Printable View
[QUOTE=Style20;7256667]Here's the worse part about LEO having the number. If the number is connected to a real email, they can find your info.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.boston.com/news/crime/2025/04/15/auburn-police-officer-caught-in-child-sex-sting-operation/?p1=hp_featurestack[/URL]
More stings with fake ads.
[QUOTE=Mattis1775;7256563]What worries me is that all the clients that reached out to this phony ad, LEO has your info. Even if you didn't take the bait, they can con up some BS just to try and charge you with something. Who knows what other bogus ads they have on LC, STG, amongst others.[/QUOTE]I'm no lawyer, but I believe merely responding to an ad to obtain sex for money is solicitation.
But I've never understood how these stings aren't entrapment. There was never a girl. The whole thing was make believe. There was never any possibility that the acts would ever take place. In reality, it was two adults role playing.
[QUOTE=EarlSandwich;7260831]I'm no lawyer, but I believe merely responding to an ad to obtain sex for money is solicitation.
But I've never understood how these stings aren't entrapment. There was never a girl. The whole thing was make believe. There was never any possibility that the acts would ever take place. In reality, it was two adults role playing.[/QUOTE]I'm not a lawyer, but basically the threshold for entrapment is whether or not the cop has to push you to do the crime. If a cop offered to sell you drugs and you said yes, that's not entrapment. If the cop had to *convince* you to buy drugs, like pushing you to buy even after you said no a couple of times, that would be entrapment.
[QUOTE=EarlSandwich;7260831]I'm no lawyer, but I believe merely responding to an ad to obtain sex for money is solicitation.
But I've never understood how these stings aren't entrapment. There was never a girl. The whole thing was make believe. There was never any possibility that the acts would ever take place. In reality, it was two adults role playing.[/QUOTE]Not a lawyer. But my understanding is the crime has nothing to do with having sex. It is all about making arrangements to have sex for a fee.
[QUOTE=RugGuy;7263325]Just out of curiosity, has anyone gotten a std from protected sex with a provider?[/QUOTE]I honestly don't know how to fucking answer this. But if you're reading this in this thread, you already know what I'm going to say.
[QUOTE=AstroAndy;7285447]Not sure how you screwed the quotes up but the first post was by OldtimerMa:
The second post was my response to him:[/QUOTE]He didn't screw up the quotes, he did it intentionally. I guess he was implying that you and me are the same person.
I now have a pretty good idea who this fag Campervan is / was on his other accounts.
[QUOTE=DonBarzini;7289328]140 and 180 for BBFS? No details other than "nice ass". Based on her rates, odds are that Linda has grandchildren. Could you elaborate more on Linda's attributes? China attacks our website and we retaliate by inseminating their grannies, LOL.[/QUOTE]The dumb fuck WiseAss is back to doing what he likes to do — posting provocative bs, hoping to start the fight.
I will give you it this time, you degenerate piece of shit.
Linda is probably in her mid-40's. Not a granny by any stretch of imagination. She is chubby and not shaved down there, natural Bs (smaller ones). She gets super wet while going bare, so she is not for the small pee pee dudes like yourself, WiseAss. You most likely will not feel anything. You need to stick to fucking your boyfriend Steve.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;7249162]You are 100% wrong. Malanna is a Post Op. She has done a good job in scrubbing most of her cross posting of pictures to both profiles. Also, just because you personally got no "trans vibe" I will trust my own research on this one. In terms of trusted reviewers posting about her being a Post Op, this is from a well respected reviewer with a long and helpful posting history:
[I] Have seen Amanda / Nanda / Malana previously, prior to her SRS and wanted to see how she was doing and what type of experience was available with a beautiful post op girl. Will certainly repeat. ;-)[/I]
From same reviewer:
[I]After she got me good and ready put her in mish and slid into her new vagina. First post op experience for me[/I][/QUOTE]
So sorry to bust up your fantasy world. She's got a son who strongly resembles her. How do you explain that?
I don't give a shit what your "trusted reviewers" say.
[QUOTE=GMan9999;7297354]So sorry to bust up your fantasy world. She's got a son who strongly resembles her. How do you explain that?
I don't give a shit what your "trusted reviewers" say.[/QUOTE]Maybe she was the father? 😜.
[QUOTE=GMan9999;7297354]So sorry to bust up your fantasy world. She's got a son who strongly resembles her. How do you explain that?
I don't give a shit what your "trusted reviewers" say.[/QUOTE]I love it how Mongers stick up for these Hookers. Read several posts on this debate and this provider has been reviewed here and TER. Whether this person is pre / post / real or an alien from Mars, no one is complaining about the service. Come in, slam, bam, thank you, pay and leave. Have a nice day.
Vulva Nut, the dude from LA area, decided to come to the MA board and started lecturing our friend JonnGlobalCorp on how insufficiently specific his reports are. I got curious about this refined gentleman and looked at his recent board activity. Oh my, his anal retentiveness is off the chart — the dude is pathologically obsessed with this silliness about the detailed description of providers and lecturing board members on this non-stop. Below, you will see what he posted on this in May only! Besides that, he posted one real (kind of) review and a description of how he can not get his pee pee up and what he does to solve the problem. Amazingly worthless piece of shit.
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7300056]Glad you had a nice time. Her services sound great but we have no idea what she looks like.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7300055]Fine review in terms of your intentions and activities, MilfLoverr, but aside from a nice assed "Latina", you gave no description of the girl, at all.
