Korean Agency BB

For guys who have seen her.

Do these pics (face only, forget body) look representative?

From all descriptions it sounds like her. Except the part about dfk, Miko used to be a dfk queen. Could taste what she had for dinner last night LOL.

My post was providing useful information for us mongers. To maximize our experience with Kgirls. But being offended by your looks is what your focus is on. We shouldn't exaggerate just because the girl didn't worship you like some expect. Positive vibes results in positive experiences. Let's keep the information flowing

[QUOTE=Jack926;5745162]Objectively and truthfully speaking, she is not more than "5" or "6" in her look. But you can rate her higher. You are missing my point on her body which I said is a definite "9" and above; so I was being objective.

My look, or any other monger look is irrelevant to this discussion.[/QUOTE].

I thought Jennie looked just like her pictures. Yes her hair and skin is almost luxurious haha. Flawless creamy white skin and pink. Watching her kissing me everywhere and blowing me, this is what it's like to fuck a Kpop star. Tight wet light pink pussy. I don't think she has any ugly on her. She made me feel special for the whole hour. Jennie is top tier.

[QUOTE=Jack926;5686722]I concur to above review 100%: I saw her yesterday and I found her real sweetheart. In regard to her age, I would think that she is in her high 20 years or low 30 but I love her hair and skin. I plan a 2nd visit very soon. A definite sweetheart in term of the attitude and definitely she has a body that is super nice.[/QUOTE].

I recently got in at Booker Gray. Suggested Vixen. I did a quick search and was impressed by the reviews. Well she's definitely a MILF and despite the raving reviews, I did not find her very attractive or sexy. Kinda reminds me of the older Korean ladies at the salon. Minus the perm. I mean she is ok for her age but I'm here to fuck younger girls not 50 year old. Legendary service? She kept making these sucking hissing noises and it was actually a turnoff. I want to get fucked wild or sensual GFE, either or. I got generic massage parlor service minus the condom. Booker Gray and Vixen was a disappointment. I would think booker would suggest a great girl for a new customer but I guess they don't really care. I guess someone new isn't important enough. Booker was impatient with me and sending weird texts I could barely understand. Then gets impatient when I send a question mark. If guess you need to prove you have money to hobby often to get Booker Grays attention. Smh, I'll stick to the bookers that treat me nice and are truthful about the girls

[QUOTE=JrueArtist;5660817]Vixen is a freak. She is a MILF but don't let that stop you. Haven't seen her in well over a year. Yesterday I stopped by for a reunion. I think I'm going to go on a reunion tour to say hello to my old friends. It was a fantastic fuck suck marathon that I haven't had in a while. She's game. Like my own porn via mirrors LOL. Still looks good with that sexy face. Def worth the 320 no upcharge.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=Bulldog4094;5747342]I am headed to LA in early Feb and would love to sample your local talent. Atlanta has nothing like what you have so rejoice and be merry. I do have a question. Do all bookers / agencies only offer beauties with man made tits? I am a fan of smaller, natural boobs. Any advice and guidance on finding options would be appreciated. PM is fine. Thanks.[/QUOTE]I would get the ball rolling on getting screened even before you land. There's a monger made website with a fairly exhaustive list of k agencies in the LA area but I don't have it saved. Maybe someone will repost it.

A good portion of kgirls will have enhanced tits but you can always let the booker know your preference for natural and smaller tits and they should let you know if anyone fits that criteria in their roster. As someone from out of town, you're at a huge disadvantage for screening. It's going to be tough. Even if you're an open book and willing to part with personal info, that may be not enough. Good Luck.

In terms of looks, how does Daisy fair compared to Jean, Eunji, and Pink?

[QUOTE=DragonWolf;5747361]Fellow connoisseur from down south (SD) here, and looking to add a little variety w / some LA / OC talent. I've noticed a trend in LA / OC to have multiple bookers for certain talent and I was wondering if there's bookers that are better to work with than others, such as KGLA vs. Preciousklove, in this case, or does it not really matter?

Things are simpler down here, though we lack the wide range of talent, so I'm trying to get the lay of the land up there.

Thanks in advance![/QUOTE]Short answer is not really, if all you're looking to do is book an appointment and are straight to the point. Of course, there will be differences like how short their fuses are, their command of the English language, their CS (customer service, not the other one) skills, prompt response times, etc. But by the by, dealing with the first to screen you through vs others shouldn't be all too different.

