Printable View
I had Blonde Ashley again.
She is cute, but she is losing too much weight for my tastes.
I don't like Boney chicks.
Actually she is in much better condition than some of the pics of girls I see posted here.
Good hygiene, but her teeth are fkd up.
Senior members DM for her number.
[QUOTE=HopinJetta;5913869]Wow. Talk about bounce back artist of the year. From being dead to now expecting a child. Truly inspiring!
Yes I would stay away from the Ave. Larger police presence and few new talent for this time of year. I actually only met one named Kay, that I thought was above average. Every other girl looked like an addict. Last year's girls are losing teeth and becoming more unstable. I wish for the past when you could find girls more readily. Still some out there I suppose but with gas prices you might as well get an escort cause it will end up costing the same.[/QUOTE]Hey is that Kay a dyed blond from the NE. ?
Has a big abscess on her right arm I think. If so where'd you see her? When you see her?
[QUOTE=ChazOne;5918800]Hey is that Kay a dyed blond from the NE. ?
Has a big abscess on her right arm I think. If so where'd you see her? When you see her?[/QUOTE]No this girl has dark haired from New Jersey. Big tits and nice body. She stood out on the ave. Just came into town and had her stuff taken. Wasn't an addict just a drug user, at least when I met her. So no abbesses. Maybe a month or so ago.
[QUOTE=ItsDaddy;5917186]You only pay taxes when you sell. Buying and HODLing is always good policy.[/QUOTE]The problem comes in on the transactional side as a currency, but I'm sure you know more than me. I'm just a tax CPA.
I'm not doubting your qualifications. I don't want to reveal much about myself, but trust me when I say I am just as qualified. In reference to what you said, there are only two types of transactions: buying and selling. As long as the digital asset is held for longer than a year, it will qualify for capital gains just like any other asset. Sell it before a year and it will be considered income tax. But both of these are only on the sell side of the transaction. As long as you buy and hold, there is no taxation or penalty.
[QUOTE=JTown74;5919260]The problem comes in on the transactional side as a currency, but I'm sure you know more than me. I'm just a tax CPA.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ItsDaddy;5919429]I'm not doubting your qualifications. I don't want to reveal much about myself, but trust me when I say I am just as qualified. In reference to what you said, there are only two types of transactions: buying and selling. As long as the digital asset is held for longer than a year, it will qualify for capital gains just like any other asset. Sell it before a year and it will be considered income tax. But both of these are only on the sell side of the transaction. As long as you buy and hold, there is no taxation or penalty.[/QUOTE]I don't want to get into a huge debate about this because I don't care what people invest in, but here's why I believe you are missing the bigger picture.
The various virtual currencies are. First and foremost. Currencies. Their value, as much as it's based on anything rational, is at least partially being a liquid, transferable, CURRENCY. Those thinking well. It's just an investment for me. Are missing that the overall value of any of this stuff, to the extent it has any, is based largely on being an unregulated currency.
Ok. Why? I believe much of it is totally irrational, but to the extent there are rational use currency concepts to the value, a large part of it is unregulated transactions viewed as having anonymity. That's going to end. Additionally, it's value as a currency is going to be compromised both by administrative cost / burden and by short sale concepts applied to currency transactions. It's ability to function as a useful currency is fundamentally going to change. And that should impact the overall value, to the extent virtual currency value has ever been rational.
I am a very early adopter in the crypto world, and I completely understand the value of a digitally derived currency, and well as the value of distributed ledger technology (I. E. Blockchain). I was only trying to clarify specifically about the taxation of digital assets based on the comment regarding the IRS, that's all. I'm not here to argue the merits of the tech or its applications, or try to persuade anyone to invest.
[QUOTE=JTown74;5919456]I don't want to get into a huge debate about this because I don't care what people invest in, but here's why I believe you are missing the bigger picture.
The various virtual currencies are. First and foremost. Currencies. Their value, as much as it's based on anything rational, is at least partially being a liquid, transferable, CURRENCY. Those thinking well. It's just an investment for me. Are missing that the overall value of any of this stuff, to the extent it has any, is based largely on being an unregulated currency.
Ok. Why? I believe much of it is totally irrational, but to the extent there are rational use currency concepts to the value, a large part of it is unregulated transactions viewed as having anonymity. That's going to end. Additionally, it's value as a currency is going to be compromised both by administrative cost / burden and by short sale concepts applied to currency transactions. It's ability to function as a useful currency is fundamentally going to change. And that should impact the overall value, to the extent virtual currency value has ever been rational.[/QUOTE]
The best take on cryptocurrency I've seen is that it basically is a pyramid scheme. The people who get in early make money when others join in,
and they make money when people after them join in, etc. It works until it doesn't.
It's not a Ponzi scheme, in which someone is selling you something and then selling it also to others to bring in funds so you'll earn dividends/profit on your investment.
A Ponzi is run by one person or central outfit, which depends on bringing in more and more people/money. Whereas cryptocurrency doesn't have that central figure.
What's happening now is that the amount of new, "real" fiat (meaning government issued) currency going in is decreasing. The base of the pyramid is getting smaller, and the people at the top
are dropping down. And when they see they are dropping down, they get out at a profit, leaving those who got in late holding the bag.
I invested in 100 shares of Coinbase, thinking that as an outfit for buying and selling crypto, it would make money no matter what. Not really, it seems, and when crypto is viewed as a pryamid scheme,
it makes sense. For whatever reasons, people are not ponying to put new money into crypto, so the clearinghouses are losing revenue, as is everyone who got in late. Lesson learned.
Sure, as a currency for doing some convenient transactions, why not? Just don't plan on making any money. It's a gamble that depends on factors beyond anyone's control, and the odds
are totally impossible to calculate.