Can you give a physical description of your provider? It really does matter to 99% of us here. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7295990]I'll be in Sacramento next week, nice to know about Pink Rose. But I have zero idea of what your provider looks like from your review. Can you just describe her?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7295502]Objective details describing your provider are always helpful, thanks. A lot of reviewers are more likely to list their activities than give useful, objective (not "sexy" or "hot"), details about a girl's looks and body. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7294152]
But as I recall those prior reviews were mostly value judgements, not objective descriptions. One person's "hot" or "amazing" is not a description, and I simply take those comments with grain of salt as you do. Just the facts ma'am.
However, "Natural B cups, pale, smooth skin, large, plump nipples", "EE cup breasts that sag low on a narrow frame", "lumpy man-made D cups with stretched flat areolas": these are more like descriptions.
But "banging" body "sexy" "bomb" ass etc- Thats just about the reviewer's attraction, not the girl herself.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7293889]My suggestion / post about descriptions was based on the review for Yoyo. I did in fact search whether Yoyo was reviewed in other reports recently and already described, and she was not. But had a brain fart and mistakenly wrote "Lola", not Yoyo as I meant. Unfortunately this obfuscated my suggestion that it helps all of us to describe the girl in detail.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7293227]
The general point is I'm not the only one here who benefits from descriptions of the provider. (Maybe there are some who don't care what the girl looks like, just what she does?)
Many/most of us use this board to decide exactly who to spend our money on, who is worth seeing, or our type physically.
Then, we want to know we got the right girl, to avoid bait and switch or the name game. Difficult without details.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7292482]Who is this Lola? 3 feet tall, 200 lbs? Grey hair, with a no-lip chicken skin pussy? Inverted nipples on E cups? You mean this Lola??
Many reviewers are poor with descriptions but in this particular review there are zero. Maybe an oversight or got truncated.
Objective, detailed descriptions of body under the clothes (shape, skin, nipples, pussy, etc). And of course face, hair, and figure.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7292377]Glad you had a good session.
You only said "nice" figure and "nice" rack. This could be hundreds of girls from the minimal description. Objective, detailed descriptions of bodies- under the clothes- are much more helpful to all of us.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7291736]For some reason, few reviewers make the small effort to give essential, objective, physical details on the particular provider they saw. Nipples, pussy, lips, clit, skin, hygiene, etc.
Essential, objective details. This is what we need to decide whether to see this provider, to distinguish among all the others.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7291616]Haven't been to this spot.
Interested but additional, objective descriptions would be helpful. Re nipples, lips, and clit?
Also did you daty? Bbj? Lacking enthusiasm?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7291590]Wish more reviewers would describe their provider's body and naughty bits w objective, physical details like this.
Got to get down there finally.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7281010]I know you're excited but OBJECTIVE detailed descriptions are much more helpful.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7280750]You noted your experience well, and I'm curious. But for obvious reasons a basic objective description of the girl is helpful to your fellow mongers, ie Tall, short, good looking? Breasts and pussy description? Hair, age?
Although "slim" with "arm tattoos", by your review she also could have been bald, EE floppy tits, shaved pussy with no lips, with rough skin and bad breath.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=VulvaNut;7279582]Sounds like a nice time, but your review gives zero idea of this woman's appearance.
I wish more reviewers would spend just two freakin minutes adding an objective physical description of the provider they saw. Face, body (bonus points for naughty bits-- nipple and clit size, etc), hair style, skin tone, shape / proportions. Does it not matter to some of you?? My apologies if you are going in there with a service dog and a cane.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CamperVan10;7310178]Having trouble recalling; is this the really attractive natural, sweet looking girl formerly from Eastern?
Or, is it the smaller skinny girl with lots of tattoos, still hot and a total spinner, just not the wholesome type, formerly at Eastern?
I think Nicole was the one with many tattoos and Nico the natural beauty, but quite a few years ago so don't remember.[/QUOTE]Oh, hi there! How's it going, CrazyCrouton?
[QUOTE=OldtimerMa;7285476]He didn't screw up the quotes, he did it intentionally. I guess he was implying that you and me are the same person.
I now have a pretty good idea who this fag Campervan is / was on his other accounts.[/QUOTE]No. I screwed the quotes up, Astro Andy is correct, as he often is. No, not intentional. No implication of any kind.
This started because of 558, the old provider Coco there. I never stated she did not do FS, or any L3, L2, etc.
I personally only went for L1 hand work with her, but it was obvious she took a pounding, often. My experience was only hand action and it was exceptional, she treated me very well.
That is all. Nothing else to misinterpret. Do what you want with it.
[QUOTE=ZackLawrence;7331099]Maybe let us know where these 20 something's are? Isn't that the point of the board?
As far as no oil I suspect that a large amount of customers ask for no oil so they don't need to deal with any questions at home. Also a large number of customers skip the massage as well so they probably just go dry by assuming.[/QUOTE]Ehhhh these spots are already busy enough to where I've been turned away the last thing I want to do is turn them in grand central and have LEO get curious.
[QUOTE=MikeAndKit;7332769]Ehhhh these spots are already busy enough to where I've been turned away the last thing I want to do is turn them in grand central and have LEO get curious.[/QUOTE]WTF kind of a response is this? You can't be serious.