I'm in the same boat as Todd. I'm just looking for as an attractive and young (20-25) girl as possible. Being nearly 40, I just can't do it on my own anymore unfortunately. And a GFE makes it even better.
Printable View
I'm in the same boat as Todd. I'm just looking for as an attractive and young (20-25) girl as possible. Being nearly 40, I just can't do it on my own anymore unfortunately. And a GFE makes it even better.
Did it seem that Crissy may have been MIA, or was it just me? I was finally able to meet with this delicious young lady back on the 15th. And as always she treated me right. Never a clock watcher, great personality and very into pleasing. What can I say? I enjoyed another moment with a gorgeous gal and plan to again.
[QUOTE=Texan707]Callie is posting here because she wants to cash from the her internal USG reviews and folks she met who PRAISED her here. It simply means she is out of business and having tough times. What she offers and how she performs. Who knows. There are tons of other providers who don't even post her and having great business is simply because they are willing to go extra miles.[/QUOTE]Isn't it hard to make a comment on someone that you have never seen? Callie post ads on here because we accually have a forum where escorts can post ads and benifit from doing so.
It pisses me off when I see someone post a comment on someone that they never met. And that have more 411 post than real ones. There are alot of us that do praise her and visit her regularly because she is an awsome provider. Her prices are great for what you get for it. Not that you would know?
For one she has a great body, all her teeth, wonderful personality, beautiful face, and she doesn't have to walk up and down the street. So I my opinion if you haven't seen a provider don't insinuate your dumbass comments.
Anyone have any information on her ?
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyRubs/_how_would_you_like_2_at_once_/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1702931[/url]
I find it interesting that you and Randyman have mentioned Callie's name doing your mundane prattle in the same posting about SW's and chat line girls when you have not even meet this lady. And also stating that she was on the lower end of Escorts. She is far from that. Those who have been around should remember earlier this year when she planned to increase her donations? What a furor this caused. Why? Because we were spoiled by having such a pleasant, attractive and quality provider at an affordable price. But she relented and we are fortunate that she kept her old rates in place for us. And by no means think that she only posts here, is out of business or couldn't command higher prices. She posts on other major quality sites where she has quite the following of clients. I would suggest one does their reseach before trashing a provider's name they haven't had first hand experience with!
Wingman
[QUOTE=Texan707]Callie is posting here because she wants to cash from the her internal USG reviews and folks she met who PRAISED her here. It simply means she is out of business and having tough times. What she offers and how she performs. Who knows. There are tons of other providers who don't even post her and having great business is simply because they are willing to go extra miles.[/QUOTE]
I called her today and got VM. Cute voice, will keep trying. Thanks Bro !
[QUOTE=Sincy Assman]Sorry guys the rate was. 80 I forgot to mention that, happy hunting.[/QUOTE]
Everyone needs to take a minute and read other peoples post and reviews from all angles before jumping down their throat. I believe what Randyman meant when talking about Callie was her pricing was on the lower end and I am so thankful for that even though I have not seen her yet, but do intend too. Some members are so quick to pounce on someone.
I have been following with some interest the running debate between the faction that likes cheaper SWs and those who like higher-end (and more expensive) escorts. This debate (and other versions of it) has troubled me at times too.
I think that there is some degree of irritation between these groups because:
1.) SW clients fear on some level that that escort clients are going to drive up prices
2.) Escort clients fear that SW clients are going to drive down "quality" (defined here as looks).
* * *
I know where you both are coming from. I've jumped into similar frays myself. A few years ago I complained on the other boards about the overwhelming presence of middle-aged women in the Ohio hobby market. I thought that the 40-year-old providers were somehow "crowding out" the younger ladies. (I was also a bit peeved at the mature lady lovers who didn't join me in clamoring for hot young chicks.)
What I realize today (now that we are awash in younger ladies!) is that it took time for younger women (as a demographic) to find the escorting scene. There are still just as many older women on the various boards. But now there are young ones too.
* * *
Similarly, the escort clients here aren't going to drive up SW prices. If SWs raised their prices to escort levels tomorrow, we (escort clients) wouldn't patronize them---and neither would the normal SW clients. So SWs could never drive their prices up like that. The market wouldn't support it.
On the other hand, as Randyman acknowledged, beauty comes with a premium. Attractive, hot young cheerleader types will never work at SW prices. They fundamentally serve a different client base. Escort clients like myself want young, fit, and attractive women---without the rough edges that SWs inevitably have. And we are willing to pay more than $.5 for it. These ladies will find the hobby (albeit in smaller numbers) and will want to be compensated at a higher level.
* * *
BTW, have been on the *other* side of this issue too. Check out Nicole Beckam's site. She is a true covergirl---and the entry fee is $1,000. I like Nicole Beckam; but I'm not going to pay $1,000, unless I hit the lottery tomorrow.
I don't worry that Nicole (and the few guys who patronize her) will drive up escort prices. The market at that price level is *very* small, and it can only support a few ladies. (She is virtually the only lady who has lasted in Ohio at that rate, and she is truly a 10+.)