[QUOTE=JTown74;5919456]I don't want to get into a huge debate about this because I don't care what people invest in, but here's why I believe you are missing the bigger picture.
The various virtual currencies are. First and foremost. Currencies. Their value, as much as it's based on anything rational, is at least partially being a liquid, transferable, CURRENCY. Those thinking well. It's just an investment for me. Are missing that the overall value of any of this stuff, to the extent it has any, is based largely on being an unregulated currency.
Ok. Why? I believe much of it is totally irrational, but to the extent there are rational use currency concepts to the value, a large part of it is unregulated transactions viewed as having anonymity. That's going to end. Additionally, it's value as a currency is going to be compromised both by administrative cost / burden and by short sale concepts applied to currency transactions. It's ability to function as a useful currency is fundamentally going to change. And that should impact the overall value, to the extent virtual currency value has ever been rational.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HopinJetta;5918892]No this girl has dark haired from New Jersey. Big tits and nice body. She stood out on the ave. Just came into town and had her stuff taken. Wasn't an addict just a drug user, at least when I met her. So no abbesses. Maybe a month or so ago.[/QUOTE]Kay was definite one of the better picks out there. Tall, dark hair, medium build. Almost like a wonder woman type but a bit thicker build. She would often wear a thick dark jacket. She would also often be accompanied by her short round friend who did not work (or couldn't work because no one found her attractive).
I wouldn't call her boobs "big" but they are definitely a nice shape and size. And fun to play with. She also had a nice attitude and a sweet puss. BJ also rocked.
She was definitely a user. It was less obvious when she first arrived on the ave but towards the end, she openly admitted to me about using. Towards the end, she would also have a bit dirtier hygiene. Also, you could also see her associating with some of the users toward allegheny.
Sadly, I think she maybe taking a break from the ave. One day I saw her in a very rough emotional state being consoled by a old pale bald dude in a black hyundai. I'm guessing he was someone close to her like family or close monger and I also guess that she might have had a few bad experiences. I haven't seen her roaming around since. The last two times I spotted her, someone scooped her up before I could get to her.
Unfortunately a higher than normal percentage of SW I've been pickup have been bleeding out of their puss. Either a bunch of them are getting their time of the month together or there is some other biological issue that made them have those symptoms.
And of course they say "oh, it must have just started" and play dumb even though they try to avoid BJ after FS and would want to wipe of their cooch before starting.
[QUOTE=BeefNoodleSoup;5920121]Kay was definite one of the better picks out there. Tall, dark hair, medium build. Almost like a wonder woman type but a bit thicker build. She would often wear a thick dark jacket. She would also often be accompanied by her short round friend who did not work (or couldn't work because no one found her attractive).
I wouldn't call her boobs "big" but they are definitely a nice shape and size. And fun to play with. She also had a nice attitude and a sweet puss. BJ also rocked.
She was definitely a user. It was less obvious when she first arrived on the ave but towards the end, she openly admitted to me about using. Towards the end, she would also have a bit dirtier hygiene. Also, you could also see her associating with some of the users toward allegheny.
Sadly, I think she maybe taking a break from the ave. One day I saw her in a very rough emotional state being consoled by a old pale bald dude in a black hyundai. I'm guessing he was someone close to her like family or close monger and I also guess that she might have had a few bad experiences. I haven't seen her roaming around since. The last two times I spotted her, someone scooped her up before I could get to her.[/QUOTE]Different Kay. This girl had only been a week on the ave. When I met her. Didn't know where anything was. Was walking to Aramingo Walmart to pick up some clothes because all her shit was taken when I met her so I drove her there. She was also complaining about the tranq that they put in the drugs out here. Her tits were also massive. I could tell this girl was absolutely new but I doubt she would hang around there too long. Probably found a boyfriend or pimp or found a way back to NJ.
In l. A. All the streetwalkers are melanin enhanced and only fuckable by the blind.
This one looks like a nice rough fuck, like she can really go at it, especially if she is on a good laced with meth hit of fennie.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr125Buj-bM&t=226s[/URL]
Compare this quality to the drek in Los Angeles:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0ApqA1s9f0&t=324s[/URL]
[QUOTE=PriscillaM;5920471]In l. A. All the streetwalkers are melanin enhanced and only fuckable by the blind.
This one looks like a nice rough fuck, like she can really go at it, especially if she is on a good laced with meth hit of fennie.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr125Buj-bM&t=226s[/URL]
Compare this quality to the drek in Los Angeles:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0ApqA1s9f0&t=324s[/URL][/QUOTE]What part of LA is bad?
I thought the West Coast was supposed to have all the best Wh0 res?
Maybe I'm confusing it with Las Vegas?
This post is gross.
[QUOTE=PriscillaM;5920471]In l. A. All the streetwalkers are melanin enhanced and only fuckable by the blind.
This one looks like a nice rough fuck, like she can really go at it, especially if she is on a good laced with meth hit of fennie.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr125Buj-bM&t=226s[/URL]
Compare this quality to the drek in Los Angeles:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0ApqA1s9f0&t=324s[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PriscillaM;5920471]In l. A. All the streetwalkers are melanin enhanced and only fuckable by the blind.
This one looks like a nice rough fuck, like she can really go at it, especially if she is on a good laced with meth hit of fennie.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr125Buj-bM&t=226s[/URL]
Compare this quality to the drek in Los Angeles:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0ApqA1s9f0&t=324s[/URL][/QUOTE]IDK about LA having "drek". I was out LA last summer and rode thru Figueroa. It was waaaaaaay better looking girls than here in Philly. And listcrawler in LA had way better options too.