I have one mutual friend with Reno Welcome.
Printable View
I have one mutual friend with Reno Welcome.
[QUOTE=Shuman;1265564]I have one mutual friend with Reno Welcome.[/QUOTE]Crook or not. You got to admit that is a great name. Sounds like a euphemism for what you DON'T from a provider. Did you get a happy ending? No man got the Reno Welcome instead. I'm going to be sore for a week.
[QUOTE=First Dude1968;1265695]Crook or not. You got to admit that is a great name. Sounds like a euphemism for what you DON'T from a provider. Did you get a happy ending? No man got the Reno Welcome instead. I'm going to be sore for a week.[/QUOTE]Best laugh I've had all weekend.
This should become proverbial in monger / provider circles. Or maybe the Reno 911 Welcome!
What you really want is the Las Vegas Welcome. Now that's a welcome, and it stays there!
[QUOTE=First Dude1968;1265695]Crook or not. You got to admit that is a great name. Sounds like a euphemism for what you DON'T from a provider. Did you get a happy ending? No man got the Reno Welcome instead. I'm going to be sore for a week.[/QUOTE]Maybe that was the sign he was born under.
[QUOTE=First Dude1968;1265695]Crook or not. You got to admit that is a great name. Sounds like a euphemism for what you DON'T from a provider. Did you get a happy ending? No man got the Reno Welcome instead. I'm going to be sore for a week.[/QUOTE]Maybe a "Reno Welcome" is a handjob in the style of pulling a slot machine arm! They keep pumping it until they see how much change comes pouring out.
[QUOTE=PinkFloyd;1265355]She's a relative newcomer to the Knoxville spinner scene, meaning new to the scene within the past four to five months. If that's not clear enough, its NOT Barbie and its not Alexis. Barbie and Alexis are both awesome! Just saw Barbie a few hours ago and she's as much fun and every bit as amazing as she was when I first saw her nearly a year ago.
That ought to make it pretty clear to anybody who reads these boards with any degree of regularity. Brunette. Charges extra for CIM. That's all the clues I got fellas.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Nickn3;1265304]What The Fuck?
Would some one please PM me with who got busted this time, Please?
What is the world comming to?
Nick[/QUOTE][blue]Greetings Everyone,
First, I have moved the posts regarding the forum's policies to the thread titled "Comment on Forum Rules Here"
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?340-Comment-on-Forum-Rules-Here[/url]
Second, the Forum's policy regarding the posting of mugshots, arrest reports and real names may be summarized as follows:
1. Members may NOT post mugshots or any individual's real name in the Forum at any time.
2. Members MAY post copies of the text of news reports regarding arrests provided that the names and street addresses of the arrestees are redacted.
3. Members MAY post links to law enforcement arrest websites [u]if the arrestee is charged with a felony level crime of violence against a client[/u]. Please note that this does NOT permit links to the arrestee's report when her pimp is the only one charged with an act of violence, and it does NOT permit links to the arrestee's report for other alleged criminal acts that are not allegedly perpertrated against a client (she kicks her dog, for example) of not actually violent, such as drug possession, parole violations, etc.
4. Members MAY post links to law enforcement arrest websites if said website report indicates tha the arrestee has been medically tested by the law enforcement authorities and they have determined that the arrestee [u]is infected with an STD[/u].
In short, you can post links to law enforcement arrest reports if the [u]provider[/u] was arrested for an act of violence [u]against a client[/u], or if the provider has a [u]medically certified STD[/u].
However, this Forum [u]does not support[/u] law enforcement strategies to embaress individuals who were arrested for their alleged involvement in commercial sex "crimes".
Get it?
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue]
[QUOTE=Admin;1266998][blue]Rules 'n Stuff[/blue][/QUOTE]I can agree with most of those rules, but I will give my opinions on the ones I don't agree with.
Statistically, you are much more likely to be busted in a sting operation by patronizing a provider who has just been arrested and released. The ability to post about the busts keeps our asses from being publicly shamed and / or arrested and keeps us out there patronizing other providers. In short, not being able to post about people getting busted means that there is less money going to providers, and is hurting them in the long run. As an example, if I get busted with Provider A because I didn't know they just got arrested and were playing 'lets make a deal! ' I will not have the funds or courage to patronize any more providers for a long while. If I had instead had known to avoid Provider A and went with Provider B, I wouldn't have gotten caught and would still be contributing to the local economy.
The information is public whenever they have been officially charged, typically with both mugshots and names. I do agree that it is a privacy violation for providers to have their real names outed, but what can ya do? Sometimes a privacy violation is warranted if it keeps people from getting busted.
As for the violent crimes thing, I would sure as shit want to know if some provider had a violent manager. She might be an angel in the street but a freak in the sheets, but if you get the shit beaten out of you or robbed by her manager, it won't do you a damn bit of good. I hope this rule can be amended to make people include that it was management and not the provider.