If you have HX and have seen girls through Splashme, Cubandreams, or HawaiiRocks, check out if they can help you get in contact with LA or OC bookers. It'll make the transition much smoother. If you don't have HX, see what I posted below.

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5747739]This is why I'm so adamant about being careful who you help get into this hobby. This is why it doesn't benefit us to help these out of towners who are just passing through. You never know what can happen, there's just no upside and little to be gained. Not too long ago there were reports about some K-girl who had her ribs broken by a monger? I wonder who messed up on that screening that let that happen.[/QUOTE]I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5748204]Short answer is not really, if all you're looking to do is book an appointment and are straight to the point. Of course, there will be differences like how short their fuses are, their command of the English language, their CS (customer service, not the other one) skills, prompt response times, etc. But by the by, dealing with the first to screen you through vs others shouldn't be all too different.

If you have HX and have seen girls through Splashme, Cubandreams, or HawaiiRocks, check out if they can help you get in contact with LA or OC bookers. It'll make the transition much smoother. If you don't have HX, see what I posted below.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I've got HX, although only for the last couple years or so. Mostly have dealt with Splashme / HawaiiRocks down here, or what we refer to SDAsianGirls and FarEastCuties (the SD side of ca-kdolls) I know both bookers have indicated I can book their respective OC offerings through them and have given me the simple safety thumbs up. LOL I have been on tee ee ar for a good while.

I suppose I'll just reach and see where that takes me. If I have to go the roundabout way by establishing a "presence" so to speak in OC before heading up to LA, then so be it.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5748227]I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.[/QUOTE]There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.

Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5747644]Provided my seed to Jamie, it really never gets old with her. Great monthly option. She's around and living here now, so go pay her bills.[/QUOTE]Only those who have seen Jamie know about how devilish smile that she has when you fill her up with cum that is so sexy and makes the experience even hotter. For all those mongers who are hungry for short and stacked with legs and thighs. She encourages CIP and makes sure to milk every drop while she stares into your soul. Jamie is the one.

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%9D%B4%EB%AF%B8[/URL]

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748280]There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.

Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.[/QUOTE]When I hear about these guys with no references being asked for their license and paystubs, it makes me feel a bit more at ease and safe that it's so tough to get in compared to years ago. Last thing I want to do is worry about whether or not the girl's roommate having some sort of psycho customer that's trying to rob the apartment when I'm balls deep inside a kgirl. It has happened in the past.

[QUOTE=TDLeafs;5580839]Hell No.

Does this look like she was pushed?

She got beat up. And robbed.[/QUOTE]This is the post that I refer to. This is what happens when screening is not good enough. Yes it's not a perfect system but I would much rather the bookers take as many precautions as possible if it lessens the chance of something like this ever happening again. Why don't these out of towners visit the Bay Area instead? It's much cheaper and there's virtually no real screening.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5748227]I would disagree here. I would like to be afforded a fair chance at vetting if I happen to pass through NorCal, Seattle, Houston, Philly, or any other kgirl hotspots throughout the country. Moreover, it wasn't revealed, at least to my knowledge, if most of the offending mongers to date were comprised of out of towners or not.

The problem lies in that screening does absolutely nothing to evaluate a mongers proclivity for violence, theft, or deception. Nor will it, unless they start asking for mental health assessments from certified psychologists or psychiatrists. It's mainly predicated on an honor system of past history with established bookers who may or may not have connections to themselves. In the end, it's really a judgement call. In addition, like in stocks, past history does not guarantee future performance. I think, in part, this is why screening has becoming more stringent and strict, invasively so. Because in truth, only the threat of doxing, public shaming, blacklisting, or the possibility of jail time can act as an effective deterrent. While it is unfortunate when something does happen, in the grand scheme of things, the catch 22 of kgirl vetting has worked well enough compared to other portions of the sex industry to provide a high level of safety and security for both the girls and mongers.

Interestingly enough, C-orgs uses the fact that mongers, girls, and bookers are all visible to one another in an, for me, uncomfortably public fashion to deter anyone from doing something stupid. They pit the mongers own penchant for secrecy against each other in the presence of everyone to maintain a tentative stalemate of unease. It's a rather extreme but effective way to manage chaos given that they have such poor screening standards.[/QUOTE]Yes, protect the girls and the mongers. Screen as needed to ensure this.

