really doubt she has graduate degree. Getting a weird vibe. Most likely a scam but at least, she did not give me a sob story or ask for electronic money transfer. Any feedback is welcome.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b2dc04a3-37f7-40ea-8e91-514d44cd43c0[/URL][/QUOTE]She has been reviewed. She's real. Really fugly that is.

[QUOTE=LikesGirls;6102286]I don't think $200 is a reasonable number for this area….[/QUOTE]With all due respect this is a highly subjective statement. It's all relative right. If the chick is genuinely digging the SD's vibe, appearance, etc. And she can snag $200 cash on top of whatever other fun (dinner, drinks, a night out, getting dined on, railed good, etc.) and do this 3-4 times a month, it's very much sufficient under the right circumstances. I've had a couple where the rest of it minus the $200 was our norm, a few at the $200 and many just above the $200. All that said, I'm not hurting for dates in the real world, I just don't like all the BS that comes with traditional dating. I've have certainly spent way more when a SB has demanded it and she met all my shallow requirements, which is basically just be hot and fit. LOL.

I agree $200 was pretty low, but I was pretty far in at this point and figured she would negotiate if she was interested LOL.

Pics seller. Don't waste your time.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04bec4d8-f964-48a0-a581-67033613b20e[/URL]

[QUOTE=TomFordModel;6102515]She has been reviewed. She's real. Really fugly that is.[/QUOTE]Her face is busted but her body is banging and if you hit it off with her then everything's on the table no extra charge and as many rounds as you want.

[QUOTE=David032;6103558]Her face is busted but her body is banging and if you hit it off with her then everything's on the table no extra charge and as many rounds as you want.[/QUOTE]Yeah but she is getting out of hand now. Wants 6 minimum and used to be able to be talked into half that with Uber fare.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fb753089-1e01-4ffd-84ac-4c36c15ddb63[/URL]

Pic scammer. Will send a bunch of freebies, agree to a meet then insist on partial fee up front before meeting.

Avoid.

[QUOTE=Pathfinder04;6102242][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/d4714246-8c00-434f-8e36-de09bbb0598f[/URL]

This girl reached out to me on SA and we went to Kik quickly. Once there, she first tried to sell me nudes and videos, then told me she was open to a 300 ppm but I had to pay 50 up front. When I said I obviously don't pay anything up front, she went quiet. Assume she's a scammer.[/QUOTE]Have yet to find someone real who can't put in the 30 secs it takes to come up with a real username instead of letting the app generate one.

[QUOTE=BobDingle10;6103897][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/fb753089-1e01-4ffd-84ac-4c36c15ddb63[/URL]

Pic scammer. Will send a bunch of freebies, agree to a meet then insist on partial fee up front before meeting.

Avoid.[/QUOTE]Adjunctive noun username is a dead give away. Just ignore them.

[QUOTE=ErnestLl;6104059]Adjunctive noun username is a dead give away. Just ignore them.[/QUOTE]I love the adjective noun myth! While it is often true, my top 3 SBs had that combo.

Scammer = 95% adjective noun combo. Adjective noun combo = far less than 95% scammer 😂.

Just looked up all my ex-SBs that have log in with in the past 24 hrs 4 out of 10 have a adjective noun name. I personally wouldn't put much stock in the adjective noun rule.

[QUOTE=GMarts018;6105746]I love the adjective noun myth! While it is often true, my top 3 SBs had that combo.

Scammer = 95% adjective noun combo. Adjective noun combo = far less than 95% scammer 😂.[/QUOTE]