Printable View
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5713378]M. Aria, Allie.
[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Berry, Helena, Angel. (WLA). (MW).
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Berry, Helena, Angel. (WLA). . MW.
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] Jenny [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Allie.[/QUOTE]SFK Allie an M's Alie the same girl. Why no reviews on Allie from SFK? He was amazing beautiful.
[QUOTE=CarInPark12;5714073]SFK Allie an M's Alie the same girl. Why no reviews on Allie from SFK? He was amazing beautiful.[/QUOTE]She ask not to post anymore reviews.
[QUOTE=CarInPark12;5714073]SFK Allie an M's Alie the same girl. Why no reviews on Allie from SFK? He was amazing beautiful.[/QUOTE]If it's the same girl, why does there need to be reviews under both agencies? She has like 92 reviews already. What other intel are you looking for at this point? LOL.
[QUOTE=LandOfKGirls;5714019]Seems the PKL bookers are off along with about half the stable there. Total radio silence from them today.[/QUOTE]That's strange, they haven't updated their HX ads since yesterday, hopefully all is well.
Anyone know any K-girls with trimmed, landing strip or a natural Bush happening? Or are they all shaved and waxed?
[QUOTE=CreamInside;5714172]That's strange, they haven't updated their HX ads since yesterday, hopefully all is well.[/QUOTE]Probably a team building event at the Getty, looking for ideas for new positions in the artwork.
[QUOTE=LandOfKGirls;5714019]Seems the PKL bookers are off along with about half the stable there. Total radio silence from them today.[/QUOTE]What booker are you texting? One of them off today? I checked to confirm with booker Angela and they have 4 working. Eunji / Helena no times but Berry / Angel had night times.
Jean / Daisy off. She said Jean back next week and Daisy in a few weeks.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5714225]What booker are you texting? One of them off today? I checked to confirm with booker Angela and they have 4 working. Eunji / Helena no times but Berry / Angel had night times.
Jean / Daisy off. She said Jean back next week and Daisy in a few weeks.[/QUOTE]I asked for time with Eunji but since she was apparently booked I guess the reply was to not reply.
[QUOTE=CreamInside;5714170]If it's the same girl, why does there need to be reviews under both agencies? She has like 92 reviews already. What other intel are you looking for at this point? LOL.[/QUOTE]I'm with him, that 93rd review is priceless, makes all the difference in deciding to see her. The other 92 are obviously all fake LOL.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5714225]What booker are you texting? One of them off today? I checked to confirm with booker Angela and they have 4 working. Eunji / Helena no times but Berry / Angel had night times.
Jean / Daisy off. She said Jean back next week and Daisy in a few weeks.[/QUOTE]PKL had three working today. Eunji was off. Helena was booked early and Berry and Angel were booked early and had only later appointments available.
[QUOTE=CarInPark12;5714073]SFK Allie an M's Alie the same girl. Why no reviews on Allie from SFK? He was amazing beautiful.[/QUOTE]Girls are reviewed. Not agencies. It's the girl you want to know about.
[QUOTE=Fantic5916;5713964]She is in San Jose area. I do not think it is a vacation.[/QUOTE]There is increased movement between NorCal and SoCal with the rates becoming even. Viola has la’s Nicole (Nicole) Cutie (Liza) and Cherry (Fendi). Then CGLA has Jennie and Amelia, which came from Viola as Luvlee and Nala. Nala still listed on vacation on their site. Luvlee got taken off when she left for LA.
I don't think connection between the org as Viola run's Viola but seems like one girl is recruiting up and down.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5714295]There is increased movement between NorCal and SoCal with the rates becoming even. Viola has las Nicole (Nicole) Cutie (Liza) and Cherry (Fendi). Then CGLA has Jennie and Amelia, which came from Viola as Luvlee and Nala. Nala still listed on vacation on their site. Luvlee got taken off when she left for LA.
I don't think connection between the org as Viola run's Viola but seems like one girl is recruiting up and down.[/QUOTE]No connect between orgs. I talked to Viola recently.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5714295]There is increased movement between NorCal and SoCal with the rates becoming even. Viola has las Nicole (Nicole) Cutie (Liza) and Cherry (Fendi). Then CGLA has Jennie and Amelia, which came from Viola as Luvlee and Nala. Nala still listed on vacation on their site. Luvlee got taken off when she left for LA.