However, I believe having a track record of booking 50+ appointments per year, for many years (without issue) and with reputable agencies that have been in business for over 5 yrs. Is the best reference you can have for another agency. I have found that many kgirl agencies already have relationships with each other or have done competitive intelligence on other kgirl orgs.

Most bookers will only verify a longtime client and they do it as a favor to that client, not because it adds to their own business.

[QUOTE=PussyDestroyr;5747644]Provided my seed to Jamie, it really never gets old with her. Great monthly option. She's around and living here now, so go pay her bills.[/QUOTE]Agreed. I gave last week.

Has anyone checked out Hyori? The booker tried to recommend her to me recently but I don't care about trying out girls with fake pictures and wanted to know if she's young and hot.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/hyori[/URL]

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;5748396]Yes, protect the girls and the mongers. Screen as needed to ensure this.

However, I believe having a track record of booking 50+ appointments per year, for many years (without issue) and with reputable agencies that have been in business for over 5 yrs. Is the best reference you can have for another agency. I have found that many kgirl agencies already have relationships with each other or have done competitive intelligence on other kgirl orgs.

Most bookers will only verify a longtime client and they do it as a favor to that client, not because it adds to their own business.[/QUOTE]I also believe that there's a certain etiquette that a monger should have when visiting k-orgs that mongers (who have never been) may not be accustomed to. There's a certain way you need to go about visiting a k-org and treating the k-girls that say a monger who's only been to rub and tugs may not know about and may not how to carry or conduct themselves.

Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for long legged, tanned, smooth skin, big tits and big butt K-girls. I'm fine with my current rotation of regulars but I don't quite have anyone similar to that build which seems very rare and one of a kind. I really miss those long sexy legs and how they wrapped around me as I fucked her deep and watched those tits bounce up and down.

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748463]Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for long legged, tanned, smooth skin, big tits and big butt K-girls. I'm fine with my current rotation of regulars but I don't quite have anyone similar to that build which seems very rare and one of a kind. I really miss those long sexy legs and how they wrapped around me as I fucked her deep and watched those tits bounce up and down.[/QUOTE]Would you prefer to fucking crazy like Moli?

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748463]Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for long legged, tanned, smooth skin, big tits and big butt K-girls. I'm fine with my current rotation of regulars but I don't quite have anyone similar to that build which seems very rare and one of a kind. I really miss those long sexy legs and how they wrapped around me as I fucked her deep and watched those tits bounce up and down.[/QUOTE]Good old days.

I would describe Remi as shy but willing. She has a bigger face than Jean but I still found her to be very cute, but not as cute as Jean. Face 7.5. Definitely 20's. As many have mentioned, her tanned smooth skin and face make her look SE Asian / Filipina. Big adorable eyes, button nose, big soft enough tits with small soft nipples that harden when licked, grabbable hips and thighs, small looking ass (not flat to me) but I was still able to grab a handful so A-OK to me. Skinny, but not boney or stick skinny, just how I like it. To me her body is an 8.5. Very soft sensual lips with a cute little tongue. Personality is very sweet and smiley. Service could improve and she takes directions well. Would give her a 7 here. Overall would repeat over and over again.

P.S. Has anyone seen PKL Ami?

[QUOTE=FreeWilly555;5748547]Would you prefer to fucking crazy like Moli?[/QUOTE]She was a great fuck until she became too crazy to be around.

She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.

Sica.

Stella.

Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL]

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748463]Wondering if anyone has any recommendations for long legged, tanned, smooth skin, big tits and big butt K-girls. I'm fine with my current rotation of regulars but I don't quite have anyone similar to that build which seems very rare and one of a kind. I really miss those long sexy legs and how they wrapped around me as I fucked her deep and watched those tits bounce up and down.[/QUOTE]Vivian from CA-Kdolls matches this description. She even has the short hair like that girl lol

Mickey.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL] (on their hx).

Sica.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

Stella.

Looks nice, don't remember seeing elsewhere.

Vivian.

Very familiar but can't recall where I've seen her pics.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749016]She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.
Sica.
Stella.
Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL][/QUOTE]

I guess Stella is in two different places. [URL]caraangels.com[/URL] as Kerri.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749016]She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.