*********
Moving forward, I think that the hobby is going to segment itself even more, based on looks, performance, and the disposable income level of the clientele involved. A lot of personal preference factors are involved here, and there will never be a "one size fits all" model for the market.
I couldn't agree more.
[QUOTE=Todd Cincy]I have been following with some interest the running debate between the faction that likes cheaper SWs and those who like higher-end (and more expensive) escorts. This debate (and other versions of it) has troubled me at times too.
I think that there is some degree of irritation between these groups because:
1.) SW clients fear on some level that that escort clients are going to drive up prices
2.) Escort clients fear that SW clients are going to drive down "quality" (defined here as looks).
* * *
I know where you both are coming from. I've jumped into similar frays myself. A few years ago I complained on the other boards about the overwhelming presence of middle-aged women in the Ohio hobby market. I thought that the 40-year-old providers were somehow "crowding out" the younger ladies. (I was also a bit peeved at the mature lady lovers who didn't join me in clamoring for hot young chicks.)
What I realize today (now that we are awash in younger ladies!) is that it took time for younger women (as a demographic) to find the escorting scene. There are still just as many older women on the various boards. But now there are young ones too.
* * *
Similarly, the escort clients here aren't going to drive up SW prices. If SWs raised their prices to escort levels tomorrow, we (escort clients) wouldn't patronize them---and neither would the normal SW clients. So SWs could never drive their prices up like that. The market wouldn't support it.
On the other hand, as Randyman acknowledged, beauty comes with a premium. Attractive, hot young cheerleader types will never work at SW prices. They fundamentally serve a different client base. Escort clients like myself want young, fit, and attractive women---without the rough edges that SWs inevitably have. And we are willing to pay more than $.5 for it. These ladies will find the hobby (albeit in smaller numbers) and will want to be compensated at a higher level.
* * *
BTW, have been on the *other* side of this issue too. Check out Nicole Beckam's site. She is a true covergirl---and the entry fee is $1,000. I like Nicole Beckam; but I'm not going to pay $1,000, unless I hit the lottery tomorrow.
I don't worry that Nicole (and the few guys who patronize her) will drive up escort prices. The market at that price level is *very* small, and it can only support a few ladies. (She is virtually the only lady who has lasted in Ohio at that rate, and she is truly a 10+.)
*********
Moving forward, I think that the hobby is going to segment itself even more, based on looks, performance, and the disposable income level of the clientele involved. A lot of personal preference factors are involved here, and there will never be a "one size fits all" model for the market.[/QUOTE]
I don't know about anyone else, but I truly appreciate these debates.
Very informative.
It is so good to see both sides of the philosophical dilemma.
Thanks, guys, for eloquently stating your positions.
Does anybody have any info?
[N][A][U][G][H][T][Y][*][G][I][R][L] JUST 18! (CinCinnati....Nky......)
[url]http://cincinnati.craigslist.org/ads/1528236549.html[/url]
My little Korean friend Kim is back in town. I saw her last week and again today. She now has an incall location in a motel and a new local phone number.
She's a tiny little thing at 4'10" and under 100 lbs. Her rates are $ for a half and $.5 for a full hour. She's not a clock watcher. She's not a beauty queen and her service is middle of the pack but she has a very friendly personality.
She is 100% Korean but raised in the US and thus has no accent. She's not currently advertising anywhere.
If you are a truly contributing member of this board and have contributed actual reviews then PM me for contact info. She is very paranoid of LEO and has requested that her number not be given to non-contributing members.
[QUOTE=Irishmut]I"ve seen both sides of Nicole. She read me the riot act once on the phone, never letting me get a word in edgewise. I've also had a great time visiting with her. I'm not sure what specifically sets her off, but you sure don't trip that trigger![/QUOTE]What this snakeeyez fails to mention irish, is he contacted me under snakeyez and his refs didn't suit my standards and then contacted me under another. From snakeeyez have numerous pestering emails. He posted bad review eventhough he never saw me. And you irish, set an appointment, then no showed no called, saying your phone died. I have standards and make my preferences known, I prefer to only see polite, considerate, thoughtful gentlemen. Anyone that has seen me knows I give great service as my reviews state, the one's taht have actually given full disclosure, proper references, and didn't try to be sneaky and dishonest like snakeeyez, whom again never saw me
Contacted from snakeeyez and I wouldn't set with so then from another name with refs from 2007.
You apologized irish for your no call no show and I set with you and we had a great time!
[QUOTE=Randyman1501]Holy crap, I realized this is the same Nicole Chase who wants guys to give their employers' name and phone numbers on her "RSVP form."
And she does crap like this. Amazing. I'm sure this makes the guys who actually gave their employers' names and phone numbers to her feel really great.
Not that you should have to read on a message board that giving your employment details to a ho is a bad idea. But, well, it's a bad idea.[/QUOTE]Many providers provide choice of employment verification or provider refs, depends on one's personal preference, do research on the matter and then make an informed statement. Look at the source as well.