I don't think connection between the org as Viola run's Viola but seems like one girl is recruiting up and down.[/QUOTE]Damn, if you can keep up with this movement I'll bet you can also solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded.
Anyone seen CGLA Seri? Are the pics real? Pics looked familiar but I don't recall where I have seen them.
So I tried Helena out of curiosity, was not impressed at all.
Face, very average round face, she reminded me of JAV star "Hikari Sena" but rounder with very little make up.
Body, similar to Nicole but more athletic with bigger ass but her tits was firm man made small C, kind spread apart but not as far apart as Angle from same org, did not like to be sucked said too sensitive, small hour glass shape, slim with curve you can say.
Attitude, playful at the beginning but once we start the action, very business like and takes control of what she want or don't want. I try to foreplay but she skipped it said nip too sensitive, she went right to BBBJ and wanted to fuck right after.
I got some DATY out of her but mostly acting from her part just to get to the main event. Overall session just feel rushed and business ish, tried hard and wanted me to cum at 35 min dot, I felt getting disconnected so I gave up instead of lasting too long. She went for a shower right after while still in session, after that we just cuddle till hour is up.
Service, only good thing I can say is good BBBJ. That's all, everything else feel mechanical and business one and done.
Overall: Each to their own but so many others out there for 320 with a lot better service, this is one and done, will def not repeat.
To be honest, I don't know why the hype.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5713284]Oh. Mystery solved.
Thanks bro.[/QUOTE]Glad that was the correct hazel.
I honestly have lost track of all the girls with the carousel of name changes. They won. I gave up.
Looks like she's landed in the OC and is now charging a super premium at $4. Crazy! She wasn't worth it at $3 when she was with M. She's going by Klorix with booker Gray and Chloe with LAKangels.
[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_oc&wr_id=700[/URL]
Girl going by Mika on LAKangels for WLA is using IG model seon_h_e pics. Anyone willing to TTOFT you've been warned.
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;5714662]Girl going by Mika on LAKangels for WLA is using IG model seon_h_e pics. Anyone willing to TTOFT you've been warned.[/QUOTE]Fake pics getting out of hand, hard to keep track and very high risk of seeing someone you already saw before but re-branded, hate that.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5714295]There is increased movement between NorCal and SoCal with the rates becoming even. Viola has las Nicole (Nicole) Cutie (Liza) and Cherry (Fendi). Then CGLA has Jennie and Amelia, which came from Viola as Luvlee and Nala. Nala still listed on vacation on their site. Luvlee got taken off when she left for LA.
I don't think connection between the org as Viola run's Viola but seems like one girl is recruiting up and down.[/QUOTE]Is the Bay Area increasing their prices or implementing an upcharge to stay competitive or are they still relying on "volume" having girls booked to see like 13 customers everyday?
Anyone had a chance to fill up this new semen demon or recognize her?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%ED%95%9C%EB%82%98[/URL]
Don't seem to be getting any hits on the reverse image search, would love to fill this one up if pics are real.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%85%B8%EC%95%84[/URL]
[QUOTE=Pyhan83;5714661]Looks like she's landed in the OC and is now charging a super premium at $4. Crazy! She wasn't worth it at $3 when she was with M. She's going by Klorix with booker Gray and Chloe with LAKangels.
[URL]https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_oc&wr_id=700[/URL][/QUOTE]She did not even worth $250.
What a name, Klorix! Maybe she should have called herself Clorox instead to be more catchy.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;5714626]So I tried Helena out of curiosity, was not impressed at all.
Face, very average round face, she reminded me of JAV star "Hikari Sena" but rounder with very little make up.
Body, similar to Nicole but more athletic with bigger ass but her tits was firm man made small C, kind spread apart but not as far apart as Angle from same org, did not like to be sucked said too sensitive, small hour glass shape, slim with curve you can say.
Attitude, playful at the beginning but once we start the action, very business like and takes control of what she want or don't want. I try to foreplay but she skipped it said nip too sensitive, she went right to BBBJ and wanted to fuck right after.
I got some DATY out of her but mostly acting from her part just to get to the main event. Overall session just feel rushed and business ish, tried hard and wanted me to cum at 35 min dot, I felt getting disconnected so I gave up instead of lasting too long. She went for a shower right after while still in session, after that we just cuddle till hour is up.