Sica.

Stella.

Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL][/QUOTE]Mickeys third pic was used by bunnygirls Mari in the bay. Tiny thing but also said to be on the older side.

[URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20211218182234/https://bunnygirlsclub.com/bunny-mari/[/URL]

[QUOTE=AvgGuy;5749055]Mickey.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL] (on their hx).

Sica.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

Stella.

Looks nice, don't remember seeing elsewhere.

Vivian.

Very familiar but can't recall where I've seen her pics.[/QUOTE]Mickey went by Mari at BGC.

[URL]http://web.archive.org/web/20211212075243/https://bunnygirlsclub.com/bunny-mari/[/URL]

Stella went by Kerri at Cara's angels.

[URL]http://caraangels.com/KERRI/[/URL]

Oh. And Vivian is similar to Kassie from [URL]violafriends.net[/URL].

But I think that picture is from an ig model.

[QUOTE=AvgGuy;5749055]Mickey.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL] (on their hx).

Sica.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

Stella.

Looks nice, don't remember seeing elsewhere.

Vivian.

Very familiar but can't recall where I've seen her pics.[/QUOTE]All these rebrands and fake pics are making it confusing:

Mickey / Miki / Minnie appears to be Miso?

Sica / Jessica / Jessie was mentioned before: DaSmith pointed out the pics are from Alibaba's AliExpress's Pantyhose listing:

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5747327&highlight=jessica[/URL]#post5747327.

[QUOTE=AvgGuy;5749055]Mickey.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL] (on their hx).

Sica.

[URL]https://www.losangelesasian.com/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EC%A0%9C%EC%8B%9C%EC%B9%B4[/URL]

Stella.

Looks nice, don't remember seeing elsewhere.

Vivian.

Very familiar but can't recall where I've seen her pics.[/QUOTE]Vivian was using the name Hazel at SAG. Jack had asked if it was Hazel of M but it is not. Sizes and pictures didnt match her at all.

[QUOTE=Panda1203;5748195]In terms of looks, how does Daisy fair compared to Jean, Eunji, and Pink?[/QUOTE]Daisy looks like those Korean college girls you want to nail. Real cute, def recommend if you like younger. Body is closer to Pink but with full B cups. I haven't seen her since her return but booker told me she has lost some weight. I will revisit to see how she looks. You can't go wrong with her.

[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5749218]Daisy looks like those Korean college girls you want to nail. Real cute, def recommend if you like younger. Body is closer to Pink but with full B cups. I haven't seen her since her return but booker told me she has lost some weight. I will revisit to see how she looks. You can't go wrong with her.[/QUOTE]Daisy & Jean could be sorority sisters in college. They don't look alike but of the same vintage. Looks-wise I'm happy with either. It would have been interesting to try Daisy & Jean doubles but it wasn't advertised during the brief time they were roommates and I didn't ask. I can't comment on comparisons to Pink or Eunji.

Daisy cums highly recommended.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749016]She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.

Sica.

Stella.

Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL][/QUOTE]I assume it's safe to say most of these are rebrands? Anyone know if they are good and the stats?

I find it a little bit of a red flag with the 'new' girls coming into M's stable working elsewhere at upcharge agencies and changing prices. I actually did have an issue with Miso / Minnie wanting an upcharge for MSOG when I booked her through M. Instead of CG / Losangelesasian, luckily I have been a regular of hers long enough to be let off the hook. I told her at M. I was never charged that (but I did not complain to M). I thought (or so it has was in the past), that M's girls were always a little more exclusive and offered non-upcharge BBFS MSOG 'perks'.

So I'm a little ambivalent about it. Might TOFTT based on reports.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749016]She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.

Sica.

Stella.

Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL][/QUOTE]Stella and Vivian also booked by SFK.

[URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL]

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749314]I assume it's safe to say most of these are rebrands? Anyone know if they are good and the stats?[/QUOTE]Vivian of "M" used to be Hazel of SweetAsianGem and she was at $100 up charge. The mere fact that she has switched to "M" at no Up Charge is an indication of No Business or slow Business for her. Secondly her photos are photos of IG model and those are not her real self photos.

