"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;5771768]Fellows is it just me or are the prices the women on SA are charging is getting out of hand? I had one girl tell me $600 for 30 minutes and now most girls are asking $350- $600 with a time limit? What happened to the good old days? I am very close to cancelling my membership.

Fell free to share you comments.[/QUOTE]My sweat spot for SB on SA is between $150-$300 and I have six SB ladies in my regular rotation. There are a few hidden gems on SA, you just have to figure out how to mine for those gems. First time visit to a SB last week and she hosted me for FREE and fucked me silly for most of the night. She kept squirting and left a soggy mess on her bed. I think my stars were aligned just right on this one. Just watch out for the SB who prey on weird, dirty old men like us...lol

[QUOTE=ToySoldier;5224545]So, yesterday I was talking to a young friend of mine who is in his early 20's. He was talking about his job, which then led to talk about his girlfriend's "job". He asked me if I had ever heard of a website called Seeking Arrangements. I played dumb and got him to explain it and how it worked. He said that the clientele was a bunch of dirty old weird men who were desperate to talk to a good looking woman. Geeks, losers, and freaks he said. LOL.

He said that his girlfriend has a profile on there and makes anywhere from $12,000-$18,000 per MONTH! On there. And she has never fucked a single guy! He says that she just chats with them, plays nice, and lets them send her money. She will play along and maybe even meet for dinner or drinks but will take the boyfriend along who poses as her brother. He says she just teases and talks nice to them and many guys will simply send her money with the expectation that they will eventually get to bang her. $12-$18 K per month!

And no, I didn't ask him what her profile name was because I didn't want him to think I was a desperate old man. LOL.[/QUOTE]

Anyone experiencing issues logging in to the site? From a laptop browser, I can't get in. No issues from my phone.

[QUOTE=WheresMyMule;5777894]Anyone experiencing issues logging in to the site? From a laptop browser, I can't get in. No issues from my phone.[/QUOTE]YES, I was unable to log in today on my desktop. I am still unable to do so.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3609737f-fbc3-47c3-97ed-03a7b1e6e7b5[/URL]

She says unicorns do exist.

[QUOTE=StayActive;5778753][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3609737f-fbc3-47c3-97ed-03a7b1e6e7b5[/URL]

She says unicorns do exist.[/QUOTE]Unicorns may exist. But anytime the only thing in their About Me section is. Have you seen my wish list, that's a red flag for me.

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;5771768]Fellows is it just me or are the prices the women on SA are charging is getting out of hand? I had one girl tell me $600 for 30 minutes and now most girls are asking $350- $600 with a time limit? What happened to the good old days? I am very close to cancelling my membership.

Fell free to share you comments.[/QUOTE]So the founder / CEO of Seeking Arrangements, Brandon Wade, is marrying a 21 year old woman he met on the site. Apparently is waiving a prenup. It appears he will change the site to a more regular or normalize dating site with less of an emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby. Not sure if this is a delayed reaction to or due to pressure under FOSTA SESTA or if its the intoxication of 21 year old orifices on his middle aged self. Either way it appears the changes that have occurred will continue and not in a direction of the old days.

[QUOTE=JimStokes;5778900]So the founder / CEO of Seeking Arrangements, Brandon Wade, is marrying a 21 year old woman he met on the site. Apparently is waiving a prenup. It appears he will change the site to a more regular or normalize dating site with less of an emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby. Not sure if this is a delayed reaction to or due to pressure under FOSTA SESTA or if its the intoxication of 21 year old orifices on his middle aged self. Either way it appears the changes that have occurred will continue and not in a direction of the old days.[/QUOTE]What do you mean "less emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby". There doesn't seem to be any emphasis on it at all, at this point. And if you even mention PPM or allowance, you get banned.

But I suppose they could change it, for the search results, so less potential sugar babies could find the site. I need to get on that other one that is sometimes mentioned here, for a backup.

[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;5779265]What do you mean "less emphasis on sugar daddy / sugar baby". There doesn't seem to be any emphasis on it at all, at this point. And if you even mention PPM or allowance, you get banned.

But I suppose they could change it, for the search results, so less potential sugar babies could find the site. I need to get on that other one that is sometimes mentioned here, for a backup.[/QUOTE]The article I scanned, wasn't interested enough to read, is that supposedly Brandon Wade believed being "in love" was for poor people. From recollection, his started SA was based on the economics of older successful men looking for younger broke women and that male / female relations were fundamentally transaction based. The site has alway had accusations that it was an escort site. Hence why it policed the PPM or discussion of money exchanges. I don't know if he still hosts these but he used to hold meets and greets in several US cities. Not unlike what Pwhipped did in Atlanta a few years back. The jest of the article is that now that Wade is "in love" he wants to change the site to foster these type of relationships as opposed to economic / transaction based.

No disagreement on your take on SA. When I read the first post, it cause me to recollect this article. Now, it could be camouflage because he is or has been taking heat in the current sex trafficking dynamic that has changed the risks / costs of running SA. Or, he may be "in love". I will say if he is marrying a 21 year old with no prenup, he takes simp to a new level. May need to rebrand from [URL]Seeking.com[/URL] to [URL]simp.com[/URL].

[QUOTE=LoriTruck;5772805]Any one remember a lady named Shard? There was a post here about her but I can't seem to find and her SA profile looks like it was deactivated. Suposed to go see her next week.[/QUOTE]Yes but its been awhile.

[QUOTE=TallGuy3000;5778779]But anytime the only thing in their About Me section is. Have you seen my wish list, that's a red flag for me.[/QUOTE]That just means they didn't enter anything in that section. The "have you seen my wish list" text is added automatically by the website.

Just curious if the juice is worth the squeeze here: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/72e41ef3-8cac-45d6-a0f1-ac61a6c1eef1[/URL].

Has anyone actually uploaded more pictures on a profile when you sent a request for more? Just curious if all of those with only 1 picture are fake.

[QUOTE=Oily123;5781002]Has anyone actually uploaded more pictures on a profile when you sent a request for more? Just curious if all of those with only 1 picture are fake.[/QUOTE]What website is SA? Seek Arran?

[QUOTE=TallGuy3000;5778779]Unicorns may exist. But anytime the only thing in their About Me section is. Have you seen my wish list, that's a red flag for me.[/QUOTE]Fair point. GPS!

[QUOTE=GoneForGood97;5780957]Just curious if the juice is worth the squeeze here: [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/72e41ef3-8cac-45d6-a0f1-ac61a6c1eef1[/URL].[/QUOTE]Did she say how much?