Service, only good thing I can say is good BBBJ. That's all, everything else feel mechanical and business one and done..[/QUOTE]LOL. Thank you for your fearless and Honest review.
Just eliminated her from my list also.
[QUOTE=Kakashiz;5714767]Is the Bay Area increasing their prices or implementing an upcharge to stay competitive or are they still relying on "volume" having girls booked to see like 13 customers everyday?[/QUOTE]A combination but more volume based. Prices are 260-280. A few orgs raised this week to 280. The popular ones are still 260. Most of the girls that go up are wanting the full schedules. Nicole told someone specifically she was staying because she was busier up there. She wasn't slow here so I would say she wanted to be much busier for less money.
M. Aria, Allie.
[URL]https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/[/URL] Eunji, Berry, Helena, Angel. (WLA). (MW).
[URL]http://www.kgla.net/[/URL] Eunji, Berry, Helena, Angel. (WLA). . MW.
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL].
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Allie.
[QUOTE=CreamInside;5714776]Don't seem to be getting any hits on the reverse image search, would love to fill this one up if pics are real.
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/%EB%85%B8%EC%95%84[/URL][/QUOTE]Nice try whoever gave cgla booker these fakes. Instagram models getting their pics ripped off.
Model name Uyussi.
Search Instagram at wxxyu_c.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5715234]A combination but more volume based. Prices are 260-280. A few orgs raised this week to 280. The popular ones are still 260. Most of the girls that go up are wanting the full schedules. Nicole told someone specifically she was staying because she was busier up there. She wasn't slow here so I would say she wanted to be much busier for less money.[/QUOTE]The house fee in Bay Area is lower, so the girl's cut is exactly the same. And Bay Area customers are known to be less demanding and more polite.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5715303]Nice try whoever gave cgla booker these fakes. Instagram models getting their pics ripped off.
Model name Uyussi.
Search Instagram at wxxyu_c.[/QUOTE]I wonder why customers don't ***** them out for using fake pics. This shit ain't cheap.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5710961]Lovely went by Darlina at PKL just a few months ago. She worked in NorCal as Jennifer with Bunnygirls. She has worked other states over the last few years.
Those stats are way off. She is closer to 55-56. Slender figure and natural B cups. Not much butt but has kept up with her body for her age. One of those girls that can keep good bod because height.[/QUOTE]Hey. Thanks for the info. There was a "Lovely" who worked out of "language of love" in Austin a few years back, that was a serious ATF candidate. Met at the door with DFK, non stop, with multi-pops encouraged. The girl was a machine, and not afraid to show it. Wondering if this is the same Lovely from Austin. I know the current pics are not even close, but this is an accurate one, from about 4-5 years back ([URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lovely-escort-austin-439510[/URL]#erotic). Is this the same girl, now working LA?
[QUOTE=Jeff1976;5715464]Hey. Thanks for the info. There was a "Lovely" who worked out of "language of love" in Austin a few years back, that was a serious ATF candidate. Met at the door with DFK, non stop, with multi-pops encouraged. The girl was a machine, and not afraid to show it. Wondering if this is the same Lovely from Austin. I know the current pics are not even close, but this is an accurate one, from about 4-5 years back ([URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lovely-escort-austin-439510[/URL]#erotic). Is this the same girl, now working LA?[/QUOTE]I don't think. Lovely was called Red in Dallas. She has been using that current set for a while now since norcals days. Used a slightly different set when she worked at bunnygirls but not the ones from the monkey link.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5715479]I don't think. Lovely was called Red in Dallas. She has been using that current set for a while now since norcals days. Used a slightly different set when she worked at bunnygirls but not the ones from the monkey link.[/QUOTE]I agree, not the same girl. Red may have used Lovely at LOL (not sure), but she's currently in NorCal as Kira. The Lovely currently in LA is known as Maple in Dallas. Red / Kira is an insatiable machine like Jeff has said. I haven't seen Maple / Lovely yet.
[QUOTE=Jack926;5715078]LOL. Thank you for your fearless and Honest review.
Just eliminated her from my list also.[/QUOTE]I saw Helena for a second time this past week and the difference between my first visit (during her first week here) and now is pretty startling.