Some of these girls that have re invented themselves (Aubrey, Vanessa) and start raising their rate from $320 to $380 will have a hard time sustaining or maintaining clients because once a client pay $320 for something, a client can't pay $380 for the same thing; at least, I won't. I was planning to see Aubrey / Naomi but upon her price increase she was a hard no for me.

Also with the Stock Market taking a Daily dump, I can assume that it is safe to say that business will slow down to good degree.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5749016]She told me she has a few girls and I haven't looked to see what other agencies they work at. Are these girls familiar to anyone?

Mickey.

Sica.

Stella.

Vivian.

[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf[/URL][/QUOTE]Damn. Stellas look is right up my alley. Lets hope she's real.

[QUOTE=LandOfKGirls;5749284]Daisy & Jean could be sorority sisters in college. They don't look alike but of the same vintage. Looks-wise I'm happy with either. It would have been interesting to try Daisy & Jean doubles but it wasn't advertised during the brief time they were roommates and I didn't ask. I can't comment on comparisons to Pink or Eunji.

Daisy cums highly recommended.[/QUOTE]Just saw Daisy today. She lost a lot of weight. She wasn't fat or chubby before. But she wasn't a spinner. She's got bolt on B's that are perfect for her frame. Her DFK and BBBJ have both improved since her long break. I'll definitely be repeating as often as I can. She's my current ATF and best currently available, especially with no upcharge.

[QUOTE=CreamInside;5748280]There's a reason why some k-orgs don't even take references from each other. Do you think that it is absolutely worth it to go through the trouble of screening an out of towner for one weekend for like maybe one appointment? It's just not efficient at all considering the risk involved of clearing a new monger. These out of town mongers are going to come in and want to see the most popular girl. So we are going to have to disagree. I do see your point but at the same time, I'm a selfish local monger who wants to protect our hobby for our sakes so you need to see it from other people's perspectives as well. From an org stand point, it really makes no sense when there are plenty of local mongers that they could be screening that can become weekly regulars instead, which is a better use of their time. Look at how hard it is to get into M's agency, there's a good reason for that. I mean sure, we don't absolutely have proof that the violators and bad actors are out of towners. But why take that risk even? Like I've mentioned in the past, I've had no issues getting cleared when traveling so if anyone passing through has legit references then they have nothing to worry about.

Another thing to think about is the constant increases in pricing. These guys like to complain about the prices so often. Well maybe if there were fewer mongers getting cleared then the girls would not be so hard to book (even among upcharge girls) and fewer price increases (theoretically of course). Anyone who deserves to get cleared and who goes through the hard screening absolutely deserves to be cleared. I'm just saying let's not try to help EVERYONE get cleared. There's absolutely no need for it since all it takes is one bad apple to ruin everything.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure what you have against out of towners to be so biased against their inclusion to be screened. Whether a potential client is worthwhile to screen or not will fall onto each booker / agencies' requirements and their particular situation. There's no telling where or when a bad apple will appear but all else being equal, the likelihood of one being an out of towner or a local is the same. Being a local or out of towner does not inherently make you a bad apple. Furthermore, there's theoretically a higher chance of a bad apple appearing in the local client pool than out of towners due the sheer numbers involved. Screening isn't perfect and not up to the task of evaluating how a monger will act so there will be a few who fall through the cracks.

Everyone will have different opinions but my take on helping newcomers is simple. I'll help anyone who wants to genuinely enter the kgirl scene by pointing where to find contact information and what they can expect and need to provide for screening. Whether they are local or not matters not to me. It'll be up to what references they already have, what they are willing to disclose, and the bookers evaluation of them to see if they get access or not. My helping them does not affect whether or not they will get cleared, it only eliminates a step in the process that they can do on their own by browsing here or on other forums. In addition, bookers worth their salt knows that they need to keep increasing their client pool to combat losses from attrition (mongers leaving the kgirl scene and competition / favoring other agencies) to keep their girls booked as much as possible.

I'm not sure how price increases fits into all of this in from your perspective. But price increases has been a long time coming given how flat rates have been for years. Take a moment to ponder that they increased prices during a pandemic and economic downturn. This flies in the face of any sane business model. We can only speculate on why but I think increased overhead costs started to eat at their margins or simple greed works too. Regardless, it would be naive to think it would remain the same.