As for the STD thing, there is always a lot of speculation involved with these thing, but if someone has obvious open sores on their genitals I want to know before I decide that I should go and see them. This rule should be adjusted so that people who are 90% sure they acquired something from a specific provider can say so, or people that have seen evidence of it, like open sores, discharge, etc. This stuff is not to be trifled with, STDs ruin lives. Not being able to post about them on here unless law enforcement takes it upon themselves to spring for testing and then posts it on a website guarantees that the level of disease in providers and patronizers will increase. I'm not saying we should be able to make unfounded reports that Provider A has herpes, but if their woman-parts are all blistered up and someone can actually confirm this, then I am not going to take a chance with Provider A when I can instead go to Provider B.
I feel like I am speaking for many people what I say these things. We, the patronizers, drive the market with demand. If the demand didn't exist, the market wouldn't exist, and the providers wouldn't be in the business of providing. The rules you listed are basically 100% anti-patronizer and only slightly benefit a minority of the provider. Every patronizer that is taken out of the market represents hundreds or even thousands of dollars of revenue for the market, whereas every provider that is taken out of the market only means that the rest of the providers will benefit more. I am asking that these rules be altered or even suspended until there is clear evidence that they are needed, like maybe someone from the same IP making a bunch of accusations about some providers and then posting their own ad.
I have no desire, to provide, or request in public anyone's real name. Call this the prime directive. Privacy is paramount to this game, for the providers, as well as most of us.
I do hope if a member finds out that a popular, well known, provider is active in armed robbery at her work location, (same as a cash and dash) I would think it's OK to post it in the rip-off reports. Example (Provider DD robbed a suspected monger with a gun at hotel xxx. Use caution). I sure as hell don't want to get shot, or have to defend myself, as that will draw undue attention to the hobby, and to me.
I guess we all get jumpy when Uncle Leo is involved. As I have said before 'Cops are people to', Hell this time, maybe he was a monger, and as usually happens, we will probably never know the whole story.
It's time for everyone to take a breath, look around, and be thankful for all of the other wonderful providers out there.
Thanks, to Jackson for providing us a free place to exchange info.
Happy Hunting.
Nick
[QUOTE=Nickn3; 1267662]I have no desire, to provide, or request in public anyone's real name. Call this the prime directive. Privacy is paramount to this game, for the providers, as well as most of us.
I do hope if a member finds out that a popular, well known, provider is active in armed robbery at her work location, (same as a cash and dash) I would think it's OK to post it in the rip-off reports. Example (Provider DD robbed a suspected monger with a gun at hotel xxx. Use caution). I sure as hell don't want to get shot, or have to defend myself, as that will draw undue attention to the hobby, and to me.
I guess we all get jumpy when Uncle Leo is involved. As I have said before 'Cops are people to', Hell this time, maybe he was a monger, and as usually happens, we will probably never know the whole story.
It's time for everyone to take a breath, look around, and be thankful for all of the other wonderful providers out there.
Thanks, to Jackson for providing us a free place to exchange info.
Happy Hunting.
Nick[/QUOTE]Nick, I agree with what you're saying and I think I might have been misunderstood about naming names. I could care less what a provider's real name is. BUT. If a particular gal is involved in the robberry or attempted robbery of a monger, I think it's totally appropriate to name her working name.
[QUOTE=Mundane;1267759]Nick, I agree with what you're saying and I think I might have been misunderstood about naming names. I could care less what a provider's real name is. BUT. If a particular gal is involved in the robberry or attempted robbery of a monger, I think it's totally appropriate to name her working name.[/QUOTE]Is she legit or does she now work for leo?
[QUOTE=Mundane;1267759]Nick, I agree with what you're saying and I think I might have been misunderstood about naming names. I could care less what a provider's real name is. BUT. If a particular gal is involved in the robberry or attempted robbery of a monger, I think it's totally appropriate to name her working name.[/QUOTE]Is she legit or does she now work for leo?
Barbie hasn't had any run-ins with the law. You must be confusing her with someone else. But unless she's decided to extend her work schedule, you've only got a few hours to see her before she retires from the hobby.
[QUOTE=Marine0331;1267779]Is she legit or does she now work for leo?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PinkFloyd;1267922]Barbie hasn't had any run-ins with the law. You must be confusing her with someone else. But unless she's decided to extend her work schedule, you've only got a few hours to see her before she retires from the hobby.[/QUOTE]I think your time's up. Barbie told me she had moved up her final day to Monday. 8/29.
[QUOTE=Curt828;1267955]I think your time's up. Barbie told me she had moved up her final day to Monday. 8/29.[/QUOTE]
Not to poke fun at the excellent Barbie, but shouldn't Hallmark put out (so to speak) a card for provider retirement?
There could be a provider-retirement announcement card, like:
"So Long, It's Been Good to Blow You"
[QUOTE=Marine0331;1267779]Is she legit or does she now work for leo?[/QUOTE]No one mentioned Barbie in regards to the LEO or Rules discusion. She is completely legit (although sadly retiring of her own choice).
This is part of the problem when names aren't mentioned in regards to robberies or arrests. The wrong people get the blame!