Absolutely no DFK, which is a major bummer.
Very tentative during DATY.
Spent too much with her piston-style BJ, which is good but isn't even close to Ara's magnificent BJ or even Viki's DT.
CG is still good, the highlight of the session.
Like others have reported, she has a lot of stubble below the waist.
Last, she spent a lot of time gone from the room after CIP. She probably was on her phone or doing some other time killing crap; didn't inquire when she returned.
320/50, CIP x 1. No more Helena for me. Back to M and SFK for now.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5715303]Nice try whoever gave cgla booker these fakes. Instagram models getting their pics ripped off.
Model name Uyussi.
Search Instagram at wxxyu_c.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the save, which search are you using for your reverse image searches?
Hmm I wonder what her issue is or what has arisen where now there's this change in her. I've seen her too when she initially started but I haven't had a chance to make a revisit this week. She seemed genuinely interested in being popular and service orientated with us horndogs based on her service and attitude. She would ask who else was popular and what type of service the other girl provided etc etc. I do admit daty was limited with her but there was no issues with BJ or going to pound town on her. If she caught the gps bug or has changed her attitude and demeanor then that is truly awful news to her.
[QUOTE=NObserver;5715884]I saw Helena for a second time this past week and the difference between my first visit (during her first week here) and now is pretty startling.
Absolutely no DFK, which is a major bummer.
Very tentative during DATY.
Spent too much with her piston-style BJ, which is good but isn't even close to Ara's magnificent BJ or even Viki's DT.
CG is still good, the highlight of the session.
Like others have reported, she has a lot of stubble below the waist.
Last, she spent a lot of time gone from the room after CIP. She probably was on her phone or doing some other time killing crap; didn't inquire when she returned.
320/50, CIP x 1. No more Helena for me. Back to M and SFK for now.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CreamInside;5716001]Thanks for the save, which search are you using for your reverse image searches?[/QUOTE]Always use Tinyeye first. If no hits then use Yandex. It searches similar images so you might have to dig. Eventually if fake it leads to pornmodels or Instagram.
[QUOTE=UnassumingGuy;5715634]I agree, not the same girl. Red may have used Lovely at LOL (not sure), but she's currently in NorCal as Kira. The Lovely currently in LA is known as Maple in Dallas. Red / Kira is an insatiable machine like Jeff has said. I haven't seen Maple / Lovely yet.[/QUOTE]Yes damn, sorry. I knew it was a tree or something, lovely's name was Maple not red. LOL. I should double check next time. Red is NorCal Kira who worked at Bunnygirlsclub and for a while. Kira / Red tried to work in La at MKC but she isn't LA's style. A little too soft and older but that BBBJ is killer. Didn't catch on here.
[QUOTE=NObserver;5715884]I saw Helena for a second time this past week and the difference between my first visit (during her first week here) and now is pretty startling.
Absolutely no DFK, which is a major bummer.
Very tentative during DATY.
Spent too much with her piston-style BJ, which is good but isn't even close to Ara's magnificent BJ or even Viki's DT.
CG is still good, the highlight of the session.
Like others have reported, she has a lot of stubble below the waist.
Last, she spent a lot of time gone from the room after CIP. She probably was on her phone or doing some other time killing crap; didn't inquire when she returned.
320/50, CIP x 1. No more Helena for me. Back to M and SFK for now.[/QUOTE]That's weird she dfk I had to stop because not my thing since I know these chicks.
Slurping dudes. Told her no thanks. BJ I agree like a shotgun back and forth.
She gave me 2 pops maybe you did something wrong?
She didn't wash up after I cip her I pounded her like no tomorrow.
Then massage then second pop.
Boner is confused. I thought neither current Lovely / Maple nor Kira / Red were the real Lovely that Jeff1976 asked about. The only Lovely worthy of the name as you can see from her real pics about 3 years ago. I wouldn't call her too soft or older even now cause she was my favorite hottie too.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5716179]Yes damn, sorry. I knew it was a tree or something, lovely's name was Maple not red. LOL. I should double check next time. Red is NorCal Kira who worked at Bunnygirlsclub and for a while. Kira / Red tried to work in La at MKC but she isn't LA's style. A little too soft and older but that BBBJ is killer. Didn't catch on here.[/QUOTE]