LK is good, but the ladies are as young as OMG
So overall, I thought the service has been good with both, but I've noticed that the photos used with the LK models are usually very photoshopped or outdated. I feel like the women are usually late 30's and 40's, but advertised as in their 20's.
Overall, I feel like OMG has younger models like 20's and 30's and the photos are a little more accurate.
But the service is usually good with both agencies.
[QUOTE=TacoDiggler;6929716]I'm sure this has been discussed in the past. I've seen three OMG models so far and haven't been disappointed yet. How does LKATL typically compare? I was going to try LKATL after my first OMG experience but that was when all COMM went black for a couple days and then LKATL came back online with a password (would appreciate if someone could PM me so I can take a look).[/QUOTE]